Selma Blair In A Bikini
Here are some brand new bikini pictures of Selma Blair, who is definitely not as skinny as she used to be but looks decent great nonetheless.
What do you all think - hot or not?
Source: Splash
Written on March 11, 2008 – 3:49 pm | by Rian |
118 Responses to “Selma Blair In A Bikini”
By Ayesha on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Nice body but I am not too crazy about her bikini.
By Jodi on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Nothing to waste stationary or ink writing home about.
By Ana on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
I think its a very unflattering picture.
But she may have put on some weight.
Just definately not in the chest area.
What’s with these flat chested actresses?
By Kodekai on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Definitely not bad … she just looks under-exercised. Like … that body couldn’t fight a lion or something.
I just like people’s bodies to look a little more functional. Like, we’re still fully working animals, we should still have muscle and the ability to run, jump etc. Selma just has the ability to drink champagne and tan … she’s wasting her body.
By Marn on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
The pale-ness is distracting
By desired5 on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
she look ok..not big..not too skinny..
By Edan on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
All I take issue with is the Juicy “couture”. I wouldn’t use that crap to sop up cat piss.
By francis on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
she looks good
By Christin on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Meow everyone. I think she looks nice and healthy and normal-skinny, not scary-skinny. I’m all for the au naturel look, and she definitely has that.
By Josh on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
She’s beautiful.
What’s she famous for again?
By mel on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Her swim suit looks like it’s meant for a 5 year old, not cute. She needs a boob job too. She has the $, so why not? I did, and I love it! She looks too much like a boy…
By Michelle on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
No. Not a good look…but if she’s happy…
By anonymous on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
She looks great. Her body reminds me of Kate Hudson’s. Selma’s butt also looks to be pretty near perfect– no cellulite, definition between butt/thigh. I she could have chosen a better bikini; the bottom has too much fabric and the top is too little girlish.
By Spanktacular on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
holy s*** she is ghost white! i think she loosk good tho. healthy……normal……. not a big fan of that bikini tho
By B.SophiaLoren on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Josh- she used to be big back in the day- most noteably (IMO) “Cruel Intentions”, “Legally Blonde”- she gets the “resident bitch” roles.
And thank you for saying she’s beautiful! Not everyone needs to be anorexic, big (fake)breasted, ant tan. Variety is the spice of life.
She looks better looking from behind- not a bad thing
By leone on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
wow she looks so much better than she used to. she got scary skinny for a while.
By Fee on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Body wise she is still slim, but normal-skinny rather than scary-skinny as someone said! Her skin is pale though, which often makes people appear bigger! I think she looks healthy though.
I LOATHE the ‘juicy’ bikini! JC is the vilest make ever!
By Jodi on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Gee, why do some girls have flat chests? Simple answer, nincompoops: Because they weren’t born inflatable.
By sazzy! on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
i agree the pictures arent flattering, but she still looks pretty good. ( i usually think everyone’s fat too!)
By srhm on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
looks ‘decent’?? she looks amazing. she’s beautiful with a gorgeous body– not to mention she only VERY recently gave birth!
By idiothater on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Ha ha! Love that reply, Jodi! Hell, yeah. Helloooo … It’s called GENETICS. And I do not want to hear crap about how “curves” and “big breasts” make someone a “real woman.” XY genes makes you a woman. Duh.
By Tinka on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Stop hating on the bikini - it is DARLING. I think she looks fabulous - not too thin, not too thick AND I think the pale totally works for her.
By StarSpy on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
If she was tan—she would look very slim
But she’s pretty pale
By leah on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
The bikini is a disaster, but her body looks great. And to the poster who was asking what’s up with these flat-chested actresses. It’s called natural. It’s called not artifically enhanced. It’s called looks great. And she is confident enough not to buy boobs.
By Lindsss on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Uhm… Idiothater? XY genes make you a MALE. XX make you a female.
As for Selma… neither hot nor not. She’s probably the closest thing to normal we’re gonna see on this site. I know pale is considered the anti-sexy, especially at the beach, but a) it’s her natural coloring, and b) kudos to her for not risking skin cancer/premature aging in the name of “beauty”.
PS–There is nothing classy about having “juicy” written across your backside. The end.
By Dances_In_Underware on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
“who is definitely not as skinny as she used to be but looks decent”
Um, are you kidding me? She’s gorgeous and who gives a toss if she’s “not as skinny as she used to be”. Who really gives a toss if any celeb gains weight. Guess what, they’re HUMAN. All humans do it.
By msgirl on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
She looks great how can you even type decent?! Not a fan of the bikini or the pale skin though. She looks at a healthy weight and she’s in her 30’s now, she’s doing good. I'’m glad that she has gained a little, she had gotten too skinny for a while.
By Verity on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Her body looks nice, just a little too pale for my taste (I know tanning is horrible and Selma has always been pale but it’s just my California bias). And that bikini is just awful…really bad. Not doing her any favors at all.
By msgirl on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
UPDATE:
Even better she is going to be 36 (wow!) this year and she DID NOT just give birth. She’s never had children.
By erin on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
I think she looks really great, especially considering that she very recently got out of rehab. She looks just right for her frame, nice slim curves and no bones jutting out. The bikini top really emphasises her flat-chestedness. I think she looks a lot better than many of the younger hollywood girls who would be at least 10 years younger than her, she’s got to be mid thirties by now cause Cruel Intentions came out years ago. Oh my god, makes me feel sort of old. I like her with the short hair, I’m so sick of everyone in Hollywood having boring waist-length hair!
By misellsneous on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
she looks great
By Nikki on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
She looks good for a 36 year old, really good. She could just use some weight training to tone up . . . and a little sun
By d on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Cute- either way. When she was thinner or now doesn’t make a difference. Cute is cute.
By BELLA on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
well wt wise she looks fine not to skinny and definetly not over wt., and no cellulite. But she just doesn’t have a nice figure, no boobs, or butt.
By salsa on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
very cute!
By Yoya on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
“She needs a boob job too. She has the $, so why not? I did, and I love it!…”
Um… I can’t even bring myself to comment on the warped mentality of this.
On a side note, is she really 36? She looks about 26. Wow.
By lilywhitetrash on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
What happened to her she used to be so thin!
By ino on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
She’s thinner than the majority of women her age (that aren’t celebrities, that is). But not too thin… I like her body, personally.
By MIMIMIMIMI on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
she looks really good - soft and feminine, but not fat or flabby.
By TheSteph on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
She’s got a belly, she’s got hips, she’s got thighs… she simply has a good body. Definitely healthy looking.
By ValerieSara on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
How is this woman considered not thin? I do not see one roll or dimple. I like her figure. It looks naturally slim, trim and womanly.
By Sarah on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
She is beautiful! A perfect example of how you don’t have to have a “perfect” body, based on societies standards, to look truly amazing.
I love her. She is awesome.
By Brodi on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
“By Jodi on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Gee, why do some girls have flat chests? Simple answer, nincompoops: Because they weren’t born inflatable. ”
That was great! I think that is the best response I have ever seen on these boards.
By Sarah on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
to Idiothater–just to let you know, XY genes do in fact make you a guy. XX genes make you a women.
By LisaR on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
I think I dislike this bikini more than the red nuumber Kate Hudson was sporting a few days ago. What’s with the cutesy ruffles and hearts? *gags*.
I like Selma Blair. I think she has a unique look and a nice heatlhy looking body. I normally love her style. A freebee from Juicy perhaps?
By midnight on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
definitely hot! Selma is fab.
By Michellekins on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
I have the EXACT same body as her.
I think she looks healthy. I too have a lack of chest:( Crazy. Exactly the same figure.
By mandolin-rb on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Where’s that side view?! That’s the kicker!
By daisy on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
i think shes got a really nice figure for her age and small boobs are so in these days loves it xxxxxxxx
By Elaine on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
great body, poor choice of bathing suit. Kate Hudson and Kate Moss are pretty flat but their choices of bathing suits and clothing don’t show it so much.
the paleness is very distracting, if she had a fake tan going I’m sure she would look slender and fit, not so doughy
By curiousmindswanttoknow on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Built like a boy. And pasty. Ilk.
By andrea on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
She is hot- nicely built, cute butt. I love the natural skin tone, and I hope she’s rockin the SPF. Although, if she’s 36 and her skin still looks that good, I bet she figured that out early. Love the lack of huge ridiulous implants.
I hate the bathing suit. Maybe it is just me, but i think writing across the ass should be reserved for 16 year olds. Or no one.
By Nancy on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
LUUUUV that Swimsuit! Plus I actually like her better with the weight gain. She looks happy and healthy.
By Lis on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Hello glow in the dark! I can’t complain really, I’m as pale as she is. She looks fit though.
By Jess on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
I think she looks hot! She used to be sooo scary skiny (like in “The Sweetest Thing”), but now she looks much healthier. And by healthier I don’t mean “fat”, I mean hot.
By alyssa on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
wow not a perfect person… what’s the world gonna do??????
who cares anyways
By gem on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
So she’s flat and pale… so what? Should she pay thousands of dollars to have her chest cut open and a pair of implants shoved in? Should she step out at her next event doused in fake tan like Lindsay and Paris? If she did, the same people would say ‘oMgzzzz hEr bOobZ r So0ooo fAkE! HeR skIn iz sooo0oo oRange!’.
By ShoeLaLa on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
terribly unflattering swimsuit, but i think she looks great.
By w on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
her body is good.
have definetly seen bikini photos which are way worse.
By suzy on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
anyone know how much she weighs? shes 5″3
By nicolem on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Hideous bikini! She is average otherwise.
By Liz on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
She looks good. The only thing I would do is try to make the legs a little more shapely. Imo she’s at the perfect weight for her.
By Megan on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Average looking. I think the pasty-ness is bad. Get some sun! Lol.
By jaded on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
what was she in rehab for?????
By Maxx05 on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
She’s a great actress, and there’s nothing wrong with being flat and pale! I hate fake boobs and fake tans. Both looks stupid to me, frankly..they cry out “BIMBO!!!” “I NEED ATTENTION!” “LOOK AT MY CHEST!” Stupid. Anyway, she could tone up a bit, but she looks pretty good. I always enjoy watching her in anything I’ve seen her in.
By Michele on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
Meh…kinda boyish looking to me.
Definitely not sexy in the least.
By Teed on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
she looks good, not fat or anything, rock it selma.
By e on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
It’s never hot when hair grows ON your forehead.
By over it on Mar 11, 2008 | Reply
wow mel! what a positive idea to send out to all the younger girls YOU MORON ,Some people are actually comfortable with the way they look with out fake boobs. so you just hush.
By Petal on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
I agree - she look under-exercised, but overall, she looks decent.
The bikini is another story. It’s terrible, and unflattering.
By Nuuhk on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
!
I like! She looks wonderful, like a real woman!
By Teri on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
I think she looks great!!!!! Her body is normal - not stick thin or something, she looks SLIM and healthy, and she doesn’t need a boob job! The only thing she COULD change is her haircut! But over all - she looks GOOD!!
PPPP
By Christy on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
MEDIOCRE at best. Close to being completely flat assed.
By Frankie on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
KUDOS to her, no tanning no huge boobs..no bleached blonde hair etc… woohooo u go Selma
By Frankie on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
lol@looks good for her age, uuum is being 30 now makes u an “older” woman? ????
By kikki on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
hot def.
By bountyhunter on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
Frankie, when you frequent a website that is largely comprised of girls in their teens…… yes. I don’t consider 30 old, I am 30. I am sure I am “middle aged” to some here, though.
By bountyhunter on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
And, I think Selma looks soft and womanly, without being flabby or fat. Not my personal preference, but it certainly isn’t “unattractive” in my book.
By --magg-- on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
nice body but why does she have hair on her forehead almost covering it??
By AnaCarolina on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
I think Selma looks fabulous despite the suggestions that she looks pasty, untoned, flat chested and much like a boy.
Yay for Jodi for pointing out that not everyone is born inflatable. Some of choose to stay uninflated as well. Having small boobs doesn’t make a person any less of a woman, any less attractive or any less desirable. I feel sorry for women who think otherwise.
Thanks also to those who made remarks about Selma’s fair skin and her old age. You’ve singlehandedly cast aspersions on women the world over who have fair skin and are older than 30.
I realise that everyone is entitled to their own opinion but opinions aired in a mass media forum such as this can damage more than entertain. After all, isn’t this site supposed to be about entertainment, not about offending people?
By Lazara on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
I would say hot! Or at least just pretty
By JustMe on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
Meh. Nothing to get all excited over and it’s a terrible choice of swimsuit. I liked her a lot better when she was married to Ahmet Zappa. Now, not so much.
My husband made an interesting comment. I asked him if he thought it was just awful that these celebrities were hounded by photographers when they were just trying to be normal, catching a few rays, and instead they are caught looking sub-par. He suggested that when they are commanding $20 mil for a movie, thinking of themselves as superior to much of the human race (whether they acknowledge it or not — when your every whim is indulged, though, how can this not affect your thinking?), requiring me to pay $10 to see one of their mediocre films and parading around much of the time like royalty or heads of state, then they should be absolute specimens, 100 percent of the time. I pretty much agree.
By DM on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
I think her body is ok,It could definately use some toning. Never thought she was all that pretty. She looks healthy and I like the bikini!
By Swanhilda on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
When she is an old lady she will be so thankful she took good care of her skin. It will take years off her looks. The chronic tanners will look like worn out leather handbags when they age. That scary skinny look she sported a few years ago is hard to keep up. Sooner or later, eating sounds like a good idea, that is if you have survival in mind.
By AnnieJ on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
She looks ok. I’m with Edan re: Juicy “Couture” - that stuff is over-hyped crap.
By Amanda on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
She looks good, thin but still normal looking.
By Bella E on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
I like how her skin tone is very light, it looks even and there no cellulite anywhere. I think she looks great and healthy. Go SELMA
By smart on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
She’s still skinny but just super white. Maybe she can tone up a little. But weightwise, she is skinny.
By Emily on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
That swimsuit looks like something my 5 year old niece would wear? She would look so much better in a tiny triangle top bikini…. and she looks normal weightwise.. I liked her really skinny and with longer hair.. circa Cruel Intentions
By Slugs on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
I LOVE HER FIGURE!!! Hate the suit. Not flattering at all. But she’s beautiful: curvy, toned, proportionate…. and not orange.
By lily on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
This line of comments really surprises me. I think she looks fantastic, healthy, trim/slender for sure (hello NO cellulite or jiggle on the back of the legs). I think the strong sun and her pale skin masks that she is toned in these pics, but you would see that more in different lighting.
By FW on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
who the f is Selma Blair? - she looks healthy - not skinny or fat - but her body proportions are not attractive to me - kinda thick in the middle and wide in the behind - and that hideous bikini does nothing for her, she should go for something more sleek and grown up - i love that her boobs are real though! fake tatas are so over!
By Mouse on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
good for her for rockin’ the small boobs. She looks much healthier then her superskinny days.
By georgie on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
the problem with selma is the face (and the hair), not the body.
By Meli on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
JustMe: I feel like that I a huge overstatement. If the paps lived by a rule that they only stalk celebs that actually make 20 mil a movie they would have very few picture. Selma Blair has NEVER been close to making 20 mil a picture and she has been out of the spotlight for quite some time. The paps should leave her alone.
And being a star does not give the paps to endanger lives the way they do. Jumping in front of moving cars, crowding around so people can’t move, it’s all disgusting IMO. Leave the pictures to red carpets and the occasional LA shopping spree.
By Maddie on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
I think she looks great, like a woman.
By star***55 on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
SO NOT HOT!
By gia on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
she isnt really hot. just neutral. she is too flat chested for me, but the weight gain looks great on her.
By Josh on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
“Average looking. I think the pasty-ness is bad. Get some sun! Lol.”
Let’s hear it for dried up raisin faces and cancer!
By may on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
idiothater actually XY genes make you a man. XX makes you a woman.
By liz on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
she looks great. absolutely love her. pale is hot people. leather skin is not. wake up and smell the sunscreen.
By ellie on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
I LOVE selma blair. wish there were more pics of her up.
By idiothater on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
Yeah, it was a joke - ironic. I was imitating earlier comments for not knowing what makes someone a woman. So I used XY as a joke. In other words, the idea was to post something as wrong-headed as the posts here. But I do love the responses!
By H3 on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
I think the bikini is bad but her body looks perfect.
By Tish Tash on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
there’s something incredibly boring about her figure, which is definitley not helped by the over-frilly bikini which emphasises her boyish figure!
By joya on Mar 12, 2008 | Reply
she looks good, no cellulite! she could use a tan but she looks so much better at this weight.
By Nique on Mar 13, 2008 | Reply
Where are her boobs?
By AnaCarolina on Mar 13, 2008 | Reply
“Where are her boobs?” - Nique
They’re on her chest. That’s the usual place to find them on most women.
By Reese on Mar 13, 2008 | Reply
I think she is at a good weight, however, I am not a fan of this body type. Also, I think she needs to get a spray tan.
By Zarb on Mar 13, 2008 | Reply
Definetly not! She looks kinda flabby. And that bikini is sooooo awful!
By ande on Mar 13, 2008 | Reply
not. very large backend.
By Kristel (20) on Mar 13, 2008 | Reply
Cute and healthy body. Gorgeous skin.
By mae on Mar 14, 2008 | Reply
ugly body
By marisa on Mar 15, 2008 | Reply
terrible bathing suit. blech!
By Lindsay on Mar 26, 2008 | Reply
I think she looks fine shape wise, kind of unflattering angle, and she looks so pale. And to Ana’s comment “What’s with these flat chested actresses?” and some others…Are all actresses clones? Are you implying they should all get implants? I think it’s great that some people are actually happy with their body type and don’t need huge boobs…crazy huh.
By Amie on Apr 1, 2008 | Reply
She looks really amazing
By Blackmour on May 6, 2008 | Reply
i am so glad that she’s pale! Finally, someone that doesn’t look like they live two blocks down from the sun.
It’s so unhealthy to tan like that. Spray on, fine but to tan .. not good.
anyway. I think she looks fine.
By bibixs on Jun 6, 2008 | Reply
i luv her bikini and i hate people that think paleness is unatractive