Giselle Bundchen Is Skinny

October 11th, 2008 by Rian | Filed under Supermodels, Skinny Celebrities.

A very slim-looking Giselle Bundchen was photographed shooting a music video for Blackcowboy’s “Come On” yesterday.

spl54331_002.jpg
(Photos via SplashNews)

Now, I know she’s always been rather thin, but she looks even skinnier than usual here for some reason…

What do YOU all think?

spl54331_013.jpg



spl54331_009.jpg


136 Responses to “Giselle Bundchen Is Skinny”

  1. jenn | 11/10/08

    FIRST! she is my favorite!!

  2. tricia | 11/10/08

    SHe always looks good :D .

  3. Ann | 11/10/08

    As usual she looks fantastic! MA-RA-VI-LHO-SA, go Gisele!

  4. shelly | 11/10/08

    she didnt lose weight
    she is as thin as always

  5. Wowza | 11/10/08

    I agree. She always looks great. No news here. She’s neither gained nor lost.

  6. StarSpy | 11/10/08

    Looks Like Jess has gained…

  7. Melanie | 11/10/08

    she’s perfect!! i’d kill to have her figure…

  8. meagain | 11/10/08

    sha had gained some weight before she quit victoria’s secret… that’s probably what your thinking of, if you’re remembering her a little bigger, but she has been at this weight now for a while.

    i think she looks great, and btw, i find it hilariously hypocritical that so many people will be saying how fabulous gisele looks, yet kristen johnson looked horrible. whatever.

  9. Cookie white | 11/10/08

    She is wonderful, as usual! her legs are so long and skinny, I’d kill for them and for her hair too!

  10. Ellie | 11/10/08

    she looks the same

  11. kez | 11/10/08

    she is amazing… my idol. I would do anything for that body!

  12. Afan | 11/10/08

    Only she can get away with boots like that.

  13. Beuu | 11/10/08

    I personally don’t think she has a very pretty face.

    But her body is absoluuutely perfect. She’s stunning how she carries herself. Good for her.

  14. Kianna | 11/10/08

    I agre with meagain…she did put on a few lbs before quitting Victoria’s Secret…when those emaciated uber skinny models were dying and the “officials” of the modeling industries (in some countries ONLY) were demanding that models possess an 18 or 18.5 BMI or COULD NOT model. However, that has been awhile back…and she put on maybe 4 or 5 lbs at that time (if t-h-a-t! )! She seems the same uber-skinny gal that she has been for quite some time. Don’t thnk she has lost any weight…IMO !

  15. Kianna | 11/10/08

    OOPS! Please excuse my type…meant to say that:
    I *agree* with meagain and NOT agre…guess I was thinking faster than I was typing.

  16. jenni | 11/10/08

    i think the difference between giselle and kristen johnson is giselle looks naturally thin, but kristen johnson looks emaciated and really bony.

  17. me =) | 11/10/08

    shes a model, their supposed to be that skinny
    but she looks amazing!

  18. Teed | 11/10/08

    If she looks slimmer, its obviously due to her black pants. I will always envy her long legs!

  19. ml-rb | 11/10/08

    She looks really good here.

  20. Lose That Girl | 11/10/08

    Amazing pins.

  21. fabi | 11/10/08

    Gisele looks healthy, she’s pretty athletic
    Besides it, she always has been thin it can cause jealousy in many people

  22. mel | 11/10/08

    She looks great! I LOVE her body!

  23. lara | 11/10/08

    wow wow wow
    thats all there is to say

  24. Tracy | 11/10/08

    PERFECT!!

  25. Tracy | 11/10/08

    her outfit,
    her shoes,
    her face,
    her body
    everything is perfect.

    I’m so jealous.

  26. Kiss My Kiwi | 11/10/08

    She looks skinnier than usual. She looks gorgeous though - long, slender legs. Love the boots

  27. spanktacular | 11/10/08

    Hot hot hot!

    She looks amazing here. I’m usually not the biggest fan of her but she is stunning

  28. Jorda | 11/10/08

    she is perfect!

  29. mars in velvet | 11/10/08

    well she’s never been overly thin, she has always looked like this

  30. Victoire | 11/10/08

    Such a beautiful face

  31. tinycoture | 11/10/08

    you’re right,
    she has deffinately lost some weight

  32. ruth | 11/10/08

    i love giselle!!

  33. lovebug | 11/10/08

    i think she’s always looked like this… she’s beautiful, but she is quite skinny. i think her legs are too skinny. but she’s terribly gorgeous, nonetheless.

  34. ayla | 11/10/08

    i think she looks about the same as always, which means… GORGEOUS! i’ve seen all the pics that were taken that day and she doesn’t even seem to be from this planet, she’s more than beautiful…her face, her HAIR, her body…everything’s perfect

  35. nikita | 11/10/08

    absolutely gorgeous. im telling you, my hair looks like that everyday, and yet i look terrible and like i just woke up and didnt have enough time for the brush. but her, wow. perfection. those legs are ridiculous.

  36. Elaine | 11/10/08

    her legs look just a bit too thin

  37. JMHO | 11/10/08

    Yes, she looks stunning. But I can’t help but mention…there’s absolutely no waist [definition]. :S

  38. Frankie | 11/10/08

    nice but waistless

  39. Juice | 11/10/08

    Her face looks cray bad.

  40. lulubelle | 11/10/08

    I’ve never thought that she was good-looking. Masculine slightly horsey face, and a straight, thin, shapeless body. OK, her hair is nice.

  41. millet | 11/10/08

    like a flagpole, no womanly curves, not my type of body.

  42. Maxx05 | 11/10/08

    I think she’s been getting prettier as she’s gotten older. I don’t know whether the make-up artists she’d worked with previously didn’t do the best jobs with her face, or whether her face is settling into it’s features better. She looks good weight wise. I don’t think she’s as thin as Kristen Johnston. She also didn’t have a health scare to contend with like Kristen went through. Gisele looks thin and healthy to me.

  43. ValerieSara | 11/10/08

    What is wrong with you people? How is she “just perfect”? She is a woman who is consumed with being the skinniest of the skinny and that is an illness. Disturbing.

  44. Lc | 11/10/08

    I love her outfit and body so much! Perfect! But her face, I just never found it pretty…like at all.

  45. Teed | 11/10/08

    that’s so not true, she gained weight after she quit smoking and she didn’t give two sh*ts what anyone had to say about it

  46. kitten | 11/10/08

    i wish i was that tall!!! arrg

  47. Lenore | 11/10/08

    Her body has always been amazing, but it’s her face I can’t stand…she just resembles a man too much for me.

  48. ande | 12/10/08

    Just to clarify, she didn’t quit VS. She was fired for demanding too much. Victoria’s Secret made her, and for her to not appreciate that is stupid. They were giving her more than anyone else, but she still wasn’t satisfied.

  49. fashionista | 12/10/08

    She looks wonderful!! I think it’s the black pants and the high high heels that are making her look extra slim.

  50. meagain | 12/10/08

    actually they didn’t fire her. yes, she was demanding too much, and no they wouldn’ meet her demands, so she left. it was a career move on her part. it was the end of her contract and it wasn’t renewed, her decision.

  51. Dude | 12/10/08

    Her face is not that great, but she has one of the nicest bodies I’ve ever seen. She must work hard for it, perfection.

  52. wanttobelikethem | 12/10/08

    far out!
    she looks so hot.
    and she is like just wearing normal clothes.
    omg.
    im totally jealous.

  53. keko | 12/10/08

    Her body looks o.k. Her face is starting to look a little “harsh”(bony, no fat). Her arms could use some bicep/tricep work or maybe they’re just bad pics of her arms.

  54. FashionIsMyPriority | 12/10/08

    Yup I’ve seen her in person she is extrmely skinny (not anorexic like) but very skinny even skinnier than on t.v. or in pictures (cuz the camera does add 10 pounds even on skinny models so i can imagine what my idol kate moss looks like in person lol) But yea I was at the coldplay concert in boston at td bank north garden in august and i was in one of the side sections but in the front row of it and she walked right in front of me less than 5 feet away my mother and I were in shock i did a double take:-p shes so gorgeous even in person- very skinny and hardly any makeup cuz she def doesnt need makeup shes so pretty. And then tom brady showed up 2 min later they were sitting a section over from me and then Kate Bosworth was there (another HOT topic on this site) and believe me the pics on this site done lie she is FRAIL looking! But still gorgeous nonetheless, and also jerry seonfeld, steven spielberg, gwentyh paltrow and her mother blythe danner were all there too! It was amazing and I ALSO got to touch Chris Martin so the concert wasnt all that bad LOL haha but yea after seeing giselle in person she is truly gorgeous and not as tall surpisingly as she looks on tv! But very thin:)

  55. FashionIsMyPriority | 12/10/08

    Yup I’ve seen her in person she is extrmely skinny (not anorexic like) but very skinny even skinnier than on t.v. or in pictures (cuz the camera does add 10 pounds even on skinny models so i can imagine what my idol kate moss looks like in person lol) But yea I was at the coldplay concert in boston at td bank north garden in august and i was in one of the side sections but in the front row of it and she walked right in front of me less than 5 feet away my mother and I were in shock i did a double take:-p shes so gorgeous even in person- very skinny and hardly any makeup cuz she def doesnt need makeup shes so pretty. And then tom brady showed up 2 min later they were sitting a section over from me and then Kate Bosworth was there (another HOT topic on this site) and believe me the pics on this site done lie she is FRAIL looking! But still gorgeous nonetheless, and also jerry seonfeld, steven spielberg, gwentyh paltrow and her mother blythe danner were all there too! It was amazing and I ALSO got to touch Chris Martin so the concert wasnt all that bad LOL haha but yea after seeing giselle in person she is truly gorgeous and not as tall surpisingly as she looks on tv! But very thin:)

  56. Natalie | 12/10/08

    She has a GREAT body.
    But I don’t get why she’s so popular. Her face is nothing special at all…

  57. Elaine | 12/10/08

    you’re right, no waist definition

    Scientists have discovered that the waist-hip ratio (WHR) is a significant factor in judging female attractiveness. Just as height is a factor in finding males attractive.

  58. lara | 12/10/08

    i have the same problem with waist definition. its so annoying.

  59. Jennie | 12/10/08

    She looks hot.
    I love those boots and those jeans!! SEXY!

  60. cza | 12/10/08

    And to think she loves Big Macs!

  61. GossipGirl | 12/10/08

    GORGEOUS!

  62. Lim | 12/10/08

    she’s sexy and gorgeous, i love her leg.

  63. laura | 12/10/08

    I love so much when you post about models !!! my favorite posts are also the hilton sisters, the new 90210 cast , and also Gossip Girl cast ! And also Mischa Barton, Nicole Richie and britbrit !

  64. laura | 12/10/08

    we haven’t see amy winehouse around for a while !

  65. lili | 12/10/08

    I would love to have her thighs…. Wouldn’t you?

  66. Nina | 12/10/08

    AWESOME

  67. breads | 12/10/08

    she is a high end model..she is meant to be underweight, she is no fool and knows what she is doing to her body

  68. maybe | 12/10/08

    wow saying that gisele bundchen is skinny is like saying the sun is yellow.

  69. khole | 12/10/08

    if she wasn’t tall I would think she is below average, face, shape etc. But since she is ubber tall ta da she is a supermodel…very very eh for me she is so plain no body its just straight down nothing is like striking me except those shoes!!!

  70. d | 12/10/08

    Lili-No, i wouldn’t like to have her thighs. I had her skinny thighs until i started putting shapely muscle on them. NOW, i love my thighs.

  71. stephani | 12/10/08

    This girl is gorgeous, I don’t understand anyone who says she looks manly. I would kill for her:

    Face
    body
    hair
    eyes
    everything!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  72. lili | 12/10/08

    d, if you managed to put a lot of muscle on your thighs, I doubt they ever looked like Giselle’s. It means that you never had the same body type, unless you made yourself ill in the past (hope not).

  73. April | 12/10/08

    I think she looks great, I don’t think she looks ill at all. Anorexic women try to emulate a body type that they just don’t have. Gisele is a supermodel because she is built like one. Gisele looks like she could go out and play sports. Some women look like they might pass out while waiting in line for starbucks.

  74. Britt | 12/10/08

    The legs… they just go on for days and days… so jealous!

  75. Britt | 12/10/08

    Also, you can tell that this looks more natural on her than that Kristen Johnson chick… yes, she’s very slim, but it suits her height and bone structure, i.e. narrow shoulders and hips.

  76. gabby. | 12/10/08

    lets face it, she IS perfect. and i dont say that often…

  77. d | 12/10/08

    Lili- I didn’t say i put ALOT of muscle on my thighs. You can still have slender thighs & have good muscle tone. I’ve always been pretty tall & thin(never dieted, & still don’t)but i never wanted to be that thin. I always liked the slender, but curvy(with great muscles) look. Well, now that i’ve put on muscle, i am slender, curvy & with great muscle tone. And i never said my body type was like Giselle’s (i have a waist) i meant skinny thighs, just what i said.
    Why bother arguing with people with differing opinions? Just because you would like to look like her doesn’t mean everyone else does.

  78. lili | 12/10/08

    d, first - I did not say that I wanted to look like Giselle, I just said that I wanted her thighs. So your quote is inaccurate.
    Second, I am not very young and have seen many women, and typically women with thighs as slender as her are not the body type to pile on enough muscle to change volume noticeably, which appears to be your case since you say to have gained enough muscle volume on your thighs to build curves on thighs from a near-total nothing. She is wearing black pants in these photos (on which I have commented) and her muscle tone or lack thereof is not visible through the thick pants. Which lead me to think that perhaps your thighs were not that tiny to begin with. Everyone has different notions of slender.
    Of course, possibly you have a miracle body type, in which case I sincerely congratulate you.

  79. lili | 12/10/08

    d -just curious - if you had skinny thighs like Giselle’s, probably you are not a pear…. since you had a waist and are naturally slender - probably you are not an apple either. you do not have Giselle’s shape, so you are not a ruler. hourglasses are typically not very slender. I am genuinely puzzled - please enlighten me. Maybe you have superior genes, or maybe you are under 20 :)

  80. Teed | 12/10/08

    She just said she never had giselle’s shape…and maybe she is a slender hourglass? I am, it happens.

    arguing on the internet is futile

  81. d | 12/10/08

    I don’t see what’s so difficult to understand. I am tall & slender. I used to be tall & skinny. Have you ever heard of a slender hourglass? Meaning thin, but proportionate? I’ts very simple, really. I don’t see how you can fail to understand the body type of used to be SKINNY & proportionate & now SLENDER & proportionate. I don’t know, maybe everyone who is naturally thin & proportionate has superior genes…thanks! :)

  82. lili | 12/10/08

    not arguing, Teed, just curious. slender hourglass w/o silicon intervention? guess you’re the luckiest of them all…

  83. Maxx05 | 12/10/08

    Too bad we can’t put up pictures of ourselves, it would put an end to alot of these arguments - lol!

  84. (*.*) | 12/10/08

    There is absolutely such a thing as a slim hourglass without silicone intervention. Lili, i think you’re deliberately misunderstanding. Is it because you wish you were an hourglass? Just asking.

  85. lili | 12/10/08

    Maxx05 - sometimes I wish the same. Am totally with you on that one.

    (*.*) - ?! what are you going on about? english is my third language maybe am not making myself clear enough. never seen a slim hourglass. was just expressing my admiration. my wishes are to continue being happy and healthy for a long long time, not to have a certain waist-hip ratio. am happy with mine….

  86. PrincessPeach | 12/10/08

    I wish we could put up pics of ourselves too! Beside the fact that it would end these little disputes, it would be very interesting on the commentary… BUT ANYWAY! …Gisele looks aaaaamazing here like always, I just love those boots paired with the skinny jeans!

  87. Hillary | 12/10/08

    way too skinny, she looks sick

  88. Hillary | 12/10/08

    her entire leg is only a little bit bigger than a pole, that is so gross

  89. (*.*) | 12/10/08

    Lili-what are YOU going on about? You are the one sarcastically disputing peoples body types. You have never seen these people before, who are you to tell them how wrong they are when it comes to what body type they have? It just seems like you are making too much of this. Let me try to make this clear. A slender hourglass is a body that is proportionate, meaning weight is distributed evenly, top & bottom, with a defined waist. These people are just a slim version, meaning everything is just slimmer. I just think it’s strange how some people presume to tell others(whom they have never seen) what their body MUST look like.

  90. lili | 12/10/08

    (*.*) - could you please provide an example of a celebrity with what you consider to be a slender natural hourglass? perhaps this will bring some clarity to the issue.

  91. paris herpes | 12/10/08

    Uhm isn’t she a model? I though models were supposed to be thin? They’re literally clothes hangers for fashion…I mean, she looks fine. She looks sort of manly in the face, thought it was a tranny pretending to be Gisele!

  92. joie | 12/10/08

    too tranny looking for me

  93. (*.*) | 12/10/08

    Lili- just out of curiosity, what is YOUR definition of an hourglass?
    Some examples would be Nicole Scherzinger & Roslyn Sanchez. To me & everyone i know, they look to be porportionate & are slender. They have a defined waist, have hips & a behind, but they are still slim, in other words i’m sure they don’t weigh much & wear a pretty small size. I think maybe you are confusing the word hourglass with a certain size & not a shape? Just like there could be a slim pear or a chunky pear, a slim apple & a chunky apple, there could be a slim hourglass & a bigger sized hourglass, it’s all about proportion. I hope that clears things up for you.

  94. (*.*) | 12/10/08

    Oops, i meant proportionate*

  95. lili | 12/10/08

    (*.*) - I looked up both the ladies you mentioned. They are sort of hourglass shaped (of course hourglass is about proportion and not size, there was not debate about that). Naturally or not - who knows. They are moderately slim too. HOWEVER, their thighs are nowhere as slim as Giselle’s. Which backs up my theory, that it is unlikely that an hourglass would have thighs naturally as slim as Giselle. Theoretically it is possible, of course, but I cannot think of one at the moment.

  96. (*.*) | 12/10/08

    Of course their thighs aren’t as slim as Giselles. I don’t see how the fact that their thighs aren’t as slim as Giselle’s backs up your theory in any way. If you agreed that an hourglass is about shape & not size, then why can there not be, lets say for example, someone with a body like Roslyn Sanchez(proportionate) but thinner, meaning thinner everything, like arms, THIGHS, smaller waist, etc. Like if she wears a size 4 for example, this person would wear a size 2 or a size 0? Why is that not possible? I’ve read some comments about Giselle having no curves & no waist. If she had a defined waist & a bit of hip, even though her thighs are skinny, then she would probably be considered an hourglass.

  97. d | 12/10/08

    Damn, my comment is in moderation, between Teed & Lili above, hopefully it’ll come up soon. Interesting conversation. I agree, there are different sizes of hourglass, when i said that my thighs used to be as skinny as Giselle’s, that has nothing to do with being an hourglass or not. It means just that-my thighs used to be skinny, now they’re not as skinny as they were. If you can’t comprehend that, then there is nothing anyone can say to make you understand.

  98. lili | 12/10/08

    ladies, I think something got lost in communication here…
    I was just speculating about possible body shape permutations. No offense to d’s shape or anything - I am sure it is fantastic. Let’s not be rude, ok? If you can come up with an example of a skinny hourglass, I would appreciate it. So far we have none.

  99. Christina | 12/10/08

    I don’t think she’s gained any weight. She’s stunning.

  100. Raven | 13/10/08

    The ultimate figure. I’d die to have that, ome. She is, imo, the most beautiful lady on earth. What a creature.

  101. bella | 13/10/08

    PERFECTION…

  102. elle | 13/10/08

    what is so special about this woman? natural breasts?? There are hundreds of other more beautiful models out there, gisele looks LIKE A MAN form certain anglez, her face is far from perfect, she is so overrated,it’s sad

  103. Suzanne | 13/10/08

    She is very beautiful and looks as good as she did when she began modeling as a teen. I think she probably is not that great a person though because of her choices in love. Dating someone who has a baby on the way with someone else is really crappy. It was degrading to her and Bridget Moynihan. I don’t think Tom Brady is that great of a catch anyhow.

  104. Cossey | 13/10/08

    Uh….you can see her bra!

  105. Necy | 13/10/08

    Man-Face!!!!

  106. Necy | 13/10/08

    look at the first picks closely!! it’s a man wearing a wig, LMOL!!!!!!

  107. d | 13/10/08

    Good Lord, you’re still at it? You’re a stubborn one, aren’t you? LOL
    I’m not quite sure what your theory is. Is it that it’s impossible to be skinny & proportionate? To add to the examples of SLENDER hourglass(which you asked for) Let me add some skinny, proportionate examples. Heidi Montag, Paris Hilton(look at bikini pics)They’re both accused of being skinny(sometimes too skinny) yet they have a defined waist & seem to carry their weight evenly. I’m not very familiar with models, but Miranda Kerr seems to have a better defined waist than Giselle & seems evenly proportioned & is skinny.
    That just proved the theory that you can be skinny & evenly proportioned.
    Goodbye!

  108. d | 13/10/08

    Maxx05- i agree about posting pics. It seems like you can’t leave an innocent comment about your body, in response to some other comment, before some poster demands proof, examples, explanations, etc. Why do people care so much? Now i know why i only occasionally come on here.

  109. lili | 13/10/08

    d - sorry for being stubborn, but surely you understand that “proportionate” is a very vague term and does not prove anything. pls don’t get upset :)
    here’s what I found:
    “HOURGLASSES will find that there is at least a 6-inch difference between their chest and waist and between their hips and waist. The girths of their chest and hips are within a couple of inches of one another.” (can’t post the link).
    PH’s thighs are much larger than Giselle’s too….

  110. starfire | 13/10/08

    Eh.
    Yes, she’s thin. But I’ve always thought her torso was disproportionately long. Her legs are killer though.

    And her face is average at best. That nose. Oh god that nose.

  111. Amy Q | 13/10/08

    She has a manly face

  112. (*.*) | 13/10/08

    d-you’ve listed some good examples of skinny, proportionate women. I doubt if you’ll come back to this post(it seems like you’ve had enough of this nonsense-i can’t blame you.) But if you do-you’ve made your point well, exactly what i’ve been saying. Yes, it is very possible to be a skinny hourglass(proportionate)
    Lili-no one is trying to find women the exact size as Giselle, for crying out loud. The point is AGAIN that you can be skinny & proportionate. The pics prove it.

  113. (*.*) | 13/10/08

    One other thing, Lili. You called Giselle a ruler body type. Now if you want to get technical, is it really possible she is shaped exactly like a ruler? She wouldn’t be human if she was. I doubt if everyone who is described as an hourglass has to get their waist, chest & hips measured to fit the 6″ difference. Now come on, aren’t you grasping at straws here?

  114. lili | 13/10/08

    (*.*) - nobody is grasping at straws. you sound angry. hungry much?

    d described her body, said her thighs used to be like Giselle’s etc…..then the discussion flowed. i think you only read your own comments…
    actually, I read up on body types today (have a cold and am in bed, hence all this time on my hands). technically - Gisele is an hourglass, actually, according to proportions. so is Kate Moss. so am I apparently (which is surprising). hourglass IS about correlation between hip-waist-chest. the difference should be more than 6′’. 6′’ is the min. (*.*) - do you have a learning disability or something? your “replies” to my posts have very little to do with the content of my posts….

  115. (*.*) | 13/10/08

    Oh my, angry & unhappy much? This all began with d saying that she used to have skinny thighs like Giselle. She did not say she measured Giselles thighs & her own & they were exactly the same. There is not just one definition of skinny-Giselle. Then you went off on a nonsensical tangent about how wrong she is, blah, blah. Why can you not admit that she knows her own body type, why so much arguing when you know that you are wrong? I’m sorry, but you seem like you could be mildly retarded to not understand simple things. With so much anger inside of you, you won’t get well as soon as you could. Please calm down & enjoy your body type(whatever it may be) Let d & Teed & anyone else who is lucky enough to be a slender hourglass(me included)enjoy ours.

  116. (*.*) | 13/10/08

    By the way, if Giselle is an hourglass, then there goes your inane argument about how it is not possible to be a skinny hourglass.
    I’m so sorry, all those posts for nothing!

  117. Raven | 13/10/08

    God, you guys are lame. Wtv. It’s just body shape, why debate about the technicalities? Lol.

  118. Maxx05 | 13/10/08

    LOL - Sorry to crash the posting party guys, but Giselle had a boob job years ago, those twins aren’t hers naturally - this may affect her actual body type….

  119. lili | 13/10/08

    (*.*) - you are new on this site, aren’t you? Random dull attacks like you just launched are rare here. Normally people here are respectful and positive. Please take note of that.
    Again, you missed the point of my post: after research I did today, I was surprised to find out that actually Gisele and Kate Moss (and myself) meet the definition of hourglass. Sure, with a Master’s and half a PhD, I must be mildly retarded…. You, on the other hand, sound like you are very young and not from a very educated family. Educated parents would have taught you reading comprehension, manners, and how to argue a point.

  120. lili | 13/10/08

    I know about her implants, Maxx05. Any suggestions re: natural skinny hourglass celebrity? :)

  121. lili | 13/10/08

    (*.*) - don’t you have homework for tomorrow? aren’t you past your bedtime? with the dismal level of maturity you exhibit in your comments, you may just be…

  122. Maxx05 | 13/10/08

    From what I’d thought to be true about traditional hourglass bodies, the differential used to be a 10″ waist to hip ratio, and the chest to waist, as well. I don’t know when the curves were downsized to 6″. The 6″ minimum seems unlikely to be an hourglass body type. I’m very straight/narrow, and even I have a 6″ difference b/t my waist and hips, and I’m certainly not an hourglass! I’ll have to think on which celebrity would be a thin hourglass. I’ll have to read up on this new info for body shapes. Where did you find it? All info. I know of for hourglasses provides the 10″ bust to waist to hip ratio.

  123. lili | 13/10/08

    Maxx05, I thought it was 10′’ too. That’s usually the waist-hip waist-chest diff. with models. I was very surprised too when I saw the 6′’ (am 32.75′’, 25′’, 33′’ and DO NOT look like an hourglass :) ). Edward Jackowski quotes the 6′’ in in his book “Escape your shape”. Granted, not the most scientific source, but looking for a skinny hourglass with 10′’ ratio would be very difficult.. :) I guess 6′’ is the absolute minimum, or maybe he just wants to make flat chested ladies feel good? Although Kate Moss is listed as a 34′’-23′’-35′’ - a skinny natural hourglass..Odd, no?

  124. Maxx05 | 13/10/08

    I just found some things about hourglass proportions and the difference cited should be at least 8 1/2″ from hips to waist and 9″ from waist to bust in order to be a true hourglass figure. Don’t shoot the messenger, I’m not an hourglass! However, at the antique store where I work we just got in the cutest little hourglass charm for a charm bracelet, I squeaked when I saw it - it was so adorable!

  125. lili | 13/10/08

    p.s. I remember that in the early 90’s, the most desirable measurements (in cm) were 90-60-90 - even more than 10′’. 36′’-24′’-36′’, in inches, I suppose. The focal point appears to be also minimal difference between bust and hip circumference.
    My apologies for the posting bonanza - it is rare that something here inspires such posting spree on my behalf…

  126. Maxx05 | 13/10/08

    Uh oh, my boyfriend wants me, later…night! My comment went to moderation - wah..there’s always tomorrow..

  127. (*.*) | 14/10/08

    You resort to insults first because you can’t think of anything to say & i’m the one who is immature? How silly you are. You’ve already proven yourself wrong, you must feel like such a fool. I am so sorry. :(
    I don’t want to be responsible for making you ill over this. It’s ok, everyone makes mistakes.

  128. Daniee | 14/10/08

    Yes, she is skinny with a boyish figure, i.e. no bum, straight twig legs. It works if you are a model.

  129. Persephone | 14/10/08

    I love her boots.

  130. d | 14/10/08

    I can’t believe this is still going on.
    Lili-i’m 34-24.5-34.Everything i’ve read pretty much classifies that as hourglass,though a slim one.When i was a bit thinner,my shape was the same.I wasn’t an apple, ruler or pear-i didn’t miraculously turn into an hourglass.I never said i had no muscle,i said i made my legs(& arms)a bit more shapely & fuller.(not Serena Williams here)because i didn’t want to look too skinny.I don’t like it when people go on at length about their bodies,but since my comment began all this(& it’s a bit annoying when someone w/ no clue tells me how wrong i am)i will.
    Let it go already sweetie,it’s settled & should be over.

  131. d | 14/10/08

    (*.*)-you are correct, I agree w/ pretty much everything you’ve said. In fact, i think you said it better than i had previously done.
    Don’t bother arguing anymore. Some people like to contradict everything other people say. Why, i don’t know, maybe jealousy…or too much time on their hands?

  132. sass | 15/10/08

    She looks near perfect to me! She is tall and has naturally slim physique-she’s beautiful ne one who says otherwise is blatantly JEALOUS!!

  133. montse | 15/10/08

    nice boots !

  134. nAt | 15/10/08

    I think it’s the black skinnies :)

  135. non | 17/10/08

    Pretty figure. A little thin, but pretty.

    Did you see how mad she was. The second pic looks like she was getting ready to flip them off! :D

  136. Jamie | 19/10/08

    Sorry, I don’t agree. I think she is so ugly and I don’t understand the appeal at all. That and she is obviously anorexic. There, I said it.


**Please read the rules, located here, before making a comment! If you choose to comment, you are agreeing to the rules. ALSO Please Note: Your comment may take a few moments to show up. Please do not submit it more than once! Thank you!**


Share Your Thoughts