Megan Fox: “I Got Super, Super-Skinny”

May 24th, 2009 by Rian | Filed under Celebrity Weight Loss, Megan Fox, Scary Skinny, Skinny Celebrities.

SPL101263_007

Actress Megan Fox revealed in a recent tabloid article that she got her weight down to 99 pounds (about 45 kilos, or 7 stone 1 lb) for a role in the upcoming movie Jennifer’s Body. If true, this would have made her BMI 16 since she’s 5′6″!

For her upcoming part in Jennifer’s Body, sexy leading lady Megan Fox whittlled her weight down to a shocking 99 pounds – turning the 5′6″ action star into what she calls a “wispy, tiny girl.” Megan, 23, got so thin that she began experiencing serious repercussions. “I got super, super skinny,” she explains. “I got to where I was losing my eyelashes and eyebrows.”

Wow!

I’m mostly wondering when this happened since we’ve all seen photos of her over the past year or so…?

Megan was spotted at LAX last week, looking thin as usual:

SPL101263_013

Photos via SplashNews; Quote Source: In Touch, June 1 2009 issue

What do you all think?

Edit: Here are some photos from the set of Jennifer’s Body.. WARNING: NOT SAFE FOR WORK! Click here.

(I don’t think she looks like she weighs 99 pounds there!!)

ADVERTISEMENT


Tags: , , , , , , ,

165 Responses to “Megan Fox: “I Got Super, Super-Skinny””

  1. Kathy | 24/05/09

    she looks amazing:)

  2. Synthara | 24/05/09

    Ugh the hair is a big no-no… But she’s cute.

  3. Ella | 24/05/09

    i think she’s actually 5′4″ which makes that weight more believable

  4. Miss Jessie | 24/05/09

    …want to see the photos too

    I like her seemingly effortless to maintain body type. Like Aniston’s

  5. suzanne | 24/05/09

    I can’t really see her body in this outfit. I am sure she is perfect as usual.

  6. guzi | 24/05/09

    i think she is lying, she didnt look like 45 kgs at all last year/// she is trailer trash

  7. Lana-bee | 24/05/09

    i saw some photos from the movie i don’t think she looked like she had lost weight. she looked the same as she always does.

  8. Lola | 24/05/09

    she doesnt look thin atall

  9. Kiss_My_Kiwi | 24/05/09

    She looks slim, not skinny here. Cute and casual, but not loving the tat.
    I don’t recall seeing her look super skinny. It’s not great that she put her health at risk for a role.

  10. s2k1 | 24/05/09

    I totally do not believe her.
    I sense some attention-whoring

  11. Victoria | 24/05/09

    What a lie! 99 pounds? When? Last year? No way, impossible. All that stuff it’s just to be in the media.

    This girl has been saying a lot of nonsense for two months aprox. All that things about Scarlett and her bisexuality, c’mon. Come back to real world, Megan! Be a bit humble and don’t be so conceited, baby.

    Who could believe that story? It’s just to draw attention. Her manager must be very good.

  12. Kugeni | 24/05/09

    I think she just looooves to play with people and making up stories, like the one about her 22 inches waist. I don’t think she’s been serious when telling that she’s been that skinny.

  13. anais18 | 24/05/09

    When you get to be too thin for your height (as she’s stating) you actually start GROWING more hair, not losing it…

  14. Ahmandaaa | 24/05/09

    She is NOT thin at all. Just normal looking. And she is no where near as cute without makeup…

  15. Jazy | 24/05/09

    what a liar…shes was thinner a tad maybe like 10-12lbs…but 99 pounds is bullshit.

  16. Black Kitty | 24/05/09

    I can’t say anything about her weight since is wearing baggy clothes; but her arms are muscly, not particoularly thin. She looks good anyway.

  17. Elizabeth | 24/05/09

    Actually, normal hair falls out, anais18, and your body begins growing a unique type of hair called “lanugo” all over, in a desperate attempt to maintain body temp.

  18. Realme2008 | 24/05/09

    First of all why do magazines get celebrity’s heights wrong all the time?! No, Mariah Carey is not 5′9″. She’s 5′7″, and always wears platform heels to appear taller. If you notice her husband is 5′11″, and if she wore the huge heels she commonly likes to wear she would be taller than him. She not though she’s always shorter than him. Megan Fox also likes to wear large heels, but isn’t any taller than 5′5″. Mostly likely in the 5′4-5′4.5″ range according to celebheights.com. 5′6″ is absolutely out of the question. She also never weighted 99 pounds. While she’s always been very slim she’s never appeared to be emaciated, gaunt, and underweight. Obvious lies.

  19. Duchess | 24/05/09

    I haven’t a clue about her weight as I don’t follow her career, but her hair extensions are rank.

  20. Audrey | 24/05/09

    I’ve never seen this girl in anything, but she always looks a bit …. yucky!? …. in pictures here. Not classy.

    Seems like a bit of desperate publicity for Jennifer’s Body – whatever that may be!

  21. MScotton | 24/05/09

    I have Never seen her at a BMI of 16!!

  22. sirena | 24/05/09

    hope it’s ok to post…you can see stills from this movie here: link edited

    Moderator’s note: Thanks for the link Sirena, I’m going to add it to the post!

  23. Ebliss | 24/05/09

    I wanted to like Megan. I really did. However, I read an article profiling her in “Elle” magazine and she came off as totally trashy and egocentric. She claimed that when she weighed 99, the director of Transformers told her to gain 10lbs for her role; in her exact words: “He wants somebody substantial.” Since when is 109lbs at 5′6 “substantial”? She seems like a self-absorbed tool.

  24. meghan | 24/05/09

    the hair is not really unique. many people are born with it and then it falls out. but yes you do lose your normal hair and start to grow that very soft peach fuzzy hair called lanugo. its a sure sign of malnurishment and eating disorders very often. although at one time i was down to 92 lbs. and im 5′6″ and i never got the lanugo, although my hair did start to thin on my head. now im at a normal of 120 so im all healthy and my head of hair is back to normal!

  25. Maxx05 | 24/05/09

    Megan Fox is short, Between 5′2″-5′3″. She could be much prettier if she removed the tattoos and dressed more elegantly. But that isn’t the image she’s reaching for and that isn’t her audience. I don’t recall seeing her as thin as she was saying she’d gotten, but I really wasn’t paying attention either.

  26. londoncalling | 24/05/09

    She always hides her face when she is without make up, make up does change someones face.

  27. Taylor | 24/05/09

    Not true…
    I am 5′6 and i have a super small build and I am normally 112-115 lbs. i got the flu and I weighed 99 lbs and I looked a HELL of alot skinnier than she EVER did.
    My guess? She was probably 105 and then she gained 10 lbs. for Transformers…putting her at 115.
    I say this, because i am the same height and I am not that easily fooled.

  28. LR | 24/05/09

    I want to like her, but I really can’t respect this girl at all. All she does is blab to the media about herself and it really annoys me. She is pretty I’ll give her that, but SO self centered and I wish she would close her mouth sometimes…there seems to always be garbage spewing out of it.

  29. ella | 24/05/09

    i think it’s just a stupid lie… cuz I’ve never seen pics of her where she was underweight. and the only reason to lie about that is what? to get attention? weird.

  30. Sabra | 24/05/09

    She’s probably about 5′4″-5′5″.

  31. ali | 24/05/09

    looked at the pics for the movie and think she’s lying. doesn’t look like she was underweight whatsoever. plus she still had boobs. unless those are fake, she would have lost them along with the weight.

  32. sup | 24/05/09

    haha, judging by her love handles, i’d say she is NOT 99 lbs. . . quite a bit over in fact.

  33. ml_rb | 24/05/09

    See looks normally thin in those pics not AT ALL sickly.

  34. Maxx05 | 24/05/09

    She doesn’t look toned in those pictures at all. She also does not look too thin. Her face does look pretty in the pics, but her body looks saggy. I’m guessing that she really had to work out like h3ll for transformers right after that.

  35. Kayla | 24/05/09

    I think she is definately 99 lbs in those pictures. She looks like a very untoned 99 lbs though and that’s why she looks like she weighs more…also, i’m not sure if she’s actually 5′6″ IDK, but she always looked shorter than that.

  36. elizabeth | 24/05/09

    ok one more reason for me to hate this girl….she is trashy, her tattoos are barf worthy, she is completely fake, and she tries to exploit her “bisexuality” so more stupid guys will drool over her. now she is going around claiming to have been 99 pounds and have this 23 inch waist. i call bullshit….she looks normal to me and i have yet to see her look remotely super skinny though she claims to be so…she must have the beyonce syndrome

  37. Ashley | 24/05/09

    All of Hollywood is severely delusional about their weight. I don’t suppose there’s some sort of magnetism in the soil there that makes their scales read 50 pounds less than it should? Now if only we could crack the mystery of the size tags!

  38. aud | 24/05/09

    she’s never weighed 99 lbs..and she’s def. not 5′6 i’d say 5′4-5′5. i think all celebrities add an inch or two onto their heights. but anyway in those pics where she’s barely wearing anything i’d say if anything she looks kinda sloppy skinny and i’d say she weighed atleast 115-118 and i think she normally looks like she weighs about that..i dunno i used to think she was gorgeous but i can’t stand her style!! seriously it seems like she tries to be one of those people who doesn’t care about her appearance but it isn’t working for her like it does some people. i can’t stand when people lie about their weight to make themselves appear thinner when we can clearly see you are lying!!

  39. Victoria | 24/05/09

    I’ve seen the photos right now and I just can say: ha-ha-ha! Try it again, Megan. Another tale, please, this one has been amazing.

    She’s only a wannabe Jolie. That’s obvious, she wannabe like her idol Angelina. The tatoos, the hair, the make-up, the wild “pre-Brad” life style, uknow, full of noisy headlines.

    She wannabe the next sex-icon and we’ve to admit it, she’s trying hard, but… We must admit it too, she’s not. She’s just a pretty face without charisma. Another girl among all that exists in Hollywood. That’s the reason why she needs saying this stuff, ’cause otherwise, nobody would remember her.

  40. BAK | 24/05/09

    Yeah I also wanted to like megan… but she has just come off as such a fake, self-absorbed idiot. There is NO way she was EVER 99 pounds. I don’t know who the hell she is trying to fool… but its just stupid. I don’t know what kind of fantasy world she is living in. She is just trying to get the media all focused on her body or something. Just a attention whore.

  41. Mel | 24/05/09

    There is NO WAY she was 99 in those pics!! When I got down to 99 (I am 5′3) I did not have love handles hanging out the side of my shorts like she did. She is thin, but not overly so in the topless pics. Why do celebs ALWAYS lie about their weight?

  42. jenn | 24/05/09

    she looks about my size in those pics and i’m 5′3″ and 103lbs.

  43. kc | 24/05/09

    I like the colors in her hair.

  44. Zzzz | 24/05/09

    She’s full of crap. Nicole Richie is a lot shorter and when Howard Stern tricked her into weighing herself, she was 97lbs… and looking WAY thinner than Megan.

  45. jed | 24/05/09

    I get a feeling that if she subtracted 10 pounds or so for this movie—the ten pounds won’t necessarily decide to land in the same places they used to be when she gains them back. She is likely to get more flab around the middle than she used to have.

  46. aoife | 24/05/09

    she is pretty and while she is really thin she doesnt look malnourished or anything especially in those topless shots – she looks untoned too!

  47. KT | 24/05/09

    wow those pics from the movie shes not skinny at all, she just looks normal. for how everyone thinks she is im shocked at what she looks like naked. what a ridiculous thing to lie about, 99lbs, please.

  48. Megan | 24/05/09

    She doesn’t look any different.

  49. Anya | 24/05/09

    There is NO WAY she was 99 pounds in those pics, I’m 5′6 and was significantly thinner than that at 104!

  50. Black Kitty | 24/05/09

    What a moron. She is so flabby in those pictures where she’s supposed to be super skinny. Almost fat, actually.

  51. valerie | 24/05/09

    I used to like her but I don’t anymore. She tries too hard to get the bad-as* look and it’s not attractive. She was also caught lying several times over the last month. She just CRAVES for attention, and I hate it. I would be offended if I were Angelina Jolie when people compare her to Megan Fox, saying Megan is the next Angelina!!! Angelina looks effortlessly pretty, with or without makeup, and she’s got a head on her shoulders. Megan is the total opposite, and she seeks attention way too much. And by the look of her body in the pictures, there’s NO way she was down to 99 lbs. Her arms are perfectly normal, she has these love handles, her thighs are also normal… still has a round face. Nothing scary skinny about her – so no where even near 99 lbs.

  52. courtney | 24/05/09

    I am currently 3 months pregnant, and I am 5′4 and 108 pounds. Although those shorts she is wearing look too small, and therefore are pushing her lovehandles out more than they are naturally, I would say that here she weighs at least 5 pounds heavier judging by what I look like in pictures vs. what she does. I also have the skinny-fat untoned body, I’m lazy, and naturally thin, but judging from how soft she looks, I would say prob 114.
    I wouldn’t doubt she did get down to that or started into the business as that(have you seen the corset pictures) but, I do think that she might be stretching a little bit. My weight does fluctuate a TON, even up to 5 pounds depending on the time of day or if I have more activity than normal. Maybe she meant during a different part of filming? IDK. I like all her tattoos except for the marilyn monroe one. I think she should have picked a better location for that one.

  53. annabells | 24/05/09

    awwwful hair.looks like a dead racoon attached to her head. pretty face but so slutty she ruins it for herself

  54. Jade | 24/05/09

    I’m horrible at guessing people’s weight, since there are all different body shapes and types and height isn’t enough to go on, but 99 seems like a definite exaggeration. That is, if she’s really 5′6. She looks a tad bit shorter but who knows. She looks hot though!

  55. maee | 24/05/09

    the only person i would believe to be so small like that is someone who looked like nicole richie… and her weight loss… shes lying.. maybe 125 pounds but no where near 99 pounds at 5′6

  56. lulu | 24/05/09

    she doesn’t look “super skinny” in those Jennifer’s Body pics

  57. Kianna | 24/05/09

    NO WAY 99 lbs. for that movie. If she is around 5′5″ give or take 1/2 inch…while she is thin….she is definitely NOT 99 lbs. Maybe more like 105 to 110 lbs.
    @ Jade: I, too, am sort bad at guessing the weights (even if the heights are accurate). LiLo (at 5′5″) is reportedly weighing 97 lbs…Megan is not as thin as the current yo-yo’ing LiLo weight issue(s) saying Linds is at the thinnest “to-date”…while LiLo is at her thinnest ever (@ 97 lbs) just now (reportedly!)

  58. kayleigh83 | 24/05/09

    I’m soo sick of this attention-hungry ho. All she does is spout crap out of her mouth in every interview – she’s a lying, self-absorbed Angelina wannabe. I can’t wait for her 15 minutes to be up.

  59. nanana | 24/05/09

    well could be that she weighted 45 kg.. but she wasnt super super skinny.. i think SHE’S OVEREACTING!!!

  60. Andrea | 24/05/09

    If she really was 99 pounds with her height (debatable whether it’s 5′6″), she would look rather emaciated a la Nicole Richie during her unhealthy skinny phase. To me, that’s a very healthy looking “99 pounds”. She should stop being delusional and so desperate for attention that she’ll lie even to herself.

  61. megs | 24/05/09

    i am 5 foot 3 inch and i weight 104 and i look littler then i think she does in those photos for her new movie??

  62. anna | 24/05/09

    well, this girl is definitely not on BMI 16! No way… ridiculous and dangerous for anorectic girls with distorted body scheme to tell so.

  63. Sienna | 24/05/09

    HAHHA MY ASS is she 99lbs and 5′6.

    Shes got a freakin muffin top (yea they could have at least gotten her panties in her own size!)

    Scary skinny is not the right tag for this, when also in the same category fall Tori Spelling, Nicole Richie and Allegra Versace. Megan Fox is practically obese compared to them.

    and if she is 5′4, 99lbs is not a scary weight for her! if she is 5′4 and 99, then she is not scary skinny. She thinks she’s underweight? She should go visit a treatment center. She’d soon start feeling like a cow, the pressure would be unbearable, and then she would seriously consider her self indulgent, flippant comments (or starve herself to REAL danger). She probably doesnt even know what real hunger means.

  64. fbo_girl | 24/05/09

    In the photos for Jennifer’s Body, she looks very average, soft-thin. No way did she weigh so little or have such a low BMI.

    In fact, her body in those photos looks pretty unremarkable for someone people make such a big deal about.

  65. Sarah | 24/05/09

    she doesn’t look really thin in any of the pictures… she looks like a normal weight

  66. bar | 24/05/09

    common
    now the lesbian sex talking and now this
    shes been talking too much lately
    she should stick to shutting up and being the hottest piece of arss in hollywood

  67. Sessa | 24/05/09

    She’s full of sh*t and silicon.

  68. summer | 24/05/09

    I think she is a habitual liar. she is lying about her weight

  69. henny | 24/05/09

    Umm Sienna

    You say 99 pounds isn’t scary skinny for 5′4? Are you completely delusional?? I am 5′4 and 115 pounds and I am thin. If I were to lose another 16 pounds I would look freakish.

  70. henny | 24/05/09

    Another thing,

    Megan is retarted. Why would she clearly lie about her weight when she is getting her picture taken everyday?? Clearly she never got down to that weight. What a freak!!

  71. Amy | 24/05/09

    I’m kind of tempted to believe her. I’m 5′6″ and at my lowest was 103 lb. I didn’t look all that thin to be honest, and certainly didn’t look emaciated. I think she’s telling the truth because if you crash diet and say get down to 99 lb, you’re not *really* 99 lb, although it’s the number on the scale, you can gain the pounds back in a couple of days.

    She might be exaggerating a teensy bit, but I can easily see her at 5′5″ and weighing about 102 lb in those photos; what she’s wearing is too tight but in one of the pics you can easily see her ribs going round into her back and she’s not stretching or anything. So yeah. Looks like I’m the only one who does believe her. Seriously I don’t see why she would lie about this.

  72. abby | 24/05/09

    her boobs look really fake in those pics (in the link), and she looks really skinny-fat…

  73. MexoleRew | 24/05/09

    ??????? ? ???????? – ? ????????. ??????? ?? ????????

  74. lili | 24/05/09

    I’m 5′8” and when I was 96lbs nothing was falling out. Not hair, not eyelashes and definitely not eyebrows. This girl is so stupid. Probably her fake eyelashes were coming unglued and her hair was falling out from all these ugly highlights.

  75. kayleigh83 | 24/05/09

    “Seriously I don’t see why she would lie about this.”

    Reeaaally? Besides being an attention whore who will do and say almost anything to milk her 15 minutes of fame and the public’s fascination with celebrity weight? She has plenty of reason to lie, and trust me, she’s using them.

  76. Susy | 24/05/09

    If she weighed 99 pounds, you would see bones protruding.

  77. Jordan | 24/05/09

    skinny is skinny and you don’t have to show bones to be considered skinny.. i like her but sometimes she tries too hard… btw, love when you post on the weekends!

  78. Natty | 24/05/09

    I’m 5′6.5″ medium build. 140 pounds. Is that too big?
    All these super skinny celebs are making me feel like a giant!!!

    MFs weight always look the same to me.. No matter what she says..

  79. Amy | 24/05/09

    Look, what I meant is if you have been 99 lb for 6 months, then that is your actual weight. If you’ve crashed dieted and lost 10 lb in 2 weeks, then, even though the scale says 99 lb, and you *technically* weight 99 lb, you’re not actually as skinny as somebody who is a true 99 lb, because most of the weight lost is merely water weight. You get me? But it’s still unhealthy.

    I don’t know, I was only a very few lb heavier than she was claiming to be and I didn’t have bones protruding significantly unless I breathed in, and I lost the weight very quickly. This is why I kind of believe her, but she obviously didn’t “weigh” 99 lb in the way you all would mean by it.

  80. size--0 | 24/05/09

    i totally get you amy

  81. jamie | 24/05/09

    i am 5′8 and 108 and i am not losing hair. She is full of crap!!!

  82. fosse | 24/05/09

    99 pounds and muffin top I don’t think so.

  83. Amy | 24/05/09

    Natty, you are a healthy weight, please don’t feel like a giant! Remember you are quite a bit taller than most of these celebs!

    You shouldn’t feel that way also because although I’m defending Megan in this instance, in general I do believe that most celebrities lie about their weight.

  84. B | 24/05/09

    She’s definately fibbing about being 99lbs. What a lying attention seeker! I’m 5′5″ and 105. When I was 99 I was grossly thin. She has a muffin top for god’s sake!

    *** FYI, anais18, I have an eating disorder and after a few good fasts my hair and eyebrows get a lot thinner. True though that you get thin hair all over your back and arms, but you also lose hair.

  85. Kate | 24/05/09

    That’s crap…I’m 5′6″ and I usually weigh around 100 (granted its natural and I’m probably smaller boned then her my feet are a size 5 and my ring size is a 4!), however right now I’m about 105 and I’m still much skinnier then she is in those pictures- she’s got a bit of a roll going on over whatever bottom she has on in those pictures! She doesn’t look boney at all…if she did it would have been everywhere that she was anorexic or something. Attention whore.

  86. Maxx05 | 24/05/09

    Many celebrities augment their height by several inches and subtract their weight by however many pounds. Hollywood is an illusion, no surprise there.

  87. Erica | 24/05/09

    Well, she’s really skinny, but I don’t know about 99 lbs. I’d say more like 110.

  88. greentea | 24/05/09

    kay when i was that weight 2 years ago, i looked WAY thinner than that.
    she’s not 99 lbs in those photos

  89. ali | 25/05/09

    i think she lies quite a bit :/ 99lbs? no way does she look “super-skinny” in those photos from the movie. i’m 5′4″ and if i weighed 99lbs, i would be boney. she never looked like that and she’s 5′6″!

  90. Blahhx16 | 25/05/09

    I completely doubt that she was 99 pounds there. But she does look thin, maybe 120 to 125, for 5′6.

  91. Lady D | 25/05/09

    idk about the whole 99 lbs thing, but what i do know, is that her hair makes me barf. gahhh, what are those highlights? there are so many more words that i have about it, but i will keep them to myself

  92. beans | 25/05/09

    i was expecting ribs and hip bones to be jutting- she looks totally normal in those pictures! the fat over the swim shorts- no way is she 99 lbs and has that- unless she’s really really really short. she’s a talentless piece of white trash. why to men find her attractive?

  93. dum-dum | 25/05/09

    nose-job, yep most of you probably know already. She had quite a bumpy honker a year or 2 ago. And what a joke re. 99lbs…I am 5′6 and when I get to 119 people are freaking out. (and I have a flat ass and a small B-cup.) She is a lying, attention seeking tralier trash ho. (IMHO.)

  94. AM | 25/05/09

    Hmm I don’t know, I don’t think she was 99 lbs but I think she could have been close. It depends a lot on your body type, I’m 5′5 1/2 and 99-98 lbs and I don’t think I look scary skinny, I think it has to do with bone structure

  95. skinny 4ever | 25/05/09

    saw the pictures, she doesn’t look 99 pounds at all.

  96. Nicole | 25/05/09

    Nonsense.

  97. FramBoise | 25/05/09

    thanks for converting to kilos! plz, think about it each time you gonna give a weight :)

  98. sasha | 25/05/09

    there is NO way she is 99lbs. she would be much much skinnier and look unhealthy. she looks thin but normal in those photos

  99. elise | 25/05/09

    I’m thinking she’s full of crap as always.

  100. Claire | 25/05/09

    Wow, you guy’s get really worked up over numbers.

    She’s a stunning girl, great figure and I like her casual relaxed style in these pictures. Not many people can carry off this look with style.

    A cross of Musician/Latin Diva/Surfer Chick, I like it. She is extreemly versatile. May need a new publistist though, just a thought.

  101. lindsey | 25/05/09

    wtf!! that would have made her be in lindsay lohan skinny range!! hmmm an I don’t remember seein’ that. oh and as for them photos love handles or those pants were way to tight!! Don’t know why she makes this shiz up, shes stunninly beautiful with an amahzing figure!! Numnut!! lol

  102. Jules | 25/05/09

    No you didn’t, Megan. Just like your waist is not 22 inches. You can stop with the lies cos it’s pathetic ;)

  103. jaz | 25/05/09

    eh 5′6 and 99 lbs isn’t that thin. she may have been. the camera adds pounds.

  104. UK Elle | 25/05/09

    Megan Fox is what you call an attention-seeking, contradictive b-esser.

    She got down to 99 lbs and lost her eyelashes?? For a role!? OH-EM-GEE!!! She’s so frickin’ cool man!!!!!!!!

    Idiot.

  105. Hannah | 25/05/09

    well certainly not bmi 16. guess she could be telling the truth about weight but not height?
    anyway, guess it’s good she didn’t get herself too unhealthy, although the eyelashes bit may be an exageration (not in that length of time!)

  106. Linda | 25/05/09

    Ok maybe she’s not the weight she said. But I don’t understand people coming on here basing if it’s true or not on their own heights + weights. There are so many things that comes in to how your body looks, build, muscles, where on your body you are most likely to carry a bit extra etc. So saying it’s a lie because she doesn’t look exactly like you at the same height is laughable.

  107. sama | 25/05/09

    meh, she’s just blabbing. i’ve seen way thinner than that, and that is DEFINITELY not a bmi of 16! 16 is … anorexic standard, i suppose.

    i think she’s trying to make a big deal out of it with the “losing my eyelashes and eyebrows”. isn’t it part of her job to lose/add weight? she should grow up, she signed up for it in the first place …

  108. sweet_tart87 | 25/05/09

    ONLY TV CAMERAS ADD LBS,NOT CANDIDS. I am so sick of people saying this. If you see a fat photo of yourself that is how fat you really are(depending on the angle). That being said I used to really like this Megan chick until she opened her mouth and started spewing this ghetto white trash talk on a non-stop basis. Now any beauty she once had to me is out the window. I despise her and her lieing antics. I really dislike conceited people I don’t care how beautiful you are. Let others tell you, don’t tell us, we do have eyes you know! With that being said there is no friggin way she was 99lbs with those handle bars and soft arms she had. Wow egotistical and a pathalogical liar. Megan you are now #3 on my celebrity sh*t list! Boo.

  109. Black Kitty | 25/05/09

    Omg Lily, you know, some models at your same height and weight died because of that. You must have a really tiny frame.

  110. A | 25/05/09

    at 5′5 ish theres no way shes 99lb in thouse pictures! id say atleast 10lb more than she said.

  111. angelique | 25/05/09

    ohhh who care what’s ur weight ….ur fugly and trash

  112. girly girl | 25/05/09

    I think she’s fudging with the numbers a bit there, both her height and her weight. Also, she doesn’t seem like the classiest girl in the world, based on her style of dress and choice of movies.

  113. babygirl | 25/05/09

    i tried crashed dieting..it’ll really cause hair fall..and that’s pretty scary..we’ll at least she’d admitted that shed did experienced those stuff..

  114. italiangirl | 25/05/09

    what a lier!!! now she’s around 115-118 lbs if she’s 5′6 and at her skinniest was 105-110 lbs for sure!! I’m 5′6 and 105-106 lbs and I look way thinner than megan-stupid-attention-whore. and also lindasy isn’t 97 lbs!!! she’s around 105.

  115. italiangirl | 25/05/09

    liar sorry

  116. Dracca | 25/05/09

    I am not seeing the 99 pound thing on those topless photos. She is thin, sure, but not excessively so, not in either photo set.

  117. tinkerbell | 25/05/09

    she’s trying to talk about unrealistic weight goals and she fails to do this because she never was 99 and i certainly doubt she was even under 110. she’s about 125 for 5′6. nothing more than a wannabe anorexic. she has a nice body, why lie about it? 125 is beautiful.

  118. Annabella | 25/05/09

    wait what 99 Pounds?
    looks like 120

    She no were near 99 Pounds
    She still has flab
    ew

  119. Laura | 25/05/09

    I doubt she weighs 99lbs in that picture. It is pretty hard to take media speculation seriously, they can’t base her weight on random guess work and a few photos, particularly ones where she is wearing baggy clothes.

    I think she’s just trying to get a media reaction and plug her new film, its all about publicity.

  120. Serafina | 25/05/09

    Hmm, I thought she was told to GAIN weight for that movie role, that would make her 109 pounds in those pictures, which could be true.

  121. Xarmani | 25/05/09

    publicity stint

  122. girly girl | 25/05/09

    her tattoo is gross. why?

  123. Leanna | 25/05/09

    If she really is 99lb in those pics then she is what is known as ’skinny-fat’. Obviously she’s not really fat, but it means basically you have no muscle and so most of your weight is body fat. This can make a person appear to be bigger and weigh more than they actually do.

    As for her height, I have no idea how you can even guess that from a picture? It might be because she has a long torso and shorter legs that you think she looks shorter…that’s the only reason I can think of.

  124. Leanna | 25/05/09

    I think if she is 99lb then she may very well be close to 30% body fat…it’s the only way to explain why she looks ‘healthy’. Probably not even 30lb of fat on her body but when you’ve only got a ridiculously low 70lb of lean mass it looks quite flabby. She must have been starving herself for this role…sad.

  125. somatic | 25/05/09

    99!? super super skinny? Impossible!! probably 115lb…

  126. boo | 25/05/09

    Honestly, the camera adds a lot of weight. I remember an interview with Anne Hathaway (sp?) where she said that she became underweight, but looked frighteningly normal on camera! A lot of these girls have to be underweight to even look normal in the movies/in pictures, and those that look underweight on screen are emaciated.

    So, I believe her. But, she’s still annoying. And..didn’t she say she essentially barely ate to lose weight for that movie? Of course she’s untoned.

  127. MMH | 25/05/09

    99 lbs?!! No, only if she’s like 5′2″; and she’s not.

  128. henny | 25/05/09

    Boo, only the LIVE camera adds 10+ pounds not movie ones. And even if it were adding 10 pounds there’s no way she was 99

  129. maria | 25/05/09

    99, try more like 110-120, with her height.(at least..!) i checked the pics and she didn’t even look like a little bit underweight. ummm, bmi 16 would look WAAAAY bonier. well at least on all the people that i know. or than she’s just really smallboned and can weigh next to nothing w/out looking skinny

  130. Jess | 25/05/09

    such a lie. she looks nothing like 99lbs in those pictures, there’s a muffin top ffs. I’ve been at 99lbs, and my hair didn’t start to fall out. she’s such a bullshitter

  131. jed | 25/05/09

    Has anybody here ever dropped from say….a well toned 115 down to 100, then when you went back to 107 you discovered you had a muffin-top? Skinny girls get them, sometimes.

  132. natalie | 25/05/09

    She’s not 100 lbs. She wishes she was but she’s definitely NOT and never was.

    She’s a talentless wanna-be attention whore. No better than those girls from “The Hills” as far as I’m concerned. Looks like any other dark haired Playmate, weird eyebrows, average body. I don’t get how she was #2 on Maxim’s Top 100, but then again Alessandra Ambrosio wasn’t even on the list…go figure.

  133. zandra | 25/05/09

    wierd. she looks at least 115Ibs.. not 99! :O
    and she actually looks not to thin at all…
    her arms, her lil ‘muffin top’ please.
    I know people who weigh 99 and it ain’t that pretty.
    they look MUCCCH thinner!

  134. Georgaina | 25/05/09

    I agree with Amy’s comments above – she could’ve starved down to an ‘empty’ weight of 99 (anyone ever been ill/fasted and lost a good 5 pounds in a day?!) but actually still have looked more like 110. Especially if people are right and she’s 5′4 rather than 5′6, in which case 99 is about the same as 110 for someone a couple of inches taller. Plus she doesn’t look to have much muscle tone in those set pics.

  135. Angela | 25/05/09

    yes she’s about 5′4. why do almost all celebrities lie about their height…why need to appear taller when you’re not a model? Lol that said..i love her

  136. Rhian | 25/05/09

    as usual, she’s full of crap. she looks slim in those photos yes, but nowhere near 45kgs!
    everything she does stinks of attention-seeking.
    even if she was only 5′4″ she would be much bonier at that weight.
    it’s a shame, because she is such an attractive girl, i would like her if she didn’t act like such a boob.

  137. lili | 25/05/09

    Black Kitty – yep – very small frame. No bones even start to show at all at above 110…

  138. RiRi | 25/05/09

    shes really like 5′4 and she started shooting this movie the end of 2007. If you see the pics of her then you can tell she was deff about 100lbs. She prob just gained some pounds before the movie started.

  139. kt | 25/05/09

    i would believe that she got down to 45. if you’re that short & very petite & slim anyway, it certainly is true. some of my friends are around that weight & height & they have the petite look i.e. small bone structure.

  140. ms_benes | 25/05/09

    She’s 5′6 and 99 pounds like Kim Kardashian is a size 2.

  141. Persephone | 25/05/09

    she is squishy so it is possible that she would weigh less than someone who is more toned. Maybe she weighed 99 pounds for like 1 hour or something.

  142. Kendra | 25/05/09

    This girl is ridiculous. I can’t even believe she gets roles, she is beyond shitty in the acting department. In 10 years she will be just like Denise Richards.

  143. wccheer | 25/05/09

    let me just say i hate this girl with a passion. everything from her annoying voice to those nasty tattoos just kills me. she is so ugly and i cannot find a reason as to why any man would find her attractive. and judging by her skanky topless pics, she is definitely not 99 pounds. sorry, but at 5′6 and 110-115 pounds, i’m smaller than her. she’s such a liar when it comes to weight…who can actually believe her when all this crap comes out of her mouth all the time? “ooooh i have a 22 inch waist..oooh i’m 99 pounds…” god, just shut up you nasty freakin whore, shew.

  144. panda_bear | 25/05/09

    Judging from the pics that were linked of her her boobs alone weigh 20 lbs. I would say if she is 5′6 she weighs about 125 lbs. She is not 99 lbs, and yeah I read the “my producer made me gain weight for Transformers” crap also, imo she has always looked the same weight to me, I also read that she was bulimic, I think this chick will say or do whatever she thinks is popular to be in the public eye, what a moron

  145. Zuwee | 25/05/09

    I really don’t like this lady, so gross and stuck up. She is always licking her lips…

  146. neatlybroken | 25/05/09

    Crash diets sometimes cause mostly muscle loss so that’s why you lose weight so quickly. And she does look pretty flabby in those pics compared to how she normally looks. She could have gotten close to 99lbs due to increased body fat, but still not look emaciated. I crash dieted for a month: lost 25lbs, hair got thinner (including eyebrows), got cold, and gained body fat (went from 16% to 30%). It all depends on your body type. But I think she’s saying this to get attention. And look…..it’s working.

  147. ErickaClaire | 25/05/09

    i don’t her, she looks like one of those playboy bunny’s

  148. Ruthy | 26/05/09

    Bull*(it..I have seen pictures of her from this movie online and NO way was she 99 pounds, attention seeker….

  149. sasha | 26/05/09

    she needs to shut the fuck up, seriously

  150. kym | 26/05/09

    she looks great. i think she has the best body in the transformers movie.

  151. samba | 26/05/09

    nar if u look at those photos from jennifers body she doesnt look to be that weight! I mean sure she is skinny (skinny fat cuz there is no tone) and her boobs look big! but she wouldnt be 99lbs. thats just silly. the olsen twins would be a good few inches shorter than her and they would weigh around that much and she looks no where near that skinny! i’d say perheps 110lbs and the lightest (if that is her actual height) otherwise i would say more around the 115lbs to 120lbs mark

  152. ssss | 26/05/09

    I really don’t think she’s 5′6″. celebheights.com has her at 5′4.5″ and I think that’s about right comparing her to others.
    At 5′4.5″ I can see her weighing 99lbs, her BMI would be about 16.6 and with neatlybrokens theory on loss of muscle and no loss of fat I can imagine her telling the truth, maybe off by a couple of pounds, because 99 sounds a bit too much like ‘i got below 100 :shock: ’ which just adds to the attention seeking imo.

    But yeah I’d buy like 100-102lbs at 5′4.5″

  153. Reese | 26/05/09

    I dont’ know why she would want to lie about that 99 pounds at that height is so awful, looks disquisting. Her body now is why she was number 3 on Maxims hottest ladies. Her hair is so pretty too. Think she wears too much makeup though….

  154. Natty | 26/05/09

    Cheers Amy :-)

  155. carrie M | 26/05/09

    Not liking those photos, but she looks like she gained the weight she lost. I never saw her too thin I dont think. Still gorgeous.

  156. Ellen | 26/05/09

    Uhh she looks the same in those photos and she has a muffin top. I don’t really like her I used to but now she seems to make a lot of snarky remarks about other celebrities and boasts about herself a lot

  157. Chelsie | 26/05/09

    hair – no
    tatoo- no

  158. spanktacular | 26/05/09

    whats with her hair?! yikes!

  159. AngelaB | 26/05/09

    This woman is starting to annoy me big time.

  160. venus in furs | 26/05/09

    I wondered how long it would take for her to get her kit off in a film…not too long at all then! She is seriously denting her longevity getting the puppies out too early, she’s only got her ‘ahem’ talent to go on now as her main fan base (men) will get bored. If she appeared more down to Earth and quit with the drag queen plastic surgery/make-up then maybe she would get more female fans?

  161. Alameda | 26/05/09

    IS THERE ANYTHING THIS WOMAN DOESN’T LIE ABOUT? I’M GETTING THE FEELING SHE HAS SERIOUS ISSUES, PSYCHOLOGICALLY.

  162. jfknight | 27/05/09

    She doesn’t look any different there then she does now. And the camera makes you look physically larger, not have a higher body fat %, lol. She would not be able to have a slight muffin top if she was 99 pounds, especially since she looks pretty proportioned (i.e. carries weight mostly in her stomache).

  163. bella | 27/05/09

    no way is she 99 pounds there.

  164. alice | 28/05/09

    i don’t believe her. 99lbs, does not in any way look like it.

  165. jenni | 29/05/09

    she’s not 5′6″ thats bs. she’s more like 5′4″