Kirsten Dunst in Short Shorts
Kirstin Dunst was spotted going to a cafe on third street in West Hollywood just yesterday, wearing very short shorts.
What do you all think - does she have nice legs, or not?
Written on October 9, 2007 – 4:48 pm | by Rian |
82 Responses to “Kirsten Dunst in Short Shorts”
By tiffs on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
she has great legs
By Katie on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
Her legs are just thin, not sexy. Maybe if she got a tan… Her first pic reminded me of Mary-Kate.
By kassia on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
she’s hot!!
By eliz on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
i like it.
By barney on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
I like her legs very much. I always wonder when I see wealthy people wearing cut-off jeans. Did she cut the jeans herself or buy it in a store? Not that it matters all that much ( I know there are more important things in life). But the bottom part looks so raggedty.
By Joelle on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
Yes, nice legs.
Also, those wedgy mules help, too.
By Sara on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
She has nice legs, but i think legs look better with some muscle tone.
By Fi on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
her legs are alright, not fantastic. think she should spend longer picking out her outfits though, looks kind of a mess
By Kitty on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
great legs, rough head.
By Molko+ on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
Her legs look very nice; slim and shapely but not overly muscular. The outfit is kind of awful though.
By Cheryl on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
Nice legs!
By amma on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
People always rag on her because she’s still fairly “natural”…like she hasn’t had her teeth fixed, etc. Don’t know if the boobs are really but it’s a good job if they aren’t. I always think she is very pretty/interesting looking…and I can’t think of a bad movie or role I’ve seen her in. Nothing bad to say about this girl–great bod. Okay, the outfit…uh, not feeling the jean shorts but then I don’t look so hot running errands either {or whatever she’s doing}. Thumbs up for Kirsten;)
By Stepho on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
She’s always had a great figure.
By suzy on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
Cute figure, OK legs (could use some thigh muscle definition).
But what the *uck’s up with that half-tucked shirt thing?? It’s like the mullet of shirts… business in the front, party in the back. WhooHoo!!!
By Maxx05 on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
I think she looks quite good. She’s very pretty, and there’s really nothing wrong with her body. I know she exercises, but she doesn’t seem to show muscle tone which must be a serious drag for her. Her legs are nice, tho again, more muscle tone would be preferable. They are nice and slim and shapely.
By Alice on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
Perfect legs! I don’t know why people keep going on about her being skinny fat…I think she’s in great shape! Really thin and pretty.
By Spectra on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
She’s got skinny legs…they look fine, but they’re not the legs I’d personally want. Too little definition. If she did some lunges and squats, I bet she’d have really great legs.
By milly on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
she has nice legs but i don’t think she does any exercise.
By PiNk BeRrrrry on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
She need to lose the inner thighs she is thin though
By BeautyQueen18 on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
She couldn’t be any less attractive if she tried! Seriously, this is what passes for good legs now-a-days?
By Ultra-skinny girl on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
I don’t find her that attractive.She looks like a ghost.
By lambman on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
well, I would compliment her but she clearly goes out of her way to look unappealing. Does she own a hair brush or clothes that fit?
By Kayleigh on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
Pretty cute legs I think!!
By Anonymous1 on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
Her legs are actually much longer looking than I would have expected (probably due to the extra lift of the shoes she’s wearing). She doesn’t look bad by any means, but I’ve never really liked her because she always looks dirty, messy, sloppy, tired, and slouchy. Yes, I had to use ALL of those adjectives to get my point across. The pasty skin doesn’t bother me (I’d rather see that than the sea of orange that is Hollywood), but she just doesn’t look healthy or clean… “fresh”, if you will.
By Asuka on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
I think she looks good. However, I wonder about her fitness regimen, if there’s any at place at all.
From what I gather, she also practices the smokes and coffee diet, while skipping exercise. In the long run she might not be able to maintain her figure with this kind of “diet”.
By lm on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
she looks great…and i hate her!
By parissucksliterally on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
she has nice legs- good shape, long and lean.
By kajover on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
umm, those aren’t wedges… they are flats
By Sinker on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
I’ve always thought she had a gorgeous body. Perfect boobs, tiny waist, great legs. And her fair skin is attractive to me. She could’ve taken more than 2 seconds to throw together that outfit.. yikes. I don’t know which is worse - the shirt or shorts. All in all though, she can pull off a messy outfit because she’s just cute and thin enough.
By Jane on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
Her legs are ok shes pale so even if her legs are toned it wont show but even so i like how she stays natural and doesnt tan i too am pale and i dont think everyone has to be tan too look good
By zoe on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
She’s got the goods, that’s for sure. But she always looks dirty to me. A thorough flea rinse and a comb through the hair and she’s good to go.
By JuLy on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
hate her, hater her legs, the colour of her skin..
I just think she is not that pretty.
By Ashley on Oct 9, 2007 | Reply
I think her legs are a little bit TOO chubby for me. I’d prefer more tone, like Britney Spears used to have [i.e: im a slave for u days]
By Samantha on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
Her legs are disgusting and pale. Legs should have some meat on them and there should definately be some muscle tone in order to have great legs. She’s got long legs, she just needs to hit the gym and she’s good to go.
By Jasmine on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
this girl —> boring.
By Mike on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
those are niice legs
looks like she doesn’t have to work for them, either
they ain’t too muscly (muscley? musley…no man muscles)
By beks on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
i’ve always loved kirsten. she’s someone comfortable with who she is. and seems oblivious to the papparazzi.
By Natalie on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
methinks she’s got gorgeous legs.
By Elisabeth on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
nice legs
By maria on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
great legs ma too much white
(excuse me for my bad English,I’m Italian,and I’m learning the English.And I like exercisize my English reading fashion blog.And I like a lot yours!)
By Frankie on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
why are her knees pink?
anyway, she doesn’t HAVE to tan, people, being white or fair skinned is NOT a bad thing.
By Asuka on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
Yeah, the suggestion that very pale people should expose themselves to skin cancer just to conform to this tanorexic crazy aesthetic is sick to me. That’s something I appreciate about Kiki, though I have to agree that she can indeed look a bit dishevelled here.
And welcome, maria! Hope you have fun here and maybe you will enrich your vocabulary while doing so
By obfuscated on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
I find her legs very nice - slim yet shapely.
By Britgirl on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
Can some kind soul remind me which films I might have seen her in. I know the name. Thanks.
She looks ok. Nothing special.
By Britgirl on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
she could do with a nice safe fake tan
By melissa on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
She looks thin but always so unkept…not a fan.
By cossey on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
Her knees are pink because she was just kneeling down in front of me…..
By Linda on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
this is a girl that looks really bad to me. Hate her
By ValerieSara on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
I like thin, just like the next “guy”, but to me, she’s just shapeless.
By Eliza on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
Her legs are too thin and lack muscle tone, is what I think.
By tallenglishgirl on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
I really can’t see what you all admire in this girl! She has dreadful posture coupled with lack of muscle tone. Add to that a rather disheveled appearance and the overall effect is rather skanky in my opinion.
By StarSpy on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
She must strictly watch her weight…because even in the movie “Interview w/a Vampire” you could tell she had chubby cheeks and some baby fat….but as she got older she must’ve become more vigilant about watching her figure
By FW on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
her weight looks great here - and she has great legs - but she always looks sloppy when out on the street that i don’t notice her prettiness
By blneroat on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
i like her look but these photos remind me of a chicken.she should see the sun sometime..
By Melissa Johnson on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
too thin, too pale. some people can pull off being pale, she can’t!
By Slugs on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
I think she has nice, shapely legs. I think they are just right! And who cares if they’re not tanned (by the sun or artificially). She looks toned and trim. Good for her!
By MySpace Addons on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
Utch… too skinny >_
By Summer on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
I love her…but I wish she’d stand up straight! She always seems kinda hunched over or something to me.
By TakeAShower on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
Why does she always look so dirty? She looks like she would smell horrible.
By poops on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
If I have to look at that picture much longer, I’m going to be sick.
By Ana on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
To the person who said she had chubby cheeks in Interview with a Vampire which shows thats she must be a naturally chubby person. Hello, she was 11 when that film was made! I guess since I was a chubby baby I must be a chubby adult who’s starving herself to be thin. Uggg..
Her legs are thin which means she can get away with the short shorts but there is no muscle tone whatsoever. Not a fan.
By Pauline on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
She’s ugly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By cossey on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
Another shirt that needs ice-water!
By skng on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
I think she looks fine… why do people hate her so much?
By saffron on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
Average legs. Below average looks.
By SupermodelSuzie on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
She was such a pretty child, but after “Interview with the Vampire” and “Jumanji”, it’s like she went down hill. Pasty flabby legs!
By Reese on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
Not a fan, I like a little more muscle and a tan. But whatever floats your boat.
By snow storm on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
nothin special
By snow storm on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
skng… ppl hate her so much bcos she dates fit male celebs
By Ally on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
She’s got a great body but her sense of fashion really sucks. She’s wealthy, why can’t she get a stylist or someone to help her picking her clothes (remember her awful bathing suit !!).
She doesn’t know what kind of clothes fit her morphology. It’s weird considering she always has been that thin with the same body figure.
By Agnes on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
Don’t really care.
By desaudia on Oct 10, 2007 | Reply
sorry-just fug. vampire teeth and jacked up hair
By Naana on Oct 11, 2007 | Reply
I don’t like her much, but darn she looks good!
By Sacharomyces cerevisiae on Oct 11, 2007 | Reply
great legs. Now if one could replace her head, and her b*obs and her clothes a very beautiful woman would have been created
By mizzy08 on Oct 11, 2007 | Reply
This girl is way to pale? What is so pretty about that. Most red heads are pale, but her hair isn’t red to me. I don’t know…she just isn’t pretty to me at all. She reminds me of that girl from “Saving the Last Dance”
their looks are not my cup of tea
By Denise on Oct 11, 2007 | Reply
She was at her best in Bring It On. But now she just looks scrawny. Is that Sarah Michelle Gellar walking behind her in the 2nd pic?
By Mia on Oct 11, 2007 | Reply
She’s just NASTY!
By bella on Oct 11, 2007 | Reply
great legs but she really needs a tan!!!
By Miss M on Oct 12, 2007 | Reply
For the first time I think she looks quite cute here. However, she could do with a few hours in the sun to get at least some shade of tan and not look like she is wearing white stockings!
By jen on Oct 13, 2007 | Reply
i think she looks great and really like her style most of the time too. buts shes just overly pasty white…
By Reenefupnob on Feb 10, 2008 | Reply
I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well. But it was interesting! Look for some my links:
By Reenefupnob on Mar 24, 2008 | Reply
I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well.