Maggie Gyllenhaal Got Skinny

Written on November 14, 2007 – 1:20 pm | by Rian |

Wow! Maggie Gyllenhaal, who had a baby girl just over a year ago, was spotted at the Chopard Flagship boutique opening just the other day looking very thin.

maggie_gyllenhaal.jpg

She’s definitely lost all the baby weight, and then some!

76919_maggiegyllenhaalchopardflagshipnov2007_121_122_501lo.jpg

76923_maggiegyllenhaalchopardflagshipnov2007_012_122_898lo.jpg



  1. 58 Responses to “Maggie Gyllenhaal Got Skinny”

  2. By stahravinne on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    first! hehheh :-P those shoes are odd, and she is decidedly skinny. she’s a witchy woman!

  3. By Ishii on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    Horrid shoes, but she looks good.

    I love her eyes.

  4. By poops on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    To lose that amount of weight in just over a year is not impressive.

    To go out in public with a face like hers is.

  5. By suzy on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    Minnie Mouse wants her shoes back!

  6. By Jodi on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    She apparently lost her mind along with the weight. No one with any shred of sanity would wear that get-up, especially those absolutely wretched shoes.

  7. By coacheiress on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    HAHA! Those shoes are hilarious!! She’s got some balls…some poorly styled, blind, non fashion-conscious balls…

    Skinny is always good, but she needs to do some lunges or something because she has no discernable ass…and a little firm, round booty is delectable…

    I like her as an actress and I hope she doesn’t join the Skeleton Brigade…Kisses!

  8. By Edan on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    Hey! I need to know where she got those shoes….so I can take The Keibler Elves shopping for the upcoming season.
    ZING!
    Did you see how I used misdirection to make it funnier? I’m like a ninja…of words.

  9. By me on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    those shoes are hideous!

  10. By breads on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    poops, that is funny but oh so harsh
    she is modelling lingerie for some company,i have forgotten who but that maybe thats why she felt the pressure to lose weight, her crimes against fashion are numerous and this only highlights her attempts to be kooky and just ends up looking wrong
    1)why wear tights with such a dress
    2)those shoes with a dress, i thought everyone knew they are only worn with skinny jeans, trousers or mini shorts if you have the legs
    otherwise i will go against the consensus and admit i like them, is that so wrong?

  11. By Karma on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    I really liked her in “Stranger Than Fiction” with Will Farrell. (One of his best performances in my opinion).

    And while I can’t say I find her in any way sexy or hot, there is something endearing about her personality and her face. This outfit, on the other hand, needs to go back in her closet and stay there.

  12. By SupermodelSuzie on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    I guess when your face looks like hers does, your body better look good.

    (I have GOT to stop being so mean!)

  13. By mem on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    I like her with bangs… cute.

  14. By SupermodelSuzie on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    Her shoes look like two vaginas.

  15. By mandolin on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    Ummm, a deer in headlights…

  16. By anon on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    She has no butt. It is not cute. Do some lunges for God’s sakes.

  17. By Sacharomyces cerevisiae on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    breads the lingerie brand is agent provocateur-it is big in UK but its product manager apparently leaves much to be desired these days. After they sacked Kate Moss they got this mushy cabbage girl to promote their lingerie and next in line is Lily Allen I heard. For Fs sake! Maggie and Lily Allen! what the world is coming to? I am seriously thinking twice about spending my hard earned cash on these morons nowdays. I really like AP stuff but Maggie’s photoshoot put me off lunch for a couple of days…

  18. By Jodi on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    SupermodelSuzie — oh no! The “V” word! I feel faint.

  19. By healthy girl on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    ok…I WAS looking forward to seeing “the dark knight” [batman begins-sequel]…but now not so much…she will bug me through the whole movie =[

    her face has always been not just “plain” but in the UGLY category…..ewwwwwww

  20. By blabla on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    god she’s not pretty. no wonder everybody is labeling her as a character actress.

  21. By breads on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    Sacharomyces cerevisiae
    i live in the UK, nut i prefer la senza and good old M&S to agent provacateur
    lily allen, why inflict such things on us

  22. By lux on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    She’s spooky

  23. By Violet on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    Bad hair day or what?? She used to be very pretty but is looking tired and old here.

  24. By andrea on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    She’s obviously an alien.

  25. By skinny time on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    Interesting… I don’t really know that much about her but for someone who had a baby she looks pretty good!

  26. By Maxx05 on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    Her body looks good, but she is looking otherwise frightful!!! That outfit has got to have been meant for a Halloween party. Maybe she wanted to get extra mileage with it, the way women try to find uses for bridesmaid dresses. This was just as bad an idea. I have no words for those shoes. Somebody either give her the proper meds, or take her off whatever she is on.

  27. By Summer on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    I love her…but oh, no ma’am. Those shoes have GOT to go.

  28. By Aunt Crabby on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    I really dig her unique look.
    Supermodel Suzie you made me almost pee my pants lol!

  29. By Elaine on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    Wrong dress, wrong hair, body needs toning.

  30. By shoegal421 on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    maybe she is not the most conventionally beautiful woman, but when you see her speak, she is very charming and seductive. she is also a great actress and silly me, i thought talent counted for something, but i completely forgot that this hollywood where those who don’t fit the cookie cutter mold are cast aside in the “eccentric” category. for shame, people.

  31. By Persephone on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    but she is still fugly. her belly is pudgy and deserves to be punished by fire for those shoes.

  32. By Asuka on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    I love Maggie and I don’t care what you BJIF say! Okay, I know she’s not everyone’s cup of tea, but I think she is beautiful.

    Oh and she’s always been skinny. I remember watching Donnie Darko and thinking so. It’s no wonder she slimmed down once again a year after giving birth.

  33. By emilypiper on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    I thought she was always skinny-she was quite svelte in Mona Lisa Smile

  34. By Spectra on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    I don’t remember her ever being fat, but she looks good here. I agree about the lunges though…she has a pancake butt.

  35. By coacheiress on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    To shoegal421:

    This website is not about Congeniality m’kay? We all come here for shallow reasons and talk about shallow things. Save your preaching for Church.

  36. By Adrienne on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    She’s always been thin. The shoes are horrid, but she’s an incredibly talented actress, and I think that’s more important than what she’s wearing. These aren’t good photos of her, but I think she’s pretty in an unconventional way, like people say about Christina Ricci.

  37. By Scott on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    Damn sexy legs but nasty shoes.

  38. By redstar0511 on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    i think she is one of the most beautiful women in the world and I think she looks great ! I have seen many of her movies and she is a great actress and she is diff. from many other actresses. you dont see her in the tabloids drinking and partying and going to jail. she is a good role model. i love her she is soo beautiful

  39. By sarahj on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    Damn! People are harsh. While I wouldn’t necessarily call her “pretty”, I think she has unconventional beauty. She kind of has that old, Greta-Garbo-Bette-Davis-Eyes look.

    She is quite thin… she has lost a good amount since she gave birth, but it suits her.

    That outfit is hideous though!!! LOL did someone say her shoes look like vaginas???!!! HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

  40. By healthy girl on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    she looks “skinny fat'’ and I think she carries her weight in the legs……I din’t think that she is overweight at all though..

  41. By healthy girl on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    supermodel suzie========
    THAT IS THE FUNNIEST THING I HAVE EVER HEARDANYONE BESIDES COSSIE SAY ON THIS SITE!!!!!!!!!! OH WOW ;)

  42. By lambman on Nov 14, 2007 | Reply

    She looks great.

    Skinnygirl - I wouldnt say lost the weight and then some, do you know how skinny she was before? r

  43. By shoegal421 on Nov 15, 2007 | Reply

    to coacheiress: don’t know what you look like but apparently you’re fucking ugly on the inside.

  44. By TwinMom on Nov 15, 2007 | Reply

    She is NOT a pretty girl…. Ugly would be a generous word to describe her. She has a strange squashed looking nose, no upper lip, and a flat old-lady ass. Her gaunt face reminds me of the Scream movie mask. She’s skinny, but has a pouchy gut. This broad is downright nasty-looking.

    I have seen her in movies and her acting isn’t anything to write home about. I would barf if I had to see her nkarf or making out in a movie. Even more so, I would pity the poor guy who has to make out with her.

    The thing that really turned me off about her is when she was breastfeeding in public. She had her saggy, leaking boob practically resting on the table. Her kid wasn’t even interested in nursing, but on both occasions, I guess Maggie felt the need to whip out her saggy, leaking boob for all to see. Maybe she was desperate for attention, but omg NO ONE WANTS TO SEE THAT! It could cause mass vomiting.

  45. By indy on Nov 15, 2007 | Reply

    i reckon shes a good actress. shes also a fabulous role-model because shes famous for her work, and not all the shit other hollywood celebs are in the papers for.

    but her outfit is DISGUSTING. i reckon her shoes could work in a lighter shade with another outfit, but with that dress its truely horrifying. she has a pot belly, and her legs are quite thick. but considering that shes come from a pregnancy weight, shes done magnificently.

    maggie, show off your success with other clothes hon.

  46. By amma on Nov 15, 2007 | Reply

    Love her! She has never been a classic beauty, she always looks like she stepped out of another century. But she is so charming & seductive…like another commentator said, she’s got something undeniably alluring about her. Great actress, great choice of roles, quirky, unique.
    Okay, now, those shoes have got to go!!! She looks slim here, but she’s always looked slim to me. In other words, no change.

  47. By Astrid on Nov 15, 2007 | Reply

    If she’s skinny, then I’m anorexic.

  48. By tallenglishgirl on Nov 15, 2007 | Reply

    She has a nice figure and the dress is lovely … just not on her. The shoes are terrible too. Overall, I like her and I think she’s different among a see of honey-toned, honey-haired women.

  49. By Miss M on Nov 15, 2007 | Reply

    She’s gorgeous in the Agent Provocateur ads. At least she is more like the rest of us women than Kate Moss. As for Lily Allen being the next model for the ad campaign: Hooray! Again, another real woman is being shown in public. Who wants skanky, all-night partying, daughter neglecting, drug taking Kate Moss?

  50. By Renita on Nov 15, 2007 | Reply

    I think she is VERY odd-looking. Her nose is like a Cabbage Patch Kid’s nose. I don’t find anything about her (or her brother, for that matter) attractive.

    That black eye makeup is way too harsh on her, too! Yikes! :P

  51. By Q on Nov 15, 2007 | Reply

    Edan…LMAO!! You are hilarious.

    P.S. those shoes are hideous.

  52. By charlotte on Nov 15, 2007 | Reply

    her face is like, droopy or something.

  53. By Jodi on Nov 15, 2007 | Reply

    TwinMom, what is “nkarf”?

  54. By linda on Nov 15, 2007 | Reply

    horrid horrid horrid shoes

  55. By Tim_Gunn_Does_Yer_Dadda on Nov 15, 2007 | Reply

    Christ, she looks fug. At least before she was a normal-sized fug. Now she’s an anorexic fug. 10x worse. And those shoes should be euthanised for the good of humanity. Not a boot, not a pump, it’s just baaaaaad.

  56. By TwinMom on Nov 16, 2007 | Reply

    Jody, LOL, “nkarf” was supposed to be “naked”. That’s what I get for trying to type so early in the morning.

  57. By Jimmy Choo 32 on Nov 16, 2007 | Reply

    ok she must have an amazing metabolism cycle, or she must be fucked up… lol i love her as an actress so i cant and wont say shit about her, but what i will say is… her shoes def dont match… i mean come on Maggie! shes wearing all black and having a hint of red… i mean red and black do match… but shes wearing ALL BLACK>… show a little red damn! not jus red shoes… the shoes are the most important part in an outfit

  58. By Dani on Nov 25, 2007 | Reply

    she looks good but im not the biggest fan of hers. she just doesnt do it for me.

  59. By Reenefupnob on Mar 10, 2008 | Reply

    I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well. But it was interesting! Look for some my links:

**Please read the rules, located here, before making a comment! If you choose to comment, you are agreeing to the rules. ALSO Please Note: Your comment may take a few moments to show up. Please do not submit it more than once! Thank you!**




Post a Comment