The Skinny Website

1. 70 Responses to “Reese Witherspoon Leaves The Gym”

2. By Sarah on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

   I love Reese!

3. By Butternut on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

   She looks great!

4. By courtney on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

   first!
   i think she looks great considering she’s had kids. Nicely toned natural physique!

5. By Annie on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

   She looks a little wider than usual, but still great…in good shape and healthy. :]

   And, lol, that looks like an American Girl catalog she’s carrying…maybe ordering something for her daughter?

6. By Becky on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

   She has so gained in her torso area!

   She’s still super cute though.

7. By shaniqua on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

   She def. gained. And she is not toned.

8. By dtt on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

   She looks good.

9. By Renita on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

   She’s so darn cute! And she seems pretty “normal”, by Hollywood standards, anyway.

10. By Boatie on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    She looks good to me.

11. By strawberry shortcake on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    She looks good and NORMAL which is a beautiful thing!

12. By LisaR on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    I love Reese, but I do think she’s gained a bit. She seems to always fluctuate 5-10 pounds..it’s easy to see since she’s photographed in form fitting gym gear so often.

    Regardless, she’s adorable.

13. By breads on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    apple shape
    she looks great and has to finally happy again as she is finally eating which she wasn’t when her marriage broke up, understandably

14. By Laila on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    Fat.

15. By jed on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    your archives has her on Feb 12th–about ten pounds thinner.

16. By jed on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    February was abnormally thin for her, though.

17. By Andie on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    She’s so cute; weight looks perfect for her height. Can’t find anything physically off- putting about this girl. A true beauty; I agree that she seems very normal in that crazy world she lives in.

    Andie

18. By Jennie on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    I love her but she has an ugly shape. She’s still so cute though:o)

19. By secrethoughts on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    Despite the being all black, that outfit is totally unflattering. The capris plus the uber long tank top make her look like she is super hippy with short legs.

20. By Jaxx on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    good for her.

21. By Danielle on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    She has alway been wide and has no waist. I find her figure extremely unattractive. And I don’t think she’s pretty either.

22. By Bruna on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    well, she’s definetly not starving like the other half of hollywood

23. By Shady on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    love her

24. By Spectra on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    I think she looks adorable! She looks a little fleshier than she was looking a little while ago. She’s not a super-skinny woman and she always looks chic and comfortable with her body.

25. By Jodi on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    Staggeringly unexciting.

26. By TM on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    I hate it when people say “She looks great for having kids!” Having kids doesn’t mean your body is forever changed. You gain weight, have the baby, and your body goes back to normal. I’ve had a baby and the only thing about my body that is forever changed is saggier boobs and a couple stretch marks. Having a kid should be no excuse for having a crappy body.

27. By TM on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    As for Reese, she’s a really skinny girl. But she’s always seemed to carry her weight in her midsection. She looks the same as always.

28. By Sally Lala on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    To add to TM’s comment: Some women don’t even get stretch marks on their bellies. Hard to believe, but it’s true.

    I love Reese; what a positive role model!

29. By Frankie on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    slim and cute, but “waistless”

30. By Oksana on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    i wonder what she is doing in the gym usually? reading mag and drinking water? how about doing something else there?

31. By Rosanna on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    TM: you rock!

32. By mandykins on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    TM must be one of the “lucky ones” because i had one kid and my body WILL NEVER be the same, no matter how much i work out! unfair

33. By bitter, party-of-one on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    I have had two kids (one 5, one 7 months) and I MADE MYSELF lose the weight! Did I go to the “extreme”? Yes. But, I will not let being a mother be an excuse for being fat.

34. By Dee on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    She is too cute and pretty to have such a frumpy, dumpy body. She needs to hire a personal trainer and get in shape. Unless she does not care but she must care some what or she woukd not be excercising. Her body loojs terrible and I agree with what another person said about people saying.”Oh well they look good for having kids.” Well that is just a load of crap.” Are they going to say that when the kid is 10!! lol

35. By DuWop on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    i think she’s kind of slender, but not toned, and i dislike her shape. there’s very little curves and definiton in her middle.

36. By Kelso on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    How people can say “SHE HAS SUCH A GOOD BOD” or “SHE LOOKS GOOD” about Reese, but then say that someone such a Hilary Duff who actually has curves say that she “Doesn’t have the best body” is beyond me.

37. By Natasha on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    she looks a little bit pudgy in the middle - almost pregnant. is she?

38. By Harper on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    I REALLY hate those capri jogging pants that older women always seem to wear…they look tacky to me and make her legs look stumpy. She has really beautiful skin though!

39. By shosh on Apr 30, 2008 | Reply

    At least she’s going to a better gym than Britney Spears. I know that gym, it’s expensive.

40. By Jayne on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    Reese is beautiful, she always has been. When she puts on weight it seems to distribute evenly. I think she loses some of her natural beauty when thin.

    I’d say she’d be around 56-57kg which is right in the middle of her healthy weight range for her height, in my opinion this is what all women should aim for to look their best.

41. By Dayz on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    she looks a little bit bigger than usual, deffinatly round the arms!

    but she has had kids so i tip my hat to her!

    she looks healthy!

42. By Whitney on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    I’ve always thought she was cute, but…I do think her midsection could use a little help.

43. By rebecca on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    What are all you guys looking at!??? this girl is rotund like a little dough ball. so much fat on her arms and legs i can practically see it all jiggling before my eyes. yuk. i’d kill myself if ever i looked like that

44. By mandy on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    i love her!

45. By ladycabdriver on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    She’s got no shape at all

46. By nataile on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    she does not look like she even works out. that is the body of someone who just has a healthy diet but doesnt exercise one bit. she probably just jogs for the publicity of it, for like a mile a week

47. By Jodi on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    Kelso, I was thinking the same exact thing.

48. By jemma on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    she’s gained weight, for sure. you can even see a tiny bit of cellulite on the inside of her thighs through the pants there. she’s in love again (Jake) and so she probably has her appetite back!

49. By Jennifer on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    Rebecca - you need to sort yourself out love.

50. By holly g on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    agreed with nataile.

51. By Kringle on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    Can’t say she looks “great”, as I don’t think her physique would be hard to attain. She looks like someone who jogs on the treadmill and plateaued five years ago. If I were her I’d switch to some sort of weight lifting class, but she seems content. She’s taking care of herself, so good for her.

52. By Lexie on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    She is like 3 pints of Ben & Jerry’s away from being chubby. She does have a slight bit of tone and shape that makes her look healthy and not overweight. She’s too cute for that body.

53. By Cossey on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    I’ll give her a workout!

54. By Belt Up on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    Boxy.

55. By spanktacular on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    i think she looks good. it amazes me how critical everyone on this site - i would love to see pics of all the negative bashers on this site

56. By d on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    She seems like a down to earth type.

57. By charu on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    supercute, a lil chubby but supercute!

58. By meens on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    I think this is a huge difference from her appearance in the Oscars (i think) in a yellow dress.

59. By pet peeve on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    A lot of you took the words right outta my mouth. My screen name “Pet Peeve” was chosen because my pet peeve is that a lot of people say: “She looks good for having had 2 kids!”. I don’t think that’s any excuse to be saggy, pudgy or soft.

    Just look at Heidi Klum, Brooke Burke, Denise Richards etc. They all got their bodies in shape shortly after babies. Those who use babies as an excuse will ALWAYS keep weight on.

60. By Persephone on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    I totally agree with TM’s comments. After you have the baby, especially YEARS later, pregnancy is no longer an excuse for your body flaws.

    She looks to be a little bit heavier to me, but she still looks OK.

61. By A-bomb on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    Pregnancy may or may not be an ‘excuse’. I know lots of women whose hormones were out of whack for YEARS after having a baby. Breastfeeding also changes your hormones so some women can’t lose it until they wean, which can be for YEARS after one has a baby. I, for the record, had a baby one year ago and I am still breastfeeding. I’m down to a size 3 pant and size 34 F bra size, lol, and I weigh about 135 pounds, 5′6″. I have lost 60 pounds since his birth, which is what I gained. I could lose more at a slow but consistent rate, which is what has happened, or I could plateau and lose another 5-10 at weaning (this commonly happens after you have a baby). Or I could be one of the unlucky few who got used to the extra ice cream and huge portions and gain after I wean. It’s not one thing for all women. We are all different with different metabolisms and hormones. Reese is beautiful. Having kids does change everyone’s bodies somewhat. My waist increased one inch, even though my weight is the same, and I FINALLY have hips!! Hooray for pregnancy, I look like a WOMAN!!!

62. By necy on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    she has a cute face but her shape is so awful!!! she has no waist at all, and she has small legs, arms and a huge mid-section..

63. By kiki on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    She does NOT have a great figure. She has NEVER had a waist though, she has just covered it well.

    Like others have said, she’s completely apple shaped. No waist, no definition at all in her torso and short little legs. Her body looks middle-aged too.

64. By ann on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    I like the girl but I think her body never developed into a womens body. She has the same body shape as her daughter. No waist, hips or butt. Which is all okay, she’s done the best you can with that shape, but some posters choose to overlook that with reese when they would normally ponce on it with other celebs. Just like a previous poster mentioned with hilary duff. I dont get it?

65. By Maria on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    Reese is soo beautiful, but you can clearly see that she have been pregnant… Specially around stomach area.

66. By girly on May 1, 2008 | Reply

    I think her arms look great especially in the first picture. I agree she does look like she doesn’t have much of a waist, but I’m apple shaped too so it’s nice to see b/c really there are very few celeb bodies in that shape. She’s cute and looks to be at a healthy weight, a little chubby for Hollywood though.

67. By Dee on May 2, 2008 | Reply

    If I had her money I would have liposuction!!!

68. By reese on May 2, 2008 | Reply

    I love her and think she is so darn cute. I bet she doesn’t weigh any more than 120 and sorry that is not a lot

69. By p.babyboy on May 3, 2008 | Reply

    Her problem area is clearly her midsection, she has no waist but I bet she looks tiny in person… And I think her stomach does not look like this because of her pregnancies, she is just built that way…And she was always like this, apple-shaped.

70. By bella on May 3, 2008 | Reply

    average body…

71. By lexi on May 4, 2008 | Reply

    Surprised she has gained so much weight. Her whole body looks bigger. Maybe she is pregnant?

**Please read the rules, located here, before making a comment! If you choose to comment, you are agreeing to the rules. ALSO Please Note: Your comment may take a few moments to show up. Please do not submit it more than once! Thank you!**