Jessica Simpson Has Gained Weight, Not Lost It!
Those pesky tabloids really need to start being a little more accurate… as you all know, In Touch Weekly is claiming Jessica has lost weight again and is down to 112 pounds.
Well, I have found evidence to the contrary. See for yourselves…
Jessica in November 2007:
Jessica now, Jan 2008:
and
Check out the arms and waist… what does it look like to you all? A lose or a gain? I’d go with the latter…
144 Responses to “Jessica Simpson Has Gained Weight, Not Lost It!”
By Natasha on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Sheeza fattie.
By Sara on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
i think she is about the same. very beautiful. Blonde suits her so much better.
By LiLi on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
And introducing JS as yo-yo diet queen!
By Natasha on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Actually I should be more specific. She’s always seemed like a fat girl to me, even when she was thin. Hard to explain. I guess she has had times when she tried harder, but I bet jealousy of how great Ashlee looks is driving her nuts. She definitely looks like she has gained - I agree with Rian - judging by the recent pictures here.
By Ihatecheese on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
About the same. Maybe a little less toned in the arms — that’s all.
By Skye on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
She’s still gorgeous! You guys need to get over yourself… theres a lot more to being attractive than being a size 0.
By BellaBee83 on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
She looks great either way, I love the dress! I’d guess she is about 125 though because she is about my size…not fat though, geesh
By Maxx05 on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
She always has her beautiful face, but her body looks SO much better when she’s trimmer and toned! Come on Jessica, whittle that cute bod down!
By cat on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
I think she looks good…maybe less toned is all. And she’s happy, so leave her alone. By no means a “fattie” … she just isn’t a stick and has a love/hate realtionship with food much like the rest of the world only her’s is followed with cameras and criticized daily. I don’t think the girl can act, don’t get me wrong, but she in no way looks terrible.
By Amber on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
“Jessica now, Jan 2007:”
shouldn’t it say 2008?
By Shina on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
It’s kinda hard to tell much of a difference since in one shot she’s wearing a very fitted dress and is heavily bronzed/made-up and in the other she’s wearing a mumu.
By Danielle on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
She looks about the same to me. Hard to tell with what she’s wearing.
By Ihatecheese on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
I don’t think she weighs 112 though.
By A.G. on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
“check out her arms and waist”
this person has issues……
the person who posts these pictures really needs to get a new hobby. This is sad and pathetic. Worry about about your own weight. whats the point of critiquing others? this is sick. they’re regular people with high paying gigs…. i cant believe this woman spends her time posting this crap
By Peaches on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
her butt looks bigger, but she doesn’t look bad at all
By Beth on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
She looks good but there’s no way she’s 112 pounds. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
By Chop_Chop on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Fatty arms dont happen at 112. She looks like she gained in the butt for sure. But she should just go with this kinda chunky size. Her butt looks like a man’s otherwise. Not a good look
By Maxx05 on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
AG, what are you doing on this website if your only comment was about critiquing the site master? BITE ME!
By Spectra on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
If she’s at 112 now, then I think she’s gained a little (even though it’s nearly impossible to tell). She used to weigh around 107 or so when she was really buff. She still looks really good though.
By emsmcb on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
and ass?
By breads on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
i trully can’t see the difference
By Ana Brynn on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
To me she looks exactly the same- about 125 pounds.
By lauraaaaaaa on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
gain
im a yoyo dieter so i dont judge
By bryanboy on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
I don’t understand why In Touch would even cover her stupid “weight loss” brou haha when clearly Jessica Simpson is nothing but a walking, talking tub of “i can’t believe it’s not butter”.
I mean seriously. Just look at her and all that excess flesh everywhere. She’s not even trimmed or tone or what have you. All I see when I look at her are creases, crevices and hanging flab.
Her arms are probably thicker than my legs and I do not see any traces or bone edges of any kind. She doesn’t even have elbows for god’s sake!
She’s shapeless and we all know it. We’re not blind.
By MarikaJ on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Well, A.G., this woman does spend her time posting this crap, and we all spend our time reading it (delightedly). Why do you spend your time reading all the posts and comments and getting worked up about them?
Everyone critiques everyone else. We just do it openly.
By suzy on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Poor Jessica. She needs work so she can stop borrowing clothes from Mrs. Roper’s closet.
No one looks good in a mumu, darlin’.
By Dani on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
she’s def not 112lbs. in that last straight to dvd movie she put alot of muscle on. if she is not still working out then it may have just turned to fat.
By jkat on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
I don’t see a difference either. She looks the same (very good) to me.
By jkat on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Also, muscle does not turn into fat. That is a myth. Muscle can be broken down as fuel, or atrophy, and the lack of activity can lead to increased fat stores, but muscle does not change form into fat.
By Rian on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Yes, A.G., over 100,000 people read this “crap” every day. Sorry that bothers you so much.
Here’s a thought: don’t view the site if it bothers you.
;-)
By Emily on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Looks about the same to me… not really much difference, except the dress is unflattering.
By #1 on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Dani, Muscle can never “turn” into fat. This is a huge myth. Fat is totally different than muscle and one can not turn into the other. I think JS looks the same weight-wise. She just isn’t wearing a form fitting dress in these pictures. I think she looks pretty at all the weights she has been at.
By Ana Brynn on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Rian, can’t you block her from posting comments?!
I can’t take her repetitious “The person who posts these pics needs a new hobby” crap anymore.
By thalia on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Ok, Suzy –Project Runway is sending your contract tomorrow. and you can wear the bunny slippers and robe, as long as they’re Prada.
By faine on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
FATTY FAT FAT
By Rian on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Ana Brynn, she has been blocked.
By Maxx05 on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
YAY!!! I’m cheering for AG’s eviction from the site.
Don’t understand what people’s motivations are to come on and then complain about the nature of the site?!?!?!?!!?
Strange.
By Melinda on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
It’s very difficult to tell with those two photographs but she looks just about the same to me, I agree with others who have said a little less toned in the arms. This however could be do do with angle of shots- in the top shot she is posing and aware of being photographed and trying to pose in a flattering manner. The recent shots appear to be candids.
I think Jessica looks fantastic both then and now, calling her ‘fat’ is just plain ridiculous.
By elle on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
I don’t think one can tell much from the outfit in the second batch of photos. It’s not a fitted outfit like the first dress. Give the girl a break. If Beyonce were this thin, we’d all be saying Beyonce looks wonderful. Jessica is absolutely beautiful, but if I were her, I wouldn’t have worn that second dress. It’s just not pretty!
By Lisa on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Hmmmm….so hard to tell!
By jazmella on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Um…I don’t know where these “pounds” are. She looks exactly the same. Very sexy, might I add.
By AnnieJ on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Big butt.
By chicknee gabirella on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
you set of complete wankers, how the fuck can you call her FAT, her arms are beautifully toned and slim. God you people need your heads examined. complete dickheads
By sarah wall on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
As much as I wish she has gained weight, it’s just the dress and the wind blowing…I mean really? Show me a picture of her in jeans or shorts and I might change my mind…
By bryanboy on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Fat is when you can pinch at least an INCH in your arms, your thighs, your neck, etc.
By jen on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
maybe shes just meant to be a little bigger
By jen on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
or maybe she eats her feelings
By Ana Brynn on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Thanks Rian, you’re the best
By colee on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
shes deffinatly not 112 more like 125 or so.
By Ala on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
I think JS looked amazing in her ‘Newlywed’ days….she was so thin and cute. Now she’s had way too much work done on her face and she’s let her body go too much. She could stand to lose 10-15 pounds.
By REALLY??? on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Come On! WE all know that there is no way we can tell is she gained or lost! The dress is FLOWY-ISH. i cant tell the size of her butt, thighs, or calves are. Even if we dont like her we should be fair. there is no way to tell. sorry.
By Trish on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
How can you guys not tell she has gained? Her arms are now huge. And no I’m not jealous, my arms are much thinner than hers!
By Lora on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
She weighs about 140. I am a good friend’s of her sister Ashlee’s, so trust me, I know.
By andrea on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Wow, in that second picture her butt is LARGE.
I still can’t help but sort of like the girl, she’s like a cute dumb puppy.
By Renita on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Don’t her boobs alone weigh about 112? (just kidding!) I think she’s beautiful whatever she weighs.
By Dardar on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
her bum looks bigger lol.. big deal
By Laura on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
I don’t know…she’s only 5′2″, so 112lbs. isn’t going to be SUPER skinny on her, just normal thin. I think she looks pretty good.
By lambman on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
only difference is a better outfit and use of a hairbrush in the first pic.
By Aaurora on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
I can’t see too much of a difference. If anything, it would be a gain rather than a loss.
She will be a yo-yo dieter for the rest of her days.
By helen on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
she looked best in dukes of hazzard now she looks to be around 130 or 135, 140
By pet peeve on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
I think that badonkadonk alone is about 112lbs! That thing GREW!
By Erin on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
We’re looking at her from an angle in the first pic, that’s why she looks more thin.
By LC on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
Of course she’s gained. You can always tell by how she dresses. She wears tight stuff when she’s thin, and huge loose dresses when she’s gained. Look at the past postings on JS and you’ll see what I’m talking about.
By Chris on Jan 7, 2008 | Reply
She is waaaay better looking than her sister. That is why Jessica is dating a real man and Ashley has to settle for that ugly little emo freak.
By ellie on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
ok i love this website, but seriously, these pictures aren’t good enough to justify a significant weight gain in jessica simpson. i did hear that she fluctuates a lot though
By Pam on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
Ummm I really don’t see a difference. She looks beautiful and not fat to me.
By j on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
does anybody else remember that picture being used of her back when they said she gained weight. ANyway thats my twocents..also Kathrine heigle anyone notice she is getting smaller..mmhm…ok thats all
By clcaste on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
i agree j, that first picture is one of the best ones of many of that same event. there were several pics from that event where jessica looked a bit bigger than usual. but the one posted is the most flattering angel. in the AFTER pics posted, she looks pretty much the same, if not a little smaller in the back area. and by back, i don’t mean booty, i mean…BACK.
By schuk on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
def the same. the dress is unflattering, but her arms look just the same to me
By calorie on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
She definitely not fat, but I wouldn’t put her on a cover of a weight loss article.
By Laura on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
i think her body is cute
By Jules on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
omfg i cant believe BRYANBOY comments here!!! brilliant
)))
She’s short…so any weight gain is very noticable. I think her butt looks big.
By Claire on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
How can you judge that from these pictures??
By Frankie on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
it IS written 2008
and yes it shows in the arms a little bit but that just doesn’t mean that she’s fat or even chubby! llol
I duno how some of u ever found her to be big :-S
By Lolapop on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
I think she’s the same; about 118-122. Clothes such as what she is wearing create the illusion that she is bigger, that’s all.
By bella on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
I think she’s beautiful…thin or not thin…she’s slim 120 lbs I guess..140 is too much for 5′2,she isn’t fat..
By Tallenglishgirl on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
Well, she looks like me so I’m going to say she’s OK but she could stand to lose a few pounds given that she’s in the media spotlight and is meant to be a ‘hot chick.’ Like other people have said, she looks so much better when she’s thin. She can’t act for toffy though, poor love.
By Britgirl on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
I think she is gorgeous. I would love a figure like hers. She is womanly.
By Bruna on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
Well… I guess she did gain …
But she definitely didn’t lose!!!
By Miss M on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
I thinks she looks good. As for the dress … she’s on holiday for God’s sake. What do you want her to wear? LBD? High heels?
She’s got a normal figure like millions of other women have. Get used to it! Size Zero will only be fashionable with people who have an ED and those sad sad Hollywood women who show a distinctive lack of brain cells (hence the size zero!!!)
By aunt crabby on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
I believe she is my height, and trust me a few pounds (even if it’s just retaining water from too many carbs or too much salt) makes a really big difference. I saw a comment that she is the yo-yo dieting queen, and I would submit that Janet Jackson should receive that honor.
That having been said–112 lbs?? I dunno, maybe the photoshop version would InTouch surely uses cranks out a 112 lb version. I’ll bet her body’s happy weight is about 125, which by the way I would love to be right now.
By breads on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
miss m, i am not an advocate for promoting the us0/uk4 body shape, but some women are really built that way naturally and thats just the way they are especially with pettite women without an ED
its the ones my height and taller that i wonder how they do it, well if i am honest i’d rther not find out because i don’t want to be uk4
By shuz4me on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
You people are on crack she looks great, she is no where close to fat
By Shaquita on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
unflattering angles that is what it looks like to me, WHO CARES IF SHE LOST OR GAINED!!!!!!!
She will always be a no arse, no hips, not cute at all girl to me.
By Edan on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
“Jessica Simpson Gains Weight Again!”
“Britney Spears Goes to Starbucks!”
*Edan leaps off a cliff.*
By healthyisbeautiful on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
Wow, the total ignorance over how body fat and muscle are distributed on the body and how they break down is shocking. This is why people need to take biology courses. As a few (intelligent) people have said, muscle doesn’t turn into fat when you eat more and exercise less. If you stop working out, your body stops building muscle, the muscle breaks down and atrophies, your metabolism slows down and more energy is stored as fat.
There is also no way that she just out of nowhere gained all of this fat. I think the dress is less than flattering and she might have gained a little bit of weight.
Oh, and “bella”, if you’re such great friends with Ashlee, why in the world would you tell the 100,000 people who read this her sister’s weight? I can’t say I believe you. I’m 5′10 and 150 and she looks thinner than ME. She’s 5′2. There’s no way she’s 140 pounds. Maybe around 120, but definitely NOT 140.
By Peyton on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
ehhh i would say she looks about the same actually. the latter shots are just less flattering
By christy on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
She’s no way 112!
I guess she’s around 125-130
By AnnieJ on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
I’m with Trish.
By Cossey on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
I’d love a few hours with her!!
By andrea on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
It is hard to judge people’s weight accurately esp. when they are short. People have different shaped bones and are finer boned or bigger boned. Also she is very muscular, so really who cares the exact #. She is cute, trying to live a happy lifestyle and is not looking like skeletor like her sister sometimes does. She is a beautful woman with voluptous curves. I think she looks glamourous like a movie star. She brings back what women used to aspire to look like- actual women. People do come in all shapes and sizes but it seems when someone gets around a siz 6, they are called fat on this site, But I know lots of men, including my boyfriend that like a woman around a size 8, but shapely. It is ok to look like Jessica and Kourtney Kashardian. Hourglass is awesome- Jessica is beautiful!
By poops on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
Jessica Simpson has to work her a** off in order to attain her ‘thinner’ physiqe and it never lasts but at least she puts in the work.
Whenever she has a dude on her arm she lets herself go somewhat but she never looks terrible.
Even annoying, inbred horses deserve some time away from the gym.
By peanut on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
Her weight fluctuates so much, it’s hard to keep track. Yes, maybe she has gained a few pounds recently, but she still looks gorgeous. Her weight is always up and down.
By bella on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
healthyisbeautiful-
Lora is an ashley’s friend,I think jessica is 120 not 140 lbs..
By mel on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
first, seriously, A.G.? apparently you took the time to get on the site, scroll down, look at the pics, and click to the comment page, so who needs to get a life, lol?
anyway, apparently i do, cause i can never get enough. for some reason, jessica’s arms always look like the plastic covering on sausage, unless shes deathly thin. i think that is just her body. she can have a flat as hell stomach, but her other areas take the brunt. and 140 is ludicrous. i think shes chubbier than usual, but im 5′8 and 140. if she is 5′3 and 140, she would not look like that or have anything close to a flat stomach.
i must say she looks so much better with barbie hair and horrible with brown hair.
By xtinaD on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
*pushing my trampoline at bottom of cliff to catch Edan*
By BBGIRL on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
GAINED!!! How can you not see it… Her arms are huge
By me on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
i think she looks great, i just wish she would take those extensions out.
By ash on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
you often make posts as if you are unaware of angles and of flattering clothes. she weighs the same. Any difference would be very slight and could be in either direction. I think you should study up on the wonderful allusion of well-fitting clothes!! and that second dress, pFTZ. you can’t tell shhhhhhhhhiiiiiiittttttt.
By ash on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
also, at jessica’s height, weighing 112 would be a bmi of 20.2. which is possible, but i’d say she’s more like 120.
By mya on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
she looks amazing. compare her to many other celebrities out there and she is definitely in the top few who look the best.
By Miss M on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
breads @ Oh I agree with you, I have nothing against women who are naturally slim and petite, they don’t look like they need a few more pounds on their ribs, but look at women like Rachel Zoe for example, she’s not a natural size zero, she eats about five raisins a day (maybe seven) and looks terrible! Or Nicole Richi when she was walking around like the living dead.
How on earth are we going to tell our daughters that it is ok not to be stick thin when we bash people like Jessica Simpson for being normal weight wise?
By nhana on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
There’s a lot to say about - Jess but she is very beautiful in my oppinion - before and after.
By lola on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
She gained yes but she is not a fat cow
By kt on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
Yeah. Seriously, you people need to seriously reconsider your priorities. There is a war going on. There is an election in less than a year for OUR president. And this is what you waste your time on. The sheer idiocy of all of you is astounding. I’m glad you have your eating disorders, because you don’t have much else going for you.
By Aunt Crabby on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
kt you’re probably right that we should be worried about bigger stuff, but if you are implying that everyone posting on this site has ED’s and nothing else, didn’t you just insult yourself? Or did you just accidentally wander to the comment section on this site…
By ECGRL on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
Tight dress with ready, angled-arm pose: “She’s lost weight!”
Loose dress in a candid: “She’s gained weight!”
I also love comments like, “She has a love/hate relationship with food,” “Oh yes, she’s gained,” and ridiculous declarations of her scale weight stated as fact rather than suppositions.
To me, she looks exactly the same - and taking into account that she is petite, she looks no bigger than a size 2 to me.
By el tornado on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
I think she is about 115-120. She looks good.
By Jasmine on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
i think it may be the dress
By Stella on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
KT,
We all have lives. We also enjoy a little harmless celeb babble. That is why we visit this site-for enjoyment ,not because we are unaware of anything else going on in the world. Oh, and you took the time to leave a comment too-so pot, let me introduce you to kettle.
By SupermodelSuzie on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
She looks the SAME to me, and beautiful!
By snow storm on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
Yeah shes huge…not!! Omg are u kidding. she looks the same as the b4 pic. she looks alryt jus cos shes not one of them lollipop head losers doesn’t make her fat!
By Alex on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
lmao! she has no butt, she’s always had a flat butt…it looks wide and flat, any perkiness is just the material of the dress…
By Kelly on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
She looks a little less toned, but not much heavier. Its just after the holiday, guys. She was probably relaxing and having a vacation (thus spending less time @ the gym)
By melissa on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
I don’t know that I’d call her fat…or thin…just healthy for her height…I’m glad she isn’t chubby anymore b/c she seemed so sad…and I’m glad she isn’t scary skinny like when she was in Dukes of H b/c she seemsed like she was a total b$ich then…I dunno…she seems normal now. Go Jess!! She finally seems happy & healthy but certainly not chubby! Puhlease!
By Elaine on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
I’d say 125 lbs on her 5′2 frame which isn’t at all thin but not huge either. She looks very large in the butt area but I think has a butt that’s as large as her boobs. It happens.
By Persephone on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
yea. she is fatter.
By Ems on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
Have to say I agree with AG on this one! Really some of these comments are pathetic! She looks no different except wearing baggier clothes! who cares anyway she has an amazing figure!
By Failure Personified on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
healthyisbeautiful, you took the words right out of my mouth. Thank you.
By Kelly on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
She looks hot with some curvage. Of course, all the ladies look great with a little more meat.
Peace,
Kelly
By Emma on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
Yes I think she looks amazing too! She is just an example for what healthy are supposted to look like. I think she looks the same weighwise, in these two pictures. I also think the dress makes her look fatter than she is.
By MarikaJ on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
kt, I’m just grateful your all-seeing self took the time to get down off your high horse and selflessly peruse these posts to let us all know how
ignorant we are.
Yes, when my eyes start bleeding from the 13 hrs of research I do every day, I like to take a break and partake in mindless gossip. Do excuse me.
And go f*ck yourself.
By Suz on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
I’m pretty sure she’s not 112 — if she’s really a D or DD, her boobs have to weigh at least 5 lbs. each. So that’s an extra 10 lbs. on a normal body. I’d say she’s probably 125 as well. Maybe more if she still has muscle.
By Cathie on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
who cares about what scale says! i am 5′2 130 pounds and a very tiny size 2/4. i workout alot. and i was 115 last year until i started stregnth training. my measurements are exactly the same as when i was 115 and i am now 130 !
By brahmin baby on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
Jessica Simpson is very TINY!!!! I have seen her recently, IN PERSON, and she is TINY, TINY…whomever said she has gained weight is smoking something illegal and HALLUCINATING. Sheesh
By Mike on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
Whether she has gained weight or lost it, I wouldn’t change her. She looks great!
By shady on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
112 LMAO
By cwb on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
looks the same to me. And 112 seems accurate seeing as she is only 5′3″
By Fifi on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
She looks the same to me too. She should give Ms. Roper her mui mui back though, why does she dress like a soccer mom most of the time?!
By leigh on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply
I definately dont think she has gained from “checking out the arms and the waist” but I doubt you’d be able to tell anyway, with that cover up dress in the second pic as compared to the form fitting one in the first.
I think the whole “Jessica gains Jessica loses” thing that the tabloids are always on about is really exaggerated and that she has never ever been big. Annnd if she did in fact gain its clearly not a lot and I’m sure it wouldn’t stop a lot of men out there from wanting to be with her. A common reaction that I have heard from men I work with when they heard Jessica was dating Tony Romo was “Lucky Bastard”
By Natalie on Jan 9, 2008 | Reply
She’s the type of girl who bulks up when she’s in a relationship, then loses it in a week after it’s over. Same thing happened with Mayer.
By ju on Jan 9, 2008 | Reply
awful dress!
no style
ugly
By Miss M on Jan 9, 2008 | Reply
MarikaJ @ I am with you on that, Congrats to that post, you took the words out of my mouth!
By Sondie on Jan 9, 2008 | Reply
That dress is just ugly….and not fitting…I think the dark hair on her was just BAD…made her look heavy….
By T on Jan 9, 2008 | Reply
The floral print dress is adding pounds. You’ve got to be taller to be able to pull that off.
By Reese on Jan 9, 2008 | Reply
I think she looks great….. I don’t think she looks too big at all, just right. She must be doing something right, she is the one always being photographed and asked about her diet, and dating the cutie football player…..
By lazara on Jan 10, 2008 | Reply
I don’t think she has gained. She looks about the same.
Although I don’t like her at all (and I don’t like her looks either), I think she has a great body.
By Corin on Feb 7, 2008 | Reply
I am 5′2 1/2 and I weigh 118. I wear a size 27/26 jeans. This picture is not an accurate way to judge her weight. I’ve seen other better recent pics of her and she looks tiny! I can guarantee that she has never weighed 140 lbs. EVER. I once watched a special on her that said at her lowest she was 102 lbs. I bet she weighs 112-115 in these pictures. I would bet money on it.
By Daniee on Feb 13, 2008 | Reply
She looks about the same, it’s just a different material and cut of dress. She’s only a size 2 or 3. A tiny girl.
By J on Mar 3, 2008 | Reply
Poor girl.. she’s been struggling and yoyo-ing with her weight for years. And after Daisy Duke, you forever hold that standard in your mind. The mere site of a carb will probably make her gain 5 lbs.. and the media will be there to catch it all.. one pound at a time.
By Tarahmonster on Mar 5, 2008 | Reply
I’ve always thought she was a bit manly. She isn’t fat- or too skinny. Just…a bit manly. And I don’t mean boyish- like she’s just a pole with no curves. Her face is a bit manly, too. I don’t know what it is.
By Dee on Mar 9, 2008 | Reply
She looked great in the Dukes of Hazzard movie. She is beautiful. So come on Jess get your fat ass on the treadmill!!
By Reenefupnob on Mar 23, 2008 | Reply
I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well.
By Whitney on Apr 29, 2008 | Reply
Whatever. I’m just sick of her butt-chin.