Nicole Richie Candids
I haven’t had any plain old candids of Nicole Richie on this website for a while…
Anyway, anyone looking at these photos can see that the 85-pound National Enquirer story about her is totally wrong. Nicole definitely has more meat on her bones here than the article claims.
105 Responses to “Nicole Richie Candids”
By A on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
she looks good.
By Delilah on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
great legs
By ames on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Luv her
By weeee on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
she looks humongous to me.
beach whale.
By Karma on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
I gotta agree- she’s got killer legs. Maybe it’s the pictures or the outfit, but she looks good here as opposed to the awful pictures we saw of her in that orange dress last week.
By lambman on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
She looks pretty good there, her legs are a lot more shapely than saw Victoria Beckham…who looked disgusting at the MTV awards…go back to england!
By kk on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Good lord. Great legs?? she looks like one of those stick bugs. those are not great legs!!! her ankles look ready to snap!
By Jodi on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Those shoes are too high-heeled for that dress/tunic/whatever. Great gams, though, even though in the second shot her left ankle looks like it’s going to snap even under her very minimal weight.
By MelissaC on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
I think she looks great in these pics. But I never thought she looked to skinny to start with except the one picture of her running down the beach.
By beautyqueen17 on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
No way is she 85 lbs. I think she looks closer to about 95. She is still too skinny, but this is definitely an improvement. Let’s see how long this will last. She will probably lose another ten pounds in two weeks.
By ThisGirl on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Wow, no wonder there are so many anorexic girls in this world. Anyone who thinks that looks “good and healthy” is a freakin’ moron. The bitch is dying and has been for a long time. LET HER!
The way she looked in that orange rag last week is the way she really is. Plain nasty.
By Ramona on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Wow, her legs look fantastic in these pics.
By Kelly on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
I love her shoes!!! She looks fantastic!
By ThisGirl on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
And don’t forget that the cam ands 10 LBS. She may look “95″ in these… which means that in reality she really IS 85.
By Karma on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Good point ThisGirl. That’s why we just never know with these pictures. The lighting ,the angle, the outfit etc. Can make a world of difference.
I was watching the new season of “The Simple Life” yesterday and she didn’t look deathly skinny at all. Just very thin and petite. Anyone else see it??
By beck on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
lmaoooo!!
yeah, “meat on her bones”
those calves are so meaty. OMG
you are all severely idiotic
The girl is 5′1″
I’ll eat shit if she is 95 pounds
By ln on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
hahaha great legs? ummmm they are straight up and down toothpicks… im sorry, but i have no desire to be as thin and unshapely as her. she looks like a boy.
By Anna on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
She looks better than she has before, but she’s definitely underweight still. WTF is this crap about “she’s meatier now” um. She’s still nasty thin. I’d say she needs to put on atleast another 15 lbs. Sick. At her height, she should be atleast 100 lbs.
By emmie on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Um yeah she has plenty of meat on those bones! No way is he 85 lbs! She is probably a ginormous 86 lbs! That lazy fat ass!
By girlie girl on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
She still looks bad. I think she she gained some weight on her upper body (or got boobs) she would look a little bit better.
By jenny on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
beck…. if you look at pictures of nicole when she was heaviest … her calves were still unnaturally small. She just has tiny calves! Of course i admit shes skinny… but she isnt as skinny as mary kate or anything lol
By Karma on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Beck- How about voicing your opinion without name calling?? What is this, middle school??
By shady on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
i would kill to look like her
By Persephone on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
I love her legs and those shoes are really cute.
By shosh on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
…..She looks just a little better than on memeorial day just because the camera is farther away! Who thinks she (and her protruding clavicle) is hot? Yuck! She rocks the headbands so that you won’t see her shedding hair hang on to thoes extensions for DEAR Life!
…….hehehehehehehehe
By hez on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Nicole Ritchie makes me hate myself, because everytime I see her I think she looks fab. I know she’s way too skinny and hangs out with paris hilton, but she has really cute legs and dresses nicely. Somehow she seems more naturally thin than Posh or the Olsens.
By SuperModelSuzie on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
She looks just like an Olsen in this picture.
By raquelle on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
she looks like a skinny crackwhore. not to be rude or anything but the girl is way too thin and she looks busted! at her height she should be at least 100 pounds
By Beck on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
I really can’t hate nicole no matter what, she’s gettin better i hope.
Also someone above stole my name and i refuse 2 change it,
By Anonymous Realist on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
I’m not a fan of hers, really - but she looks good. Her legs look amazing, especially considering how short she is. Goes to show how important heels are.
By Beck on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
and also again , the objects in the second picture are really a pencil and its sharpener.
By Lazara on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
I seriously doubt she ’s more than 85 pounds.
She’s really WAY too thin, and she’s short.
I’ve been 83 pounds in the past, and I’m taller, and I can tell you I didn’t look much thinner than her.
Anyone who says she doesn’t look severely underweight is mad.
If you think she looks good - OK, that’s your opinion / problem.
But she’s definately underweight, that’s just a fact.
By Nina on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Wow she’s got beautiful legs!
By alina on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
she looks GREAT! i really like everything about her looks… character, not so much, she looks sweet though =)
By glam on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
for a short girl she has such long gorgeous legs.
By jaime j on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
I hate how whe’s wearing her headbands lately…it looks so wannabe rocker/hippie.
Weight-wise she looks like she’s gotten a LITTLE better since her lowest weight…maybe she’s gained 5 lbs. However, I would guess she weights between 80-85 lbs. Also, I don’t think she has great legs, b/c they only look good when she’s skeleton-like. When she was bigger they looked odd b/c her ankles are so skinny.
By mdawg on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
she looks better than she has been looking… but im guessing shes going to continue this up-and-down weight trend for a while
By ala on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
My God…MEAT on her bones????
No way!
Her weight has been within the same 5 pound range for like two years now. What range is that you ask?
A.N.O.R.E.X.I.C. and underweight. Period!
By elle on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Does anyone notice how MK, LL, and Nicole all got skinny when they switched to that one skinny stylist . . . what’shername?
By Maxx05 on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Sometimes a few pounds can make all the difference in how you look and feel. I know it’s that way with me. Your coloring, your energy level, everything. With me it’s because I get tied up in not paying attention to what I need sometimes. With her it may be anorexia susposedly. She is looking a bit better. I would say at her height she is probably in the upper 80’s).
By Sarah on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Great legs? I don’t think so… what happened to her calf muscle? There isn’t any! Gross chicken legs.
By lolita on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
those legs!!! wow!!!
By Area on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Scary skinny…
By Am on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Excuse me…what is she famous for?
*crickets chirping*
By um... on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Yeah elle… her name is Rachel Zoe. That’s REALLY old news though…
By moze on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
it’s pretty stupid to estimate someones weight since no one seems to take into consideration two very big influences on a persons weight! ->
1. the taller you are, the more you’ll weigh in comparison to someone shorter…no matter how skinny you are…. height also affects how much weigh you have to gain for it to show! …as a shorter person she could put on 5 lbs and have it look like alot more than someone my height (5′9)…i’ve gained 10 lbs recently and no one can see it anywhere. If that happened to nicole it would be a dramatic difference!
the other thing is that muscles weighs more than fat which means you could have two people 5′1…one weighs 90lbs and looks like a water balloon, the other weighs 105lbs yet looks tinier because she is “compact” or what not….
tabloids never seem to think of these things and will put victoria beckham at the same weight as nicole richie…even though they are 5-6 inches different in height and nicole obviously has more muscle definition than victoria any day! Or even comparing nicole to MK….nicole obviously has more muscle definition than (what we can see) of MK….so she would most likely weigh more than her, even if they both fit into the same size jeans!
By Heather on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
She looks so cute here.
By Anon on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
I can’t believe there are people who think she has great legs?!?!?! Toothpicks.
By Pink Cashmere on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
It’s sad, yet amazing how some folks are so easily drawn into silly fads–the latest being this bony craze.
Nicole looks horrendous. Her legs are like pale matchsticks–absolutely no trace of femininity. Plain gross.
By Nan on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Her legs arn’t really shapely at all. Just really skinny. Nicole needs to be 100 pounds to be considered healthy. 100 pounds for her height is still awfully skinny but at least we will see her pear body shape again
By *Sullen Girl* on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Beauty
By Karrie A. on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
It is difficult to see these pictures after seeing Nicole in the most recent tabloid in that horrid orange dress where she looked so totally …beyond emaciated ! ! ~~!
I think that the angle at which the cameras snap pics of her makes a big difference as well !! As many have said…I believe that Nicole fluctuates (”weight-wise”) by 5 to 7 or so pounds very regularly and on someone with her very, very tiny petite frame and 5′1″ height …it makes a BIG DIFFERENCE. If someone of 5′5″ to 5′7″ or over were to fluctuate 5 to 7 pounds….it would not be as noticeable at all !! The one tabloid claims she is preggers and and I cannot believe that ONE! How on God’s Green Earth can she get pregnant. If she has periods at all…she may only have one or two in a year !!! When I was ana (at my worst) at 5′7″ and 81 pounds…I didn’t have a cycle for several years and even after I gained a bit of weight (over 4 to 5 years) to about 105 or so…I still very rarely had one and I’ve never been “regular since”. I cannot believe that Nicole (with her health, eating, (non-eating) drug and partying-hard issues) could EVER conceive a child ! ?? !! Gees ……..
By kim on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
terrible outfit
By C on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
She is not “naturally” this thin. She used to be pretty chubby all over. A person who is “naturally thin” has such a high metabolism that it makes it nearly impossible for them to gain weight. obviously Nicole never really had this problem…
By C on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
oh, and can someone please inform me as to why celebrities are wearing those horrendous headbands in such a sloppy way?! I have yet to see one person say “oh that headband is so hot” but yet no one points out how ridiculous it looks. so I will. they look ridiculous!
By Laura on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
I’m so happy to see her looking better and she looks pretty happy in these pictures.
I agree that she has great legs.
By Rian on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Relax, people, when I said “meat on her bones” I meant she has more meat on her bones now than she did before. If she weighed 85 she would be emaciated, which she isn’t. She’s just skinny.
By Tucker on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
ugh
Her legs do look okay in the first picture, but they are disgusting in the second picture. Just becasue she put on a dress that hides her disgusting figure does not mean that she is getting healthier. word
By nicole on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
There are no meat on those bones. You people are becoming delusional because we are so used to anorexic bodies.
By for giggles on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
“If she weighed 85lbs she would be emaciated”…….err, have you looked at any pics of her lately? The woman IS friggen emaciated, or near enough anyway. YUCK, I actually can not believe that some people think she has “great legs”, nicole’s body makes me want to vomit lately, especially her ash-grey corpse/(skinny) man legs, and back to her ash-grey skin, man wtf is WITH that? She looks like she’s decomposing or something :X, and the head bands are just ridiculous, it’s obvious why she wears them (to cover her drugs/anorexia/whatever induced hair-loss), but even that hair-in-a-can stuff would look better than those dumb wannabe rocker/hippie headbands
By *Sullen Girl* on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
I think people are going a little overboard on the “nicole is so skinny that she’s dying” front. Sure, the girl is thin. She is probably unhealthily thin and might tbe causing unnecessary dangers for her future with whatever she’s doing to her body. But she’s not dying, she’s not a corpse, she’s not decomposing.
She has been gaining weight, if very very very slowly.. this is the best way for her to do it. If there’s another problem like drugs (lol IF) than that’s another story. Look at pictures of real emaciation and starvation and compare them with this…. Nicole is just a spoiled vain rich girl who isn’t eating quite enough to maintain a normal weight, but she’s nothing near those pictures of people who are actually starving to death. Those make me well up instantly.
Now I know I’m going to get one or two people saying “just because she doesn’t look like she’s starving to death doesn’t mean she isn’t” or some other lame overused mantra about anorexia-and-the-you-wouldn’t-knows (haha… sounds like a good bad name
). It’s very pradictable that this will happen.
By *Sullen Girl* on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
*band name, not bad name.
By charlotte on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
She looks so much better than those pics with all the pregnancy accusations! !She IS skinny, but she doesn’t look emaciated. Her legs do look toned and I think heels work like magic to make legs look longer and leaner. She’s never going to go back to how she was like the first season of the Simple Life so people need to get over it!! She’s 5′1, right? That’s little…
By mandy on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
she looks soooooo skinny to me…..at 5′1 what would you guess her weight to be?
By for giggles on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
lol sullen girl! K so nicole isn’t anywhere near as skinny as say the pics of starving third-world orphans we (sometimes, when other more ‘important’ celeb and general cack isn’t being shown) see on the news, but that doesn’t mean she isn’t dangerously thin and malnourished, or even that she may not be emaciated (clinical defination by BMI, I have been there and she looks as if she easily may be). Just because someone isn’t as ill as someone else, doesn’t mean they aren’t still ill, comparisons arem pointless. Saying that, I was in hospital the other day and met a man with a tumour on his brain, I told him to chill because that ain’t nothing, I once saw a TV show about a woman who had a tumour that weighed more than her own body, thats an ACTUAL tumour, none of this golf-ball sized fluff that the rich and spoilt worry about
By Anonymous1 on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Yeah, she is really thin and more than likely has drug issues still… but in her defense, you can tell that she’s naturally small-boned. I’m a dancer, and many of the girls I work with are naturally FREAKISHLY thin and lithe. They, unlike Nicole, have a healthier appearance to their build (especially noticeable in muscle tone and skin appearance). Nicole is a small girl all around, and one look at her ankles and you can tell she’s built naturally small. I’m sure if she lived a healthy lifestyle she would still be thin.
By *Sullen Girl* on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
for giggles: ick about the huge tumor thing, but I’m pretty sure that any tumor isn’t something to go “that’s nothing” about. Seriously though: that sucks about a tumor that’s heavier than a person’s body weight. Poor lady.
By Blah on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
In these pictures i think she looks healthy. Thin - yes. But healthy…
..But then her in the orange dress just looked AWFUL. I can’t believe they were taken like, less than a week apart….
By moni on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Sullen Girl…
really, truly, don’t you realize that “for giggles” was being facetious? It was obviously a joke, in the effort to make a good point - matters of degree in illness exist, just because someone is sicker than another person does not mean the other person with the “lesser” sickness isn’t sick too.
By *Sullen Girl* on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Well gosh, moni, I’m just a big fat retard.
By renee on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
That was a very rapid weight change. She gained, which is a good thing.. but wow. were the older ones we saw last week photoshopped?
By MMH on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
She has killer legs! She’s a little thin, but looks good!
By me on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
i think her legs look very weird.
By rebeca (beck-i) on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
she’s incredibly tiny - this goes without saying, but she might just be at that weight & healthy. I can name quite a few girls who are under weight yet eat and live healthy active life styles.
By sandy on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
She still looks alarmingly thin. I think the outfit is fooling us. Pics of her from memorial day were down right scary.
By thinista on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
Woman’s got a strange body shape after being malnourished for 3 years. This dress hides the weirdness that is her torso
By say what on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
i think that girl has issues. she is famous for losing and gaining weight. Period. Today , Nicole Richie is 85 pounds. Next week she is 90 and so its much healthier of course, next month she’ s actually 100, but then she drops to 80 of course because she’s stressed out by her strenuous jobs of posing on the red carpet of exactly what premiere??? and walking in high heels to go where???? and of course ” The Simple Life”, i forgot its the tv show to watch because she’s giving Oscar performances.
By Slurm on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
It’s hard to say with what she is wearing. She and MK Olsen always wear the biggest clothes so it is hard to see their weight fluctuations. She is certainly not as small as 85 lbs though.
By real on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
weeeee…….haha u crack me up….how tha hell can she look humungous??? us normal ppl at average weight must all be…god i cant even think of a word to describe it…maybe 10 beach whales…morbidly obese…thats funny get help sweet heart
By brandy alexander on Jun 4, 2007 | Reply
100lbs would be a normal weight for a girl that height.
I think she just needs to add lean body mass and a little bit of softness to her face.
By Jan on Jun 5, 2007 | Reply
sarah, are you blind? , she clearly has calf muscles
By dani on Jun 5, 2007 | Reply
she looks okay. she is thin. okay, she lost it too quickly, yeah, probably unhealthily, yeah, she has been too thin, yeah. but shes looks good now. happy. yeah.
By pinot fino on Jun 5, 2007 | Reply
she looks slim but healthy. seriously, people, try and forget what she looked like in the simple life 1. If someone came on the scene now looking like Nicole does, it wouldn’t even draw comment.
Especially if you didn’t know she was only 5′1′’ - it’s as if short people aren’t allowed to be as proportionate as tall people. Unfair much?
By pinot fino on Jun 5, 2007 | Reply
I know I’d be pretty mad if I was chubbier than all my friends, so I dieted, and (after a period of excessive skinniness) got myself to a slim equilibrium - and then the whole frickin world told me that no, I was only allowed to be the chubby one.
Rant complete
By Sairie on Jun 5, 2007 | Reply
she looks fantastic. her legs.. man they look good. when am i ever going to have those beautiful legs? but what’s this about her being malnurished and a pot stomach?? are you sure she just didn’t have a meal or something?
By purpleplague on Jun 5, 2007 | Reply
She looks, dare I say it, on the low end of the normal weight range for her height. I’d estimate a BMI of 18 - 19, which means aprox 96 - 100 lbs, since she is 5′1″. She obviously still looks and is slim, but she certainly isn’t on her death-bed based on her appearance. She definitely does not weigh 84 lbs in these pictures. Good for her.
By Katie on Jun 5, 2007 | Reply
Shes still stupidly skinny. I’m sick of this bimbo who is only famous because she is stick thin. She’s made a career out of her weight, when she was on the simple life no one cared because she was just the chunky one. Now shes become anorexic and shes now a fashion icon.
By Anon on Jun 5, 2007 | Reply
C, you know what’s even worse than celebs wearing the headband? Sloppy tourists wearing it. I’ve been seing tourists in giant baggie t-shirts, walking shorts, sneakers, fannie packs and headbands in the meat packing district. It’s so disturbing and sad that it’s funny.
By Kelly Anne on Jun 5, 2007 | Reply
she’s still skinny but at least she doesn’t look sick. her face now projects a more healthy aura.
By Lydia on Jun 5, 2007 | Reply
she has the kate moss knees! like golf balls popping out of the middle of her legs.
By Sara on Jun 5, 2007 | Reply
She most definitely could be 85 pounds. I am the same height as her and weight 98 lbs. If I lost 10 pounds, I still wouldn’t look that thin and gaunt. For once, I believe the national enquirer…hmm.
By lux on Jun 5, 2007 | Reply
She look fabio. Who cares what she weighs as long as she’s not dead.
By Melissa on Jun 5, 2007 | Reply
I think some of you people are too harsh. Stop calling other people morons and idiots. Because really, saying that just proves that you are the one in need of some enlightenment. I think her legs look great. She is very thin here but looks better to me.
By Linda on Jun 5, 2007 | Reply
What does everyone else weigh whom is her height. I think she is on alot of Cocaine and therefore never eats. Very easy way to get thin if you have enough money for this way of life.
I am 5′2″ and weigh 135lbs. I feel about 10 lbs overweight and am eating no breads. I think 95 lbs is exremely thin to maintaine without drugs?
By Nicolette on Jun 5, 2007 | Reply
She actually does look pretty good. 5-10lbs more would be good.
By mimi on Jun 6, 2007 | Reply
I personally don’t think she has gained weight - she has always had meat on her legs and at the same time boney upper body. Nicole’s legs are really nice and shapy. It’s her upper body that’s freaking most people out and since it’s covered here there’s no problem. She needs to cover it more often and accentuates her gorgeous legs. . But she tends to do the opposite I think. Those infamous pictures with the orange dress were so scary exactly because of the dress she was wearing - it uncovered her upper body - her protruding sternum and bony shoulders and coverd her much more meaty lower body. I start to think from time to time she likes to shock the public and tends to wear ridiculously deeply necklined clothes just to show off the bones she knows protrude most on her, while covering the meatier and much more normal parts…how sick is that. And all this to get media attention. I think she will never actually put on weight because of all the attention she gets for that.
By leo on Jun 7, 2007 | Reply
she is pathetic!! Everybody knows she starves herself to be skinny! How else can you explain that she lost half her body weight?!! Nicole is supposed to weigh 125 pounds, that is her natural weight.
Anorexia is an ugly disease..
By Ray Ray on Jun 11, 2007 | Reply
She has calf tendons, not calf muscles
By omfg girl on Jun 13, 2007 | Reply
why is that band on her head for, keeping her hair from falling off?!
By omfg girl on Jun 13, 2007 | Reply
*what
By Sadie on Jun 14, 2007 | Reply
She looks a tiny (haha) bit better.. still has a lot more to gain.
By Kristy on Jul 3, 2007 | Reply
Oh my fucking god. I would *die* for legs like hers!
By Sam on Jul 20, 2007 | Reply
I would kill to look liek her. Shes is amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By mklover on Jul 25, 2007 | Reply
is looks amazing!!! love her hair & her outfit and im seriously jelious of her legs. i wish i looked like her so much
By horndog69 on Jul 30, 2007 | Reply
I’d like to give her a spin!!