New Kim Kardashian Candids

May 8th, 2009 by Rian | Filed under Celebs in Bikinis, Curvy Celebrities, Healthy Celebrity, Kim Kardashian, Polls.

Kim Kardashian – who recently claimed to weigh 118 pounds – was spotted arriving at a Hollywood production set to film a public service announcement yesterday.

30749pcn_psacelebs14
Photos via PacificCoastNews

Do you think Kim Kardashian really is a size 2/4 and weighs 118 pounds as she recently claimed?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

30749pcn_psacelebs10

30749pcn_psacelebs03

ADVERTISEMENT


Tags: , , , , ,

219 Responses to “New Kim Kardashian Candids”

  1. Miss Jessie | 8/05/09

    She is gorgeous from the front, hideous in side shots (waist down only)

  2. tara | 8/05/09

    no WAY she weighs 118!! wish she would give it up its really getting old.

  3. Polly | 8/05/09

    She’s gorgeous, but that lighting is not the most flattering! When she’s all tan, she looks 10 lbs. thinner!

  4. heather | 8/05/09

    Let’s try something…how bout just this ONE time, say something NICE about her even if you don’t like her, even if you thnk she looks ugly or fat..TRY to find something good. It could be fun to see how we can find the good!! ;)

  5. fletn1 | 8/05/09

    She’s probably a size 4/6 (nearer 6) but no way a size 2/4.. why pretend to be something you’re not?! It’s not like being a size 6 is fat :|

  6. Clare | 8/05/09

    i do believe 118 but not size 2/4.

  7. The Jess | 8/05/09

    Yeah, she’s actually quite small in person. she’s just CURVY. probably 118 and has a hard time squeezing into 2/4 because of the curves.

  8. Dracca | 8/05/09

    She is short, like 5′2″ if I recall? I am putting her at 128 and a size 6. Sorry but her hips and rear are not fitting in a 4 (certainly not a 2), IMO. She’s a little pudgy in the legs too. On the boarded between very curvy and just pudgy round.

  9. kate | 8/05/09

    there is no way that girl weights less than me!! She’s a big girl

  10. Meredith | 8/05/09

    I’m about that weight, height and size and have NO curves. I don’t think her hips could fit into a 2, but I believe she could maybe get into a 4 or a vanity 2. I also think it’s possible she weighs 118.

  11. Clare | 8/05/09

    Her skin is so smooth and gorgeous! Where’s my previous comment ??????

  12. Clare | 8/05/09

    heather, i agree, but then again, I think she is gorgeous and would love to look like her! most men would love to have her!

  13. Shae | 8/05/09

    She’s very curvy (not a bad thing!) and I don’t think the dress is really all that flattering on her, personally. I’m not even going to get back into that size 2 debate.

  14. Mel | 8/05/09

    There is no way in hell she is 118!! I am 5′3, and when I was 118 I looked way thinner than she is now! She has to at least weigh 140! I don’t see why she is lying about her weight. It is obvious she is at least a size 6 or more.

    She is gorgeous, but def NOT a 2!! She needs to just accept that!

  15. Liv | 8/05/09

    I definitely think she could wear a 2/4 she is short, so it looks so much wider even if you have a little extra weight…. She is beautiful! I want her long gorgeous hair!

  16. avaadore | 8/05/09

    I don’t find her attractive at all. Her legs look doughy and I hate her figure

  17. Marjorgie | 8/05/09

    I don’t understand why she has to lie about this stuff cause she is looks so great! If she would just admit that she is a size 6, she could be a great rolemodel for others! She is making other girls who are a size 6 that they are more fat than her, it’s just cruel!!

  18. Marjorgie | 8/05/09

    sorry for my language: i meant that she makes other size 6 girls feel bad about themselves

  19. Lindsay | 8/05/09

    I don’t think the light and the dress are terribly flattering on her. Sheesh…I think she is one of the most naturally beautiful woman in Hollywood and I can’t understand why she cakes on the makeup despite the fact.

    I think she may have weighed 118 at one time but I’m not so sure here. Anyways, I find it interesting people always try to figure out weight on here…why does it matter? As long as you look good and are in the correct BMI range the numbers shouldn’t be applicable.

  20. caroline | 8/05/09

    no way.. if she really weights 118 pounds all of it must be pure fat! cause muscles weight more.

  21. kelli | 8/05/09

    She’s short so she could weigh that and still look a little fuller. No way a size 2/4 though.

  22. Meko | 8/05/09

    She must be a size 2/4 in womens or misses because with that lower body it darn sure aint the Jr section. and 118 must be her goal weight shes trying to get down to because i would guess her weight between 128-138lbs.

  23. Kristy | 8/05/09

    I agree with Draca on all acounts!

  24. ValerieSara | 8/05/09

    the amount of make up she wears during the daytime is unbelievable. her boobs and butt are huge and, overall, just not what i find attractive.

  25. bella-elizabeth | 8/05/09

    SHE’S LYING! SHE’S LYING!! THERE IS NO F-ING WAY THAT SHE IS 1.) a size 2/4 and 2.) weighs f-ing 118 lbs!!!

    LIAR! LIAR!!! she has one of the biggest asses in hollywood!! only Applebottoms in a 2/4 size jean would fit her…MAYBE!!!!

    omg. she is a liar.

  26. lizwells | 8/05/09

    this woman is ridiculous, if she’s meant to be championing curvy women, why lie about her weight and dress size? she’s just sending the message that being a bigger woman is something to be embarassed about. Its doubley stupid considering a blind person could tell she AINT a size 2/4, but theres nothing wrong with that! she’s obviously not happy with herself to be lying like that, but it is very annoying as shes taking the public for fools to believe her! ggrrrr! i really dont understand what she’s about

  27. kara | 8/05/09

    I’m almost 5′3”, my weight is 118 pounds and she is really curvier than me. I can’t believe she is 118 just like me. I think her weight is around 125 pounds.

  28. ncpstarrylove | 8/05/09

    i have no idea how she could weigh that and fit into a size 2/4 since i am just an inch taller than her and weigh a similar amount…but i definitely don’t look like that in candids/photos…

  29. Olivia | 8/05/09

    Yeah well, fat weighs less than muscles, so maybe she’s just all fat and weighs 118lbs, otherwise there’s nooo way that’s her weight..

  30. LadyChocolate | 8/05/09

    She’s 5′2″, I think she’s not 118 lbs… maybe 130-132…

  31. kim | 8/05/09

    She probably is 118. When you are short, in order to appear skinny, you have to weigh next to nothing and eat next to nothing or have really good genes.

  32. April A | 8/05/09

    NO WAY!!!! does she weigh that, i think she looks good, but i agree it cud make girls that r a size 6 (american size) think they look way bigger then her, as im a size 4 – 6 i thought “oh no” i look a bigger size then that, altho she looks good an can carry it!! i cudnt carry it an look that good i wud just look fat!!!

  33. April A | 8/05/09

    im english, and an english size 8 to 10, but in american thats a 4 to 6 right? x

  34. Jennie | 8/05/09

    It was said as a quote of hers out of the People magazine weight issue her waist measurement was 27″ and her hips are 40″ and she wears a 27″ jean or 2/4. I’m 5′7″ weigh 140lbs with a 27″ waist and 39″ hip and I can RARELY if ever fit my butt in anything smaller than a 6. So it’s not about how tall she is if her measurements are the same or bigger than mine, how is she wearing smaller clothing? I want to know what brand she buys!

  35. Dracca | 8/05/09

    April A – A US size 8 is a UK 10 or a Europe 38.

  36. Thin&Beautiful | 8/05/09

    No way is she 118. I would say around 125. Since she felt the need to show the world she could fit in size 27 jeans then maybe she should film herself weighing 118 pounds… I doubt thats possible.

  37. Faint | 8/05/09

    I totally agree with Mel, when i was 118 pounds i looked way thinner than her too, and i am also 5′3″, her hips and butt are way too big to fit into a size 2, and i was a size 3 at that weight, so no way!

    I don’t think she is fat, she shouldn’t lie about her weight, just cause she isn’t stick thin doesn’t mean she doesn’t look good.

    On a side note though: she annoys me.

  38. USAUSA | 8/05/09

    Not only straight-up-and-down types are size 2’s, guys.

    Here’s a wake-up call: this is what a very short size 2-4 looks like.

  39. amybee | 8/05/09

    thats wrong – a US size 2 is a UK size 6, a 4 is a UK 8, a 6 a UK 10…

  40. Sian | 8/05/09

    I’d really need to see her standing to a normal sized person, to see if she’s really as tiny and short as she claims.

  41. hanna | 8/05/09

    i really don’t think Kim is 118 and a size 2 because i am 120 pounds and i am a size 0 and people think im 105 pounds. kim looks about 130/135. I mean why else would she get so defensive about it? If she really was 118 than she wouldn’t go off flaunting it. shes a fake bitch.

  42. Alice | 8/05/09

    LYING!
    I weigh 114 and am the same height, and am thinner than she looks here! I think she’s around 125 at least . . . I mean there’s no way she fits her butt into size 2!

  43. lola | 8/05/09

    there are videos of her putting on size 2 jeans!

  44. Jess | 8/05/09

    I believe she weighs 118….in her dreams

  45. happygolucky | 8/05/09

    Maybe her scale is broken.

  46. miso_soup | 8/05/09

    118, hahahahahahahahaha! that’s all I have to say about it.

  47. kayleigh83 | 8/05/09

    At 5′3″, she’s definitely around 130!! I’m the same height and around 120, and i don’t look nearly as big as her!! she has a pretty good body, so why lie about it? it just makes you look like an idiot!

    she probably just lies her face off about her weight so that people (like us LOL) will talk about it all the time, thus getting her more publicity. it’s pretty transparent!

  48. Sam | 8/05/09

    a video of her putting on size 2 jeans, how do you know? because they had ‘2′ written on them…? lol

  49. kayleigh83 | 8/05/09

    lola: there is also such a thing as vanity sizing!! it’s a fact that sizes are different from brand to brand, and many designer brands PURPOSELY put sizes on their clothes that are smaller than normal sizing, so someone who is really a size six feels all superior cause they’re wearing a two or something!! i mean who ever heard of a size ZERO 20 years ago? it’s not like everyone is suddenly shrinking – that size was invented!!!

  50. hay | 8/05/09

    I think she could easily weigh 138.

  51. Tee | 8/05/09

    Lola, she didn’t put those size 26 jeans on with ease. It took her about a minute AND her sisters help to get her ass into them and zip them shut. She could hardly move. And when she put on the 27s she had some trouble too. She just needs to give it up and realize she would look a lot thinner if she just wore the right size and stfu, because she’s made an ass out of herself ever since she got in the public eye (no pun intended)

  52. shortorder | 8/05/09

    i think she could weigh that and be a 4. a 2 is pushing it. i’m 5′2″ and much lighter than her and if i weighed anything close to 118 would definitely be that “curvy” and probably would wear a 4. i have a friend who is 5′3″ and 123 and wears a 2/4. it all depends on your build. why does everyone care so much?

  53. Lauriss | 8/05/09

    I don’t care how much she weighs…She looks great, she’s one of the sexiest celebs out there! Of course she’s just an attention seeker but nobody can deny she’s beautiful and sexy and very curvaceous!

  54. Joey | 8/05/09

    Don’t forget that a lot of higher end stores use vanity sizing so although it says 2/4 on the label it could easily be more like a 4/6/8 in size.

    She, like most women, probably has jeans in various sizes and 2/4 is the smallest one. She said her hips are 40 inches which sounds likely, there’s no reason that with the right tailor a size 2/4 with a 27 inch waist wouldn’t fit a hip size of 40.

    And also, 118lbs for her height does seem possible to me. Other short celebrities who weigh around 100lbs look tiny.. there’s a really noticeable difference between 100 and 118 on someone so short.

    AND.. my last point – she’s not super fit and toned so it’s more than likely she has a higher fat content than muscle. Which would make her appear a good bit bigger than if she was lean and muscley.

  55. carrie | 8/05/09

    nasty face and body. Never liked her. Way to into herself. Famous for absolutely nothing. Not even a role model for kids, teens, or anything. yuck barf barf

  56. shorty | 8/05/09

    she could totally be around 120 and size 4 cause she’s short. a little weight makes a big difference on short people and short people tend to still look “chubby” until they reach size 0-2. I’m 5′ and when I’m around 115, I’m a size 4, I have plenty of belly fat, and I still look chubby for hollywood standards. my short friends that look hollywood skinny (and not scary skinny) are all around 100-105 and size 0.

  57. Christine | 8/05/09

    I’m 5′4.5, and I weigh between 110 and 115lbs. I am a 34A, and I have no hips. I’m shaped like a ruler. There’s NO WAY she is 118lbs. No WAY. Not unless she’s 4ft tall.

  58. a | 8/05/09

    she’s only 5′2″, so i think 118 pounds is a believable weight.

  59. kb | 8/05/09

    she doesn’t weigh 140! she would be borderline overweight/obese. i would say she’s 125. not 118. but then again, i’m 5′3” and weigh 100 & can see that we have about the same size thighs. maybe she’s 118 like she says she is.

  60. Joy | 8/05/09

    I’m 5′1 & 120 & look about 5-8 lbs heavier than her, so yeah I think she could be 118.

    Not a size 2 though unless she’s strictly speaking empire waist dresses.

  61. Jade | 8/05/09

    She lies.

  62. Jade | 8/05/09

    About the size 2 anyways, not sure about the weight.

  63. Booya | 8/05/09

    I’m 5′3 and 117 and I am way thinner than her. She’s around 130-135.

  64. Valentina | 8/05/09

    Ugh, I can’t stand this woman. Publicity loving skank who lies about her size and weight.

  65. zanahorias | 8/05/09

    i am 122 at 5′4″ and WAY skinnier than her. she is definitely in 130 territory at that height. i cant even fit into a size two sometimes and by butt and thighs are half her size

  66. Angel | 8/05/09

    I think that Kim is very beautiful but not truthful about her weight/measurements. I am 120 and 5.1″ but I don’t have curves like that. I also wear a size 4 and find it hard to believe she wears a 2. From what I have read her height is not that much off from mine. I don’t understand the need to lie.

  67. CeeCee | 8/05/09

    HAHAHHAHAHAH AHHA HA AH AH AH AHA oh my goodness, she can’t be 118lbs, there’s just no way.
    i’m 5′2″ as well and i weigh 120, and i don’t look anywhere near as meaty as her.
    though it could be that my arms, legs, waist and hips are actually TONED,
    i think she’s around 148lbs, rather.

  68. CeeCee | 8/05/09

    oh and i’m a size 0Short

  69. CeeCee | 8/05/09

    so she can’t be 118 pounds =S

  70. Amanda Marie | 8/05/09

    I think shes beautiful :)

  71. diamondgirl | 8/05/09

    Think Kim is a beautiful girl with an amazing body. Hands down my hubby would find her body type attractive and others like Tori, Kate B and all the too skinny’s not. Beauty doesn’t = SKINNY and I could give a shit what she weighs. Give it a rest, PUH-leeze.

  72. swine | 8/05/09

    maybe kim should give it a rest

  73. Julie | 8/05/09

    Here’s another thought…
    WHO CARES! She looks good and who gives a sh*t what she says she weighs!! She is a pretty girl and most men would love how she looks.

  74. Morgan | 8/05/09

    HAHAHAHAHAHA

    not unless she’s 4′11″ can someone that squat and curvy way less than 120. Yeah she’s short, but please.

    though that comment above on vanity sizing is spot on.

  75. d_perfectionist | 8/05/09

    girl’s face is ok but body no no lol

  76. Sabra | 8/05/09

    Maybe Kim & all the people on here who are losing sleep about her size should give it a rest.

  77. Hell on High Heels | 8/05/09

    Body composition people!!!! Geez. Just because you are the same weight or less and same height does not mean your measurement are the same. It depends on lean muscle mass and FAT. I weigh more than a lot of girls that are waaaay fatter than me because I’ve got a good amount of LBM vs. fat, so it can be deceiving, trust me.

    BTW- did anyone see her on the view? She looked pretty small. Aside from the ass of course.

  78. yeeeesh | 8/05/09

    OH GREAT A KIM KARDASHIAN POST…
    now we have to listen to everybody else’s heights and weights……….

    i think she could weigh as little as 118. but she might way 125 too. i watched a KUWtK marathon and she actually lookd realy tiny it was probably taped while she was doing dancng with the stars or right after she got kicked out…so she prob was still toned from that. but she looked pretty damn good.

  79. HcG | 8/05/09

    Seriously…who cares what size she is? the woman has a face most would kill for, a tiny ass waist, and a figure the guys go crazy for. I think it is hard to get a real idea of her weight and size from pictures or television.

    She is a small person, pettite. I don’t think it is an unreasonable statement to say that she weighs 118-120 pounds. She is slim everywhere and just happens to have something other than a flat ass and happens to actually have womanly looking hips. I think there was a video of her somewhere trying on jeans that said 27 or something in the tag, and they fit. Sizes run differently as well
    1) stretch denim fits way smaller that regular
    2) a size 6 in one brand can be a size 2 in another, etc. etc.- sound crazy? nope. It depends on the maker of the jean and there models.

    Idk…who cares what the tag says! I think she’s gorgeous.

  80. so | 8/05/09

    I just don’t get her: she claims to love her body the way it is, and yet, she keeps lying about it…

    She should be honest and say it right : “I’m a size 6, I think I look great like that, and I don’t want/need to be a size 2″.

    Then, I would have a little respect for that woman.

  81. Duchess | 8/05/09

    that dress is too small for her frame. you have to be willowy to get away with a dress like that.

  82. FUckhead | 8/05/09

    SHe should be slaughtered and made into fat burgers. Probably the most disgusting female walking our pathetic planet. Amen.

  83. isa | 8/05/09

    dude, i like my body and it’s more or less like hers (i have a lot less butt thought!) and i weigh 130, have a dress size of 6/8, and jean size of 29/30. she is SO not a size 2/4, and she SO does not weigh 118 pounds! i like her body but i seriously do not believe those measurements.

  84. Amy | 8/05/09

    I think she probably is 118 because she’s so short and even if you look to be fairly well-fed, simply being short reduces your weight by more than most people realise. I believe her.

  85. Size 8 | 8/05/09

    Ugh – why is the same discussion taking place that always happens with her. We get it, you’re xlbs and xfeetxinches and there’s no way she’s a 2 blah, blah, blah. It’s boring. And, she’s incredibly gorgeous.

  86. carmen | 8/05/09

    Thin&Beautiful-

    I agree I think she should step on the scale and prove it. I recall Kelly Ripa weighing herself on a late night show. Lets see her do it.

  87. Petal | 8/05/09

    I believe her, too. She and I have a similar body type — small AND curvy. Based on her appearance (and my experience with my body), I think it’s possible for her to be 118 lbs, and fit into size 2/4 misses sizes (NOT juniors, as someone else has posted). JMHO.

  88. Kyle | 8/05/09

    I’d believe her. You dont know the plight of short people unless you ARE short. I look way heavier than I am (130 lbs 5′2), not to mention heavier than Kim, so I believe her. Show some pictures of her standing next to someone else of a known taller height, and then we can compare.

  89. lolah | 8/05/09

    She cannot be size 2/4. I’d say size 6. I’m the same height 5′2 and weight 44-46 kilos and I’m size 2.

    But I think Kim Kardashian is FABULOUS, I wish I had her body!! :) )))

  90. Susy | 8/05/09

    I’m 5′2, 107 pounds. I wear a size 2 , sometimes a 4 depending on the cut. When I weighed 118, I wore a size 8-9, there is no way she can fit into a 2.

  91. Leanna | 8/05/09

    YES she can weigh 118lb. She has a small frame and not a lot of muscle so more of her weight is coming from fat, hence her boobs and butt and softer look. Being short with curves can lead people to seriously overestimate your weight.

    As for her clothes size I don’t think she is lying, I just think it’s a case of vanity sizing. I’m seeing lots of girls fitting into smaller sizes than they should for their stats.

    Her true size is obviously not 2/4 (except her waist perhaps) but lets face it there is some messed up sizing in the US and don’t think you guys should be blaming Kim for that! In fact we should be grateful that celebs like her are bringing the vanity sizing issue to everyone’s attention.

  92. Lose That Girl | 8/05/09

    She’s quite pretty with lovely curves but I doubt she’s that tiny.

  93. jjj | 8/05/09

    I guess the problem is that she is ashamed that she is a little bit chubby and won’t admit to her weight. The problem is that if she worked hard and got the body she really wants, she would be criticized for being unhealthy.

  94. jane | 8/05/09

    She is so short, 118 lb seems fully appropriate.

  95. Black Kitty | 8/05/09

    If she weighs 118 lbs then she must be 4 feet tall, no more.

  96. Cassie | 8/05/09

    I believe it. I’m 5′2″ and 113…I almost have the same size ass probably but I have a smaller chest…so if you add 1 – 2 pounds to my ass and 1.5 – 2 lbs to each boob then voila! 118!…I totally believe it. Oh and i vary between size 1 to size 5 depending on the jean brand. I don’t think she is lying.

  97. Reese | 8/05/09

    I don’t think she wears a size 27 jeans because of her hip measurement that she admitted to having! (40) I dont’ know why she is lying. She looks good and guys are crazy about her so just admit what you really weigh or just don’t say anything at all about it!

  98. italiangirl | 8/05/09

    she’s beautiful but I think 118 is the weight of one leg…

  99. krystal | 8/05/09

    well seeing as she is 5′2 it is possible!
    i dont think she is lying at all she isnt fat she just has a big butt, I don’t care if she was 130 pounds she is still one of the most beautiful girls in hollywood right now and I have nothing bad to say about her.

  100. alice | 8/05/09

    sure, she’d be 118 if she was 4′9.

  101. justine | 8/05/09

    she still looks pretty, i think she is a bit heavier than she claims, though.

  102. edamame | 8/05/09

    I thought 40″ hips were like an American size 10 (at least)…???

  103. Cossey | 8/05/09

    Fat pig!

  104. Andie | 8/05/09

    Guys, she’s only 5′2. I’d say she probably weighs a little bit more, maybe 124. It’s hard to guess weights for people who are shorter/taller than you, but I’m 5′3 and weigh 105 so I think it is believable that she only weighs about 120 at 5′2.

  105. Umi | 8/05/09

    I was about to say…My hips are a 32 and my waist is a 25 and I’m a two to a four. I think sizes have gotten even smaller, so I don’t think a person that curvy could wear that size unless it was vanity.

  106. Girl Butt | 8/05/09

    Can we seriously find another Kim K. discussion point besides her size? Sickening. Who cares what her size is? Honestly.

    The girl is HOT, HOT, HOT, HOT, HOT, HOT, HOT. And that dress is super sexy. Her body is phenomenal. And the hair. Oy. . . I could go on.

    Love her, love her, love her.

  107. may | 8/05/09

    i voted yes because i think that is around how much she weighs, but i dont think her usual size is 2/4 but i think she prob can fit some 2/4 especially dresses

  108. ThaiCoco05 | 8/05/09

    I love how girls don’t want to believe… thats what 118 at 5′2 can look like.

    I’m 5ft and at 154lbs
    I’m a size 5/6 dress & 6 (in every brand) jeans

    It REALLY does just depend on your body type.

  109. M* | 8/05/09

    this SKANKOLA is a size 8!!!!!! what crap! she makes me barf.

  110. ruby | 8/05/09

    She is gorgeous, and i weigh 112, but look leaner but im 5ft 6. If she’s between 5ft and 5ft 4, i’d say that is her true weight. She looks like a very fit and healthy women. I don’t think she doesn’t need to lie about her weight, as she looks great. I think the clothing size sounds wrong, but weight is probably true.

  111. T.D.P | 8/05/09

    I don’t know…maybe it’s where she shops?? Where I shop a size 2 is a 24 inch waist and 34 inch hips….a size 4 is a 25 inch waist and 35 inch hips….a size 10 is has 38 inch hips…isn’t that what she has? So, if she were to shop there she would need a size 10 to accomodate her bum/hips. Not even close to a 2 or 4…

  112. mayinha | 8/05/09

    I really dont beieve in any of the measures, because Im way smaller than her and, not only I weigh more, my clothing measures are like 4/6, and Im not much taller than her

  113. T.D.P | 8/05/09

    Oh, and muscle takes up less space than fat pound per pound. She is quite doughy, so she might be 118.

  114. dumdum | 8/05/09

    FUckhead, not a bad idea. She could feed an entire african country. 118 lbs what a crock. Who the hell does she think she’s kidding? One of her ass cheeks weighs more than that.

  115. ella | 8/05/09

    no way in hell. i would guess 120-135lbs.. she looks like a size 6 or 8 to me.

  116. sirena | 8/05/09

    Clare — I totally agree with you; I was thinking the same thing!
    118 could be right, but not the sz 2/4. More like a 6/8.

  117. Persephone | 8/05/09

    she is pretty and curvy, but I don’t think she wears a two nor do I think she weighs 118.

    The dress she is wearing is beautiful in the picture.

  118. M* | 8/05/09

    okay this is pure silly talk!!! those saying she is a role model, um, hold up!! you want you want your daughter to have PREMARITAL SEX? you want your daughter to have sex on tape?! do you want your daughter obsessed with the statement, ” I am a lot smaller than people think?” you want your daughter obsessed with her size, smallness, curviness? give me a fat break, this girl is wide, full of crap, and a slut! she is no role model, and she is fat!!!!! okay, im wrong about the fat comment, she is NOT fat by all means, but she is chubby and not in shape. oh geeze, i totally went nuts. but this girl is not the IMAGE OF HEALTHY..both mentally and physically..

  119. Jess | 8/05/09

    She CAN (and probably does) weigh 118 at 5′2″… Uggh, this is such an irritating discussion.

  120. Kiss_My_Kiwi | 8/05/09

    She has one heck of a rear and thick thighs, but I think she looks good. She may not have a ‘model’ body, but she is sexy and attractive

  121. aj | 8/05/09

    i’m 5′4 and about 135, wear a size 6, and i look way thinner than she does. it makes me feel really bad about myself. she should really give it up. like who cares if you’re not as skinny as all the other celebs, BE REAL.

  122. Leanna | 8/05/09

    Even if she is a size 6/8 she’s still not fat. Perhaps not in the best shape nor particularly lean but certainly not overweight.

    For a woman, once you go over 30% body fat this is considered overweight and under 25% body fat is lean. My best guess is that she’s between the overweight and lean range.

  123. Ad | 8/05/09

    She admitted to having 40″ hips. FORTY INCHES! There is no way 40″ hips fit into a size 2/4. Go to any clothing merchant’s website and take a look at the size charts. 40″ hips are a size 10 to a size 12.

  124. Mary | 8/05/09

    maybe she lies.. but she looks still gorgeous and she aint fat at all !! do you want to fuck a girl with bones sticking out ? her body is much more attractive than lindsay lohans or victoriaa beckhams.. her face is perfect and she doesnt have to be stick-thin to be attractive.

  125. swine | 8/05/09

    As always, thank you all for posting your heights, weights, and sizes. Sooooo interesting…*yawn*

  126. Zuwee | 8/05/09

    She needs to just stop with the B.S. We all know she isn’t 118 and 5′2-3″, girls on my track/xc team are 5′2-3″ and weight about 108-115, but they look way way smaller.

  127. BlackLotus | 8/05/09

    I’m 5′1 and weigh 110pds. There is no way she is 118. I am half the size of her..I’d say 130+ How tall is she? 5′3? She would be much smaller than that.

  128. d-tron | 8/05/09

    hahaha yeah right she’s freaking FAT!!eeeeew

  129. helen | 8/05/09

    my behind is way smaller than hers and i a size 6 right now, theres no way shes a 2

  130. Cal | 8/05/09

    I’ve said it before and I will say it again. Kim is tiny tiny–if you see her in person you almost won’t believe it. the camera adds like 40 pounds to her body–I promise!

  131. Maxx05 | 8/05/09

    Pretty face, lousy body. The dress is tacky. I do believe that she weighs in the 120lb. range. She’s short and not muscular. She could also be a size 2/4 with the crazy vanity sizing. There are many brands that cut their items quite large for the size shown. I’ve looked at things that are supposed to be my size, and I could pull them on and off without undoing a zipper. Obviously those garments weren’t true to size-lol. Many people like to say, Oh, I’m THIS SIZE, and it’s due to the vanity sizing issue. Kim and others can tell themselves that they are these sizes. Really, tho- she could use to tone up, then she’d feel better and wouldn’t care so much. Her face is lovely.

  132. wondercow | 8/05/09

    Maybe she’s 3 feet tall.

  133. klubgal | 8/05/09

    Hell to the no! She is just saying this stuff to stay in the press. Or she’s totally delusional!

  134. michyyy | 8/05/09

    No way that Kim is 118 pounds! My guess would be that she between 126-132 pounds, around there…which is quite heavy for someone who is only 5ft 2!

    I am 5ft 6 and I weigh 116 pounds and I wear a size 2, sometimes even a 4- so there is no way she is a size 2/4

  135. spanktacular | 8/05/09

    I think Kim is attractive. However, I can’t stand this woman, particularly after watching her wrangle herself into a pair of jeans to prove to the world what size she wears.

  136. tmoney | 8/05/09

    im 5′2 m like 110 n i understand looking bigger in pictures b/c i def do but there is nooo way that i can believe she is a 2.. i 4 sure but not a 2 n maybe she was 118 like one rare day n shes just holding on to that number but i cannot believe shes under 120lbs but i love her regardless n she is gorgeous

  137. Mer | 8/05/09

    I am shocked that so many people think she has a nice face. Ugly! Ugly all around.

  138. pretty and nice | 8/05/09

    hells to the no! i’m 5′6 118 and there is no way kk wears the same size as me; it’s almost mildly offensive.

    honestly, she is doing women a disservice lying about her weight (ala kristi alley a few yrs ago). embrace your bmi of 22+, girl!

  139. MScotton | 8/05/09

    SHE IS SAYING SHE HAS A BMI of 21.9 THATS NOT TINY OR ANYTHING. who knows …
    But a size 40 inch hip isn’t a size 2.
    Anyway I don’t like her body at all!

  140. Erica | 8/05/09

    She is not 118 lbs. She’s more like 130, I think. She looks like she could be a size 4 though. I’ve seen stuff of hers on ebay from size 2-6 although the 2s are only dresses, I think. But 118 lbs, no way, I fit in size 4 occasionally and I weigh 140ish!!

  141. Erica | 8/05/09

    Btw I am not tall either.. 5′4″

  142. fairytale21 | 9/05/09

    im 118 and my arms and legs look thinner than hers when i llok of pictures of myself i have nothing against her but its really lame when girls lie about their weight and size i mean shes beautiful she doesnt have to front that she has this tiny figure when she obviously doesnt

  143. dumdum | 9/05/09

    swine, just get the damn flu and die already.

  144. Alicia | 9/05/09

    Honestly, I don’t really care how much she weighs or if she is a size 2 (honestly her weight is quite plausible and her size since sizes are not universal, but using the inches for instance in designer jeans is) etc…but Kim is an attractive lady. I don’t particularly love her outfit though.

  145. rachel_ | 9/05/09

    for all the people who said ”no way”, it really depends on the height, i think she’s just really short so she’s telling the truth about her weight

  146. sweet_tart87 | 9/05/09

    LIAR LIAR FAE ASS ON FIRE!!! If you are a size 2(LOL)like you claim than what size are all the short women 20 lbs slimmer than you??? Like Jennifer Annuiston, Eva Longoria,Posh Spice, Frida Pinto, Natalie Portman etc??? Do they wear childrens clothes??? I don’t think so. I look up models sizes they are all 2/4 you sure as hell ain’t no model size! Please stop lying and just be honest you’re always talking about you love your curves and your so proud u ain’t skinny. Paris is a size 2.

  147. sweet_tart87 | 9/05/09

    You are a size 6 and at least 125lbs! Stop the madness and stop making girls who are really a size 2 or larger feel like they must be bigger than they are to share a size or be bigger than you(you are a thick girl). Please stop lying. You were already pathetic being famous for a sex tape and now your just lying lying lying. UGH!! PLEASE GO AWAY!!!

  148. sweet_tart87 | 9/05/09

    I meant fake ass on fire and SHE still looks like a TRANNY!

  149. Jetta C | 9/05/09

    I am with Clare – I believe the weight. She is short and probably does not have a lot of muscle. But not the size, unless we are talking vanity sizing. My daughter is a size 4 and her bum is 1/2 the width of Kim’s!

  150. aoife | 9/05/09

    stunning girl – im a closet fan of her show… khloe says she is a US size 6 so Kim could easily be a 2/4!
    im 5ft 10′ so i have no clue what small people weigh but i definitely believe her regardless – if Kim was ashamed of her size wouldn’t she just say nothing at all rather than make up smaller ones and have people hating her??

  151. Alameda | 9/05/09

    CAN YOU PLS STOP POSTING ABOUT THIS? WE’VE HAD THIS EXACT TOPIC LIKE 3-4 TIMES ON HERE. THE COMMENTS ARE ALWAYS THE SAME.

    BTW, I DON’T GET THE APPEAL OF THIS WOMAN AT ALL. HER FACE IS AVERAGE TO ME, SOMETIMES EVEN TRANNY-LIKE, TBH.

  152. anna | 9/05/09

    NO WAY in hell shes 118pounds…NO WAY IN HELL…

    but shes pretty!! i love her hair…

  153. weightwatcher | 9/05/09

    There is no way in hell this woman is 118pounds! If she was like 4 feet tall maybe.

  154. Josefine | 9/05/09

    I really think she is. I mean – why would she lie about it? And she is only 5 ft 2 in, which is really small. I’m 5 ft 4 in and I weigh 108, and I consider myself a little big, so it seems realistic to me..

  155. Betty | 9/05/09

    I actually believe her, because I am 130 and 5′6 and if she is really that much shorter than me, I would guess that she weighs less because I’d guess we’re about equally skinny.

    But Khloe as a size 6? That I do NOT believe. A size 8 or maybe 10.

  156. Betty | 9/05/09

    I actually believe her, because I am 130 and 5′6 and if she is really that much shorter than me, I would guess that she weighs less because I’d guess we’re about equally skinny. I’m a size 6 and someone shorter than me I would guess would wear a smaller size.

    But Khloe as a size 6? That I do NOT believe. A size 8 or maybe 10.

  157. Cissy | 9/05/09

    I would guess her to be around 125 lbs size 4. Maybe her weight and size go up and down! I know mine sure does! I’m 5′2″ and stay between 110-118. A size 2 thank you very much.
    Her ass is what gets me though. 40 inches in a size 2???

  158. chic | 9/05/09

    there is nooooooo way! … i am 5′5” and weigh 120 pounds and next to her i would look tiny! i don’t claim to be really skinny..because i’m not .. but next to her i would..haha! he is definitely a size 6 at the least! kim..stop lying to yourself and the rest of the world it just shows you’re insecure!

  159. barb | 9/05/09

    She might be right with the weight but no way can she wear 2 or 4 pants. Maybe a dress because she has a very tiny waist but 40″ hips are not getting in a size 2 pant – not even vanity size 2 pants.

  160. FragileFlame | 9/05/09

    I don’t care what size she is, she’s gorgeous! I’d give EVERYTHING to look like her.

  161. swine | 9/05/09

    omg noooo way I am 6′3, 87 pounds and a size 000 just to let you all know what my body looks like ok nooooo waaaaaaayyyy

  162. megz67 | 9/05/09

    normally I would not be so obsessed with what the actual number is, but its only because this trick has to bring it up so much. I want her to go on howard stern and him to trick her onto some kind of scale like he did to nicole richie and anna nicole in the past!! then we will know once and for all! BITCH IS A GOOD 140! easy! at the very least i give her 135.

    The only reason I care so much is because she likes to promote being a curvy girl and to be proud of that but she is so god damn hypocritical to turn around and then claim to be 118 and a size 2. why do these women do this to young girls? its very cruel. Its definately the wrong message to send.

  163. Roxy | 9/05/09

    I met all three (Kim, Kourtney, & Khloe) in Vegas …. I gotta tell you, they are the tiniest people I have ever met. Kim and Kourtney are so small they could have fit in my handbag!! I am 5′5″ and weigh 125lbs and they were WAY WAY WAY Tiny!!! Kim is 4′10″ if she is lucky and Kourtney is 4′9″ if she is wearing heels… and Khloe (the fat one) is about 5′4″ and SKINNY!!!!

  164. hateonit. | 9/05/09

    ok yeahh well shes totally lying. im 4′11 and 117. and im curvy and shes pretty huge compared to me. theres no way. maybe her butt is 118. shes gorgeous and it sucks that she would lie about that. i mean who really cares?? everyone thinks shes great already so whats the point of lying? i dunno….but just seeing her hip n waist ratio….its pretty unlikely.imho.

  165. missy | 9/05/09

    ok…i’m 5′5 and my hips are 36 and i’m not a size 2 so how is it possible that she is with 40 inch hips…i think she is delusional or maybe she cuts the sizes off and sews a size two to feel better

  166. Rian | 9/05/09

    Roxy, if Kim was that short it would be pretty well known in Hollywood… my niece is 4′11 and she is 10 years old! Also Khloe is 5′9, it’s well known that she is a big/tall girl. I think your measurements are way off. :)

  167. M&A | 9/05/09

    FatASs! OMG fat ass Liar. yuck.

  168. mari | 9/05/09

    more like 218 lbs

  169. Nai | 9/05/09

    OH DIOS MIO! Yeah, RIGHT. If she weights 118 pounds I weight 40. HAHAHAHH.. stop pretending! LIARRRRRRRRR.

  170. kate | 9/05/09

    you guys are really ignorant. different people carry different weight differently. at 5′4″ and 118 lbs, i should be thinner than her (5′2″, 118 lbs,) but i am bigger (and yet still a size 4.) i believe her 100%.

  171. Sacharomyces cerevisiae | 9/05/09

    b@tch, please….

  172. Sacharomyces cerevisiae | 9/05/09

    she looks like an oveprocessed, stuffed sausage

  173. ashley | 9/05/09

    she should just embrace her size..what kind of message does that send to young girls when shes obviously lying about her size

  174. ashley | 9/05/09

    yeah umm roxy we’re not dumb those measurements you “made up” are ridiculous…we’re not blind

  175. Yovana | 9/05/09

    OMG!!! FUCK! I’m a size 2 or 1…and i don’t have such a big but!!! There is no way in hell she’s a size 2…Then i’m fat…!!! I hate people who lie..

  176. Leanna | 9/05/09

    Being a short person myself I can tell you she does not look like a typical 140lb girl of 5ft2, no way. People like America Ferrera are that sort of weight and Kim is much slimmer than that.

    She LOOKS more like 125lb-130lb HOWEVER as has been mentioned before she lacks muscle, she has a small frame, even her head is small for her body which is why she could well be 120lb or less.

    People need to stop relaying this to themselves…’omg I’m a size 6 and 130lb’, do I really look bigger than Kim. Get a grip! It is possible to weigh less than someone else and look bigger, even when the person is the same height. Why? because people all carry their weight in different places and body composition is a major player in how you will look at any given size or weight.

  177. FragileFlame | 9/05/09

    If Khloe is 5′4 then I’m Elvis back from the dead.

  178. skinnygirl | 9/05/09

    this girl is maybe 140 no less. yes a size 6 is huge! lets get real with ourselves. theres no way kim could fit that chunky body in anything less than a six

  179. cly12 | 9/05/09

    I saw her once when I went to vegas. I TOTALLY believe her when she says she is 118. She is very small in person, I almost didn’t believe it was her until I saw her face and all that hair. She is very short and curvy.

  180. manny | 9/05/09

    i’m 5ft3, curvy, and have been at 118lbs and 125lbs.
    i definitely believe her when she says she weighs 118lbs.
    &even if she isn’t, she’s still hot.

  181. swine | 9/05/09

    yes, a size 6 is huge. And pigs fly as well, betcha didnt know that.

  182. Dancer | 9/05/09

    118? She is an effen liar… or totally self delusional. Please.

  183. Rebel Annie | 9/05/09

    I feel like she’s probably someone who fluctuates a LOT. Maybe she weighed 118 like for a day or so sometime recently, but I’d guess that usually she’s closer to 128 and DEFINITELY not a size 2. She’s just too curvy. Maybe her waist could be a size 2 sometimes, but the hips still have to be at least a 6.

  184. Luela | 9/05/09

    Who cares, she’s common.

  185. patrigon | 9/05/09

    there’s no way she wears a size 2. She said she has 40 in hips and I sometimes have trouble getting my 35 in hips into size 4. I’m 5′3″ and i weigh 118 and she’s lots bigger than me. Even allowing for the extra 10 pounds the camera ass – she looks bigger than me in pictures.

  186. Izzy | 10/05/09

    Shes so hot. Chubby legs in that pic though. In most pics ive seen shes got a awesome body though.

  187. Soph | 10/05/09

    I’d believe it. She’s short and I bet looks a lot smaller in real life. Her waist is tiny so the rest of her looks a lot bigger in comparison. It’s hard to judge someone in a photo as you really only see their proportions rather than their actual size.

  188. jfknight | 10/05/09

    Okay she has a huge ass and fat legs and big boobs. How in the hell could she weigh 118? Her waist is marinally small, not tiny, but that’s it. Everything else is substantial size. If she only weighs 118, then how much does everyone else in Hollywood weigh, because she is bigger than everyone besides Queen Latifah. They said Jessica Simpson was 135 at her fattest, and she’s only 5′3″, and Kim is still bigger.

  189. Lauriss | 10/05/09

    She’s so sexual and looks trashy elegant if there is such thing…hahha…

  190. Sarah | 10/05/09

    Being short doesn’t automatically make you weigh 118. A lot of women are 5′2″. I think she looks fine, but she is definitely lying about the weight. As someone who is 5′2″ and weighs 118, I can tell, even while allowing a margin of error, that she is not my weight. I’d say she’s 130. Being 5′2″ and 130 is perfectly normal. She should be proud of herself, not lie about it.

  191. SuzieJones | 10/05/09

    who cares what she weighs. all the anna’s on this site need to find something better to do, esp the moderator. who the hell has time to sit around and document celebs and if they look bloated more one day than the other. find a real job and something else to do. this is why the world is the way it is cuz some sad losers like the people on here comment on shit from behind closed doors. everyone should include a full body shot of themselves with no make-up on their face along side their comments since im sure everyone on this site is skinny and flawless

  192. Lesh | 10/05/09

    her boobs and her fake looking hair all have to weigh atleast 5lbs each…

  193. Thin&Beautiful | 10/05/09

    i hate how everyone says “why do you care so much?” then why are you looking at the comments under this post? the reason everyone cares so much is because she made such a big deal about it and felt a reason to publicly announce her weight. obviously people are going to respond.
    PS: I still don’t believe she is 118. My best friend wore a size 2/3 and she was barely 5′3 and 100 pounds…. yeah big difference.

  194. fashionista | 10/05/09

    Her measurements put her in a size 6 for waist and 10 for hips. So she would wear a 10 and get them taken in to fit her waist. I agree, I don’t see why she is lying.

  195. Miranda | 10/05/09

    She looks great, but NO WAY she wears a 2! I wear a 6 and my bottom half is much smaller than hers. I’d love to see her get herself into my jeans. If it weren’t for her butt and big thighs she could be a 4 maybe, but deff. not a 2.

  196. Mari | 10/05/09

    How tall is she? I’m 5′6” and I weigh 108 lbs. I look waaaay skinnier than her, so unless she’s really, really small, no way she’s 118 lbs. I was skinnier than her even when I weighed about 135 lbs.

    If you have to lie about your weight, don’t do it in such an obvious way!!!

  197. bexNZ | 10/05/09

    GirlButt- if u want to talk about kims hair etc. go on another website,!! and i agree shes not 118. i am 117 and shes huge.

  198. kt | 10/05/09

    Yes , I think she being honest too. She is only 5″3 remember.

  199. Maxx05 | 10/05/09

    I really think that with some of these hugely vanity sized clothes she could believe she’s a size 2/4. Some of these jeans that are tagged as small sizes look more like 6/8’s. So there you go….
    And Kim is 5′2″.

  200. skii | 10/05/09

    i don’t think she’s really that big. why would she lie about that? the picture could be taken from a bad angle or something. maybe 118 pounds is a little off but she took a video of herself fitting into the size 2 jeans! she obviously can wear them so stop wasting your time obsessing about how she is lying!!

  201. Ciao | 10/05/09

    There’s NO WAY she’s a 2/4. I’m a 6/8 and 5′8 and i look thinner than she does.

  202. person | 11/05/09

    @ skinnygirl- “yes a size 6 is huge!”

    Huge? A size 6 is not huge, at any height.

  203. skinny + healthy = beauty | 11/05/09

    if she is so happy and proud to be a plus size, why does she always fight for small sizes and weights.
    she is too pretentious.

  204. Dnnle | 11/05/09

    no way she’s 118 pounds. Thats such an unrealistic number for her size.

  205. ali | 11/05/09

    haha:

    No way! (85.0%, 8,088 Votes)
    Yes (15.0%, 1,449 Votes)

  206. S | 11/05/09

    I won’t believe that she weighs 118 lbs until she steps on my scale.

    I’m 4′11″, 115 lbs, and a size 8. My body looks very close to hers (except for the boobs – mine are small). There is just no way that she is a size two & only three pounds heavier than me despite being 3 inches taller and having bigger breasts.

  207. Miriam | 11/05/09

    How sad to find so many women and girls here who are obsessed by what other people weigh and how tall they are. Who cares what they weigh? You need to feel comfortable with your own body and not idolise someone you don’t even know and can only judge by pictures. Most people look different in life than on a picture.

  208. Zandra | 11/05/09

    she’s my size a 4/6/8 and like 125+

  209. Huncorp | 11/05/09

    She looks like a getto-girl. Hairy body. . . . Her but is really big! Ungraceful!

  210. Kennie | 11/05/09

    ugly, wobbly legs.

  211. Kennie | 11/05/09

    she looks like a getto-girl. Ugly, wobbly legs……

  212. liars | 11/05/09

    THERE IS NOOOOOOOOO EFFFFFING WAY SHE IS A 2!!!!!
    Naturally dress sizes are smaller than your pants size…is she talkin dress or pants? Dress…maybe a 5/6 pants….who knows honey..

    I am 5′8 and thin….and just cus you are SHORT does not mean you can fit in that size pants!!!!! her ass is huge! Her thighs are huge! I have tried to fit into pants that are too small…..it doesnt happen…I dont care…

    as far as the dresses go…maybe thats why she wears dresses that dont zip up?
    She can squeeze into a smaller size

  213. Emma | 11/05/09

    I’m 5′2″ and to be perfectly blunt, I look quite chubby at 118 so yeah, she could DEFINITELY weigh 118 or less and be that curvy. EASILY. It’s all body type. Being a shorty, I only look thin/fit once I get under 110 because I have a small frame. So yes, she could weigh 118 and still looks a lot better than other short girls at the same weight. PS- at 5′1″/5′2″ I wear a zero when I’m 108lbs, but a 2/4 at 118 (and I look plump.) Height is everything!

  214. Kristina | 11/05/09

    I really can’t get over the amount of negativity on this site. Clearly you all have issues! This woman is gorgeous. She has a womans body… who really gives a damn about what size she is? She has a smaller waist than me and I’m the same height as her and probably 10 pounds lighter. Who cares if she lies about her weight/ size. It’s her body! Leave the woman alone.

  215. Liana | 11/05/09

    Her legs/hips/butt are bigger than mine, and yet she claims to be a size 2 when I’m a size 10. Something’s not right here.

  216. toodles | 12/05/09

    I’m 5′2 and 130lbs and I look around her size in photos so maybe it is a build-thing? I used to be 118lbs about 7 years ago and when I was that weight, I looked tiny in photos and could fit into a size 2. I don’t know. We all carry weight different. She doesn’t look very toned and fat does weigh a lot less than muscle…

  217. Anna | 12/05/09

    I’m 5′2 – weigh 115 and wear a size 4 – it all depends on how you are built. She is short – so 118 is going to look bigger on her than a taller person

  218. AngelaB | 12/05/09

    There is nothing wrong with her weight. Why the heck is she lying about it?

  219. ting | 13/05/09

    hopefully she would be more honest with her actual weight, since its not a shame to face the truth.