The Skinny Website

1. 95 Responses to “Kate Bosworth in Shorts”

2. By Rachel on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

   Am I first?? Yay!!
   I think she has a really petite body and amazing legs.
   She looks so much better with a little weight on her.!

3. By Sasha on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

   She’s healthier for sure, but she looks washed out here. Perhaps putting some more effort into her look rather than looking like she just got out of bed.

4. By Scarah on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

   Her body is amazing, absolute perfection. I would kill to look like her or Cameron Diaz.

5. By jaime j on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

   I don’t find her that appealing. I hate how she dresses.

   Very nice legs, though.

6. By Angela on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

   I agree, beautiful body, from 800 cals a day to a normal diet, does make her great.

7. By Jenny on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

   She is genuinely gorgeous, in my opinion… although her body gets criticized or praised based on how much weight she loses/gains, I think it always looks good.

8. By lambman on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

   she looks really good body wise, but I don’t think she’s looked attractive over-all since Blue Crush and Rules of Attraction.

   she’s so boring also, she just doesn’t seem like she’d be fun or interesting to hang out with and she’s not what I would call compelling onscreen

9. By mdawg on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

   she certainly looks alot better than she was looking!

10. By Scarlet on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    she looks great, how much do you think she weighs now? 110? how tall is she?

11. By Anon on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    ^She’s apparently 5″5″. 110 sounds about right. She looks fab.

12. By billie on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    she’s 5′5′’(1.65 cm)…I had not realised how beautiful she was until I saw on tv the other day her movie “win a date with tad hamilton”.she is really stunning:beautiful lips,eyes,legs….looked better with long hair though…weight-wise she is thin for sure,but looks good

13. By Maxx05 on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    She looks so much healthier, thankfully. She could use some more muscle tone, tho. She is lucky she is such a beautiful girl. I hope she stays well. I hope she feels as well as she appears.

14. By Grace on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    I like the way she dresses, that top is cute!

15. By Jennie on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    5′5″ 110 sounds about right…maybe 115. She’s still thin but meatier than she was before! She looks way better!

16. By amanda on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    I loved her in Blue Crush. So athletic and fit. She still looks good here though. Better than last summer at least.

17. By Scarlet on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    yeh, i’m second guessing at around 115 - she looks really healthy, hope she stays this way

18. By charlotte on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    She looks nice. I hope she stays with this look.

19. By suzy on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    Ummm…that body isn’t exactly perfect. Look at how her knees turn in even when her feet are pointed straight ahead. No use being at a perfect weight if you look awkward!

20. By ~*~katie~*~ on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    what a frumpy shirt…..the shorts are cute but the top is not….

21. By arev on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    i think she looks more around 118.
    i’m about her height and looked like that figure-wise at 118.

22. By Dee on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    looking good kate!

23. By Tucker on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    commenting about how her knees turn in?
    Thats like commenting on someones ankle circumference, their is no point to it. Its not like they could change it if they wanted to.

24. By billie on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    suzy,everyone does his best to look good,even with their “akward”-as you say- characteristics.their IS use being at a perfect weight if you look “akward” because everyone tries his best.if you had a big,ugly nose for instance,their would be no use having a nice body?? it’s like telling people,if you have ONE drawback,back off snd stay forever locked in your house.anyways, her legs look pretty good..kate moss is a top and very rich model all this years,and has crooked legs…and stands out,even at a job fully connected to how you look.

25. By Jodi on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    Ehhh. Nothing exciting to see here. I’m more interested in the unseen dog at the end of the leash.

26. By Karma on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    um…. not liking her in these photos. Her arms look good but the legs don’t. Could just be the lighting of course. Regardless, I’m glad she’s not a walking skeleton anymore.

27. By Stephanie on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    i totally agree with lambman- she seems liek she’d be kind of boring to hang around. i’m not sure why lol, but she does.

28. By Persephone on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    She looks good. I’d only wear the outfit around the house though.

    I agree with others who said that she seems boring.

29. By meme on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    I’m not perfect, not even close to looking as good as her in this pic, but I think she looked so much better in blue crush. Here she looks untoned skinny.,… which is more nasty (IMO) than just being normal untoned. Being skinny untoned is gross.. before this she was just bones. She used to have this beautiful face and body, now something just doesn’t seem right with her. Still a cute girl! Justs not at her best potential!!

30. By Aly on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    I think she looks great!!!!! I don’t really care for the shirt, though, but I’m just glad she doesn’t look on the brink of death anymore. Here’s to being healthy!!!!

    What does IMO mean????

31. By OMG on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    Her legs are ugly.

32. By Nani on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    I loooove her! i think she has such a beautiful face — it glows! I don’t understand what she’s wearing though. Even my frumpy clothes don’t look that silly!

33. By beautyqueen18 on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    Kate is looking so much better! The outfit is hideous though. I’m glad she got her priorities straight, and she is actually looking pretty decent these days. She needs to do everyone a favor and get her Blue Crush body back. She could use a bit more weight on her.

34. By beautyqueen18 on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    About 5 lbs of muscle would bring her back to her hotness.

35. By raquelle on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    118 looks right. shes def bigger than 110 at 5′5. she looks so gorgeous though…very angelic in the face

36. By mem on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    In My Opinion (IMO)

37. By erin on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    She looks so much healthier! She has such long legs and as good as they look a little bit more muscle on them would make them even better! I actually think the t-shirt is OK with the shorts.. Sometimes if you wear something skimpy on the bottom or top in can balance it out by wearing something less fitted on the other half.. If she was wearing a skin tight tank top then she might look a bit skanky. She might also be somewhat self-conscious about her figure. I like the outfit and her in it!

38. By apricotmuffins on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    suzy, on June 28th, 2007 at 5:42 pm Said:

    “Ummm…that body isn’t exactly perfect. Look at how her knees turn in even when her feet are pointed straight ahead. No use being at a perfect weight if you look awkward!”

    Really? so she should just give up now, be absolutely skeletal or morbidly obese because she has awekward knees?

    yeah. I TOTALLY agree. Everyone should just give up if they arent perfect.

39. By apricotmuffins on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    damn spelling. Makes me look so dumb when i dont read over my posts properly…

40. By A on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    If she is 5′5″ as everyone is saying I’d guess in the 110 range also. I’m her height and 10 lbs. lighter but look more or less the same. So cute!

41. By Sam on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    she looks awesome, i wish i had her body

42. By b on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    she looks healthier and better than she has, but really untoned. she’d look a lot better with some tone, defintion, or muscle but hey she still looks a billion times better than she did as a stick last summer.

43. By Aly on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    Thanks mem!!!!!!!

44. By Anon on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    I doubt she’s 118. The camera adds 10 lbs., that’s why I guessed about 110.

45. By hez on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    I *hate* those shorts, but her legs are enviable. Also, that shirt is adorable, I need one.

46. By Ala on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    I hate her rolled shorts but she is looking a bit better with a few extra pounds

47. By Ala on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    and yea…there’s no way she is 118….im 5′4″ and 118, and she is far skinnier than I am

48. By ladylumps on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    can I just say I find the 118 comments hilarious…as if you could every visually assess somebody’s weight that closely…heck try two different brands of scales and you’ll go from 115 to 118

49. By s on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    I think she is more than 110 lbs, like 115. I am around her height and I looked much smaller than her when 110.

50. By JaneDoe on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    i’m glad she decided to gain some weight. she looks healthier but still looking thin. for some reason her legs remind me of kate moss’s legs

51. By Ashly on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    She looks really good, untoned but good.

52. By maddison on Jun 28, 2007 | Reply

    Awkward knees and untoned legs? Give the girl credit for looking healthy again!

53. By Fliss on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I think it is just the angle that makes her knees look strange and I’d guess her at 110 as well coz i’m 5′6/120 and I’d look huge next to her.

    I don’t think she would be boring either. She seems really intelligent and not obsessed with herself. It’s just coz we don’t see pictures of her wasted and stuff that she seems boring. She probably keeps that stuff behind closed doors.

54. By Joelle on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    She looks pretty!

55. By ashley on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    she looks a lot healthier lately than before. i think she has really nice legs. sure, it could use a little more tone, but they’re nice.

56. By HAHA on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    ok i have never seen a movie with her in it!! but i love her, she is so beautiful!! i just dont understand why having “ugly” knees would make someone ugly!! I think she is gorgeous, and her knees look fine!! I dont know if she would be boring, but orlando bloom dated her for a long time, and if he looks like he enjoys having a good time, so maybe she is fun, but i wouldnt know haha!!

57. By kamilia on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    she’s still very thin but atleast she looks good, athletic thin rather than “starving myself” thin.

    i hope she keeps it up!!
    i definitely think her gorgeous boyfriend james rousseau plays a part in this and it’s adorable that he encourages her to eat!xx

58. By Miss M on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I’ve seen better legs!

59. By georgie on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    pity about the face though!

60. By p on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    she’s so beautiful…love her and glad to see she seems happier these days.

    i’d kill for her legs…and for those people saying her legs aren’t that great and whatnot, they’re still better than like 99% of the population, myself included lol. I’d never wear what she’s wearing but she’s one of the few people I’ve ever seen look good (and not trashy) in short shorts.

61. By girlie girl on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    She looks sooo much better, but still needs to gain about 5-10 more lbs to look ‘perfect.’ She is gorgeous!

62. By apricotmuffins on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I forgot to say that its great to see her looking healthier. I hope she’s happier for it too.

63. By Brynn on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I’d say she looks 110 pounds too, but who really cares. She looks healthy and beautiful!

64. By tallenglishgirl on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    She is such a pretty girl, and it looks almost effortless. I love her legs. She deffinitely looks better at this weight rather than the weight she was a few months back.

65. By Area on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    She looks good, so much better than before.

66. By Ana on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    she looks gorgeous!!!

67. By Denise on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Looking good. Nice to see she’s gotten over the eating issues that had caused her to shrink so drastically.

68. By charlotte on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    the knee comment is just ridiculous! Maybe I should be more self-conscious about my knees now…

69. By Pheno on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    blah, she looks average, nothing special

70. By cat on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    her legs really don’t look all that “untoned” or whatever to me. in fact, i think they look pretty awesome.

71. By JO on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I LOVE HER

72. By Heather on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    hmmm…if she were to weigh 110, she’d be considered underweight, albeit barely, according to BMI standards. I think she just looks slim, but not underweight at this weight. I loved her figure in Blue Crush though!

73. By SuperModelSuzie on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    She’s just adorable. What happened to all the muscle tone she had in Blue Crush, though?

74. By Swanhilda on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    You couldn’t pay me enough to wear that shirt.

75. By Karma on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Blue Crush was 5 years ago. People change and so do their bodies. Besides, she had to prepare for that role with rigorous training (running, surfing,swimming and lifting)- that’s why she had such a hot body.

76. By nat on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Looks good !!

77. By KallystaDee. on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Oh my gosh she looks wayyy better. I can’t believe the transformation!

78. By whitney on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    im so glad to see here looking healthier! she looks amazing with a little more meat on her bones. back in her super super skinny days she looked like she was about to pass out at any moment.

79. By mike on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    She still looks like utter shit.

80. By Francy on Jun 30, 2007 | Reply

    I think she’s so cute in these pictures.. I like her, she’s angelic, pretty, a sort of “girl next door”.. =D

81. By jenna on Jun 30, 2007 | Reply

    horrible legs..she has no calves AT ALL..i think she looked better thinner because her calves looked better proportioned to her thighs..and her face is always puffy lately..

82. By sara on Jun 30, 2007 | Reply

    i think she looks perfict dose any one know how much dose she waigh she s about 5′5

83. By asiangirl on Jun 30, 2007 | Reply

    She looks much, much better than her very skinny days, although like everyone else, I miss her hot Blue Crush body.

84. By elise on Jul 1, 2007 | Reply

    For some reason these pictures made me incredibly happy. She’s still absolutely tiny but looks sooo much better.

85. By Anonymous1 on Jul 5, 2007 | Reply

    She looks INFINITELY more healthy than in months past. Good for her.

86. By Elle on Jul 6, 2007 | Reply

    Guessing 118 for her weight is crazy! I’m 5′6″ and 110. She looks to be about my size these days. I’d guess she’s around 110, maybe a pound or two less.

87. By horndog69 on Jul 6, 2007 | Reply

    That shirt & shorts would look MUCH better thrown on the floor in my bedroom!!

88. By Lola on Jul 8, 2007 | Reply

    I think she is still battling anorexia

89. By lauraaaaaaaaa on Jul 10, 2007 | Reply

    she’s so ugly. poor thing

90. By laura 11 on Jul 16, 2007 | Reply

    My god she has an amazing figure! im so jealous. i love what she is wearing too. this picture is what perfection looks like people!

91. By Claud on Sep 2, 2007 | Reply

    today, My been life’s but unremarkable shrug. ,

92. By Cassi on Sep 2, 2007 | Reply

    matters. it that Not ,

93. By Patsy on Sep 3, 2007 | Reply

    gotten I done recently. anything haven’t ,

94. By Denis on Sep 3, 2007 | Reply

    It’s not important. ,

95. By Jinny on Sep 3, 2007 | Reply

    room. My an mind like is empty ,

96. By Chery on Sep 3, 2007 | Reply

    life’s pretty been My boring recently. ,

**Please read the rules, located here, before making a comment! If you choose to comment, you are agreeing to the rules. ALSO Please Note: Your comment may take a few moments to show up. Please do not submit it more than once! Thank you!**