Photoshopped Or…
March 19th, 2008 by Rian | Filed under Britney Spears, Photoshopped Celebs.Wow! Either the latest issue of TV Guide has a picture of a very heavily photoshopped Britney Spears, or this is a very old photo of her.
What do you all think? I mean, we’ve seen recent pictures of her and her arms do NOT look like this.
In regards to Britney’s recent weight gain, the latest issue of OK Magazine is reporting that Britney has gained weight simply because her father has been forcing her to eat three square meals each day. She is also now completely sober and drug-free.
Here is a link to some new pictures of Britney’s legs, which seemed to have doubled in size recently: DailyMail.co.uk
Photo by Splash
Good for her dad, making her eat 3 meals a day. She will lose the weight soon enough…One thing at a time.
She 5′4″ i wouldn’t say she’s more then 145 now anyway. Thats just my guess.
I think it’s a new picture, look at the hair! Definitely photoshopped though!!!
It is definately photoshopped! But it doesn’t matter! Britney actually looks cute on the show and I am happy that people are actually starting to say nice things about her again. She needs positive feedback in order for her to regain her confidence and make a comeback! I hope she is feeling better and getting healthy. Even though she’s been pretty much insane for the past 2 years, I still love her and wish the best for her. EVERYONE STOP BEING SO HARD ON HER!!!!
This has to be old, look how tiny her arm looks! Her arm is much bigger now.
And…first?
Dang it, fourth. Oh well! I tried!
New picture, definitely photoshopped
This is not an old picture of her! They just shot the episode on March 13th right?
seriously, her arms never looked like that. although they are very nice arms, i dont even think she had those small of arms when she was really thin and toned…
Yes, it is a new picture. But photoshopped.
I totally agree with you Sarah.
yes definately photoshopped, i mean just look at her arms…
Magazines sure do take us for a bunch of idiots.
Her face has also been photoshopped I think. She looks older than in the photo. The years of boozing and who knows what else has taken a toll on her face.
Um no, who’s father forces them to eat 3 meals a day at age 26? give me a break. Definitely photoshopped too.
Wow, if she really looked like that then I think her “come back” would be a lot more welcome! lol
rian, that is EXACTLY what i thought when i saw this pic
The upper part of her arm has been photoshopped very badly. That, or the lighting is bizarre or the fold of the sleeve is hiding some of her arm.
But no matter what, something has been done to make Britney’s arm look smaller than usual…
Well, I’m glad someone else finally said something about this photo. I was thinking the same thing. She definately looks good, but in all her other photos looks alot heavier.
I had to look twice to even figure out who that is!! I think to say it’s her but photoshopped is being kind. It looks more like someone elses body with her face glued on.
That being said, I am so glad that she is finally getting her sh!t together!!!! GO BRITNEY
I’m so glad that she is getting healthy and the help that she needs and hope she makes a huge and successful comeback. That being said… something is weird about her arm. The longer I look at it, the stranger it seems….
She looks beautiful there. Buuut it isn’t possible to drop 30 pounds overnight like that. How stupid do they think we are?
This is getting kinda pathetic. First that stupid music video where they blatantly wiped pounds off her body and now this?? If they are going to photoshop her to death then why not just do an article on a naturally slim person to begin with?
SOOOOOO photoshopped! Her arm looks 1/4 of it’s actual size here.
My good friend’s father has worked for Victoria’s Secret as a photoshopper for many years and says that basically they crop and shadow pictures to fit the mold of a “barbie” doll. At least the VS models are close to as thin and gorgeous as they appear in their pictures. This is just ridiculous though!
Her arms have NEVER been that thin! That girl has tone and muscle! why did they do that!? ew! thats so ridiculous. she looks FINE the way she is!
*shakes head* so sad
Well I’m glad poor Britney finally is getting some good press and venturing back to work….But…that pic is totally photoshopped. Did anyone look at the pics of her “elephant” legs? I can’t decide if that is photoshopped too, but they look BAD!!! If my legs looked like that, I would NEVER wear short shorts, not to mention ankle socks and sneakers, get some of those low socks so you don’t have cankled. For goodness sake, the girl is a multi-millionaire and she really can’t afford to find a decent stylist!! And please, Brit, I beg you, get yourself a BRA!!!
Nobody thought this was Jamie Lynn at first?
She doesn’t look anyhting like this…photoshopped!
it’s definitely photoshopped.
jorda i agree! but you know, of course its photoshopped but my god i don’t care what she looks like as long as she gets her shit together, and it appears she is. and can you imagine the issues you would have if somebody ran a picture of you in a paper w/ the headline elephant legs?! jesus that would drive anyone to insanity!
It looks old to me.
The hair looks too real.
And it’s 100% photoshopped.
And the tan makes me sick to my stomach.
RIAN RIAN RIAN
Do you really think those are Britney’s legs?
Good jesus.
They HAVE to be photoshopped.
Dear god.
I’m so sick of people talking about her “comeback.” The only “comeback” this bitch needs to be worried about is a “comback” to being a real mother to her children. What a pitiful excuse for a woman. Who cares if she has a stupid guest spot on some stupid sitcom. Instead of reading lines, she should be reading some parenting books.
So so photoshopped!
If my father monitored my eating at age 26, I would not be able to be sane. I feel so horrible for her. It’s like her childhood was stripped away because of her singing success and now she is one again.
clearly photoshopped……..and not very well done
Those pics of Brit’s legs look to have been photoshopped.
’shopped f’sho!!
I saw a scene from her new appearance and she looked almost the same as the pics, or can videos/shows be digitally enhanced too? idk……
This is a really bad chop shop. I’m surprised they’d publish something this badly photoshopped. If you look at the right side of her face the cheekbone has been messed with, the way that it curves in is unnatural, at least on britney. If you look at her hand, on the right side of her wrist it has been pushed inward. They were able to successfully shrink her arms but the hand doesn’t match up in size. Not to mention that her forearm is almost the same size as her upper arm.
It’s a shame, she’s not an ugly girl, and she doesn’t need to be warped this much if at all. She looks like a normal sized woman, but not in this picture.
omg im sure they did that to her arm!! wtf! im sure it would’ve been just soooo repulsive for her to have her normal arm!!
I think this is great for Britney. I would love to see her come back and get her life and herself together. I think they made her legs look worse than they really do. The legs they showed to be Britney’s looked like an over weight 60 year old woman.Britney’s legs would not look like that even if she is a little overweight!!
Looks like both pics were photoshopped, her arms aren’t that skinny but in the pic of her in the short shorts she looks terrible. I’ve seen this pic on other sites and she doesn’t look NEAR that bad. They’re both fake. Why can’t people just leave these pics alone…then maybe people could just be accepted for who they are instead of who we want them to be.
I was thinking that when I saw the cover at the store…her arms were NEVER that thin. They are definitely photoshopped. I’m not saying Britney’s fat or anything, it’s just that she’s no where near that thin yet.
photoshopped for sure.
daily mail is KNOWN for photoshopping celebrities and making them look all weird. i’ve seen other pictures of britney and her legs don’t look like that. remember what they did to posh’s legs and madonna’s arms?!?!?
anyway… neither are her arms that thin… but the photoshop done in the daily mail looks like someone went mad with the liquify filter in photoshop.
Does TV Guide think we’ve never seen Britney Spears?
yo-yoing is just tragic for the metabolism
That picture of her legs is obviously photoshopped,i should know cos i photoshop pics all the time.
her head looks like she hasn’t looked in 5 years so that seems like an old picture - if it’s a new picture than her arms are TOTALLY photoshopped - look at any other picture of her from the last 2 years and her arms are 2 or 3 times bigger tahn that - this is pathetic TV Guide - she is probally the most photographed person in the world right now - we all know what she looks like! - but those other pictures of her running in that pepeto bismal outfit (with no bra - hello strangely downward pointing boobs) are FANTASTIC - now i really need to hit the gym
photoshopped….but the one that shows her leg doubling in size seem to be photoshopped as well….I’ve seen the same photos fr other website…is not THAT dimpled
HAHAH those legs in that link are hilarious. umm i think they belong to a 60 yr old, much fatter, much more pale person.. NOT britney– lol, please look at them if you havent already…
those are not her legs, go to x17online , they got the real pics, her legs are actually very beutiful and lean.
Definitely photoshopped but I saw a clip of the episode and she actually looked cute. Now that picture in the link is totally fake, those are the legs of an old woman!
you can tell that the picture is photoshopped… look at her hand to her wrist… i major in graphic design and learned all about photoshopping and it DEFINTELY is.
Both the new pic of her arm and the “older” pic of her legs are photoshopped.
you are all retarded. it’s an OLD PICTURE. just like this is an OLD EPISODE. this shit isn’t filmed live. christ. get some brains. every network on american cable practically has been on a huge lag. DDDUUUUHHHHH
They are all photoshopped, the dailyuk magazine thing as well. On the tvguide cover, if you follow her shoulder down, the inside of her arm slopes in. The shadowing on her face and arms just doesn’t fit once you take a second look. And in the other magazine, her so-called elephant thighs look painfully retouched. Not to mention her ass. I don’t even know why I bother looking at tabloid pictures anymore, its not like you can believe anything because apparently the truth is like a farfetched idea now.