Comments on: New Kim Kardashian Candids

By: ting

ting — Wed, 13 May 2009 07:45:01 +0000

hopefully she would be more honest with her actual weight, since its not a shame to face the truth.

By: AngelaB

AngelaB — Tue, 12 May 2009 17:26:39 +0000

There is nothing wrong with her weight. Why the heck is she lying about it?

By: Anna

Anna — Tue, 12 May 2009 14:36:20 +0000

I’m 5′2 – weigh 115 and wear a size 4 – it all depends on how you are built. She is short – so 118 is going to look bigger on her than a taller person

By: toodles

toodles — Tue, 12 May 2009 12:15:05 +0000

I’m 5′2 and 130lbs and I look around her size in photos so maybe it is a build-thing? I used to be 118lbs about 7 years ago and when I was that weight, I looked tiny in photos and could fit into a size 2. I don’t know. We all carry weight different. She doesn’t look very toned and fat does weigh a lot less than muscle…

By: Liana

Liana — Tue, 12 May 2009 01:46:52 +0000

Her legs/hips/butt are bigger than mine, and yet she claims to be a size 2 when I’m a size 10. Something’s not right here.

By: Kristina

Kristina — Mon, 11 May 2009 22:36:34 +0000

I really can’t get over the amount of negativity on this site. Clearly you all have issues! This woman is gorgeous. She has a womans body… who really gives a damn about what size she is? She has a smaller waist than me and I’m the same height as her and probably 10 pounds lighter. Who cares if she lies about her weight/ size. It’s her body! Leave the woman alone.

By: Emma

Emma — Mon, 11 May 2009 22:27:47 +0000

I’m 5′2″ and to be perfectly blunt, I look quite chubby at 118 so yeah, she could DEFINITELY weigh 118 or less and be that curvy. EASILY. It’s all body type. Being a shorty, I only look thin/fit once I get under 110 because I have a small frame. So yes, she could weigh 118 and still looks a lot better than other short girls at the same weight. PS- at 5′1″/5′2″ I wear a zero when I’m 108lbs, but a 2/4 at 118 (and I look plump.) Height is everything!