National Enquirer: Angelina Jolie Drops to 94 Pounds

November 19th, 2007 by Rian | Filed under Celebrity Bones, Tabloid Magazines, Angelina Jolie.

ne1.jpg

Here we go again… Angelina Jolie is on the cover of the latest National Enquirer, where they claim she is 94 pounds - and dropping.

There isn’t much to say about the story, other than the fact that it’s the same old story once again! (And I don’t personally believe she is 94 pounds).

What do you all think?




92 Responses to “National Enquirer: Angelina Jolie Drops to 94 Pounds”

  1. dani | 19/11/07

    please just eat

  2. Nydia | 19/11/07

    It is a shame that she is so skinny, she has a georgeous face and would look incredible with some more meat on her bones. I wonder if it is stress or maybe she has a condition or an emotional eating disorder. Is it her trips to Africa? Does she feel bad for those people she feels guilty and does not eat?? I mean, What is it??? Why is she so skinny these days?

  3. cody | 19/11/07

    beautiful and classy, all she needs is to eat more. i dont think she wants to be the next nichole richie or the next posh . maybe shes going through some bad stuff? who knows. shes still gorgeous

  4. Frankie | 19/11/07

    maybe she has got some worm in her tummy bcz my dad when he was young was taken once by his mom to the doc to check if he had any as he wasn’t gaining any weight no matter what she fed him with…
    Or maybe hyper thyroid..I dunno ofcourse I’m not sure but it’s impossible to have an ED with such a lifestyle as Angelina’s..

  5. peaches. | 19/11/07

    Frankie - why is it impossible for her to have an eating disorder? i dont get it.

  6. Natasha | 19/11/07

    She’s skinny, but she’s not 94 lbs. I think she looks great thin - I’d guess she’s probably 100-105.

  7. cassy_b | 19/11/07

    She is very skinny but I agree Rian, probably not 94 lbs. How do they get these weights anyway? Tackle down celebrities on the street and throw them onto a giant scale? pfhh

  8. breads | 19/11/07

    anybody seen the ad’s for beowolf in which she is meant to be some sexy siren, well talk about excessive use of CGI, because she is nothing but a bag of bones these days and there is nothing sexy about that
    even the boobs that probably have been surgically enhanced, doesn’t make up for it

  9. babyboy | 19/11/07

    I don’t think it’s the tummy worm :) And I’m pretty sure she’s not starving herself for the extra publicity (as some of the young starlets). I just think she has lot of worries and that shows on her body, and maybe are her emotions connected with the food issues in Africa, like Nydia previously said. She’s too skinny and I don’t think she looks beautiful anymore. The thing that people loved about her was her sex-appeal, and that is gone.

  10. Sassy | 19/11/07

    I think its sad! She looked so perfect guys use to drool over her! She looked healthy and sexy before now she looks very sick.

  11. tim jones | 19/11/07

    I wonder what she would look like at 194lbs

  12. mandy | 19/11/07

    maybe not 94lbs but close enough!! she desperately needs to eat!!

  13. missmarnip | 19/11/07

    enough of this woman. she went from weird to classy… and back. she COULD just tell why she is losing weight but her new film is coming into cinema these days and any publicity is good publicity… by being such a bad body-image-rolemodel in her own country and worldwide she is really not so much of a humanitarian to me.

  14. Alice | 19/11/07

    From what we know about Jolie it’s very hard to believe that she’d be doing this for vanity reasons - or intentionally for that matter.
    Something’s going on with her, but I personally think everyone should just leave her the hell alone and stop prying. How often do you hear “Oh wow, Angelina Jolie does so much admirable humanitarian work!” as opposed to “ZOMG BBQ SHEZ 60LBS!!!!11″

  15. kelly | 19/11/07

    her excuse of being a humanitarian makes me want to vomit. don’t get me wrong, i think its great that she helps where she can bring attention to, but don’t claim to be so involved with the plight of refugees and the poor when you walk around wearing clothes that would feed these people for days and days. not to mention, her rent for just one month in nyc is 100,000 dollars. her weight is not a result of feeling guilty, thats for sure.

  16. kim | 19/11/07

    Sad, I use to envy her shape and look. Now she looks sick and gross. She is nothing special to look at anymore.

  17. moni | 19/11/07

    ummm…. I’m surprised that no one has made any mention about the biggest headline here… that she LOST HER BABY. I think that’s a lot more tragic and important than exactly how much she ways. I’m all for being very thin, and am absorbed by it, unfortunately, but I recognize there are many things far more important. It’s really sad that losing a child doesn’t garner any attention, compared to her continuing weight loss. I love Angelina, always will, and I want her to get better… she will never fall into Nicole Richie territory, as she has a million more times going on up there than just getting her picture into every tabloid, like Miss Richie.

  18. mamalisa | 19/11/07

    way too skinny

  19. Alice W | 19/11/07

    Yeah, like you can trust the national enquirer to tell the truth. That’s just a scum paper!

  20. Rachel | 19/11/07

    Gosh, she looks so thin. I’d definately say 94lbs.

  21. Mary | 19/11/07

    if she was pregnant, it’s no wonder she lost her baby. her stomach is indented, the poor baby would of starved to death. she looks stupid and with the amount of money and people waiting on her hand and foot as she has, i think she is just trying to compete with the starving kids.

    someone put her on a drip.

  22. maya | 19/11/07

    it’s not surprising that she’s that thin.. look at herh stomach; it looks as if she hasn’t eaten in days. it’s so weird.

  23. Josie | 19/11/07

    Agree with you Rian, she is not 94 pounds, she weights more than that and the picture on the paper is a old one…old story too…and national inquire is just shit about stories…I’m surprise that people still believe in it…I would have been that skinny to do what she is all doing! on this have a nice day!

  24. ph3nix | 19/11/07

    i find it amazing that she hasn’t lost her boobs with all the weight.

  25. Amanda | 19/11/07

    I doubt she was even pregnant to begin with, just rumors. I don’t think she’s 94 pounds either. Isn’t she pretty tall, like 5′8″? I’d guess she’s at least 10-15 pounds heavier than they say. Also, she has battled an eating disorder before so it’d very possible that she is again.

  26. mm | 19/11/07

    I’m SO over her! Can’t she just be ignored into oblivion, please.

  27. SupermodelSuzie | 19/11/07

    She probably is close to 100 lbs but I don’t believe for a second that it’s intentional. Some people just naturally don’t have healthy appetites.

  28. linda | 19/11/07

    She is mostly reported as 5′7 I think.

  29. anna | 19/11/07

    omg did she really lose her baby??????!!!!???

    POOOOOOOR gal!!!!!!!
    I really do feel for her! she didnt deserve that! she’s sucha kind person.

    Hope she’ll realize the miserable lfe she’s leading wont do her any good..

  30. Vivasect | 19/11/07

    112 lb.

  31. Edan | 19/11/07

    She’s starting to look like a herring.

  32. sarah3 | 19/11/07

    Why does anyone think that she was pregnant? Did I miss an announcement or something?

  33. sam | 19/11/07

    Moni, its not that we are focusing on her weight when she lost a child…its because the pregnancy was a RUMOUR,…I think we would be compassionate if it was for real…but since the tabloids just made it up and published it to sell copies…they had to go back and change that when she is this THIN..noone would believe the previous stories to be true…so now they write she lost her baby…if there is a quote by her confirming the pregnancy or losing the baby…then maybe our attention would be on that…otherwise…she is scary THIN…and it doesnt suit her…Also…how much do you want to bet that another article about Jolie’s weight loss wouldnt sell as well as that she has lost a baby…thats when ppl feel sorry and want to know what happened and buy the magazine…thats all!

  34. serafin | 19/11/07

    94 pounds, that is complete nonsense. She is skinny o.k. and it´s not her natural frame for sure, but she is at least 100 more likely 105 pounds.

    Not enough weight for her hight anyway, but her eating disorder has a long history, she needs psychological help.

  35. Jodi | 19/11/07

    Ladies, ladies! Are we so focused on her skinniness that we haven’t noticed her enormous erection?

  36. plastichearts | 19/11/07

    Jodi. :’D

  37. Scott | 19/11/07

    She still looks too fat to me. I think she needs to lose another 10-20 pounds.

  38. Audiohairband | 19/11/07

    Sooooooo whaaaat if shes still skinny and eeew at the knitted bag.

  39. violet | 19/11/07

    She’s not that tiny - I would bet her bones probably weight more than 94 pounds.

    Jodi - yes, and in juxtaposition to Martha it’s particularly disturbing. Eeeeeek!

  40. Edan | 19/11/07

    AH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!
    Jodi, you are killing me, sweetie. : D

  41. Asuka | 19/11/07

    I think it’s so funny that everybody says they hate seeing her in yet another tabloid cover. Well, the love triangle still sells a ton of rags and as such will remain in the news forever. Brad, Jen, Ange might not attract a bunch of people to the theaters — seems their movies are constantly bombing — but they’re tabloid blockbusters.

    In conclusion: I’ve no sympathy for those claiming to be tired of them, because most will turn around and snatch a tabloid featuring them in a heartbeat. Besides, they seem to f*** with their photos to suit whatever story they’re trying to sell. I don’t believe Ange weighs 94lbs at all, that’s an altered photo probably.

  42. Brandy | 19/11/07

    I can’t believe she lost the baby. I love Angie and know how bad she wants a family and to have all the tabloids talkking about her weight instead of the fact that her baby died is so sad.

  43. LaLa | 19/11/07

    What liars. 95 lbs my butt. My sister is 100 lbs and is considerably shorter and skinnier than Jolie. Complete rubbish.

  44. skinny time | 19/11/07

    94? Not too sure… but either way she is way too small. She is very gross looking

  45. Violet | 19/11/07

    How on earth does she still have boobs??

  46. Erica | 19/11/07

    If she actually weighs that little, that’s dangerously low for her height.. but everyone knows that by now.

  47. Spectra | 19/11/07

    If she was pregnant, I’m not surprised she lost her baby. When you get below a certain level of body fat, you have a lot of problems with your hormones/fertility. I don’t know if she’s 94 lbs, but even if she’s 100-105 lbs, she’s too thin for her height. It’s not impossible for her to have an ED either…they come in all types. She could be anorexic and just not be willing to admit it to the public. If she’s using the whole “starving children in Africa” line to defend her low weight, it’s not working for me. It’s such a stupid excuse…just because some kids in Ethiopia aren’t getting enough food doesn’t mean you should stop eating…it’s not gonna solve anything, you know.

  48. d | 19/11/07

    fake boobs don’t get smaller when you lose weight violet.

  49. safari girl | 19/11/07

    for pete’s sake, she didn’t lose any baby! this is a tabloid magazine! the baby is made up!

    oh, and p.s. - where is brad pitt in all of this???

  50. Amanda | 19/11/07

    How do her boobs stay so big, if she’s losing all this weight and is supposedly 94 lbs?

  51. amle | 19/11/07

    I think she is back on drugs.

  52. Elaine | 19/11/07

    Her boobs are fake? Do you really think so? I figured she just
    padded her bra or used gel inserts.
    I know she used padding for some of her roles in movies, figured she did in real life, too.
    I don’t believe she would stoop that low as to have implants, she seems too genuine a person.

  53. gia | 19/11/07

    her bones are too big for her to be just 94 lbs. i would say 105 or 110…esp if she is over 5′7″. as much as i dont care about her either way, i do think she cares too much about children to have harmed her baby if she was in fact pregnant. i truly believe she would never starve herself if she was pregnant.
    i am pretty sure she has breast implants too.

  54. Uh hu | 19/11/07

    I say she could be 94 pounds. I’m 5′6″ and 97 and she’s way thinner than I am.

  55. mrs. norton | 19/11/07

    at least she doesn’t have those ridiculous boobs anymore

  56. stahravinne | 19/11/07

    it’s just really a shame. i used to think she was beautiful and i don’t care to see her at all anymore nowadays. she used to be the pinnacle of sexy, seductive, curvy lusciousness and woman and now she looks like a bony, angular, leech-lipped starving person. very sad.

  57. d | 19/11/07

    She lost her Baby Heroin.

  58. amelia*** | 19/11/07

    If you beleive that everytime a mag says someone is pregnant that they are that means that JLo was pregnant at least 10 times. Come on do not beleive everything you read! And she looks gross.

  59. anonymous | 19/11/07

    Does Brad require his women to be rail thin?. I do recall all his women were either naturally thin(Juliet Lewis and Gwynneth) or lost lots of weight(Aniston and Jolie).

    I know some women have a tendency to change themselves drastically to please a man. I have never been a Jolie fan, but, I liked how she looked physically; pre-Brad.

  60. healthy girl | 19/11/07

    to everyone who has said—-

    “she hasn’t lost her boobs yet”

    ummm I’m pretty sure she has had a boob job, look at her b4 and afters ,poeple—I think it is pretty darn obvious!

  61. Huh? | 19/11/07

    Consider the source. And she is classless trash so who really cares anyway.

  62. Huh? | 19/11/07

    And fake boobs do get smaller when you lose weight. The muscle and tissue around the implants shrink and therefore the boobs do too.

  63. littleb1rd | 19/11/07

    1. Her boobs are fake-for sure!
    2. She starves herself because she desperately hopes to avoid becoming pregnant again. She never wanted biological children in the first place.

  64. marmalade | 20/11/07

    its weird she isnt losing her boobs.

  65. shibajonz | 20/11/07

    I don’t think you can breast feed if you have implants, can you?
    And where has her eating disorder been documented?

  66. cassy_b | 20/11/07

    About the boobs debate…

    If a woman has a lot of breast tissue she’s always going to have decent sized jugs. When I was living in an anorexic treatment clinic a few years back there was this girl there who had a bmi of around 13 yet her boobs were a large b-cup. It was the strangest thing I’d ever seen. Chest bones popping out painfully with a nice rack. And she was only 16..she didn’t have fake ones.

    Or angelina could have implants..i dunno.

  67. shelly | 20/11/07

    angelina has a tattoe which says , what nourishes me destroys me! she has had it for years, across the bottom of her stomach, so a reoccurring eating disorder springs to mind. lov her thou. x

  68. MarikaJ | 20/11/07

    All I can say is wearing belly shirts when you are 100 lbs. might not stem the tabloid e.d. stories. Anyway, she’s skinny, I get it, bored now!

    You’d think all the humanitarian anguish might prevent her from i don’t know, buying matching valentino handbags for her and baby? (or whatever designer, i don’t remember)

  69. Junior | 20/11/07

    IT IS VERY UGLY !!!

  70. Katrina | 20/11/07

    On the post you posted a few days ago, 10 best after baby bodies. It reported she weighed 96 lbs. So it might be possible.

  71. lauren | 20/11/07

    I’ve never been a big fan, but she was pretty. Now she just looks awful.

  72. lauren | 20/11/07

    and i don’t beleive a word of the baby portion of the story. We all know that the magazine made it all up. Just like that invent the alien baby stories.

  73. bella | 20/11/07

    Talk about psycological obessesstion.She looks beautiful in the london permire of her movie. The tabs and some idots so obesessesed with her that they used every oppurtinuty to bash her. Angie rocks! learn to accept it. Non of this take a shit from her. She get stronger by day.She is a real woman who lives her life unlike some who can’t live their’s and wants to rub on her thier miserablity.Turst me It won’t stick on her.

  74. Violet | 20/11/07

    Uurgh - fake boobs on an emacited frame is just too weird. I know what she reminds me of! A barbie doll!

  75. Violet | 20/11/07

    I meant emaciated.

  76. Violet | 20/11/07

    I don’t get the ‘I feel guilty about the starving Africans’ bit either. In that case, why spend ridiculous amounts of money on an enormous boob job?? Why not donate the cash instead?

  77. so what | 20/11/07

    As she is pretty tall 5′7″ or 5′8″ I think she definitely weighs more than 94lbs. probalby closer to 110 which would still make her VERY thin. She used to be so beautiful, but now….

  78. nadia | 20/11/07

    i didn’t read all comments,
    but it makes me angry that people only talks about her weight loss, i know this is a website about skinny celebs, and that’s why i and u read this site… but, I’m a Hugh Angelina Jolie fan… and i read all the other things about her 2… and she had a hard couple of years behind her, first all about brad pitt, everyone blame her for the break between brad en jennifer… and even brad was there, and make his own choise 2 sleep whit angie, evryone only blaims her… and thats sounds weird 2 me, because, she didn’t was in a relationship, so she didn’nt cheat on some one else, brad did… and after that, she become pregnent from brad… and evryone felt over that… after a copple of months people didn’t talk about the brad isseu,,, the camera dint’ gave her a break, because, they all wanna know how angie looks pregnent and what they buy for this beautiful girl… then she gave birth 2 this beautiful girl… and again people was follow her evrywere she goes… and then het mom (the only one she ever trust loved, and was there for her) became really ill and died… the mother from angie was the one who was father and dad together, and iff you are that big cleb as she is, the only person u cane depend on, and are really hounest 2 u is youre mum.. (ore dad, but he wasn’t there 4 her) so who does she have now? she lost her evrything… i see this around me, that greeves makes people ill, i see a lot people that doesn’t eat anymore (ore began 2 eat a lot) and she was skinny before, so when u loss weight when u are already skinny there is nothing left on youre body…. and it is really treu that she lost her baby also, what would u do? would u think of eating? would u greef? i think she is in a big greeve, and i think we have t gave here some space to greeve and to built up her life again.. but instead of that.. we don’t gave her space but we take her space… leef here alone ok, let her greeve…

    and let we hope she become the old one, the most beautiful woman on earth * thats what i think ;) *

  79. jolie | 20/11/07

    just wonder,

    how would u feel.
    if u felt in love on someone, who let u feel special, and the hole world, fall over this…
    how would u feel,
    if people hold u responsible for a break of wolds best couple,
    how would u feel,
    if every day u have 2 walk true a line of paparazzi, and u can’t even make a walk in the park without yelling people and camera around u…
    how would u feel,
    if u were pregnant, and u can’t be happy because people say this is the reason the daddy stays whit u…
    how would u feel,
    if you cant celebrate the birth of your daughter whit both of your parents…
    how would u feel,
    if your new born baby was chased by paparazzi..
    how would u feel, when u hear that your mummy is ill and will die?
    how would u feel,
    if your mummy the only person u cane trust when u are this big of a celeb …died,,, and u and your children lost the most important person of your life…
    how would u feel,
    if you lose your child?

    would you think of eating? could you eat?
    and if you cant. and your body was already skinny, what would be left of you?
    nothing…

    i hope we give her space to grieve, and find her self back… and maybe we will see world most beautiful woman again… * i think she was and for me she still is world most beautiful woman… and i hope we will see her soon, when she is ready for it*

    pleas give here some space…
    she is worth it…

    (a Angelina Jolie fan)
    *sorry for my English, I’m not very good in it*

  80. Alison | 21/11/07

    She’s 5′7″ so def. not 94…prob closer to 105 or 110

  81. h | 21/11/07

    Wow. Many things to say. Where to start? Okay. FIRST OFF, how the hell do you people *know* that she doesn’t weigh 94 lbs, she probably does, it is possible. I am 5′6″ and I have weighed

  82. Hi | 21/11/07

    If Angelina is 5′8 like it says on Google, then she looks more like 105 lbs.

  83. kendra | 21/11/07

    i personally think she’s a bit of an audrey hepburn wannabe, i mean, she’s been photographed in that black dress with the iconic sholder/neck cut, hair swept black and glasses; she’s also got the whole africa charity work thing goin on, maybe audrey’s her “icon” like Posh’s. She’s the same height as audrey was, maybe she wantz to be the same wight too?

  84. Rita | 21/11/07

    nadie and jolie, do you two dopes really think anyone’s going to read all that crap you wrote??

  85. Lynette | 21/11/07

    Go eat a cracker, Biaatch.

  86. Lynette | 21/11/07

    And Ethiopa..and wherever else she finds her “children” should get a government and feed their own. Maybe Angie could feed some fricken Americans cuz I actually know a few children that could use it.

  87. Muumuu | 26/11/07

    missmarnip: “she COULD just tell why she is losing weight”

    The article says she lost a baby. And there’s been other speculations aswell.
    She’s entitled to private life, just like you are. Not every darn stranger has to know how she feels and why she feels the way she does. I know I wouldn’t want to talk to press about my lost baby so soon after it happened.

    To me the picture seems somehow old, not sure why. I have a feeling I’ve seen it before on the site, with news of her gaining more weight, but I couldn’t find the picture. Too bad you can’t see her hands properly, but she -is- very skinny now.

  88. Nicole | 5/12/07

    Angelina Jolie is so nasty looking. If you think she looks good, than chances are, you are in to necrophelia, because she looks like a fucking corpse. And all that money she makes for her shitty moves that do TERRIBLE at the box office, and she still can’t buy clothes that look half decent? Her clothes look like shit, her hair looks like shit, and her random tattoos are constant reminders of the blood-toting, bisexual, brother kissing freak she used to be before latching on to Brad Pitt to boost her dying career.

  89. luxuria | 16/12/07

    nicole-u r an idiot, get a life

  90. Maddison | 17/12/07

    What is wrong with you people? do you honestly believe she’s 94 pounds?? At 94 lb her bmi would be like 14, which is FREAKISHLY thin even for a bloody anorexic. She’s more like 110-115 pounds (which is still horribly underweight)

  91. beattie | 21/12/07

    YES I believe it when her own BROTHER just a few weeks ago said she was 95 pounds and then she lost more weight. The camera DOES make people look much heavier than they are and she looks awful!! Say what you want about Jennifer Aniston’s chin but she has one hell of a gorgeous figure.

  92. beattie | 21/12/07

    PS I KNOW what it’s like to be TOO THIN, all of my life I could NOT gain weight and at 95 pounds I looked heavier than she does here and I’m the same height! I am FINALLY over 100 pounds now that I am over 40, but Angelina USED to be a decent weight, I never was so I DO think she might have a disorder or illness.

Share Your Thoughts