Does Mary-Kate Look Healthier?
Some new photos of Mary-Kate Olsen have surfaced. Here, she is on the set of her latest movie.
I received a couple of email tips stating that Mary-Kate looks healthier. In these photos, it almost looks like she has a bit of a tummy bump.
What do you all think - has she gained a bit?
78 Responses to “Does Mary-Kate Look Healthier?”
By Jodi on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
She actually looks somewhat normal. Is she the one who’s usually really skinny? I don’t know my Olsens from a hole in the ground.
By Jesska on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
First! haha this first thing is so stupid! Anyway she does look slightly bigger but is still thin. Her style leaves a little to be desired tho!
By Jesska on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
oops - obviously not first! my mistake x
By KatSpills on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
It’s kind of hard to tell in this outfit, but overall she looks good. I’m not sure if that’s an actual tummy bump or just the shirt blown up by the wind. I don’t even want to think about another pregnancy speculation (ala Nicole Richie) starting with MK. Off the weight subject though–will she please cut her hair?? just a bit of a trim, and get rid of the wierd shawls (those shawls should be confiscated, just like Britney Spears’ cut-offs).
By lambman on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
she looks much healthier! I think she’s on the set of Weeds, as she’s doing like the whole season…I don’t know of any movies.
Jodi - Yes, Mary-Kate is the one who is generally thinner (and poorly dressed) who was treated for annorexia in the past
By Loffles on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
I love her style.
So much more original than other Hollywoodbots.
She looks great!
By Catherine on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
Definitely looks healthier! Way to go Mary-Kate!
By Diane on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
i think she only looks bigger because we’re used to see her wearing high heels that make her look really long and stick-thin.
she looks petite but normal.
By lambman on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
request -
Skinny Girl - can you do a post on Cindy Crawford, there are some bikini pics floating around (some are topless) and I didn’t want to click the NSFW links, so I didn’t get to see any but tumbnails.
also, I’d really love it if you scanned in the UK wedding dress anorexia story, it sounds interesting
By Annie on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
Nope. She’s wearing flats as opposed to the crazy high heels she normally wear which make the chubbiest legs look leaner. Plus she’s wearing crazy voluminous clother covering the rest of her bodyl
By LAURA on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
perez hilton said he thought she had a baby bump - which is bull if you ask me. in this picture she looks a bit biggger, but just days ago when she was with the weeds cast she looked very thin, and gorgeous
By Kate on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
omg i almost died of delight, this is even cooler than the nicole update the other day. MK has always been my hero, from like 4 when I knew what a hero was on up.
No baby bum, probably the wind for sure. She might have recently eatten.
By emoxlies on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
I think that she does look alittle bigger. Maybe she’s gainned 5 or so pounds but i think its got more to do with the fact she’s not wearing heals or black tights. Both of which may your legs look much slimmer.
xxx
By Adrienne on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
She looks preggo in these pictures, but I think it’s the wind.
By Jennie on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
Much much healthier. I’m happy for her!
By Stephanie on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
wow, she looks somewhat normal for her body type i think.
more like ashley body-wise too.
good for her!
By lilchic on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
it’s not just because she’s wearing flats, her thighs look a bit bigger than they used to, they used to look like twigs…
By kel on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
she looks really good!
more like her sister
By brandy alexander on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
I have never been diagnosed with an eating disorder, but if I read comments about me being “bigger” I would probably want to lose weight. Even at Mary Kate’s size, I would. I wonder sometimes if our comments reverberate more than we know.
By Ramona on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
Brandy, you are right. Anybody with an eating disorder who hears comments about their weight (even something like “you look healthier!”) will turn that negative, like they’re being called fat. I doubt that MK’s looking at this site, but still. Not that we’re gonna stop discussing celebrity body sizes anytime soon either.
By heather on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
shes lookin DAMN fine!
By thinista on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
She usually wears sky high platforms that make her look thinner. She seems to be less skeletal though
By plastichearts on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
wow.
she looks amazing. :]
so much healthier.
her legs have filled out.
By heather on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
yup the legs have filled out …looks alot better….anybody know the girls weight?
By Rage on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
Its because she is wearing flats, MK and I are about the same size and when I wear heels I look thinner.
By bethany on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
her legs look a little better, but the ‘baby bump’ is obviously just because of the very loose shirt.
By Denise on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
Definitely bigger, and that bump is not her shirt. I’ve seen other pics and it is indeed her tummy poking out. I don’t think she exercises, so again, this is an example of someone who starves themselves normally. So when they eat something, they gain immediately.
By izzie on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
WOW! yes,she gained and she looks SOOOO MUCH better now!
By amanda on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
Her thighs look more shapely.
By Barbie_Princess on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
She looks healthier
By purpleplague on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
She’s probably bloated from eating something.
By SupermodelSuzie on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
She does look to be a bit healthier, maybe a 5lb or so gain.
But it almost looks as if all the excessive dieting at such a young age has stunted her development. Her shape looks almost child-like.
By Charlotte on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
I agree with Diane- the shoes make notable difference to me too.
By YANICIA on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
yes….she looks way better…she gain few pounds….
she is so cute
i love her
love her style…………..
By Persephone on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
I doubt Mary Kate or any other celebrity looks at this site. She looks healthy body wise in these pictures.
I do agree that people with eating disorders don’t like it when people comment on their weights.
By Christina on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
She does look healthier but the “bump” looks like just a shadow or wind blowing her shirt.
I think the healthier legs might come from her flats shes wearing because she never wears them.
Love her
By Spectra on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
She looks good, weightwise. I don’t think the tummy bump is a baby bump…it looks like it’s just the shirt she’s got on.
By Ala on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
Just like Nicole, she is also sporting a ‘malnutrition bump’
Great role model.
By Baby on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
She should gain like 20 pounds to be considered healthy.
By Elle on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
It’s hard to tell with her baggy clothes but her legs look fuller. She appears to be a great size! Good for her! I hope she can keep this up!
By jewel on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
shes very cute imo
By Megan on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
yay Mary-kate! She looks awesome!
By bella on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
I don’t like mk and her style but she seems healthy here…but she hasn’t good body imo
By Erica on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
her legs look bigger, yeah
By omg on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
Yes! AND I see a little belly! Good for her!
By kelly on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
yes! YAY!!! good for her!
By London2LA on Jul 31, 2007 | Reply
i secretly like her crazy cat lady style. keeps things interesting.
weight-wise this is the best she’s looked in years. Yay!
By Ashly on Aug 1, 2007 | Reply
She looks a ton better than she used too. She looks very healthy. She got so bad for a while, it was so sad.
By Shaun MorgAN on Aug 1, 2007 | Reply
Oh, wow, she looks great. Don’t think she has a tummy bump really, but she looks way awesome.
By sammy on Aug 1, 2007 | Reply
Cute….i agree i think it’s because of the shoes that her legs look more filled out
By Layla on Aug 1, 2007 | Reply
I swear that is Ashley, not M.K.
By Kate on Aug 1, 2007 | Reply
I was wondering if anyone knew where I could find the rest of this set of pictures?
By Frankie on Aug 1, 2007 | Reply
I guess it is because she doesn’t finally wear high tower heels with all black outfit or maybe both dunno
By meme on Aug 1, 2007 | Reply
i dnt think this is Ashley…..plus she does look a bit healthier!!!!!
By anna on Aug 1, 2007 | Reply
sure she does!
she look much healthier now, that’s good to see. she’s definitely going the right way.
she looks good, and I adore her style
By leo on Aug 1, 2007 | Reply
She looks too short and disproportioned to be wearing all those layers!
By leo on Aug 1, 2007 | Reply
And I agree, she should cut her hair!! It’s too long in proportion to her tiny childlike body.
By dane on Aug 1, 2007 | Reply
this is on the set of weeds, not a movie
By Dee on Aug 1, 2007 | Reply
She looks much healthier here than in any other picture I have seen of her recently. I don’t think the clothing is doing her any favours though, just drowning her small build.
By Mee on Aug 1, 2007 | Reply
WOw she is looking so much healthier! I think she has put on at least 8-10 lbs, and looks around 97-100, good for her!!
By Yan on Aug 1, 2007 | Reply
she’s wearing ballerina, I think that makes the difference ~ she’s still thin !
By Jessica on Aug 1, 2007 | Reply
Both of the girls look fine to me. She isnt all that thin. Alot of their photos have been doctored over. Such bullshit people will believe these days. Leave these girls alone.
By tutu on Aug 1, 2007 | Reply
That’s Ashley !
By chelsea on Aug 1, 2007 | Reply
I saw a pic of marykate a day ago on another site and she looked just as thin as always
I cant understand why she looks relativly normal here, and then she can put heels and black pants on and look so thin. She cant possibly be happy, I think she likes looking awful.
By karla on Aug 2, 2007 | Reply
i dont think saying like it looks like she has a “tummy bump” is going to make things any better
By Miss M on Aug 2, 2007 | Reply
I can never say whether they’ve lost weight or gained. They always have those loose clothes and those weird shawls hanging around so it’s hard to say!
By Bea on Aug 2, 2007 | Reply
the legs have deffinetly filled out,
ive seen pictures of her from the past where there was so much space between her legs…it just looked like two twigs propped up.
she looked better here,
pretty normal for her height and bone structure.
_bea
x33
By Kate on Aug 2, 2007 | Reply
either thats ashley (who showed up at teh weeds redcarpet event for mk too) or mk has gained some serious weight. Seriously, her arms are waaaaay bigger than what we’ve seen in forever.
By cossey on Aug 3, 2007 | Reply
MK….I want you!
By Riv on Aug 3, 2007 | Reply
there’s definitely a weight gain here. but i bet in no time at all, she’ll go back to her waif self again.
By Jessica on Aug 4, 2007 | Reply
omg she looks fabulousssss!!!! yay I’m so happy.
By Mims on Aug 5, 2007 | Reply
She looks skinny, but not scary skinny
By kellizzle on Aug 7, 2007 | Reply
she looks good =] she looks like a good shape for her height =] gooo mary-kate!!!
By RusTyFXY on Aug 7, 2007 | Reply
she does look better she looks healthier tan before…
she has so much money why doesnt she dress up nicelly??
By MelodySoul on Aug 9, 2007 | Reply
I think she looks the same except she is wearing flats instead of super tall heels. Heels make your legs look thinner.
By noelle on Aug 17, 2007 | Reply
I don’t think she’s gained any, she just isn’t wearing the six inch heels she normally wears.
Actually, on second thought she may have a gained a little.
By Jeneroni on Aug 26, 2007 | Reply
yes her legs do look bigger, you know, i think she might be want to stay thin because she has small boobies, because if youve noticed, heavyweight women with little boobs dont look that good so i think she look fantastic as usual. beautiful!
By Reenefupnob on Mar 9, 2008 | Reply
I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well. But it was interesting! Look for some my links: