Supermodel Lily Cole Update

Written on June 29, 2007 – 9:39 am | by Rian |

Gorgeous Lily Cole proves that not all supermodels are underfed, malnourished skeletons.

37858_lily_cole_at_mappin_and_webb_flagship_store_opening_in_london_6-19-07_2_122_407lo.jpg

37871_lily_cole_at_mappin_and_webb_flagship_store_opening_in_london_6-19-07_7_122_1174lo.jpg



37852_lily_cole_at_mappin_and_webb_flagship_store_opening_in_london_6-19-07_1_122_982lo.jpg



  1. 111 Responses to “Supermodel Lily Cole Update”

  2. By ln on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    great figure! awesome role model to others! however, she is very odd looking. i wonder where they find these women sometimes…

  3. By GoshGollyMe on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    dhe looks cute..but did she gain? i though she always looked more willowy?

  4. By cat on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    i think the dress makes her appear WAY larger than she actually is. look at how tiny her legs are! and if you try to see through the dress, you can tell that her hips are narrower than the line of the dress. all that being said, i think she looks great.

  5. By barbs on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    mmmm yea cute but mmm those legs????

  6. By izzie on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    wooow, hot body! :-) but her legs are very skinny..

  7. By SuperModelSuzie on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    What’s odd is that her arms look full and healthy, but her legs look too skinny for her frame. Odd. Regardless she’s beautiful!

  8. By Caro on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    It’s just a lucky shot of her..usually she looks emaciated…

  9. By anelej on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    she is not skeletal,but still very thin..
    even if she recently GAINED weight- so she wasn’t this “skinny” or “normal” before…

  10. By amanda on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    wasn’t she the model that wore a t-shirt that said “eat or die” in a recent teen vogue?

  11. By niki on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I’v nener seen her before. I agree her legs are verry skinny. A dress can hide alot..

  12. By Grace on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    THIS is what naturally thin looks like. That’s why she looks healthy, and Nicole Richie looks sick.

  13. By JO on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Just cause she has boobs everyone assumes that she is not as thin as all the other models.
    Take away those and she would be a coat hanger

  14. By lie-on on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    she looks thin & beaut,ful n____________n
    vlada is thinner but still naturally

  15. By Heather on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    good body but her face….

  16. By Miss M on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    She looks a bit odd to me, I wouldn’t call her pretty or attractive or sexy, she is like Jodi Kidd, another model that looks odd. But hey, whatever the fashion industry wants and obviously they like her a lot.
    I don’t like the red dress to her white skin and her orangey hair, I don’t think she can wear this colour. And what is up with those flip flops? Too casual for my liking to appear on a green carpet event LOL ;-)

  17. By Jodi on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Ugggh! She’s not attractive at all. Now, I’m not one for the bland, insipid “American blonde” look, but this is just … no. Nothing to see here.

  18. By Jodi on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    P.S. And we’re wearing flip-flops WHY?

  19. By tim jones on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    legs nasty, face ls gross and bordering on being extraterrestrial

  20. By Anna on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I don’t know who she is, but she has GREAT curves!! See, put her next to Kim Karashian and you will see that Kim is just plain fat.

  21. By Lenore on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    The dress is see-through and she looks quite thin through it (not unhealthily thin), but her face isn’t anything too special imo

  22. By kenbot on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I can’t see anything except those hideous shoes.

  23. By Choc on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I am sorry but i think this model is butt ugly.

  24. By graetchen on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    not too long ago, lily was quite willowy herself, she seems to have gained some… it does not look good on her, and her pumpkinhead bugs the hell out of me. fugly.

  25. By Girly on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    i dont live her…she’s fugly. Not a supermodel at all. Beside she’s like…fat.

  26. By Girly on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    i dont like her…she’s fugly. Not a supermodel at all. Beside she’s like…fat.

  27. By adriana on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    She looks like a little girl…

  28. By Ala on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I agree, ppl think if you have big boobs then you aren’t thin. The fact is she is really skinny and has implants most likely. Thats not healthy.

    I think her body is great though….but her boobs are too big for my personal liking.

  29. By emmie on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    So gorgeous. Lily Cole has that pre-raphaelite, porcelain doll thing going for her. Thin but not dying and she’s been on the cover on Brittish Vogue atleast twice. . .funny that some are already posting that they think she’s “weird looking” they probably prefer the common, sorority girl look of low rent fashion shows like America’s Next Top (Catalog) Model.

  30. By Kikilicious on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    She is cute and yes this is what a women looks like when she is naturally very thin. Her hair, face and glow look heathy!! as opposed to nicole richie. Bravo to her.

  31. By purpleplague on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    She was basically forced to gain weight due to the whole Spain BMI deal.

  32. By lambman on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    She looks gorgeous and healthy…very sexy body, long thin arms and legs, but still got some curves.

    I like that she didn’t try to starve herself into keeping the same body she had when she was 15 and just started modeling. I remember reading her talking about that, now that she’s a woman and not a teen she has curves and finds them sexy!

  33. By maddison on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    She looks like the grown-up version of a Cabbage Patch Kid.

  34. By Alice on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I agree she is odd looking. She looks like a boring person. but she isnt fat. But shes only gained weight to stop herself losing her job. She was ematiated beforehand.

  35. By catseyesvc on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    i think she’s gaining weight. she might have been quite thin before b/c she was so young but i think she’s “becoming a woman”. her body type might be one of gaining in the upper body and not in the lower body but she’s still gaining weight.

  36. By Emi on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I personally don’t find her attractive AT ALL. How is this girl even near the same category of “supermodels” with Alessandra?

  37. By mdawg on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    yeah she has gained weight… remember the post about her saying she’s not naturally a size 0, and she likes her new curvy self…?

    anyway, i think she looks great

  38. By Mylo on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    i dont find her attractive either. What I DO like is her hair, beautiful curly red hair and i like her skintone.
    I think that when i would meet her we would not get along.
    Dont know why, something in het expression

  39. By Child Bride on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    She is unusual-looking, but *very* striking. I like her at this slightly higher weight. She looks healthy and slim - not heavy at all. Frankly, I’m jealous.

    But…flip-flops? White, rubber flip-flops? What did ballet flats ever do to her?

  40. By Karma on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Yikes. Exactly what part of her body does she get paid to model?? I’m assuming it’s not her face.
    I had no idea this woman was a supermodel..

  41. By suzy on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    She was the skinniest waif-iest looking model a few years ago. Really a knock-out when she was all made-up. It looks like her face has changes as she’s grown up and filled out.

    As to looking “wierd” or ugly as some of you have said… natural red-heads without a ton of make-up look like this. It’s different, especially if you prefer the assembly-line-blonde-tanned-starlet look. Branch out a little. Makes life more interesting.

  42. By *Sullen Girl* on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Perfect perfect perfect. She is a fucking doll.

  43. By Barbie_Princess on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I totally LOVE Lily, she’s perfect! In this pics she looks so healthy and gorgeous!

  44. By evey on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    she was quoted recently about how she’s been allowed to gain weight as part of the model-weight controversy. She said something like ‘it’s great now, that i can have a chest and not be extra-careful about what i eat”. I think she’s fairly pretty and her hair is cute!

  45. By Jodi on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I like “different” looking people, and can’t STAND the stamped-out cookie-cutter too-tan, too-blonde, too-implanted starlet look, but this one? Icccch. A face like that of Sophia Loren (in her younger days) is SO gorgeous.

  46. By Am on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Suzy: thanks for point that out. It was models like Lily Cole who sparked the ban on models w/low BMI’s.

    I wouldn’t be suprised if she gained some weight to keep working. However this outfit doesn’t really show what her body looks like. It’s clear however her legs are still clearly very tiny.

  47. By cherry on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I think she’s beautiful (having the exact same hair and skin colour myself lol) and yes she gained a little weight and looks great!

  48. By Dreea on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Her body is not bad. Her boobs are nice and full. But the rest of her, let’s just say she’s not all that attractive.

  49. By Girly Girl on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Just because she has boobs, I don’t think that makes her curvy or not skinny. Like others have said, she is plenty thin. Besides she doesn’t have any hips.
    I think she is gorgeous. Such a departure from the norm.

  50. By Ala on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I know why I don’t find her attractive….her face is too wide for my liking. Otherwise she’d be beautiful.

  51. By Angelique on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    wow she gained a lot of weight. Her legs are still tiny though.

  52. By Joelle on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Gorgeous!

  53. By ho on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Is she the one who survived cancer twice?

  54. By LILY on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Ok for the record she is unique not weird looking…And def not UGLY! Shrek is ugly.
    And whats up with the skinny-fat comments?
    If someone wants to be skinny they can be. Its their choice. If someone wants to eat a pie and gain five pounds, it’s their choice. I mean it’s one thing to make a comment. Like wow she is attractive or her outfits cute or wow what a great bod. But to judge every aspect of someone is really sad. I mean whats the point.? She is a supermodel and someone thought she was pretty enough to be one. So get over it…

  55. By Persephone on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I like her body, but not her face. I wouldn’t call her ugly, just plain.

  56. By Bullshit on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    She’s simply a model, not a supermodel. And not a good one at that.

    Offcourse it’s personal taste on wether or not she’s attractive or not, but for me she simply isn’t good looking. She isn’t even ‘cute’ looking. Her bonestructure is hideous, her measurements are disproportional and her hair (colour aswell as texture) is simply not my taste.

    Once again, just because someone had a few pictures taken doesnt mean she’s a supermodel.

  57. By carolina on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    omg she is fn uglyyyyyyy - could be cuz i just got done looking at the hottness of alexandra ambrosio.
    this chick looks dead , she needs a tan too

  58. By Cloo on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    She’s not fat, she’s quite thin actually. But, she looks like she came out of a shower.

  59. By MJ on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Wowie she looks amazing, beautiful hair and dress! And her curves are amazing and really lovely, her legs still look skinny though, but i think she has a naturally small figure, overall; awesome :)

  60. By MJ on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    P.S. Her choice of footwear could have been better though…

  61. By Danni on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Lily looks great, and since her weigh gain she’s got a ton more work.

  62. By KallystaDee. on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Her legs are so tiny though. No offense, but how can she be a model? She isn’t even pretty…nor has an amazing body. And she dresses bad.

  63. By clo on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    she has deff gained weight since the ban on skinny models, im guessing not to loose work

  64. By beautyqueen18 on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    It really doesn’t matter that some some of you think she is ugly, she is the only that is getting paid for being a SUPER MODEL. She is not too skinny and she is not fat. No, she hasn’t gotten breast implants either. She obviously is top heavy. Her arms are healthy looking. Lily’s legs are a bit skinny, but she carries her weight on top. So she can’t really help that. I think she is one of the healthiest runway models, and hopefully other models will follow her example.

  65. By ~*~katie~*~ on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    shes very unique looking….i love that! and i am in love with her hair….its gorgeous!

  66. By MMH on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I agree that her body is sort of ’strange’ looking: Her legs are very, very skinny as compared to the rest of her body! However, her skin is beautiful and so is her firey red hair!!

  67. By Sarah on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    THE GIRL IS NATURALLY SLIM!
    Yes she has gained some weight over recent months…however this girl has never been one of those who have starved herself!
    HER LEGS ARE VERY SLIM - NOT BECAUSE OF THE DRESS HIDING THE REST OF HER - BUT BECAUSE ITS CLEARLY HER STRUCTURE!
    YOU KNOW LIKE HOW SOME PEOPLE HAVE BIGGER BOTTOM HALVES (HIPS AND LEGS) THAN THEIR TOP - LIKE BEYONCE, J-LO AND MISCHA BARTON!

  68. By Natalia on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    beauty is in the eye of the beholder people.

    You ragging on her being ‘FUgLEy!!11!!1!’ doesn’t diminish the fact that she earns millions with that ‘dis-proportionate’ body and face.

  69. By me on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    i cant believe shes a supermodel.. i dont think her face is very pretty….

  70. By andy on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    model?
    she looks like… butterface to me.
    more renee z posts please!

  71. By Tim on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I don’t know what to say but i can’t beleive she get’s paid for her looks. i don’t find her phyically attractive in any way. yes… she does have a different look which i like in a Angelina Jolie, Eva Medes, Uma Thurman type of way but not in a strawberry shortcake way.

  72. By moni on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Sorry to be another one of those ragging on her “unconventional beauty,” but honestly, I just find her plain ugly. Her eyes look like they are about to get lost in the undefined pudgy shapelessness of her face… I think a beautiful face is one that looks sculpted, her’s is just a plump featureless expanse. Very very very bland. And her body just eeks me out, for some reason. Ick.

  73. By moni on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    *hers

  74. By Keelia on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    I absolutely DESPISE lily cole.
    She looks like shes permanently sucking on a lemon.

    She also wasn’t always so “curvy” either, though. For ages she and Gemma Ward had the exact same figure- which looked pretty malnourished in my opinion!

    And now that shes a supermodel and has aquired the calibre of fame that she has, she doesn’t really need to be as stick thin anymore does she?

  75. By Lina on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    Everything but the legs! Her legs look disgusting.

  76. By armida on Jun 29, 2007 | Reply

    her face looks like a porclain doll. and i LOVE the red curly locks. she is so beautiful in such a natural way…

  77. By dee on Jun 30, 2007 | Reply

    red dress with white flip-flops! - and she works in the fashion industry?
    ouch

  78. By Lazara on Jun 30, 2007 | Reply

    I think she looks really, really great now!
    It’s always good to see non-emaciated supermodels :)

  79. By nina on Jun 30, 2007 | Reply

    i gues shes just one of those models you love or hate..
    i peronaly cant see anything attractive about her..

  80. By zimbozambozzzz on Jun 30, 2007 | Reply

    I think she is very average looking nothing great about her. AND those thongs with that dress?? a big NO NO

  81. By Critico on Jun 30, 2007 | Reply

    She looks so odd I absolutely love her!

  82. By thinista on Jun 30, 2007 | Reply

    Put her in a pair of high heels and a bikini and she would look ‘emaciated’

  83. By Pak31 on Jun 30, 2007 | Reply

    Ew. Very odd looking girl. How does she become a supermodel. Very thin scrawny legs, white skin, no tone to her body. I am confused. She doesn’t even have a pretty face.

  84. By kat on Jul 1, 2007 | Reply

    wow im sure everyone thinks she’s so fug! i think she looks interesting and cool, and thin, but healthy looking. she looks normal for her - i think she’s beautiful

    but the shoes and her panties showing thru her dress - how old is she? like shes super rich right? now i wont feel like i look so poor lmao

  85. By Pheno on Jul 1, 2007 | Reply

    Her breast look ridiculous compared to her skinny frame

  86. By Sacharomyces cerevisiae on Jul 1, 2007 | Reply

    ehm… how exactly does she prove this? by her tiny implants I suppose? or by her stick thin legs? or by her shapeless dress which can equally hide an elephant or a bag of bones? She is thin-maybe too thin-dont fool yourselves. But again this is how models should be and not fat cows. and it is ridiculous to fight on her “attractiveness”-granted, her face is weird but this is a plus in fashion-an unforgetable face-as long as it has two eyes that look at the same direction, a cute nose and a mouth without a cleft palate

  87. By crowb on Jul 1, 2007 | Reply

    It looks like she gained weight in the face only, how weird.
    I think she’s a stunning in print ads (what a model should be) but her legs look pretty gross with the flip-flops and all, I don’t understand why people wear those at all much less with a nice dress.
    Did she do runway at this weight?

  88. By pinot fino on Jul 1, 2007 | Reply

    I believe you mean cleft lip, Sacharomyces. Cleft palates aren’t visible.

  89. By jc on Jul 2, 2007 | Reply

    I LOVE LILY COLE!!!! She looks like one of those ceremic doll :)

    but thumbs down for her flip-flops

  90. By Miss M on Jul 2, 2007 | Reply

    Girly, where is Lily Cole fat? What are you? A size 000?

  91. By Veronica on Jul 2, 2007 | Reply

    Mmmm, butterface.

  92. By blondie339 on Jul 3, 2007 | Reply

    who is she? she’s just a supermodel? cuz i’ve never even heard of her. but yeah she looks good. what event is she at? are flip flops appropriate? and you can see her underwear through her dress.

  93. By Eew on Jul 5, 2007 | Reply

    Curves???????????? The ruler on my desk has more curves than that. And she looks like she needs a good smack in the face.

  94. By Chloe on Jul 5, 2007 | Reply

    And where is the brown bag?
    Her face is hideous!!!!!
    Lol and yes, whic part of her body does she get paid to model?
    Her tits in mens mags?

  95. By Pip on Jul 6, 2007 | Reply

    Lily Cole is a couture/high fashion type model - to compare her to Alessandra or a Victoria’s Secret model is plain ridiculous.
    She’s gained because she’s going to Cambridge university this year now and no longer needs to be super-skinny for the catwalk, though she’s naturally thin anyway.
    Her doll faced looks and her hair and skin tone make her look very striking on the runway, just as a model should.
    And yes, she is a supermodel. Given that she’s only about 19 or 20 she’s earnt more and been in more catwalk shows than many models do in a lifetime. She did Accessorize adverts here in the UK and she’s starring in a film or two. She’s very successful and those who haven’t heard of her or ask how she can be a model obviously don’t pay any attention to fashion or modelling at all. In which case, they shouldn’t comment on it.

  96. By Liakojean on Jul 8, 2007 | Reply

    Ugly…..too ugly for my pc…I want to create a place where these pictures will not be able to find me

  97. By izzy on Jul 9, 2007 | Reply

    good figure…her face is weird though. really weird actually

  98. By lauraaaaaaaaa on Jul 9, 2007 | Reply

    whatta cutie! love her

  99. By Anne on Jul 14, 2007 | Reply

    I love to look at her! She is beautiful in an interesting way — not the boring, stereotypical “beauty” we see far too much of these days. She has a weird expression on her face in the 2nd photo though.

  100. By Kandice on Jul 17, 2007 | Reply

    She’s a great role model for whom….women with high metabolism who indulge in too many sweets?

  101. By FW on Aug 17, 2007 | Reply

    her legs are quite twiggy

  102. By Doris on Sep 2, 2007 | Reply

    bother I guess doesn’t me. it ,

  103. By Renay on Sep 2, 2007 | Reply

    a Today was total loss. ,

  104. By Greta on Sep 2, 2007 | Reply

    now. on right much Not my mind ,

  105. By Ernie on Sep 3, 2007 | Reply

    staying been I’ve nothing. at doing home just ,

  106. By Alita on Sep 3, 2007 | Reply

    recently. I anything can’t bothered be with ,

  107. By Nydia on Sep 3, 2007 | Reply

    bother guess it I doesn’t me. ,

  108. By Hulda on Sep 4, 2007 | Reply

    like say? void. feel What I a can ,

  109. By Cammy on Sep 4, 2007 | Reply

    with I can’t bothered anything be lately. ,

  110. By Hilde on Sep 4, 2007 | Reply

    XmJhJG I to recently. don’t much say have just ,

  111. By anony on Feb 21, 2008 | Reply

    Look at her legs, she’s still too thin. She just got lucky enough to be curvier than most super models (esp in the chest area) so it kind of helps to hide the fact that she’s so skinny. The fact is, she’s just too skinny.

  112. By Reenefupnob on Mar 23, 2008 | Reply

    I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well.

**Please read the rules, located here, before making a comment! If you choose to comment, you are agreeing to the rules. ALSO Please Note: Your comment may take a few moments to show up. Please do not submit it more than once! Thank you!**




Post a Comment