Katie Holmes Is Getting Thinner
Here is a quick Katie Holmes update. She was spotted out and about, doing some Christmas shopping yesterday, sporting a see-thru blouse and looking quite skinny.
And here is a close-up of her chest area:
I’m not sure what she was thinking, wearing that shirt, but she is looking quite a bit thinner these days…
98 Responses to “Katie Holmes Is Getting Thinner”
By Anonymous Realist on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
Looks like the Tom-n-Posh starvination plan is still in effect.
By ValerieSara on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
Thinner.
Pretty girl…nice Mum. Who could ask for anything more?
By Anonymous Realist on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
Sorry to double-post; I accidentally left a broken link behind.
By coacheiress on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
Hmmm…nothing classier than a see-through shirt…*eye roll*…but there is no doubt that she looks good (with her sunglasses on).
By cskinny on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
This is as thin as I have seen her!
By Tucker on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
Hmm, she has a bra on so it’s all good.
See though shirts are better at night at a party though.
By MarikaJ on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
She looks great. Way too pretty for that nutjob husband IMO.
By Tucker on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
Exactly, MarikaJ.
Poor girl totally got brainwashed by the scientologits or whatever.
Almost happened to me a couple months ago at a bus stop. I was just sitting their with my ipod when these two dead eyes ladies started talking about Zenu and sh*t. Scary times.
By MarikaJ on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
And is that a hand going for her tit in the second pic? Maybe Tom trying to cast a spell on her booby?
By Jodi on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
Ooooh, the second picture! Looks like the fingers on that hand are MAKING CONTACT!! :-O
By Jodi on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
MarikaJ — I just chortled mightily. For obvious reasons.
By mamalisa on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
wow, she got small…posh’s influence, no doubt
By Tara on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
nice hipbones, nice collarbones.
she looks great. really slim.
By CJ on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
Definitely thinner… but I’m liking thin at the moment…
By tesla coil on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
I like it… she looks gorgeous.
By jena on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
not surprising since I’m sure Tom wants her shorter and thinner than he is. she just seems so controlled! and must be lonely to shop all day (sounds nice, but really….?).
By buggy on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
she has no bum.
By Bruna on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
still no posh skinny… which is good…
By MrsB on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
She looks sick. Remember how cute she was on “Dawson’s Creek?” So sad. And she has a daughter. Even worse. That poor kid is an eating disorder waiting to happen!
By me on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
how does Posh stay thin eating only pretzels and edamame? They are carbs. with pretzels being simple and going right into sugar. Wouln’t her metabolism be so slow her body would hold onto every calorie? Please help me understand this. Also, does she ever excercise? I am thinking no, which is how she gets away with so little food. She also has had lipo I am sure/
By Maxx05 on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
Tom is probably trying to get Posh to teach Katie to starve herself so she won’t have the strength to think for herself or runaway from him. Though I must admit her finishing the N.Y. marathon was impressive, Don’t think you can do that if you’re really completely starving, your body would collapse, I’m sure. Katie looks pretty, but I’m not a fan of see through shirts. I also like her hair longer, otherwise she looks cute.
By tb on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
that shirt is tacky in daylight. i’m surprised, as usually she dresses very classy.
i don’t think she’s a ‘naturally thin’ person - her weight is carried below her waist, sometimes her legs look quite chunky. which means that for her to be THIS thin, she must work really hard to keep it that way.
By Lenore on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
She’s wearing black pants, of course she looks thin.
By Beth on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
I can’t believe Tom let her out of the house wearing that.
She’s so skinny! She looks good like that though..
By Miss Luana on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
TB —- I met her back when she was engaged to that guy from American Pie and let me tell you, I almost didnt recognize her, she was so skinny and not as tall as I pictured her. Im 5′9 and she was shorter than me. Therefore, Tom is a dwarf. Literraly. And I think she’s naturally skinny.
By breads on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
i actually think see through tops on the flater chested women looks hot and can be still demure
those of us with breast should avoid them like the plague
MarikaJ - lol
those loving this new and it seems unnatural look because she has been slim all her life and now she look like she was when she started out on dawson creek, except she isn’t a teen anymore and those hips were created to support more muscle or fat
a friend i went to school with has just gone ano/exercise crazy on us and gone from a UK14-16 to a UK4-6, it is unhealthy and for a smart girl like her i expected more self confidence that didnt depend on her wieght (yes she works in fashion now) but that is no excuse to mess up your metoblism, internal organs, fertility all for what????? being skinny
the tolerance of healthy or just above average women messing themselves up in order to fit in what fashion, music, film stars etc project as the ideal body is sick
it’s like your either obese or gone too far with the wieght loss, i accept many people are naturally very thin but when people like my friend are dum enough to think once they are thin (usually a warped sense of what constitutes as thin) their lives will be better
well suprise it doesn’t
and i am tired of tolerating it
why can’t people be encouraged to be healthy and love themselves, and women like katie holmes, the family of my freind actually use their influence for the better
By Fiona on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
She is a marathon runner so she is serious about exercise and she can spend 600 calories in a run.
By ericka on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
i think she looks great for someone who has a kid..i like her new bod..
By lola on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
She was never this small. She needs to stop losing weight.
By Jenna on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
I think she totally pulls off this oufit…part of the advantage of being flat chested is that you could wear stuff like this once in a while wiithout looking sluttly - one of the few advatages we have lol. As for the weight loss -she doesn’t seem much thinner to me than before she got pregnant. This seems like her natural bodty type that she’s gotten back to -possibly a little more toned.
By LC on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
It doesn’t look natural on her. You can still see the shape of her hips, so being this thin doesn’t look right on her. Katie is trying too hard to look like Victoria.
By Jodi on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
I can’t stand the haircut.
By hirbirt on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
Yeah, she’s ok….
P.S. You have the most annoying pop-up ads!!
By MandyKat on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
I saw her at the airport with Chris Klein once, and she was tall (at least 5′8″), thin, and pretty (you never know how stars will look in real life). She looks thinner in these pictures than when I saw her and when she completed the NY marathon. I would imagine she would need a fairly healthy diet (no starvation plans) to run a marathon, though I’ve been passed by plenty of deadly-thin women during races.
By Stephanie on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
I think she looks fantastic, she looks really good.
By sulci on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
cute hair really
By hayley on Dec 17, 2007 | Reply
” Tom is probably trying to get Posh to teach Katie to starve herself so she won’t have the strength to think for herself or runaway from him. ”
i think you are on to it maxx05
By Umberlee on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I’m pretty sure the second pic has been “X-Ray Photoshopped” to make it look totally transparent. If you look at the first picture the see through sections look nothing like they do in the second pic.
By Camille on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I think she is thin and pretty, but, is it me or is she pear-shaped with thicker upper arms? Or is that just when she wears a strappless dress. She’s doing the best with what she has, all power to her, only that isn’t a bod I would aim for.
By Frankie on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Camille I think u have a distorted image of thin, and katie has NOTHING fat on in her whole body.
By Miss M on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Who says Posh is pressurising Katie into getting even thinner than she already is? Katie Holmes may be married to a weirdo but that doesn’t mean that she can’t use her own brain, she’s quite feisty making her own decisions. And I don’t think she’s lost any weight recently anyway. Stop blaming other people for someone’s weight loss!
By RainbowSprite on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I think she looks much better at this kind of weight, less solid and dull looking!
@ me, calories are calories in the end, I guess 200cals of pretzels is much the same as 200cals of fish or something, it just comes down to what you prefer. I know I often do better on eating small amounts of things I prefer, like a bagel, than eating bigger helpings of low-carb foods, because I don’t end up feeling deprived.
By poops on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She looks retarded. No offense.
By Edan on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
That hair cut looks so cute some days. In these pictures, it looks a lot like her hairdresser is a riding lawn mower.
I actually don’t mind the shirt, but it need to be at a party, not in broad daylight.
By you wanna know, i will tell you on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
hot shit
By Coffeegirl on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
she looks pretty good.
By Mouse on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Is she taking fashion tips from Britney?
She looks a bit frail in these photos and I think I’m seeing the veins in her hands, which to me is a sign of being underweight and dehydrated… Tom Cruise and scientology cannot be good for this girl.
By loveher on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Katie looks AWESOME! As for Tom though… that’s another story.
By Slugs on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I quite like that shirt on her. She’s thin and small busted and that’s the body type that can wear that type of shirt. I think she looks great. Her slump makes her look frail and thinner than she is. If she stood up straight, it would give a completely different body image.
By Bella E on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Sorry, but I think shes trying to take on a males body (reason for her weight loss) because her little tommy girl wants a man. She even got a terrible haircut like the guys from Oasis for his pleasure, Im sure. Could she get anymore manly?
By Elaine on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Her body looks good, slender not skinny. I don’t care for short hair on tall girls.
Cute shirt on someone small busted as she is, would look slutty on someone of larger proportions.
By Ellie on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Personally, I don’t think she looks great at all. She looked good and healthy and adorable in Pieces of April, but now she just looks way too thin. This is not natural for her which is obvious from her pear shaped figure. She looked good before…now she’s looking haggard, and too thin.
Also, you can kind of say that Victoria could have had an impact on Katie losing weight. When you are friends and you are photographed next to Victoria, or when someone tells her she looks great (eww) and doesn’t say it to you, that can convince someone that they need to be as thin as she is. That is the way Hollywood is. You have to be as thin, if not thinner than the person next to you. There is always going to be someone that says skin and bones is gorgeous, when it looks grody, regardless of who the person is.
By thalia on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
How old is she? In these pictures she looks mid-30’s. If she’s much younger than that, then she’s too thin. Being overly thin ages a person. Period.
By thalia on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I also think –posture! Pull yourself up, girl!
With all the image help these people get, you think they’d learn the most basic thing. Sometimes this site looks like a parade of hunchbacks.
By Carly on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I think she is so lost and has not a clue who she is. She has falling victim to Victoria’s anorexia spell and Tom’s Scientology curse. At some point I wish the real Katie would just stand up. She’s dying to be thin, cutting her hair like this woman and even dressing like her. How riduclous is that????
By BuzzPatrol on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I think she looks great! Not too thin. Remember, she is wearing ALL black. The shirt is a bit risky for Katie. Maybe she bought it in Vegas for The Spice Girl’s reunion.
By mandolin_rb on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I like her hair cut, but I don’t like the shirt. She looks about the same weight that she has been to me.
I read somewhere that when she was a kid she had a poster of Tom (from Top Gun, I think) in her bedroom and said she was going to marry him someday. Hmmm, he’s still so weird, I think Nicole Kidman got a better deal than Katie.
By thalia on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Apparently the deal for her is that she plays Tom’s wife for 10 years, and his people will see to it that her career flourishes. It worked for Nicole Kidman.
Sorry, that’s not related to weight, but it just seems too convincing to not share.
By mem on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She’s pretty thin but not skeletal.
Thalia– where did you hear that??? Tha’s crazy!
By amma on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I think body wise, she looks great–not too thin. Don’t like the new hair though it’s better than the old}. The outfit is very L.A. and while not my taste, doesn’t stand out from how others’ there dress {let’s just say I know}.
I can’t help but thinking she is either crazy or incredibly naive–because she is married to Tom Cruise {I think Tom is a great actor in certain types of roles, but make no mistake–he is batsh!t insane}.
By purrtykitty on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Yeah, I saw these pictures on another site and I instantly thought, “She’s lost more weight!”
Speaking of losing more weight…you MUST post the new pics of the skeletal Tara Reid. She collapsed in Bali and is looking horribly sick these days.
By Natasha on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Miss M i think people are talking about the article that Anonymous Realist posted above.
By Persephone on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She looks great.
By Jeez on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She’s always been pretty skinny.. maybe she just went a little too far on the post-baby diet. If you saw her in person though you’d think she was exceptionally thin
By rebs on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
she’s not THAT skinny.
She looks great!
She’s always been thin, but I do see it in her face.
She used to have a round face (even though she was always so skinny) and now it’s thin.
But she looks nowhere sickly skinny, it’s beautiful skinny.
By Janie on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She is starting to look so old. Looks like being married to Tom has really worn her out and aged her. Not worth it. It seems to me like he’s forcing her to be something she’s not.
By Jasmine on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
good for her..
By KT on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
she ran i marathon! that explains her getting thinner. if shes just doing areobic excercise especially running, shes going to slim down and it doesnt mean shes unhealthy. actully if you run many mile everyday you can eat more and still loose weight. i was a runner and i experienced this.
By Tucker on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I agree about the ageing. She looks like Anna Wintour or whoever, and she is not even thirty.
By Erika on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Has anyone seen the Tara Reid pictures on www.egotastic.com posted today? They are FRIGHTENING!! She looks totally anorexic. Poor girl, she seems to be such a mess.
Katie looks great!
By Ana Brynn on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I’m not crazy about the shirt, but I think Katie’s shape looks great.
By SupermodelSuzie on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
DAMN!!! She DID lose weight. Her legs look especially thin.
By Maggie on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Whether its natural or not, Katie has ALWAYS been this thin… She is not only a daily runner, saying even as far back as Dawson’s days that she ran 6-10 miles a day… She was also originally a model, being scouted and represented at age 16-18 before signing on to do Dawson’s Creek… So she must’ve have been thin… Also, its been constantly reported that her pre-Suri size was a Size 26/27 and 2/4… It was always mentioned in her “Losing weight” articles, as well as her “Shopping Sprees” articles…
Its the angle, she’s been this thin always except for when she had Suri
By REESE on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
From these pictures I think she looks great. Her top does not look sleezy to me but some people are really conservative on these boards.
By Cathy on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I don’t care how flat chested you are, that top is tacky. On anyone. She does look pretty thin, hate the haircut.
By roseanne on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
she looks good she probably lost the weight from running in the marathon . shes not too thin shes just slender
By Spectra on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
If she’s getting serious about running, it’s not surprising that she’s losing weight. I dropped weight like crazy when I started running a lot. Now, even though I eat a normal amount of food, it’s hard for me to keep weight ON. So maybe that’s what’s going on with Katie.
Although, I like the idea that Tom is trying to starve her so she won’t run away from him. That sounds about like something he’d do.
By jenbug on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I think she looks great. She just ran a marathon, of course she is going to be thin - Have you ever seen the televised ones? it looks like a bunch of anorexics running away from some ice cream…Anyway, I think this is a normal weight for her. She has always been thin, She just wore those baggy sweaters in Dawson’s Creek which made her look bigger. I also think she was thinner when she went on Oprah with Crazy Tom before they were married, actually.
By Genevieve Jules on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She looks good. Where is her camisole?
By Shaquita on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
It would be scary if I looked like my fiance. This girl resembles her husband a little too much. THat is pretty darn spooky
She looks like a freak’n man
By bleh on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
She looks cute except for that skanky shirt.
By blabla on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
she was always so boring and seemed so old. i hated her guts in dawson’s creek. she seems perfect for the role of cruise’s brainwashed wife. she looks plain.
By kels on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
We shouldn’t be concerned about what she weighs. Rather who she is married too.
By Jodi on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
The only weight she should ever lose is about 165 pounds or so of so-called “man”.
By Mouse on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
jenbug. The skinny thing is just a typical elite distance runners build - men and women alike. It’s from miles and miles of training and also because it makes you more efficient on the runs. I don’t think Katie’s thin because of her marathon run or even training for it.
By Mouse on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Jodi, that would be 165 soaking wet after christmas dinner.
By Jodi on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
True, true, Mouse
By Jodi on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Whoops. That comment came out weird. Let’s try again, shall we?
*pitch pipe* (Meee meee meeee meeee … figaro, figaro, fiiiiigaro!)
Here we go:
True, true, Mouse! But I figured his overinflated ego and sense of entitlement are good for about 40 of those pounds.
By chris on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
it’s the running that she does. it definitely makes you shed off your wt.
By Laura on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
*looks at close up of chest area* What chest? I can probably find a few guys that will fill that bra better.
By Elle on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
I think the top is really cute. She does look to be getting thinner. She doesn’t look bad or sickly but I don’t think she should get any smaller.
By Summer on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Jodi - LOL!! Can always count on you for a giggle!
By Jodi on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Yay! Thanks, Summer!
In other news, I don’t like Katie’s ensemble here. I’m not against sheer tops, per se, but this one is just so *bleh*. She looks like an officer manager in a mid-size law firm. (No offense to any mid-size law firm office managers with a sense of style, of course!)
By kimmy on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
she looks good- she probably eats normally (ie doesn’t cut out food groups but she burns s much running so shes skinny, (look at other marathon runners, theyr bonyetc)
By kendra on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
her face looks so much better than it did on dawson’s creek. aww her daughter is so cute too. i think another 10lb and she’ll look great
By Tina on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
Yawn……she is so boring.
By ash on Dec 23, 2007 | Reply
her hair looks ugly. i find her to be so annoying eva sense she got with tom
By Sue on Jan 24, 2008 | Reply
Katie has naturally thick legs (check out those calves in previous pictures). Women who carry their weight in specific places often keep themselves rail-thin so that those areas won’t appear any bigger. (Very few women are fortunate enough to be proportionately thin like Angelina Jolie.) Regardless, Katie is still beautiful. She and Tom remind me of Princess Diana and Prince Charles — she being tall and glamorous, and Tom being just “average.” I wish that Katie would go back to her wide-open smile. These days she’s doing the anti-smile like Posh, which takes away her charm.