Poll: Is Ashley Olsen’s See-Through Skirt Sexy?

Written on June 19, 2007 – 4:24 pm | by Rian |

You guys decide… does Ashley Olsen look sexy in this see-through skirt? With her body-type, can she pull it off?

86743_01_122_444lo.jpg

Leave your opinion in the comments section.

86743_01_122_444lo-2.jpg

Personally, I think she has the legs for it, but the outfit is just plain ridiculous and trashy.





  1. 115 Responses to “Poll: Is Ashley Olsen’s See-Through Skirt Sexy?”

  2. By Anaya on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    i think she has the figure for it, but it might be more appropriate for the beach. she is stunning though

  3. By lace on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    shes gorge, but i dont get it..its cool, but puzzling

  4. By FD on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    she looks less thin than with skinny jeans, I think she looks ok in it, but the skirt is just plain ugly.

  5. By Imke on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    yeah i agree, fd! she looks more skinny with skinny jeans! she def has the body to wear something like that. but for the street? no! maybe for halloween ;)

  6. By jammie on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    Yes, i think so.

    She works the shabby chic look well. Not a great angle but i think this outfit is romantic without being too obvious and predictable.

    I can understand if others think she just looks like a plain mess though.

  7. By sassy on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    Is she wearing leggings? I know she has bear feet but her legs look a little thick - like they have leggings. I think I’d have to see this in real life to decide if I’d deem it fashionable or not-so-much.

  8. By lindsay on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    ew.

  9. By lil one on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    she’s thin enough to pull the look off, but this particular outfit isn’t really working for her, but she doesn’t look too skinny here. She looks like she’s woke up and used her blanket as an outfit.

  10. By jane on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    yeah, i agree. she looks great, but i’m not wild about the skirt. maybe with a slip or something?

  11. By Persephone on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    maybe to the beach or pool, or something.

    If not, it’s sleezy. I don’t care how thin you are.

  12. By Karma on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    I don’t know it I’d call it “trashy” but I certainly don’t like the look. In my opinion, see through outfits should be saved for the beach (or the bedroom). I’ve never been a fan of her style. She could do much better than this..

  13. By Jocelyn on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    Her and her sister just plain suck.

  14. By cancandoll on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    ew. looks like something she sewed herself when she was 5.

  15. By Area on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    not a big fan of it

  16. By Karma on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    I don’t know *if

  17. By kristen on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    i think she has a gorgeous body and usually she looks fab. but this outfit doesn’t look right, no matter who you are. even the person with the most perfect body couldn’t pull this skirt off!

  18. By sulci on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    looks weird….

  19. By Holly J on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    I agree that the outfit is just dumb and trashy, not to mention tacky. However, she has nice legs and a nice butt, so at least she isn’t one of those fat people wearing trashy tacky crap! Thats the worst!!

  20. By Ala on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    These twins have the worst style ever!!!!!!

    I wish they’d go away

  21. By Koko on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    Her body type can pull off almost anything but this look is trashy. Actually, she often looks trashy IMO.

  22. By Christina on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    It looks like she is wearing tiny denim shorts underneath.

    meh i dont know, im use to there outfits lol im a big fan.

    She has good legs

  23. By Jodi on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    Oh, come on. She looks like such a schleppy, sloppy slattern. I can’t believe anyone finds this cute.

  24. By katypea... on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    the skirt might not be as see through in real life, camera flashes have a way of making things more transparent…. and her legs only look a little bigger because she isnt wearing the usual olsen towering heels! i think she has a great figure regardless!

  25. By Andi on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    Obviously thin enugh to pull it off, but why would she want to??!!

  26. By Maya on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    I’m sorry, but she can never be sexy… Maybe she can pull off cute, sweet or pretty, but never sexy.

  27. By lady on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    she def has the legs for it, but that skirt is just plain awful. no one would be able to pull that off unless it was halloween or a dance recital.

  28. By Keelia on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    ONly someone with her bodytype could get away with it- as you said, she has the legs for it.
    The outfit altogether is bizarre though- its looks like the hobo outfits MK usually wears.

    The bottom half looks like shes going to the beah- a sarong and thongs. :s

  29. By Jade-chan on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    I don’t like this outfit. yeah she can pull it off but the color just bothers me.this would be kinda cute in a brighter color and probably better to be worn at a beach

  30. By Swanhilda on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    I still can’t think of the Olsens as being anything but little girls, so naturally “sexy” and “little girls” just don’t mix . Whenever I see them, I think of them as little girls playing dress-up.

  31. By Emily on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    she looks terrible and skanky. “Nasty put some clothes on I told ya, don’t walk out yo heazy w/o clothes on I told ya…”

  32. By lb on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    not at all.

  33. By asiangirl on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    Ewww.

  34. By pri on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    wow
    what a style!! I hate..

  35. By Kittah on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    I also think it’s more appropriate for the beach as someone else said it.

  36. By narcissiste on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    what is that? a mosquito net? i don’t get it…

  37. By Am on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    N.O.

  38. By *Sullen Girl* on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    Wow.

    I mean, the girl’s GORGEOUS and all, but this is some Jessica Simpson or Britney Spears shit. I think I’d like it with leggings and without the big grey sweatshirt, but then it wouldn’t be Olsen Style,

    She’s got the body though, that’s for sure.

  39. By Bess on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    It’s totally inappropriate for walking down the street (but fine for the beach). I mean she is totally showing her undies. Lets hope Lindsay an Britney don’t pick up on this look. That would be real nasty.

  40. By Elle on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    She can pull it off with those legs of hers but it really looks more like something you’d wear to a beach rather than out around town.

  41. By Li on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    she has a nice figure, but this is kinda pushing it. i agree with everyone else: fine for the beach, not so much for the street. besides, the rippling on the skirt makes her skin look wrinkly. it’s really disturbing.

  42. By someone took my nickname on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    She’s cute, bute I don’t like that.
    Why do tailors create such dresses anyway?

  43. By Isabella on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    Sexy? No.
    It looks cheap and not very classy. Usually I like her style…but not here.

  44. By hailey on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    god I wish those girls would buy some good taste with all that money!!!

  45. By jed on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    The big story here is that one of the twins has a decent body. I do not know how it will affect mary kate to see positive attention to her sister—she does look slightly healthier lately. I suspect it will be good—she will just stay a few pounds lighter than her sister, but she would probably go a little nuts if someone said her sister looked a little fat.

    They are an unusual couple, to say the least.

  46. By utahaugust on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    The funniest part is that she probably paid a fortune for this fashion disaster. bleh.

  47. By Caitie on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    I think that on any normal, non-famous person, regardless of what their body looked like, this would be a disaster. She’s got the attitude and poise to pull it off….and *def* the body for it. More power to her for wearing see through skirts on a daily basis running errands!

  48. By charlotte on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    nobody should wear a see-through skirt. ever. what happened to modesty and class?

  49. By elise on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    I’ve never understood this trend. I think it’s plain silly. Ashley is beautiful and yes she has the legs for it but I agree with Anaya - see-through is only acceptable as a beach cover-up.

  50. By BlahBlahBlah on Jun 19, 2007 | Reply

    What a hot mess!!!THat looks like a a black trash bag that she has on. What was she thinking?

    Come on Ash….I wonder what some of these celebs spend money on when they go clothes shopping, It certainly isn’t fashion worth being spent on..

  51. By Fiona on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    Looks like she rolled a bum and stole his clothes - this is atrocious!

  52. By Meg on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    Honestly…has Ashley taken to dumpster diving?

    “Hmmm…now that I found some old bedding to cinch around my upper half, what virtually non-existant material could I use to (sort of) prevent public indecency? - Eureka! A wad of green mosquito netting!”

    …I thought these girls had, you know, millions to spend on clothes.

  53. By shayla on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    I think the skirt is just plain ugly. It doesn’t matter if she has legs for it because the garment is ridiculous! She usually has such a good taste but this..

  54. By Sgt.SlamHog on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    So I guess from now on I can just wear some pink plastic wrap and possibly a bowler hat on the tip of my manhood because that’s what passes for fashion these days.

  55. By Madi on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    just another weird outfit…her body is fine but hwy another dam ugly weird outfit

  56. By Katherine on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    No one should wear a skirt like that.

  57. By katie on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    agreed- this would not be flattering on anyone- I think she is going for her sister MK’s previous homeless person look hehe.

  58. By Monza on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    She has the legs and all but the skirt is just plain ugly. It’s something you wear to the beach not to go shopping.

  59. By anda on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    what on earth could be sexy on this girl???i find it horrible..no fasions style..i start to tink that her main wish is to look as bad as possible..and to be honest..she manages it quite well..if not wonderfully..

  60. By alina on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    she is hott but that skirt is not.

  61. By saintdevil on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    She almost always looks like she crawled through a donation box from the salvation army and put on the clothes that stuck to her.

  62. By emoxlies on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    From the back she just looks a plain mess but the outfit may look great from the front. Personally think shes got great legs and can pull it off.

  63. By Claudia on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    skinny doesn’t equal a good body. She’s thin but her figure is terrible - so no, she doesn’t look good.

  64. By peach on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    things like this are meant for the catwalk, not the street…. she looks comical!
    and i love ashley so thats saying somethign!

  65. By Fliss on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    Maybe she has just come from the beach and is wearing swimwear.

    Or maybe she is showing us all her underwear. Seriously would anyone here walk down the street in their undies and a piece of mosquito net?

  66. By Agnes on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    That’s just plain disgusting.

  67. By Lazara on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    no, that skirt wouldn’t be sexy for anyone

  68. By Scarlet on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    I agree with everyone that the skirt is pretty horrendous!!!

    But Ashley’s looking in great shape these days - does anyone have an idea of how much she weighs? i’m guessing around 112?

  69. By Jodi on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    Sgt. SlamHog, that ensemble for your member sounds delightful! The classic bowler hat would nicely offset the avant-garde touch of the plastic wrap. Nice work.

  70. By Jodi on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    She looks like she rolled out of some guy’s bed and, having lost her real clothing somewhere during the course of the previous evening’s escapades, had to scramble to find something to slump home in for the classy “walk of shame”. And all her elegant lover had available was an old blanket and a random trash bag.

  71. By Cherie on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    Yeah, 112 or something like that sounds good. If she is 112 pounds (and 5″1), her BMI is 21.2. It sounds very believable. She is slim and she has a great pair of legs but she isn’t still underweight unlike Mary-Kate.

  72. By tallenglishgirl on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    The girl is just strange. Yes, she has the figure for it but that doesn’t mean that she should wear this dreadful outfit.

  73. By Ana on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    well, I love her, but this outfit is kind of strange ô.O

  74. By leo on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    She always looks strange to me…she has the face of a little girl, but she always dresses older than her age. Same goes for her sister.

  75. By 2perfect on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    I am just gobsmacked. This is one confusing outfit. I consider myself a bit risky when it comes to fashion and I’m sure that much could be criticized about some of my clothing…but this is just over the top. I can’t imagine purposefully putting something like this on and thinking it looks even “fine”, let alone “good”.

    By the way, sure, she has thin legs with no sign of a dimple or jiggle…but, for me, this by no means means she has a nice body…it’s thin, but that’s about the extent of it.

  76. By Anon on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    There’s nothing wrong with what she’s wearing only if she’s going to the beach. Doesn’t look like she is though. Someone needs a reality check.

  77. By baiba on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    :( don’t like

  78. By Aly on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    No.

  79. By Danielle on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    Cute buns! I don’t like the outfit but sure she can pull it off.

  80. By mee on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    great shape?! not eating is now called being in great shape?! geesh

  81. By adriana on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    Ohhhh Ashley…really? Why? She and her sister are so cute, I just don’t get anything else about them.

  82. By Deja on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    there is nothing at all attractive about this girl or this awful skirt. Hideous. What do those 2 do now adays?!?

  83. By SuperModelSuzie on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    I don’t think I’ve ever seen her wearing flats!

  84. By mandy on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    I think this skirt is a little silly unless you are wearing it to the beach…I would say that if she is 5′3 then she weighs about 105 pounds….she is still slim

  85. By whit on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    ashley’s legs are cute but i think a see through shirt with a fitted or possibly midriff camisole would be sexier. or hell, this chick could be covering up her bikini–if she is then i think its sexy–work it little mama! lol.

  86. By Letitbe on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    granny like……not sexy.

  87. By KallystaDee. on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    NOBODY pulls it off. It looks plain awful/

  88. By lux on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    Of course she can pull it off, she’s an Olsen!

  89. By Jodi on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    I *wish* she would “pull it off” — and put something else on!

  90. By GoshGollyMe on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    i dont think she was going for sexy with this…lol

    but anyway..it looks so comfy…i would wear it and not care how shleppy it looked. i think the grey cashmere top is suppose to be over her butt but its hitched all up like she just got out of a car.

    if i ever was olsen rich i would wear hefty bags..no..dollar store trash bags just to mess with people…(hefty is too high class..lol)

  91. By Mi on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    She looks like she would just have been on the beach… who knows, maybe she was?

    Anyhow, In my opinion, she can totally pull the look off figure wise, but I think she should have added there black leggins and higher heels to transform the beach style into the street style. Whatever.

    As for completely other things, does she have a tattoo on the back of her thigh, or is it just a shadow?

  92. By Eew on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    Hagsville.

  93. By Loli on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    see-throw skirt?????????this is ridiculoussss…thats not sexy…sexy is letting people guess…now this skirt is just weird..and it has nothing to do with body type but at least, she has okay legs, not ewww put something on legs

  94. By Lucie on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    what’s wrong with the “upper-half” of her outfit? It looks like her wrists are attached to her throat… o__O

  95. By nat on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    not the BEST style choice in my opinion. but, okay for possibly..the beach over a bikini?

  96. By karla on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    love her… dont love the dress

  97. By weirdo on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    what is there to see? It looks like a used toothpick with a bunch of nasty tooth gunk stuck to it, and a bobblehead doll stuck on top.

  98. By weirdo on Jun 20, 2007 | Reply

    or Norman Bate’s mom from Psycho!

  99. By Sarah on Jun 21, 2007 | Reply

    That skirt would be cute on the beach or by a pool maybe…

  100. By ellie on Jun 21, 2007 | Reply

    i’d say that’s pretty see- through.. don’t quite get that outfit though

  101. By Sarah on Jun 21, 2007 | Reply

    She’s got a great bum (I’m actually surprised she has one), but the skirt is gross.

  102. By jamie on Jun 21, 2007 | Reply

    ew! ashley olsen has very good figure, but no matter HOW good your body is, even if you’re jessica freaking alba, a see through skirt is a NO NO.

  103. By super skinny!!! on Jun 22, 2007 | Reply

    i think she looks amazing!! ashley could wear a bin bag and still look fabulous!!! she has the best figure and style in hollywood!!

  104. By Banky Sinatra on Jun 27, 2007 | Reply

    Weight wise not so great…

    …if she worked out a bit and got a little muscle tone without gaining a lot of weight she’d look better.

  105. By C'est moi on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    No, no, and no.

    She looks like she took this outfit from the first homeless man she saw.

  106. By Kim on Jul 2, 2007 | Reply

    it would look good with a one-piece bathing suit on the beach.

    at least she’s wearing some sort of underwear, unlike some celebs who show everything, even when they shouldn’t.

  107. By Lotte on Jul 4, 2007 | Reply

    It looks awful on her like this. It’s like she’s wearing a bin bag or something. Nope, I would not recommend her putting on that skirt ever again.

  108. By horndog69 on Jul 19, 2007 | Reply

    I’d like to see through the entire dress!!!

  109. By kate on Jul 20, 2007 | Reply

    These twins are great but their fashion is just plainly baaad!

  110. By hali on Aug 3, 2007 | Reply

    no, its shere except there is like skin tone fabric underneath

  111. By Natalia on Aug 5, 2007 | Reply

    PFFFT. NO it looks gay and the fact it looks like she’s got no undies is worse. She looks like a total bogan - even if she does have the figure for it.

  112. By Priya on Aug 6, 2007 | Reply

    NO ONE would look good in that… What is she wearing?!

  113. By FW on Aug 15, 2007 | Reply

    Anyone wearing this outfit wouldn’t be sexy. It’s some kind of sweatshirt jersey top and caftan mosquito net bottom. Very unsexy.

  114. By ** on Sep 4, 2007 | Reply

    NEW ASHLEY POST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  115. By sophie on Oct 5, 2007 | Reply

    NEW ASHLEY POST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  116. By holl on Dec 24, 2007 | Reply

    more ashley posts!!!!

**Please read the rules, located here, before making a comment! If you choose to comment, you are agreeing to the rules. ALSO Please Note: Your comment may take a few moments to show up. Please do not submit it more than once! Thank you!**




Post a Comment