Jennifer Love Hewitt Update
I’ve gotten several emails from people saying that it looks like Jennifer Love Hewitt has lost weight.
These photos are from May 10th (Thursday). To be honest, I don’t see any weight loss. Her arms and legs look the same to me… what do you all think?
143 Responses to “Jennifer Love Hewitt Update”
By s on May 12, 2007 | Reply
Her face is sooo skinny! Yea I don’t see any weight loss, her arms and legs are really, really big…..I wish she could get back in shape by losing at least 10 lbs.
By Sadie on May 12, 2007 | Reply
She probably thinks she is emphasizing her small waist in that dress, but all I am really looking at is hot wide her hips look in that second picture…..Yes, her face is very small and thin which just makes the rest of her look bigger. Losing 10lbs would do wonders
By Ramona on May 12, 2007 | Reply
she’s lucky that her face isn’t showing the extra weight!
By Beck on May 12, 2007 | Reply
She looks weird
By Beck on May 12, 2007 | Reply
… and old
By arev on May 12, 2007 | Reply
she’s getting so thick
she has the figure of a baby doll.
By lb on May 12, 2007 | Reply
I remember how jealous I was of her when I know what you did last summer fist came out. she was sooo thin then. Its good to see that things are the other way around now. Maybe shes happy eating whatever she wants, and not being on a diet, although you can tell for a minute there she was going a little out of control with the weight gain. I think she looks great in these pics though, she is thicker but like I said, its a nice change.
By Agnes on May 12, 2007 | Reply
That doesn’t look healthy!
By parissucksliterally on May 12, 2007 | Reply
she has really ugly legs- I feel badly for ladies with those thick, cankly legs.
By Rigzy on May 12, 2007 | Reply
She looks fine, a little thicker than I would want to be, but I don’t think it’s compromising her health.
And I don’t see a weight loss
By Annie on May 12, 2007 | Reply
These pictures show just how photoshopped her Hanes ads are. Obviously, her bottom half is much heavier IRL.
By Persephone on May 12, 2007 | Reply
“she has the figure of a baby doll. ”
thanks arev. now I will be picture women as kewpie dolls and yes she has the figure of a baby doll.
She does not quite have cankles. Her ankles are a little smaller than her calves. She just has no definition in her calves so she doesn’t qualify for cankledom.
She hasn’t lost weight and I would NEVER want to be her size.
By angelbaby on May 12, 2007 | Reply
She has a very thin face so it gives the illusion that she is bigger than she is. But really she can’t be anymore than 8 at 7lb / 120lb, like most female celebrities. She is in no way fat, so it would be insulting for anyone to call her that.
By Loffles on May 12, 2007 | Reply
She’s frumpy, as always;.
By Perfectionist Cabaret on May 12, 2007 | Reply
She’s naturally pear-shaped; it does look as though she’s lost a little bit of weight, however.
By GoshGollyMe on May 12, 2007 | Reply
WHAT?
120 pounds..i dont think so!
shes still just as fat..but she squeezed it into a corset under her dress. her neck is still to fat for her face. a prime example of how bad extra weight looks on a small frame.
By Claudia on May 12, 2007 | Reply
ankle straps are so unflattering - especially if you’ve got thick legs like she has
By glam on May 12, 2007 | Reply
looks the same to me. and she has cankles!
By junkenstein on May 12, 2007 | Reply
I think the dress does work for her, actually… very well. I can easily imagine that people would say she looks like she’s lost, but I don’t know. The dress really hides her lower body, which is where she carries most of her weight anyway, so it’s really hard to tell.
By Ally on May 12, 2007 | Reply
She’s so huge…..remember her in Can’t Hardly Wait? She was super tiny and looked like a size 0-2. She doesn’t look awful (although I’ve never thought she was attractive) but she could stand to lose a few pounds and tone up….she would look better.
By Pinky on May 12, 2007 | Reply
angelbaby, no way she’s 120. she looks about 145.
By Kittah on May 12, 2007 | Reply
She only looks bigger because we compare her to what she used to be. For example, if that was Kirstie Alley now, she would be quite thin in my eyes.
Anyhow, the shoes are lovely and that hairdo looks cute. Maybe the dress isn’t the best choice for her body type.
By Jess on May 12, 2007 | Reply
She looks heavier than before. And that dress makes her look like she has canckles. Ew.
By Nicole on May 12, 2007 | Reply
I don’t see it. But whatever. She looks fine to me.
By eden on May 12, 2007 | Reply
there are other photos of her in pants wear she seemed to have lost. of course if you bring up these pics with this covering, unflaterring dress DUH no one will see a weight loss. so put up the right pictures.
anyway, shes not FAT, but shes also not 120. the person who said that is proportionately insane when it comes to weight numbers. she has to be around 145-155. i have the same unfortunate pear shape, am short, and around 120s but look 50 pds smaller than her. even when i was in the 140s i never looked that stocky. and with that in mind i’d say she might even be 155-160.
but it’s her perogative. she looks happy and fine with herself so i don’t see a problem…its not like fat pockets are hanging out at every cornor. she’s carrying the weight well i’d say, unlike others.. *cough* kelly clarkson.
By eden on May 12, 2007 | Reply
corner*
By ino on May 12, 2007 | Reply
She does carry her weight well. And while she isn’t thin, she isn’t unhealthy…thinner than many of the girls on my campus who have developed beer guts and whose idea of a workout is lifting a piece of pizza to their face at 4 a.m. I would never call her fat, and this is coming from a 100lb twenty-something who has been a 6-days-a-week gym goer for the past four years. She looks healthy, she glows, and I’m sorry if her failing to be a twiggy little haute couture fashion model is causing so much disappointment to some.
By Christie on May 12, 2007 | Reply
im sorry but the shape of her legs isnt fucking her fault, people with legs like that are more upset about it than you all are, jesus.
By Maya on May 12, 2007 | Reply
I think this post proves hos deceptive single photos can be, as she looks much thinner in the first pictures than the rest. Anyway, I this she’s a doll. I love her.
By millie on May 12, 2007 | Reply
yep, she definitely carries it well. So if she’s comfortable and happy, all power to her, she looks fantastic!
Pear-shaped people should quit complaining. Imagine how awful someone apple-shaped would look at that height/weight. Big legs? = wear a skirt. or wide-leg trousers. simple.
By tim jones on May 12, 2007 | Reply
She is prob wearing a girdle. She looks amazing. Nothing more feminine than those soft, supple, lush curves.
By Ellie on May 12, 2007 | Reply
Are you all nuts? This girl is beautiful, and she looks great. What is wrong with having extra meat on your bones? Would people rather see the disgusting body of Britney Spears walking around in a hot pink bra and a cut off skirt? Or maybe Nicole Richie in a bikini on the beach where it looks like if she runs, her leg will break? She looks good.
By alisa on May 12, 2007 | Reply
gaaaah it looks so weird when weight just goes to legs and arms but at least she still has a cute little middle and slender face.. shed be beautiful at any weight though
By Becky on May 12, 2007 | Reply
Well the dress isn’t very flattering, but she ook snice!
By Dana on May 12, 2007 | Reply
The first pic she looks great in…but the other pics are definitely at an unflattering angle. I guess it just depends on how she’s photographed. She definitely is thick in the waist and legs…
By jed on May 12, 2007 | Reply
If she loses weight, she will wear something which shows it. She has to be aware of the comments, especially those from clothes that tell her “I beg of you–skip dessert a few days before you wear me!”
Still a decent looking woman—-probably very healthy—I always thought she was over rated—-losing a lot of weight is not going to help. Her face needs the fatter legs just to not look older than it is.
By kim on May 12, 2007 | Reply
she should lose weight, she looks so chunky, yuk
although it doesnt go to her face so she is lucky, if i put n weight it goes straight to my fat face, yuk
By Sabine on May 12, 2007 | Reply
i think she looks really good!!!
I personally think she looks really cute with the extra weight. And I think the dress was a very good choice.
I don’t think she’s lost any weight tho..but seriously, i do think she looks really cute with the weight. I always found her very twiggy and icky when she was super skinny. She doesn’t suit skinny in my opinon
By Tucker on May 12, 2007 | Reply
uh, wow
I sent you an email saying that because I saw recent pictures of her that did make it look like she lost weight, but it looks like she gained here
By sara on May 12, 2007 | Reply
She’s shapely, it’s so sad that in Hollywood you have to look like Gisele to be considered “beautiful”. I think she’s pretty, she has a beautiful face but she is more shapely than most….plus, the camera angles don’t help her at all, not to mention the whole “the camera adds 10lbs” bit.
I’m glad she hasn’t gone to extremes to get her hips and legs shaven off like most of hollywood girls. She gives women with curves more confidence and is a great role model.
By Alyssa on May 12, 2007 | Reply
Remeber how thin she used to be, like in ‘Heartbreakers’. Its a shame she sort of let herself go…BUT if she had a hard time staying thin, then I can see why she looks like this now.
By nameless on May 12, 2007 | Reply
she’s so beautiful in her face that no one really looks at her body
By apricotmuffins on May 12, 2007 | Reply
I happen to love her figure. I find it asthetically pleasing, and as an artist it is my right to like that. She has victorian arms (which were admired at the time for being thick and shapely like hers, by the way) She’s no where near overweight, i can guarantee.
By tim jones on May 12, 2007 | Reply
apricotmuffins
Wow you are so modest.
By Fliss on May 12, 2007 | Reply
I think she looks good. She has a curvy, feminine shape and I don’t know her height but I weigh 120 and I don’t think she looks any bigger than me (esp considering the camera makes u look fat).
By Robin on May 12, 2007 | Reply
I think she is always gorgeous.
I love her show - she always looks amazing. Yeah, she isn’t stick thin anymore, but I really don’t think it matters - it doesn’t change how great she looks.
By Persephone on May 12, 2007 | Reply
ha! ha!
she does have the figure of a baby doll, but I don’t think she has cankles.
I don’t see any weightloss at all.
By hez on May 12, 2007 | Reply
she looks really pretty at this weight, sort of like jennifer connelly (sp?). She has a really cute figure and I want that dress. However, I’m not crazy about those shoes- strappy shoes should only be worn by those with long, skinny calves. They kind of give her cankles that I don’t think she’d have otherwise.
By Wyldegod on May 12, 2007 | Reply
Here’s the sad part in all of this. She actually looks like a real woman and not some anexoric on quaaludes with a binge and purge complex like so many of the young idiots out there these days. You young people are all so brainwashed into thinking that beauty means bones poking through your skin that you can’t see what a real honest to god curvy, healthy, beautiful woman looks like. Well, there she is. Beauty defined.
By nwisbest on May 12, 2007 | Reply
The top of her body and the bottom of her body look like they belong to two different people. Or is that just me seeing that?
By carmen on May 12, 2007 | Reply
pretty girl but needs to shoot her stylist/best friend/boyf/whoever helped her put that outfit together. It emphasises her child-bearing hips and makes her look matronly- old lady re-living prom. Short cap sleeves only flatter slim toned arms - thick arms like hers need a longer sleeve -its hollywood hasn’t she heard of pashmina?!
She has gained weight since her “I know what you did last summer days” where she was basically a skinny girl with huge boobs. She’s not fat but certainly needs to dress better. Oh, and as has been mentioned before she needs to ditch the shoes and go for super high sling backs or sandals that help elongate her short legs and prevent oompa loompa syndrome!
By Melanie on May 13, 2007 | Reply
She´s the opposite of a lollipop-head, her face is way to small for her body.
She´s pretty, though, very beautiful face and hair.
By Linda on May 13, 2007 | Reply
What the hell happened to her? She has piano legs and fat arms. She has the figure of a 65 year old woman, very matronly. She’s always been nasty as far as I’m concerned.
By Linda on May 13, 2007 | Reply
apricotmuffins, You say you have a figure like hers? I feel sorry for you.
By Brenda G on May 13, 2007 | Reply
she is very lucky
all her fat falls in the right places, she looks great to me, better looking than the average woman
and anybody with a body like hers i think is rather lucky as long as you dress for your shape
i dont want to look like that not because i think she is fat but because i wouldnt feel healthy being that size, i dont carry extra wieght well
By Frankie on May 13, 2007 | Reply
the dress doesn’t show much to tell.
By Cherie on May 13, 2007 | Reply
She looks as heavy as my sister (her BMI is 23.2 - 24).
But I don’t think that Jennifer looks bad - she glows and looks just so happy and comfortable whit her weight.
By Lazara on May 13, 2007 | Reply
My god, you are all so harsh! How could anyone call this woman fat?
By Dark_Angel on May 13, 2007 | Reply
Usually, I would pretty much call someone this chubby a fat tarb-o lard but I seriously cannot do it to Jen coz her face is just soo exquisite… shes still SO BEAUTIFUL so it makes her body seem ok for her.
By Anonymous Realist on May 13, 2007 | Reply
That’s one industrial-strength corset she has under there. Probably made by Kenworth or Volvo or Mack.
It’s such a shame; she used to be so slim and pretty. She’s got to be 150+
And whoever suggested she ought skip dessert? Umm - she ought to skip *food* for a few months. That’d at least be a good start.
By Anonymous Realist on May 13, 2007 | Reply
P.S. Fliss - I am a photographer. The camera doesn’t make you look fat, but fat does.
By bluecherries on May 13, 2007 | Reply
150+ are you crazy? She’s only 5ft 5, so she cant be more than 135, and a US size 8 max, maybe even a 6. I think she looks beautiful, and healthy.
By apricotmuffins on May 13, 2007 | Reply
linda, i dont have a figure like JLH. Im guessing you are reffering to my comment on the jessica simpson article, not this one. I DO have a figure a similar shape to jessica simpsons and you know what, Im not ashamed of that and i never will be. Im healthy and active, quite muscular and I have awesome boobs.
and how dare you condescend me. I dont give to shits if you ‘feel sorry’ for me, I dont need you to. I feel sorry for you, for being so tied down to your purile, close minded and superficial ideals of beauty.
By Tucker on May 13, 2007 | Reply
Um, yeah Linda obviousely I dont know you or anything but that was kind of harsh, especially because she didnt say anything about looking like Jennifer Love Hugetits, so um dont mean to real people, but celebrities ask for it, so thats okay
By Michelle on May 13, 2007 | Reply
Good for you Apricotmuffins!!! Who gives a shit what that (girl with problems) Linda thinks of you! Everyone Is shaped diffrently and good for you for being happy with your shape! She Is probably throwing names out there to make herself feel better. You have enough self confidence to be above that. If only more woman had that. Good for you!
By brittney on May 13, 2007 | Reply
So, so many of you need therapy. Sad.
By sowhat on May 13, 2007 | Reply
OH MY WORD!! SO GROSS!! Her lower body is HUGE!
By Naty on May 13, 2007 | Reply
According to IMDB, she is only 5′2.5″ tall. At that height I’m guessing she is about 140lbs (if not more). Her face is thin but her head looks completely out of proportion to her neck and body. She is obviously wearing a corset. 140lbs is a “nice” estimate
By malrose9389 on May 13, 2007 | Reply
the top part of her body (waist up) doesnt match the lower half. her face is thin n her collar boners show, but her hips/legs…
By Loffles on May 13, 2007 | Reply
I know that links are not allowed, but…there is a great site which has a height/weight matrix - pictures of people with their heights and weights listed. ORDINARY people, not celebrities who lie. If you google Photographic Height/Weight Chart you will find it easily…People look different at different weights…
By reasonable on May 13, 2007 | Reply
She needs to understand as not only a petite woman but also a curvacious petite woman that wearing shoes with straps that cut off you leg at the ankle make you legs look shorter and wider. Her legs would look longer and leaner if she opted for a pointy-toed shoe with a strap across the top of the foot or no strap at all.
Clothing choices make a HUGE difference in the way a person’s body looks.
By Sofia on May 13, 2007 | Reply
She’s obviously not skinny but I think she may have lost some weight. Or she just managed to choose a really flattering dress. She does look pretty though.
By Linda on May 13, 2007 | Reply
Apricotmuffins, first of all, learn to spell. It’s “two shits” NOT “TO shits”. Maybe you should look into furthering your education beyond 6th grade English.
Nothing superficial about my ideas of beauty, I know what’s pretty and when someone has a good figure and when they don’t. Very simple. JLH looks like hell.
By maggie on May 13, 2007 | Reply
oh come on .. she’s still what i would call slender or normal … she looks like a WOMAN that’s what you cannot say of many of the females here (because of figure, general appearance .. just how she carries herself) . she has a tiny waist and in real i’m sure she is petite and graceful.
By nat on May 13, 2007 | Reply
Yeah her legs aren’t stick thin, but her waist is pretty tiny compared to the rest of her body !! And her face is just beautiful
By Linda on May 13, 2007 | Reply
She’s a pear shape and that is NOT a good figure to have. I’ve never thought JLH was attractive, but when she was thin her body was normal looking.
By StarSpy on May 13, 2007 | Reply
Love looks to have lost some wght…she is defin not 5′5…5′2 at best…celebs always embellish their hgt…her bro is a fitness trainer, so she’s prob getting advice from him
By Pixie on May 13, 2007 | Reply
she looks much older then she is
By Scarlet on May 13, 2007 | Reply
Pear is awesome shape to have if you carry it well, Linda. Better than apple or beanpole and close second to hourglass.
i actually thinks she’s more hourglass anyway, in proportion top and bottom, tiny waist.
she looks good, feminine.
By parissucksliterally on May 13, 2007 | Reply
apricotmuffins, it is your right to appreciate her body whether or not you are an artist. Plenty of people seem to agree with you.
I still would be very upset if my body were that shape, but that is my right- (wink)
By givi on May 13, 2007 | Reply
who cares dude, she’s healthy and friggin gorgeous
By givi on May 13, 2007 | Reply
anyone looking for a co-mod? this site pretty much owns me anyway
By Maxx05 on May 13, 2007 | Reply
I think that JLH has a beautiful face, but she had really gotten horribly fat. I don’t care how many of you protest and say she isn’t overweight. She is shorter than I am, and eighteen years younger than I am, and within a very small time period, she must have put on at least 30 pounds. I have never had any weight fluctuations like that ever. Maybe a couple of puff pounds when I get my period ( I know you all really wanted that info…). She has to have been really seriously overeating to gain such an extreme amount of weight. I think it looks revolting, her arms look spongy and huge. Her waist naturally looks smaller because the rest of her is so much bigger in comparison. I feel really badly for her, because I’m sure she really can’t be happy with herself over this change in her body. I would never let something like this happen to me. I find it absolutely disgusting. I hope she gets some control over herself, and drops some tonnage.
By Linda on May 13, 2007 | Reply
I think what most of us notice is not how fat she has gotten, but her body has on odd shape. Small waist, thin face and neck..but her arms and legs are fat, looks odd as all hell!
By tim jones on May 13, 2007 | Reply
Maxx05,
Get some perspective
By tim jones on May 13, 2007 | Reply
and a cheeseburger
By Eliza on May 13, 2007 | Reply
I think she looks nice.
By Jamie on May 13, 2007 | Reply
she has put on a few, but i still think she looks curvy and healthy!! nothing to be ashamed of.
By Maxx05 on May 13, 2007 | Reply
I don’t need to get a different perspective, and I don’t need a cheeseburger. I eat and I happen to be quite thin and am not eating disordered. I think that JLH has got to be quite unhealthy to have had such a weight swing, period. Not good.
By Anonymous Realist on May 13, 2007 | Reply
Loffles: “People look different at different weights”
Gee, thanks, Sherlock, for adding that bit of wisdom. Don’t think any of us around here knew that.
By Dee on May 14, 2007 | Reply
She looks beautiful. A nice hourglass figure. Healthy and fit..not skinny anymore.
By Jasmyn on May 14, 2007 | Reply
Linda you are telling apricotmuffins to furture her education? Well I must tell you to go get a life, as you are on here constantly. You must have something better to do with your time? At least she isn’t sitting on her ass for hours at a time writing on here. Go outside and do something or you might start to look like JLH. LOL. I gotta go as I have things to do.
By Jasmyn on May 14, 2007 | Reply
*further
By Fliss on May 14, 2007 | Reply
i’m finding this 150 thing crazy. I’m 120 and 5′6 and I’m pretty sure I look just like that so stop calling her fat coz i’m getting offended.
By omfg girl on May 14, 2007 | Reply
she looks pretty and i love her dress!
By Jodi on May 14, 2007 | Reply
These comments are extremely amusing. Keep ‘em coming!
By tim jones on May 14, 2007 | Reply
Maxx05,
I never said you had an eating disorder, but you act like weight is such a great indicator of health and happiness. Personally, I think she looks truly amazing.
By Abby on May 14, 2007 | Reply
TEAM TIM JONES!!
By Ds on May 14, 2007 | Reply
If by ’she’s lost weight’ you mean she only has 12 instead of the usual baker’s dozen of muffins stuffed up that muffin paper dress (I’m sure there’s a name for the paper that muffins come in, but it escapes me at the moment) … then yes, she’s lost weight.
Seriously, people who have the monetary means should be REQUIRED to hire a stylist who’s sole purpose in life is to make sure that their clients don’t go out looking and/or dressed like this.
By Monica on May 14, 2007 | Reply
I think she looks lovely, so soft, feminine and womanly and I just adore that dress! I think most men would agree but obviously from the posts here, most women don’t.
By jed on May 14, 2007 | Reply
Hillary Clinton is so impressed with her cankles, that she will be considered for a cabinet position. Bill likes her, too. Kind of reminds him of a younger Monica.
By tim jones on May 14, 2007 | Reply
Man, remember monica lewinsky? She was so hot.
By Em on May 14, 2007 | Reply
I think Jennifer looks gorgeous. I really can’t tell how much she weighs, but I don’t care. Her body (as people have mentioned previously) puts on weight very proportionally, and her waist always looks tiny. So what if she’s not as fit as she was at 22 (or whatever)?
By Karen on May 14, 2007 | Reply
Do you people smoke crack??? she looks fine! if you think she’s fat you need your head examined.
By lambman on May 14, 2007 | Reply
I wish my face was that thin, I’m really skinny but have big chubby cheeks
By {{_*Vanessa*_}} on May 14, 2007 | Reply
Creepy in the first pic she looks like an Older…thicker Hayden Panetierre..from Heroes.
By Maxx05 on May 14, 2007 | Reply
Tim Jones, this is a woman ( JLH ) who has had an extreme weight swing, which is NOT healthy in the least. I don’t find plump/stocky attractive. That’s me. Don’t, won’t ever ever find it attractive. Not with a ballet background. I don’t think Monica Lewinski was attractive, I think she looked like a stuffed pig. And, Fliss, I can guarentee you that at 5′6″ and 120lbs., you are most definitely thinner than JLH, so don’t worry. You are 4 inches taller and a good 10-15lbs lighter than JLH.
By karmalife on May 14, 2007 | Reply
I think it’s a bad photograph in my opinion. How is it possible to be heavy and have collar bones like that?? I just don’t get it…
By tim jones on May 14, 2007 | Reply
Maxx05,
That is all well and good but you are missing the point. You are perfectly free to think slimmer is more attractive, but body weight is the not the main, nor is it a very good indicator of overall health. That is my point.
By Kittah on May 14, 2007 | Reply
Ahh…..I feel like having a cheesburger.
By elle on May 14, 2007 | Reply
in the first pic she looks grat but not the following ones with the exception of the close up on her face. She has always been a little curvy on top and now the bottom matches. The dress is drawing attention to her figure, whetther it be good or bad in your eyes, but I think she looks rather nice. Kinda of a throw back to the hollywood women of the fifties. Its not like she looks like “jello on stings,” as Monroe was once called. She has looked slimmer before, but only because she was wearing a longer dress in a solid color which elongated and slimed her body. But honest people, she’s not fat! Just curvy and cute.
By Otis Rail on May 14, 2007 | Reply
Ewww.
Cankles and a porker, to boot.
If it weren’t for the boobies…
Otis Rail
By tom on May 15, 2007 | Reply
I wish all you whores that left insults would post your photos so that the world could point out what they think is wrong with you! this is what a real woman should look like and as for her legs….they look awesome! I and I can bet some of your husbands and or boyfriends feel the same as I do. easy thing to hide in your homes looking all torn up yourself and make crude remarks about someone whom your are probably jealous of if your were really being honest with yoursef.
By tod on May 15, 2007 | Reply
LINDA POST A PIC OF YOURSELF. FULL SHOT AND LET US ALL RATE YOUR LOOKS!
By Anonymous Realist on May 15, 2007 | Reply
Whew. I dunno Vanessa - I know Hayden is a bit thick, but let’s hope she never goes to where JLH has gone…
By smoothie on May 15, 2007 | Reply
fat for a celeb.
By enzogirl on May 15, 2007 | Reply
JLH has really beefed up-she is heavy at any standard! She has a skinny face and a chubby body-that is just bizzare. How do young woman get cankles? I’ve had 2 children, exercise my butt off, and I am a size 2. Jen needs to wake up and get in shape- cankles are not healthy!
By joejo on May 15, 2007 | Reply
I want to see what you guys look like. I bet you are all ugly and need something to vent on…thats sad.
By Michelle on May 15, 2007 | Reply
LOL joejo I agree with that. Wow do u want an award for working out enzogirl? Big deal, so do I. Just because JLH Is bigger then a size 2 dosen’t mean she dosen’t work out either. LOL
By Sacharomyces cerevisiae on May 15, 2007 | Reply
Tom calm down the last thing we need here is some moronic male teenage angst-not everyone is turned on by an excess of triglycerides like JLH. Idiot
By suzy on May 15, 2007 | Reply
Wow. People have gotten CRABBY. This site is for everyone to have a little fun airing opinions about weight fluctuations, outfits, and other celebrity wackiness. This is just for FUN! We aren’t insecure closet fatties (tom, joejo) just because we are interested in how celebrities (who put themselves out there to be gawked at, by the way) look. Preferences vary about what looks good; it doesn’t necessarily make them chubby-chasers, pro-ana, anorexic, bulemic, insecure, personally ugly, or whatever . Snarling about someone else’s preferences is just missing the point of this site. If you don’t like the site, go away. Stop flaming people. I’m here for fun, not to read nasty remarks about other commenters. ‘Kay. I’m done.
By Tracy on May 16, 2007 | Reply
Really cute dress, but really fat girl. She is fat. Anyone who says she isn’t IS WRONG. No seriously, major arm fat, and DISTURBING cankles.
By Miss M on May 16, 2007 | Reply
That dress does not suit her. Her legs are too short for it. I don’t like her hair cut either.
By Fliss on May 16, 2007 | Reply
I just looked at the previous posts on her and she is alot bigger than I thought. I still think she looks good though coz her face is so bright and pretty and she also has a huge smile. I also like that she hasn’t begun to starve herself or hide from the public eye.
By WOW on May 17, 2007 | Reply
Wow. So many of you are either teenyboppers without brains and a little bit of life on you, or else desperately angry twits who need a good therapist to stop projecting their own body issues on everyone around them.
JLH has the figure of a real person, with a face that is quite astonishingly beautiful. There is nothing wrong with her figure. If your mother or your sister or your best friend had her figure, would you hack and cough and advise them to stop eating entirely? Don’t think so. Please, please grow up. Every body is different. Different bodies even process the same types of food differently. And, for what it’s worth, very few people are lucky enough to retain the same body at 35 that they had at 15.
Call me in 20 years, and then we’ll talk.
And before anyone suggests that I must be a fat cow for even suggesting any of this, maybe in your eyes I would be. But at 40 I am in better shape than I ever have been, with terrific endurance, and I exercise every day **FOR MY HEALTH**. Taking care of oneself does not mean attempting to shove a size 8 body into a size 2, no matter what it takes.
By jasmin on May 17, 2007 | Reply
And in the end Im sure she doesnt give a shit about if you think shes fat or not…cuz if she did she would be really really skinny…I think its hilarious how all you waste your time caring so much…..you are all really big losers for bringing her down, shes comfortable in her own skin enough to go out and be photographed in a town that looks down on extra weight. I think she is cool for not following what all the other stupid girls in hollywood are doing…and Im sure shes truly happy unlike them. Shes beautiful at any weight and thats when you know your really a beautiful person.
By John L on May 18, 2007 | Reply
a lot of actresses in America starved themselves to death seeing them as an unhealthy peoplr. Love just have a greater weight than ever before.. embrace yourself
By Sloan on May 18, 2007 | Reply
Oh gawd she is one of the most insipid people ever. Minor to no talent, sickeningly-fake-sweet smile and boobs. That’s all there is to her. If she gains of loses weight it doesn’t change that.
By Sloan on May 18, 2007 | Reply
… If she gains OR loses weight, sorry.
By parissucksliterally on May 20, 2007 | Reply
For the last time, cankles are heridtary, and have NOTHING to do with age! I see 9 year old girls that have them. If you have them, you’re STUCK. There is NOTHING you can do- even Carmen Electra is on the cankly side…..not stake legs, but almost……….
By Katie on May 20, 2007 | Reply
Her hips are so wide… what is going on there?
By kk on May 23, 2007 | Reply
She is not fat!!!!! That dress is what is making her look bigger than she really is. And there is no way she weighs 155-160 lbs..
By Cookie on May 25, 2007 | Reply
Absolutely lovely. No bones sticking out like the other fugly bods.
By Ew on Jun 2, 2007 | Reply
Cankles and sausage arms. She’s annoying.
By FATT on Jun 3, 2007 | Reply
she is fat. especially if you are in hollywood cant you afford a nutritionist???
look at her cankles!
By tony on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
she is so dam fine
By el hombre moreno on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
id hecka let her go down on me
By chelsea on Jun 9, 2007 | Reply
i think she looks really fat
By MP on Jun 22, 2007 | Reply
Her shape reminds me so much of Giada de Laurentiis’s
By Hi on Jun 27, 2007 | Reply
Weight going to arms and legs is the most healthy thing: as far away possible from the vital organs. It is much better than to have weight in your organs or your mid-section.
I think she’s beautiful and she is just not very tall, which might make her look bigger on photos than she actually is. She is gorgeous to me and I love her.
By Dee on Jul 11, 2007 | Reply
Trying to guess her weight? How silly. If you understand that people are all built and proportioned differently, you would know two people can be the same height, same size but one could be 120lb and one could be 140lb.
But whatever her weight is (which is irrelevant really), she certainly doesn’t look big or fat or unhealthy. And there is NO doctor on this planet who would say she looked unhealthy or overweight so all you sad little anorexic wannabes, keep your traps shut ok. It’s been proven that a pear shape body is very healthy, not straight up and down, if you don’t like that well tough.
And she doesn’t have cankles either, but like the girl said above she doesn’t have much definition in her calves, so there isn’t a big difference between her ankles and her calves.
By Danika on Oct 3, 2007 | Reply
OMG, I can’t believe you people are all ratting on her to lose weight. She looks petite and healthy, for a change and very happy. When I see her on Ghost Whisperer she is so bony and looks anorexic. I am thrilled to see a bit of flesh on her. She is a fun actress with a lot of talent. I hope she remains a health one, at that. Grow up and learn to be a healthy weight. I have known so many girls who have lost their lives to anorexia as their organs shut down after they reach a certain point. Jennifer-you rock girl, and don’t let anyone else tell you otherwise. Be healthy and live long and happily.
By OMG on Dec 14, 2007 | Reply
she may LOVE her body to much, talk about junk in the trunk, lordy lordy, she probably thinks she can act too, hate that stupid show…oh i tink i see a ghost, , falling over her open blouse, pellllllllease, fat cottage cheese butt, only going to get worst and it couldn’t happen to a more deserving person, haha, no more whispers here, it LOUD and CLEAR, you ugly girl!!