Jennifer Love Hewitt In Red
I keep getting email requests to do Jennifer Love Hewitt posts, so here you all go - some new candids of her in a red dress, walking with her fiance.
I have also gotten some tips saying that it looks like Jennifer has gained more weight recently. I would have to agree that it does kind of look that way… what do you all think?
215 Responses to “Jennifer Love Hewitt In Red”
By jackie on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
she looks great!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By Tucker on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She is still pretty. I like her, even though for a while I didn’t want too.
By Nicky on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
gorgeous
By Cocottenubs on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Her dress is WAY too tight on top. These chicks should have their dresses tailored to FIT THEM, not suffocate them. You can see it pulling in the back and the front - not flattering, even when it’s on the smallest part of her.
Hideous legs, or should I say cankles. Less J L-H, more skinny chicks, please!!
By bryanboy on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
i think she looks thick.
for someone who is young, her arms has the same girth as a 50 year old woman.
sorry!
By Cherie on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Tiny Waist
Wide hips,
prominent Butt
big boobs
Genetically, she’s born with perfect proportions
She’s just at a higher weight, when she drops a few, she’ll look even more breath taking.
By Heather on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Don’t get me wrong. I love Jennifer Love Hewitt, but I really wonder…a size 2? Really?
By bryanboy on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
there is NO way that woman is size 2.
i’m size 2-4 (0-2 on a good day, 4 in trousers) and i don’t look as thick as her
By mel on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
no way in hell is she a size 2. i am by no means skinny but i am a size 6 and i am smaller than her. anyway, she has a tiny waist, but those legs really detract from it.
By loveher on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Beautiful face… but yeah, she looks chunky - not healthy.
By bryanboy on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
her arms are just as big as her legs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By se on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
she looks like a lard*ss, but i would rathar look at her than tara reid any day!!
By justine on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
oooh she looks good.
much better from the back.
By Slugs on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She looks so vibrant, happy and healthy! I think she carries her shape and her weight very well!!!!
By EM on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
FAT FAT FAT
By cosmicgirl on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
yes ppl she gained weight but i am so tired of everyone criticising her she is beautiful as she is and if she feels good about herself then thats all that really matters…
By Megan on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She is fine. Stop calling her fat.
By breads on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
she can dress oh so well for a her shape but the flare on that dress is too much
she looks fabulous though
bryanboy not every 50yr old woman is thesame size as JLH, some a re bigger some are smaller but very few have thesame skin
By Ray to the izzle on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
in the last couple pics her back looks very narrow and tiny.. but thats also in comparison to her bottom half. so who knows..
By kara on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Ohlalala I’m not English but as far as I remember she has never said that her current size is ‘2′ NEVER.
She looks ok but I really don’t like her dress. (I love her dresses in the movie ‘Heartbreakers’ !)
By MJ on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
jesus christ, i am sick of everyone saying that she is looking chubby or overweight. she has a lovely figure! a beautiful classical hourglass figure, which - before this media enduced love of the ’supper skinny’ came into play - was the most desireable and feminine figure a girl could have! and i love her dress the colour is great and so is the shape, x
By Jodi on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Oh god no. No no no no no. How many times is the “size 2″ garbage going to be rehashed? The horse is dead and beaten (*pause to get a little sad at the image of an actual horse so situated*). Why revive the horse again?
And no, by “horse” I do not mean Ms. Love-Hewitt herself.
P.S. Fantastically unflattering frock.
By SupermodelSuzie on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Yes she has gained weight, practically has cankles. She looks like a little chunkey monkey. But I’ll bet her fiance loves it, more cushion for the pushin’.
All that asside, she looks happy, that’s all that matters. She’s practically glowing.
By Bruna on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She has a fat ass..
LOL
By Edan on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She needs to take that waist, which is well-balanced by big boobs and run with it.
Why some women seem absolutely unable to figure out what the positive features of their figure are, I will never understand.
Tea length, shiny, red satin, darling? No. No. No.
Long, black, plunging neckline, contrasting sash? Now you’re in business.
Get thee to a stylist.
By BELLA on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I WOULDN’T SAY SHE IS FAT, BUT SHE HAS SOME HUGE LEGS LOOK AT HER ANKLES. ATLEAST SHE IS WELL PORPORTIONED
By RainbowSprite on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
That dress is DIRE, from the front that black insert makes her look bow-legged (squint and look at it!) and from the back it makes the natural flare of her hips look never-ending - not good.
She might have a nice curvy bod under that, and nothing wrong with a few pounds on a frame that can carry them (I’m talking Marilyn Monroe for one) but she is delusional if she thinks that dress does her any favours.
By bryanboy on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
breads, i’m not talking about her skin but her girth.
when i first saw her arms and that unflattering dress, the first thing that came to my mind is my 50 year old mother who is the same height as her.
By bryanboy on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
come on
look at her arms on the 2nd photo.
those look like a teenager’s thighs!!!
By Krid on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
You can definately see it in the calves. She still looks good, though, with the small waist and everything. That dress is the perfect style for her, too.
By Ms.Yeager on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
THIS is how you wear a dress!
I think she looks amazing.. heaven forbid a woman have some curves on her body. The dress is a beautiful colour and she knows how to rock those 1950s silhouettes. Her waist is teeny tiny.. she’s just an hourglass kinda’ girl.
By Beth on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I think she looks awesome!!! And the fact that she smiles a lot adds to her hotness
By Sharon on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Right on MJ - she is stunning, leave her alone and for all you freaks out there sitting in front of your computers stuffing crapola into your mouth as you type get a life and go pick on someone your own size
By tete on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
beutiful
By elyse on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
she is soooo smug. i hate her, and she definitely does not have a good body anymore.
By Bella on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
R U guys freakin kidding me? She looks great.
She is a short, tiny thing. I saw her one time at a Starbucks in Brentwood and she is small. A lot smaller than I would have ever imagined.
By krystal on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
what dress is that? i want it! who makes it?
By Jeez on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Judy Jetson! Oh wait…
By Jodi on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She gets all dressed up, and her escort wears sneakers? Bleh.
By MiaMaria on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Hm… apart from the fact, that I think that she is totally gorgeous looking - isn’t she supposedly pregnant right now?
By Sonya on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She looks stunning! By no means is this woman fat. She is pear shaped and I think this dress is very flattering for her figure. I really don’t understand how people can say she is fat…
By Maggie on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Agree with MiaMaria, apperantly she’s pregnant accroding to some of the other blogs/tabloids. She looks great, don’t get me wrong, not a size 2… Well, maybe at Old Navy (just kidding)…
She’s not “fat” though, and she’s so tiny, she’s probably no bigger than a size 6 in real life. But, its just funny the big stink made over the bikini pictures.
By jane on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
i think she wears the most unflattering clothing EVER for her shape. she desperately needs a stylist. different clothes would improve her look a thousand times over.
By andrea on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
From the neck up, lovely.
Her arms are very large and untoned, and her lower legs are the size her thighs SHOULD be. I find it unfortunate that she has let herself go like this. I can’t excuse that sort of laziness in anyone who has the time and resources to utilize a personal trainer and personal chef. I cut “normal” people a bit more slack.
That said, at least her ass is covered because I REALLY don’t want to look at it anymore.
By mandolin_rb on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
The size debate will never end because sizes are so messed anyway. No matter what the number is you can tell if someone is thin or thick/healthy or unhealthy.
I would she she is thick around the lower half, but not unhealthy.
By Whateva on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Actually — depending on her height she could be a size 2. I knew someone in HS that was about 5′3″, 5′4″ and she always looks a tad heavy, but actually only wore a size 2. It was b/c of her hieght and proportions that she looked larger than she was.
By breads on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
i would like to say there is nothing wrong with being fat
if we all have accept very skinny chicks who are that way naturally say eva longoria then it should be thesame for larger women
most health studies show a correlation/i am not sure if it is a causation with being slightly overwieght and living longer so this isn’t damaging her health
THERE IS NO NEED FOR EVRYONE TO BE THIN, IT IS ALL IN YOUR MINDS, its just a way of thinking that has been pepertuated into you by your environment
By Mary on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She looks great! Healthy, thin but not skinny, pretty, amazing shape, and so cute!
She looks like she actually IS healthy - eats properly, excersises, and doesn’t go on fad diets or drugs to be super-skinny. I’d rather see 100 JLH than 1 Paris Hiltion or Tara Reid. JLH is a GREAT role model.
By Jamie on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
she just has very heavy legs - i feel her pain, we can’t all be born with bean poles for gams. and while she never actually said she was a size 2, she certainly did hint at it. the one weakness in her little diatribe on her website. it comes off like: “stop calling me fat, i’m beautiful the way i am… and ps i’m actually a size 2 so i’m not technically fat anyway”. it would have been better had she just said “my size is none of your damn business” and actually meant it.
By madison on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
i don’t think she’s gained any more weight. the dress just seems to be an unflattering shape for her body, as she has very curvy hips. she looks gorgeous, though! very healthy and cute!
By Lena on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
If this woman was not a celebrity, we would all look at her and think “”what a fox!” But due to the fact that our petty minds are warped by media propoganda that a malnourished, emaciated woman are attractive, we all give her shit for being “fat”. Wake up 2 urselves!
By Lenore on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
This is the way her body is supposed to be. She’s pear shaped meaning all the weight goes to the lower half….she CANNOT HAVE STICK LEGS!!!, or stick thighs; it just wouldn’t work, nor would it look right. Stop trying to conform her body to what you think is right, if she’s happy with it then leave it alone.
By Kaleena on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I think she looks absolutely gorgeous.
By REESE on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Oh for the love of god, not the size 2 debate again!!! I wish she would just clear that up so we could stop hearing from all the old hags on this board who think their so smart by saying she’s not a size 2. Obviously morons!!
By Fran on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
she needs to learn how to dress herself. that dress is way too tight. its making rolls of backfat.
she always looks smug. i kind of hate her. but she has a great rack so ill forgive her.
By mmmary on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
gorgeous & beautiful
By LEMMY on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
OINK OINK I SPOT A PIG
By Elaine on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Pretty face, fat trollish body.
By Cathy on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
That dress is hideous. No at all flattering.
By Cathy on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
*Not*
By LC on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I think she looks gorgeous. It’s strange she doesn’t really gain weight in her face.
By srash on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
i remember reading once she drank a can of coke everyday. well, this is what it does to you.
seriously, she used to be so skinny, but maybe her metabolism has slowed down or she is on the pill and that has done it. remember christina aguilera got the shot and it made her gain weight a few years ago.
By Spectra on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
You can tell from that picture that she is wearing a girdle of some sort under that dress. There’s no way her waist could be that small otherwise. I mean, she isn’t “fat” or anything, but she is a bit on the voluptuous side. You can tell by her arms and legs that her middle is unnaturally being forced into that dress.
By jenbug on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I think the dress is great, but I do think it’s making her arms look bigger. I also think the length makes her calves look bigger. That said, she is gorgeous and seems to be very down to earth. I would love for my daughter and her friends to look up to JLH instead of the other toothpick girls…
By Mizzy on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
anyone who says her weight is “unhealthy” is obviously INSANE!!!! she is not obese, she is not even overweight by medical standards. She is only overweight or obese by your insane standards. This is really sad.
By PinkBubble on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I would much rather look at her than Tara Reid any day…
people who honestly think this is fat in THIS insanely overweight country have absolutely no perspective… I feel sorry for you.
By MissFamous on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
yet more tweeen ana wannabe girls making completely false/ insane sounding comments on here when a girl is actually a normal weight…
what is going to happen when you girls finally get out of high school and metabolism catches up with you? god forbid…
By Vomit on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She looks sexy!
By ph3nix on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
she must be hiding a family of squirrels under that skirt.
oh, wait, it’s just her butt and thighs.
woops.
By emma on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
how can she have cankles when her ankles look half the size of her calves? i must be missing something…
By Jenna on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She just looked sooo much better before. She used to be so pretty now she looks frumpy and out of shape. This isn’t the popular thing to say, but I’d def rather look like Tara than her.
By Bee on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I think she looks good, she can pull off a higher weight it doesn’t look bad on her and her face is still looking gorgeous. People are way to used to anorexic looking celebrities!
By Natasha on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Oh hello corset which in a fat girl like her generates plenty of backfat rolls.
And whoa wiiiide ass.
And I know we’ve beaten this to death but if she wants people to be so comfortable with their bodies why does she lie about hers?
By MandyKat on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Overweight for Hollywood and compared to her former figure - - normal or even slim for the rest of the country.
By miss m on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
speaking of Jennifer Love…this is too freaking hilarious
By Amanda on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
At least she’s trying to hide her huge lower half. That helps!
By Tucker on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Britney’s sister is pregnant!!!! Haha, so funny. Poor little sixteen year old…
By Maxx05 on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Andrea, I couldn’t have said it better myself! I hope she IS pregnant so there is a reason for the weight gain.
By TruthTeller on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She looks good, she is in love and that isn’t always slimming.
By becca on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
i know she’s curvy & gaining & hippy & whatever but i just don’t think she looks that bad. she’s a lot thicker than she was but she’s not lumpy in random places. i have a much slimmer body type, but if i gain it goes straight to my stomach! she’s actually quite lucky that she has an hourglass shape. and her figure isn’t all THAT different from people like scarlett johannson’s, who everyone seems to worship.
By lola on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She is probably a size eight
By ValerieSara on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Maybe it depends on where you live in the U.S. If she walked down the street in Boston, she’d be considered fat. Maybe down South or in the Mid-West she’d be considered normal or even thin-I don’t know, but not where I’m from. And for whoever said it’s only old ladies calling her fat, that’s stupid.
By Natasha on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Valerie i agree that it’s very location-dependent. In the midwest it’s amazing what passes for “slim”… the coastal cities tend to go much thinner - but as the coastal cities go, Boston girls are fairly heavy. I grew up just north of Boston..
By ValerieSara on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Not anymore Natasha. Take a walk down Newbury Street or mostly anywhere in Boston Proper. Women are skinny and very much slaves to fashion (goes hand in hand). Back in the day, though, I agree with you 100%.
By Heather on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
cherie is right. she’s got great proportions. she’s beautiful whatever weight I see her.
By Megan on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Not like it’s pertaining to this, but I just saw on the news that Britney Spears’ SIXTEEN YEAR OLD sister is pregnant. Great parenting going on there. Can anyone else believe this? Rian, you should do a post on this to get people’s opinions.
By monkey on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
I’ll stop calling her fat when she’s not fat anymore but for now SHE IS FAT. Don’t get me wrong, I wouldn’t mind grabbing hold of some of that fat but JLH is not skinny, she is not chubby, she is FAT.
By andi on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
It would make sense if she gained weight…isn’t she pregnant??
By Vomit on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
She’s size 2 on top, 8 on the bottom, so she didn’t lie. Anyway, like I said, she looks sexy and should stay that way.
By ValerieSara on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Wait. Is she really pregnant? That would make sense, because it almost looks like water retention and not fat. But, lol, she doesn’t strike me as someone would get pregnant before she gets married! She seems to be a very correct person.
By Spectra on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Good point about the geography thing…I live in the Midwest and she would be considered thin here. I am thin (thinner than she is, anyways) and most people around here think I look like a skeleton. If she were in LA or New York, she’d probably be considered fat.
By faine on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
SHE IS NOT A SIZE TWO!!!!
fatty
By gem on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
My my my..this site is starting to sound a little like a pro-ana forum. I think this is her natural shape because look how thin her face looks.
Lmao at Jodi’s horse comments..you get my award for most witty poster on this site.
By sabrina on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
Um she clearly looks gorgeous and is so pretty!
You’re all losers!
LOOK AT YOURSELVES
By Ashley on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
post something about jamie lynn spears being pregnant…
By stahravinne on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply
she looks fabulous, sexy, sophisticated, and beautiful. she’s not fat. she does appear to be wearing a girdle and/or stuffing herself into something to make herself look tinier. she should just be herself and not worry about trying too hard - she’s gorgeous and is nowhere near fat.
By Maxx05 on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
I work on Newbury St. in Boston, and it is definitely a thin and fit conscious city. JLH would need to get that wide A$$ of hers into a gym and whipped into shape if she wanted attention to compete with the rest of the pack here. She has a lovely face, but that won’t cut it in this city, you need to have the whole package going if you want to stand apart and better than the crowd. You can’t be sloppy, you can’t be stupid, you can’t dress poorly, and you can’t be overweight. Not if you really want to be taken seriously. Just some insight from my years in Boston society. I’ve moved other places at times in my life, but this is where I was born and bred.
By tori on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
maybe she isn’t fat by normal standards, but there is absolutely no denying the fact she’s overweight by celeb standards. there’s no excuse to be out of shape when you’re that rich- you have all the resources to been toned and taut 24/7- trainers, chefs, food, programs, plus the pressure to be beautiful and thin as a job prerequisite.
of course she’s telling all the gossip mags that she loves her body the way it is and sticking up for the big girls, but you know she thinks she’s fat as shit right now, and the only way she can live with it is by telling herself she’s being a good role model for all the plus size chicks in the world.
the reason i don’t cut this girl any slack is because we all know she prided herself in her appearance and body at one point, and for some reason thinks she’s justified in blowing up. oh, and she thinks we’re all fucking morons if we believe she’s a size 2.
yeah, and post something about that skanky sister of britney’s who went and got herself knocked up at the ripe ol’ age of 16. now thats some high-quality trailer trash gossip right there.
By doogle on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
damn looking more lucious than ever yummy
By Wow... on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Wow, Maxx05. You act like you people are curing cancer or something. That is so cool you are from Boston- please tell us more of your inspiring story…(please sense the sarcasm).
I think she looks beautiful and people should lay off her.
By Rigzy on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
It’s the Queen of Hearts from Alice in Wonderland!!!!!!
By miraclemommie on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
She looks like “Marion” from Happy Days(Richie’s mom if anyone here remembers that show)… Sorry that’s what I saw when I saw the pic from the back.. thinking… hmmm where have I seen this look before?
By tesla coil on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Eh… she is SOOOO plain… I do not see the “gorgeous” that so many talk about. Nothing remarkable or beautiful in her features at all… I’m happy that she seems happy, and she should not worry about changing her body to fit anyone else’s ideals, because we all obviously have different ideals, that there is no body type that would be agreed by all to be “perfect,” but in my opinion, I think she looks ugly and fat. I wouldn’t leave the house looking like her… not until I’ve lost a good thirty pounds or so.
By Chop_Chop on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Chunky cute. She would look so much better if she dropped a few.
By bleh on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
It annoys me that she would wear a dress that is clearly too tight on top for her.
By cheryl on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
I think she looks great!
OK she’s not skinny but anyway looks good!
By Pierina on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
she dressed like a FAT FRUMP!!! seriously those lines arent for her. colour is nice though.
By anon on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
she’s pregnant maybe?
since she’s engaged, and gaining weight… makes sense to me.
By Rosanna on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
At least this time she wore an outfit that makes her look at her best of her present possibilities *smirk*
By aa on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
why she’s keeping gaining ive no idea…!
By Aurora on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Rumors say she is pregnant with her first child. An unexpected surprise LOL They did not plan it, she wanted to get married first.
xx
By Lynda on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
I love the dress, but she does tend to wear that style a lot–likely attempting to slim her hips–and it’s not as flattering as something that has a little less of that A-line to it. Dresses with the flowy chiffon-type bottoms work better than these stiffer styles. I also would bet that she could pull off a lower waistline, rather than constantly wearing the empire waist dresses. She’s got a nice body, but I think it’s more attractive when she covers her problem areas more artfully. She’d look gorgeous in a long (mid-calf), slinky dress with sleeves that at least hit her at the elbow. I like the neckline of that dress though. It draws attention to her face and neck, which are still nice and slender. She wears her weight very well. I’m about the same size as she is, and I’ve turned into a blob, with a fat face and double chin to boot! I’m miserable, but if I didn’t have this full face and pot-belly, I’d be much more content with my weight. She is lucky to have such a nice shape.
By supersoph on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
i totally agree with cherie. (:
By ValerieSara on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Too funny MAXX05-I probably walk right past you every other day! I’m the fatty. Just kidding!
SABRINA, calling us losers. WTF? Lighten up. We’re doing what we’re supposed to be doing here:sharing opinons about the celebs. What we are NOT supposed to be doing is exactly what you are doing-tossing insults at us if we don’t share your opinion.
By ValerieSara on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Thanks AURORA. I hadn’t heard that yet. But someone here said that Jamie Spears, 16, is pregnant and now it’s been all over the new. Oh, my head.
By schuk on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
the colour of her dress is gorgeous !!! and i personally think that she looks very very beautiful. and her face is still so slim, her body is very feminine…. thumbs up !
By RainbowSprite on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
All that dress needed was a fitted pencil skirt and she’d be okay, but that flarey bit from the back? Bleurgh.
By Germangirl on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Well, this long discussion only shows that we are already used to see skinny and boney girls and tend to call anyone “fat” oder “chubby” who’s at a normal weight - even with phenomenal proportions like these!… If the anorexic hype keeps on like this, the category “boney” will be normal one day - and an ordinary and healthy body mass index of 19, 20 will be called “fat”. I hope it won’t get so far - and the ideal will change once again as it used to do if we look back to history… (Btw, I don’t call myself fat - at a BMI of 18,5 - or do I have to?!)
By Dash on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Ooooh! So beautiful!
By Berlin on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
She looks like a woman to me - what’s wrong with that? I wish there were more like her, that would to the industry some good…
By Gem on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Tabloids in the UK are saying she’s prenant - could exp[lain the recent weight gain? x
By kels on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
I will not stop calling her fat. She is fat. Sorry.
By poops on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
She can thank the good lord above (or a surgeon?) for her oft displayed rack. It’s the only thing that, at least temporarily, takes the focus off of the ‘generosity’ of her other body parts.
Unfortunately for the rest of us, she’s under the impression that it’s her motivational nugget spewing mouth that makes her interesting/likeable/relevant.
Wrong again, Jenny.
By caroline on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
i’d say she’s a size 2 in DRESSES, but no way in pants.
By Kara on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
I actually think that she looks fabulous here! I agree with her statements that were made recently in an interview that people have accepted a size 0 as normal- that is not normal! Most women are an 8 or more in size!
I commend her for loving herself and not letting anything get her down!
By CrazySecretRecipe on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
First - if her legs are big because she’s a pear shape, why are her arms so damn fat too?
Second - just because the majority of people in this country are grossly overweight or obese, it doesn’t mean that JLH isn’t fat too. You don’t have to weigh 400 lbs to be officially fat.
She is looking sloppy and better tone it up for her wedding. Fat brides make me sad.
By Jodi on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Thanks, gem! I am honored to receive the award and accept it proudly and with copious tears!
By Mouse on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
I don’t believe she actually eats as healthy as she claims she does or that she gets any excercise at all. That’s a complete crock. How does she go from being a skinny minnie for years and in just 2-3 years go to this? Poor eating and lack of excercise.
I see someone like Serena Williams who’s probably bigger than Jennifer or even Brooke Hogan and say those are healthy bigger girls. Jennifer, not so much. Not so much at all.
By cassidy on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
I’m a personal trainer. If she was just a normal girl who came to me and wanted to be a client, I’d suggest she’d lose about 20 pounds to put her in a the “healthy weight” category. Obese? No. Overweight? Yes. In addition to that, she definitely would benefit from some overall toning up.
By Katrina on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
She’s not a size 2. By the way Lily Allen is pregnant!
By Renita on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
She is beautiful. She looks like a “normal” woman, not a Hollywood woman. We’re just used to people being little tiny sticks, so it makes her look huge. I think she is AWESOME, especially after the whole bikini picture fiasco and how she defended herself. I love that she’s comfortable with who she is!
By brandy alexander on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Why is it that people assume southern girls are fat?
Southern white women tend to be VERY thin, but the South has a large black community, which generally has a larger, heavier build. Weight tends to be a cultural/ethnic/socio-economic indicator. Even “white trash” comes in two varieties: fat and ultra skinny.
I was at the University of Mississippi and it is a beacon for preppy, ultra skinny blonde belles.
By #1 on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
My honest opinion is that she looks very beautiful. She has the body of a woman. Has she gained weight since she was younger? Obviously. She is getting older and more comfortable in her skin. It is not that she has let herself go, but perhaps, that she has finally felt able to find herself instead. In her line of work, she had to be as thin as possible and I am sure along the way she was taking unhealthy, if not drastic measures to reach them. She is healthy now. The only thing disgusting and sad are the comments on here calling her a pig. You are beautiful girl, work it!
By Jodi on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Ewww. Someone actually f*cks Lily Allen? :-S
By ValerieSara on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Thumbs up, Cassidy!
Wow, Katrina, another one is pregnant?! Well,
ding dang y ‘all, at least she isn’t 16.
By Sacharomyces cerevisiae on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
This woman is a joke. And for the people bringing up again the size 2 debate-(yeah I know you are sick of this!): of course she implied that she is a size 2! otherwise it made no sense. And even though our worls is one big f*cked up place everybody who is size 2 (outside hollywood) would never believe that he/she is fat so her comment was pointless anyway. Still for some she is the quintessence (sp?) of femininity, for some others she is a women’s right activist and some others only think about b*obies. Regarding my opinion, I cannot see lower than her mouse face
By Sacharomyces cerevisiae on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Jodi I know-it is disgusting. Stupid FAS chav…
By Dawn on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
I don’t think she looks HUGE.
But that is one fugly dress.
By Emily on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
That dress is hideous and NOT in style.. she has gone down hill big time.. I used to love her back in the I know what you did last summer days.. and honestly.. okay fine she was 18 then and her body was smoking, but it’s not like she’s 40 she is 28. She totally let herself go. Like think Ali Larter, also 28 and still miraculously in shape!
By FW on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
she is so very pretty - it’s hard to tell her weight gain or loss in that outfit - as we all know now, she seems to put most of it on her hips and that dress covers that up - i don’t care what her weight she’s a smart, sensible super nice real woman - so NOT Hollywood!!
By Mandy on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
She looks good. Curvy and cute. Some women can rock the extra lbs!
By skinny princess on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
if i were her i would wear a kimono everywhere to hide those enormous legs and arms!
By the real winners don't obsess on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
I love how everyone is all up in arms about her weight (oh my god! how DARE she not be skinny!) while she is just going on enjoying her life. Of course we wanted these pics of her, as they make us feel better about ourselves.
By kelli on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
some sources are reporting that she’s expecting. sooo…weight gain would make sense, I guess.
By poops on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Looking at this inverted candy apple has made me hungry.
By sandy2 on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Hate to admit it, but you’re right. It DOES make me feel better that I’m thinner. Although she probably still looks better in a bikini than I (with that tiny waist she’s got). I’d trade faces with her, too…
By Fiona on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
I like her very much, but she is chubby.
By Tracey on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
I think she’s a very pretty woman. I’ve noticed that as she’s gotten older that her breasts have gotten much larger. I think that her genetic inheritance is just coming to bear as she gets older. She’s not a skinny teen any more. She’s maturing into a more shapely woman, but is by no means fat! She still has a very tiny waist, but has developed bigger hips and thighs and breasts, a very hourglass figure. She’s just made that way, and I applaud her for accepting that and not starving herself to fit the Hollywood lollipop mold. When we were watching “Ghost Whisperer” last week, my mother commented that she looked like she might be in the earlier stages of pregnancy because she was not wearing her usual tight-waisted clothes and had jackets covering her belly. That remains to be seen. In any case, it will be interesting in the coming months to see if she resists all the pressure thats being put on her and stays the same or drops a ton of weight
By Dani on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
pretty face. looks great with clothes ON (altho this dress is hideous)
By CeleBritney on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Anyone else thinks she looks like the Queen of Hearts from Alice in Wonderland. Not a good look.
By anonymous on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
i honestly don’t think she’s healthy. i don’t see a bit of muscle on her. she’s probably a bit overweight for her height. she should definitely tone up. if she wasn’t so out of shape, people would be calling her curvy instead of fat.
By tim jones on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
cassidy, the fact that you used the phrase “could use some toning up,” automatically strips you of your credibility. That being said, she is breathtaking. I would love to introduce myself to her nether regions.
By ale on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
theres a difference between fat and big. to me shes big not fat.
By jane on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
um ok i’m not the same jane as above but she looks fine to me. however i do think she needs to copy almost any look oprah and tyra do b/c they seem to have a similar body type and tyra can pull some shit off (with the exception of that leggings outfit). i mean i’m not saying the love is looking like oprah. oh hell you know what i mean.
By amma on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
…Who said she was a size two? She did!–in response to her bikini pics. Uhhh…NO WAY she is a size two {unless he is four feet tall?}. All that being said, she’s a great looking woman and a talented actress/producer. I agree with others that say she needs to improve her fashion sense, while I love the color of her outfit, that style is NOT doing her any favors. Work that cleavage, show off that waist and for goodness sakes…cover those cankles!!!
By misellsneous on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
No way is this woman a size 2! (aka UK 6)
By kimmy on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
hate the dress, (would make most ppl look fat)
not too fond of her either- terrible body, but not worth wasting thought over; don’t know why thers been so much fuss over her lately
By yawn on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
one word..
cankles
By Persephone on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Isn’t she pregnant? Of course she is going to gain. Other than the fact she is wearing a hideous dress and she is lying about being a size 2, I have nothing against her.
By Skinny Eater on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
She’s such a pretty lady. She strikes me as a very approachable person, like someone I could hang out with and share hair care tips or something.
By barney on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Jennifer you have changed. When she did the movie I know what you did ______. I had a crush on her since she was so skinny. She had a nice tiny waist and happily exposed her ribcage in the movie. Now I see her a few years older with big piano legs. I hope her fiance does not dump her if she gains more weight.
By TerTer on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
I think she’s so cute and she’s actually one of the few in Hollywood that likes what she looks like and doesn’t want to change herself just to get that role.
She’s a role model to a lot of girls, I admire her.
By SupermodelSuzie on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
CHUNKY
CHUNKY
CHUNKY!!!
By cassidy on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
i don’t understand how a personal trainer using the phrase “toning up” discredits them. However, my nationally recognized certifications do. Allow me to reiterate: the girl would benefit from a combination of cardiovascular exercise, resistance training, and a restricted (1200-1500) calorie diet. Exactly how would you have preferred me to phrase that, tim?
By cassidy on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
ahem, i mean that my nationally recognized certifications (PFIT, ACSM, ACE) give me substantial credibility.
By jess on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
DID SHE FORGET THE 1 … IN FRONT OF THE SIZE 2 ?????? LOL IM NOT SAYING SHE LOOKS BAD BUT PLEASE DONT LIE ABOUT YOUR SIZE
By 40ish on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
god for a celebrity she is fat, no question about it.
Does no one remember how great she looked in Heartbreakers?
She’s lucky that she has a pretty face & great tits, because her arms are way too big for her age and her cankles are hideous. She’s lucky that her series is still on TV. If she was actually competing for movie roles she would have to lose some weight fast!!!!
By Victoria on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
This girl is my biggest inspiration, along with Kate Winslet & Scarlett Johansson. These women are so beautiful. Like the rest of you skinny wannabe’s, I’m sad that your lives evolve around your weight & not the important things like family, friends, the beautfiul scenery of the land, the fun parks & even just enjoying the things you love. These ladies have found the happy place & honestly, if these women were considered “fat” in some countries, how come I don’t see any of you’se earning more money & recognition for your lives in the media than what they have for their successes? This proves to show that these women have more brains & beauty than you lot. Hope that sinks in!
By Victoria on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
I have to post that I’m smaller than these women too, but i would take credit for it if I ever do look as sexy as these ladies. I would never starve myself as i love food but it saddens me that when i look at the really skinny girls walking down the street, 1/2 of the them look SICK & GROSS. It surprises me that people think this looks ATTRACTIVE.
By khouston on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Hourglass figure?
More like super-size pear shape.
By khouston on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
And don’t even compare this attention whore to the lovely, talented, gorgeous ScarJo. ScarJo is proportionate.
Kate Winslet is too.
JLH - absolutely not.
If you want to make a liar and an out-of-shape hypocrite your role model, go ahead.
The lazy fatties win another one.
Don’t exercise or eat well- be lazy and eat crap and be proud of your “natural” shape.
Hahaha.
By andrea on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Cassidy- I tend to agree with you. I’d say “toning up” is a usable phrase. Oh, what I wouldn’t give for the time and money to hire a personal trainer! What’s the price scale, if you don’t mind me asking?
By tim jones on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
So you are nationally certified? People who receive a drivers license in one state are free to travel the country. I would say they are nationally certified, but most people are horrible drivers. Certification does not mean very much when the institution that is certifying is broken. And then, you mention a 1200-1500 cal a day diet. I haven seen hundreds of personal trainers, from all around the country, instructing their clients, and 99% of them are utilizing misinformation. Words like “tone up,” or “toning” are just examples of what is wrong with personal training and popular fitness in general. The word “tone,” in regards to fitness, is meaningless. You surely can’t slim and reshape your muscles to be sleeker and more aesthetically pleasing. They can grow, that is about it. And any “toning” that is going on is merely body fat loss exposing muscle tissue.
By har on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
SHE NEVER SAID SHES A SIZE 2! she said a size 2 isnt fat… shes pointing out how even the skinniest people are called fat, and they’re NOT
By Meg on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
Tim Jones, I applaud you for trying to be a voice of reason here, but I fear it’s a fruitless endeavor. It’s tough trying to speak rationally to people who believe any amount of body fat is “unhealthy” because that’s what they read in OK Magazine.
By lauraaaaaaa on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
her and her size-2 self…lol
By Maxx05 on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
ValarieSara~ I was thinking the same thing when you said you were in the Boston area! I’m the skinny chick that’s bundled all up like “Kenny” from “South Park” trying not to fall on my a$$ with all of this f#%cking ice all over the place! Newbury St. is the newest skating rink!
By Maxx05 on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply
I meant ICE skating rink!! LOL!!
By Sylvie on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
The dress kinda reminds me of the Queen from “Alice in Wonderland”.
I like JLH, I think she’s a great actress, gotta love her in “Ghost Whisperer”, but I think she can dress way better for her body. She looks like she has short legs and from experience, any skirts or dresses that end below the knee just makes your legs look shorter. She should start wearing them above the knee. It would make her legs look so much better!
By cassidy on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
you’re right, tim, the fact that i believe that JLH is overweight indicates that i’m a bad trainer.
high reps plus low weight equals lean muscle, not big muscle. working muscles increases metabolism and thus burns FAT while at the same time making said muscles more visible and thus producing this phenomenon we call “TONING.” dumbshit.
By Christy on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
Regarding thinness being geographically relative-try living in LA.
In LA, if you’re a size two, you’re a cow.
By gem on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
You’re welcome Jodi. Feel free to make a speech. Don’t forget to thank god..and your fans..couldn’t have done it without the fans.
By Ames on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
Didn’t I read somewhere that she’s pregnant?
By Virgile Mollen on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
She has a pretty face
but please she needs to go to the gym fast
By looker mike on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
F A T !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By Crabby Patty on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
JLH - love the girl, hate that dress. Honey, SATIN is not your friend (have the Fug Girls posted yet about this dress?)
Wow - what color is the sky in the world that many of you live in? You know, the world where “bony” is a compliment, size 2 is fat, everyone is jealous of Tara Reid’s great body, etc.
By Q on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
She is NOT FAT! She is a beautiful, curvy woman. Her body is in proportion and she looks sexy and happy. Remember Marilyn Monroe was a size 16 and one the greatest sex symbols of all time. I think curvy women are much prettier and more attractive to men than skeletons. Who wants to hug a skeleton?? Except for publicity reasons.
By tim jones on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
Cassidy,
“you’re right, tim, the fact that i believe that JLH is overweight indicates that i’m a bad trainer.”
I never said that, nor implied that. I said because you used the word “toning” and suggested a 1200-1500 cal a day diet, you are bad personal trainer. Please give your definition of “lean muscle”. To my knowledge, all muscle qualifies as lean mass.
By beck on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
Strange lookin…
By Helga on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
How come you think this dress is unflattering? Can you imagine what she would look like in a narrow dress??
By cassidy on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
Lean muscle means not bulky muscle and is generally what the female population strives for. There is a difference. For example, distance runners versus sprinters. The former usually has long “lean” muscle while the latter tends to be somewhat stockier and more compact. These things are partly to do with genetics, but mostly they are honed through a repetitive practice of a particular manner of exercise.
As for the 1200-1500 calorie per day diet? It’s more than enough to healthfully sustain an average woman (and especially JLH because of her small stature). Unless you’re breastfeeding or an athlete, this is generally a good number to stick with. I probably eat around 2500 calories a day (I’m guessing because I don’t keep count ), but I’m also training for a marathon and teach spin class and pilates.
Everyone’s different, but 1200-1500 definitely the ballpark figure for the AVERAGE woman. And yeah, I’m not a nutritionist, but I can tell you that if you consume more calories than you burn you will gain weight and that if you burn more than you consume you will lose weight-not quite rocket science.
Bottom line: CARDIO, because it’s a huge calorie burner and it’s just plain good for your heart. It will play a huge part in creating the calorie deficit necessary to lose weight and unveil the LEAN muscle garnered though STRENGTH/RESISTANCE TRAINING which, again,not only aids the calorie burning process but also results in definition. Additionally, a person with a lower body fat percentage will actually burn more calories just sitting around than someone with a higher percentage of body fat because more calories are needed just to maintain muscle. And the DIET? I’m sorry, but you can’t tell me that one doesn’t need to watch their caloric intake when trying to lose weight. Trust me, you can out-eat ANY training program. But I’m sure you know all of this Tim. After all, you’re the expert and all.
Based on appearance, I don’t think JLH is at a healthy weight. I don’t think she looks ugly or “fat” by any means. Contrarily, I think she has a beautiful face. I also think she is what the average American girl looks like, which is unfortunate because it’s not good when overweight is the accepted norm. Not because it’s not attractive, not because it’s unfashionable, but because it’s not healthy-not any more healthy than being underweight.
I’ve ranted enough. This is the last post I’ll ever do on the matter…unless, of course, you want to pay me.
By Amaranta on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
I don’t think she looks fat at all. She looks NORMAL. I think she just need to go to the gym and get more fit, that’s all.
By Edan on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
Cassidy, calling someone (who has shown on this forum repeatedly that he’s pretty knowledgeable) a “dumbshit” for disputing your heavy-handed remarks makes you look like a sullen, belligerent child.
By Sue on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
At the risk of using the word “fat” I’ll simple say soft, terribly overweight, lacking any muscle tone, and matronly. What happened to you JLH?
By victoria on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
so how much do people think she weighs now?
i think she looks pretty good myself - her face is pretty enough to carry the extra 15lbs or so on her frame. and i really don’t think its much more than that.
By tim jones on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
cassidy, I am glad that will be your last post on the matter, because just about everything you said was wrong. I am no expert, but I know a lot more than you. That is for sure. Also, I never once said one should disregard calories when trying to lose weight. This is the second time you have misunderstood what I have said. And finally, why would I pay for muscle imbalances, destroyed joints, and a decrease in mobility?
Thank you Edan.
By Catti on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
She is pregnant u know!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By Pebble on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
Why this 1200 calories a day, with strength and cardiovascular training? Sounds like starving!!
An active male like myself takes about 2500, as a rough guess, so half of that for an active female? No way!
By loli on Dec 20, 2007 | Reply
to Cassidy, as a certified trainer, you should know that this girl is not overweight by the ACSM health standards. She has a tiny waist. Yes she has big hips, but it shouldn’t matter.
Shes not at risk for her health at all. The dress is wrong, but so are you.
You can have the largest ass in the world, and it shouldn’t be of concern if you don’t have abdominal fat.
By Erin on Dec 21, 2007 | Reply
ValerieSara- I travel to Boston on a weekly basis and go out socially while Im there and the women seem very very average to me (looks and weight wise)- and I sure would not consider any of them to be “slaves to fashion” based on the clothes that I see
maybe I am missing something because I certainly dont see any uber thin very well dressed women there- and with the abundance of men in that city you would think that would be the case and it is certainly not from what I can tell
By Edan on Dec 21, 2007 | Reply
I’ve got your back, Tim.
By skinnylove on Dec 21, 2007 | Reply
We know what’s under that ugly dress - cellulite and a fat arse!
By Tmae on Dec 21, 2007 | Reply
Ugh, I envy her so much! I’m rather tall (5′10) with a tiny waist and larger hips than some of these loons would consider “pretty” and I work non stop to keep myself a fit as possible, avoiding all my fav foods ect, all because I’ll never ever be as comfortable in my own skin as she is, and she looks great!n We should all be so lucky to just be healthy, happy and ourselves.
By JLH on Dec 22, 2007 | Reply
What is wrong with you people. She lookes beautiful and I want that dress. You dont have to be skinny to be beautiful
By DYLI on Dec 22, 2007 | Reply
She looks fat. I don’t believe for a second she is a size two. Plus the dress is hideous.
By Message on Dec 22, 2007 | Reply
Cassidy I have a message for you. Shut up. This is not the place to take shots at people simply because you do not agree with them.
By Frankie on Dec 23, 2007 | Reply
I think she’s a curvy woman..not really fat but “meaty”
By Jasmine on Dec 23, 2007 | Reply
to people who’ve said she looks gorgeous - are you freaking blind.
and someone said she’d much rather look like tara reid, i agree.
By Lucy on Dec 23, 2007 | Reply
Oh my god, shes so fat, look at her ugly butt, like a whale-disgusting.
By ash on Dec 23, 2007 | Reply
shes has a pretty face still but shes gotten pretty wide.
By Lou Lou on Dec 23, 2007 | Reply
She is stunning, head to toe.
By Agnes on Dec 24, 2007 | Reply
The dress is way to puffy for her, it doesn’t suit her body type.
By raven on Dec 28, 2007 | Reply
The skirt on that dress is not particularly flattering. Also, she has large calves, which really are difficult, if not impossible to deal with, even for quite a thin person. If she was in a more flattering straight skirt and her calves alone were airbrushed, I doubt people would have much problem with her. Sadly, she may be one of those people who looks better in slacks.
By Reenefupnob on Mar 9, 2008 | Reply
I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well. But it was interesting! Look for some my links:
By zara on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply
CANT BELIVE YOU LOSERS ARE CALLING HER FAT.SHE IS A NORMAL (IF NOT ON THE SMALLER SIDE)SIZED GIRL.SHE LOOKS FAR BETTER THAN STICK THIN CELEBS