New Britney Spears Performance Candids

June 11th, 2009 by Rian | Filed under Britney Spears, Polls.

Britney Spears performed live at the O2 Arena in London again last night… here are some (much clearer) photos!

spl105849_018
Photos via SplashNews

Make sure to vote in this poll if you already haven’t!

Do you think Britney has a great body these days?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

spl105849_007

spl105849_001

spl105849_022

ADVERTISEMENT


Tags: , , , , , ,

93 Responses to “New Britney Spears Performance Candids”

  1. Victoria | 11/06/09

    Her legs look quite tones, but I think her arms need some work (…first? :D )

  2. Victoria | 11/06/09

    toned*

  3. Hell on High Heels | 11/06/09

    Her legs look great, pretty toned quads- you can tell she has put some work into them! She could probably lose some body fat, but all in all, she has come a long way, kudos to her!

    P.S- Those costumes are ridiculous!

  4. Hell on High Heels | 11/06/09

    Funny how my comments are always “in moderation” I sense someone is trying to keep the woman down!

  5. foe | 11/06/09

    yeah i think that she’s looking better…
    but not by much…..

    oh and those outfits are beyond unflattering

  6. izzie | 11/06/09

    not bad at all!
    she seems to be pretty fit and healthy!

    i guess she´ll never be as thin as she was in the “i´m a slave for you” days, now she´s more atlethic and muscular which isn´t bad either. :)

    her body cleary changed over the years which is no surprise! she´s mother of two kids and not 20 anymore!

  7. Claire | 11/06/09

    I’m surprised you haven’t posted any of the pictures of Brit with her agent in the Bahamas. You really can see she’s quite chunky in those shots.

    I can’t imagine what this woman eat’s?? That, or her backing dancers do all the hard work and she just struts around the stage doing sexy poses???

  8. londoncalling | 11/06/09

    She needs to lose weight if she wants to use that sort of costumes, people will compare her with the old Britney dress up like that

  9. aoife | 11/06/09

    i think she’s looking fantastic – her legs are in great shape and she has a fairly flat tummy!

  10. breads | 11/06/09

    i think i put the wrong thing on my vote, she looks great

  11. Ingrid | 11/06/09

    After two kids its good…some mothers wont ever loose her babyweight- maybe for hormonal causes…

  12. Lucy | 11/06/09

    Still some work to do, so still some weight to lose.

  13. chris | 11/06/09

    no words for the last outfit -.-

  14. Creepy Doll | 11/06/09

    She has a pretty unfortunate frame in my opinion, but she doesn’t need to lose any more weight.

  15. passerbee | 11/06/09

    she is pretty toned but the costumes make it look so much worst than it is! so much! she should fire those “designers”.

  16. Amy | 11/06/09

    I agree with everyone else; she is pretty toned, but I voted that she still has some weight to lose. I know the goal posts have changed now she’s had children and will probably never go back to how she was, but it does seem a shame as she had a rockin’ body back in the day. She doesn’t look bad or nowhere near bad, but I can’t help thinking that there are loads of celebrities who do manage to get back to a pretty slim figure after having babies….I don’t mean straight away cos that’s unhealthy, but she’s on tour and you’d think the pounds would drop off her. But they haven’t.

  17. Amy | 11/06/09

    I meant she doesn’t look anywhere near bad!

  18. mm | 11/06/09

    She has come a gazillion miles from her melt down days, but I still find her utterly unappealing. To put it nicely.

  19. Duchess | 11/06/09

    She is too big for my taste – she looks quite butch.

    On another note, people need to stop asking why their comment is in moderation. ALL comments go into moderation to start with. Stop panicking ladies.

  20. queenb | 11/06/09

    I think she has done well to get back in shape, but to me she has put on a little bit of weight recently she seemed to be thinner a few months ago when she first lost the weight. But she still looks good.

  21. amanda | 11/06/09

    her legs look fine, it seems she needs to work on her upper body & stomach area. I bet though that her toned legs just come from all the dancing she is doing on tour and she doesn’t work out much besides that (though yes, I know dancing is a good work out).

  22. d_perfectionist | 11/06/09

    still huge

  23. Miss Jessie | 11/06/09

    @ Hell on High

    the word “fat” sentences you to moderation

  24. Miss Jessie | 11/06/09

    Her face looks so cute in the 2nd photo. She has good muscle tone, and just has to loose a bit of weight to be just about right in my eyes

  25. whocares | 11/06/09

    Nice legs. I still can’t believe people find Britney entertaining. Amusing, perhaps…

  26. Draccae | 11/06/09

    She looks better but really, she needs to cut out the tiny, shiny, stage outfits. Her body looks wonderful when in more covered clothing. I think she is at a fine weight for her, she only looks a little thick when dressed in such small stage clothes.

  27. BuffMama | 11/06/09

    One word: HOG!!!

    I mean, she’s fine if she just wants to wear normal everyday clothes. But if you want to parade around in circus gear that only covers half your body, you better be in crack-a$$ shape! She’s very toned, but she has a thick layer of body fat everywhere — can’t see her arm muscles or abs at all. There’s simply no excuse — with her kind of money, she should have been in killer shape before she set foot on a stage. These celebrities bring on the criticism themselves — no normal person would be seen in public in those outfits, thus they wouldn’t be criticized for looking like that. But if you’re going to parade around half-naked and charge people a hundred bucks (or more!) to see it, you better look like you just got out of military boot camp.

    Just my 2 cents…

  28. lauren | 11/06/09

    Britney is looking fit and toned. With all the energetic routines she’s doing she has to stay fit.

  29. lydia | 11/06/09

    I don’ T LIKE the damn costum! Not saying she is fat, but it doesn’t look good on her…
    What do u mean, izzie, “she is the mother of two, and not 20 yrs anymore”?????She is 27-28… jeez, is not like she is 75 yrs old…

  30. Lillian | 11/06/09

    yeah in my opinion, her legs are a little thick, and she still has room for improvement but what I don’t get is why Jessica Simpson gets so much crap for wearing a pair of mini shorts and being told to “cover it up” when Brittany Speares Here is hardly any better and showing MUCH more…

  31. Sybila | 11/06/09

    Well … She looks much better, but despite being definitely toned, I don’t know … She still looks too big for me … She’s my age! And I wouldn’t like to look that big, and people have seen her slim in the past, she was never skinny, it’s true, but I prefer the old Britney. Anyways, she has impoved a lot …I think It’s just a matter of time to see her back again …

  32. Kianna | 11/06/09

    I think that Britney looks better a bit more “covered up” as well (her costumes). She really has muscular legs but that must come from her workouts, practicing her dancing and then doing all that dancing in her shows. She does seem to be a little thicker in the middle (lately)….but she still looks good. She has come a HUGE WAY since her meltdown days. Have to give the girl some credit for that! However, she is older now and has had 2 kids so her body may not come back to what we originally saw when she 1st started out. And, also, those anti-depressants (she is supposed to be taking) cause a person’s body to bloat or retain fluid, etc. It’s hard when you’re taking meds of that nature.

  33. Cossey | 11/06/09

    I like her in that first pose the best!!!!

  34. jane tennison | 11/06/09

    Once trailer trash, always trailer trash.

  35. Megan | 11/06/09

    She is such a has been.

  36. WannaBeSkinny | 11/06/09

    Its so silly how people keep comparing her to what she used to be. I mean she is 27, has kids, and has had some sort of mental problems. She is still only recovering from all of that.

    Her leg muscles are huge! Prolly much more toned than rest of us here have. And also, is it really so great when someone starves herself to look like “she used to look like”? I mean she does have kids and she has to work hard, how is she gonna do all of that if she has no energy?

  37. lola | 11/06/09

    That concert was fantastic. She looks alot bigger in these pictures than she did on stage. I was only 8 rows from the front and i couldnt believe how much thinner Britney looked in real life. Great show!

  38. Lydia | 11/06/09

    my daughter and I saw brit in Concert this past April. it was an awesome show. We had third row seats. She looked amazing and alot smaller/fit in person. LOVE HER!

  39. Mel | 11/06/09

    She does NOT have the body to pull those outfits off. She looks much better than she did before she started her tour, but she still has a long way to go to look good in those costumes.She still looks chunky.

  40. Girl Butt | 11/06/09

    I love her costume in the first pic. The others are questionable (what’s with the LAST one? There’s so much wrong with it).

    I can’t think of anything else to say though.

  41. Polly | 11/06/09

    I think her legs look great! I love well muscled legs. She looks overall good, except the oufits and hair.

  42. Faint | 11/06/09

    I dont like her anymore, i used to like her when she wasn’t such a nutcase, and her body looks just too odd now, it used to be soo feminine. Now she looks kinda man-ish, and sort of chunky.

  43. cyclechick | 11/06/09

    She looks great, fit and healthy. Although I don’t think the outfit in the last photo does much to flatter her upper body.

  44. hlw | 11/06/09

    What I dislike about Britney Spears is not Britney at all. It is the way that she is so clearly directed by entertainment managers, or some such, to dress the way she is dressing, etc. There is no sense of originality or of who she really is as an artist in what she performs/exudes. It is not her body that is or is not the problem. It is the lack of something more true to being a performing artist that is the problem, such as great music, new ideas, creative energy, etc. Hence all the ridiculous focus on her weight, etc.

  45. chaz | 11/06/09

    Ham shanks!

  46. hay | 11/06/09

    she looks gross. she’s very thick. she’d look a lot better a bit more covered up. so NOT hot, ug, ug, ug.

  47. Veronica | 11/06/09

    She is looking pretty good. They really need some different costumes though.

  48. Leanna | 11/06/09

    She is pretty muscular these days. Some people pointed out her arms aren’t as lean, but that’s because she’s an apple shape so the fat is mostly concentrated in the upper body. Her legs and butt probably lean out first, then her stomach, chest, arms and back.

  49. Lori | 11/06/09

    I agree with the other comments. Its mostly her costumes that make her look so bad. Its like everything shrunk in the dryer and she is still wearing it. Not to mention they are just a horrible design! I cant wait to see what she looks like after her tour is over and shes just living her normal life.

  50. Jade | 11/06/09

    She’s just way too thick. I agree she looks toned, in-shape, definitely not flabby. But I would have dropped more weight before building so much muscle, I mean she looks so large even though she’s not jiggly.

  51. Mer | 11/06/09

    She is the trashiest person on earth. And she is ugly.

  52. Lou | 11/06/09

    ewww..she looks disgusting

  53. shayna | 11/06/09

    The costumes are pretty silly, but whatever. I think she def looks much better than she did and will probably continue to improve as her morale gets better. I agree that she looks better a little more “covered,” the shorty shorts are ok because her legs are so toned, but she should avoid the skin-tight and midriff revelaing stuff until she gets back to her prime condition. Her face looks cute in a couple of the pics. I’m glad to see her getting healthy again!!!!

  54. AngelaB | 11/06/09

    Has Been.

  55. so | 11/06/09

    she looks kinda buff…

  56. Bea | 11/06/09

    Honestly, I think she should retire once and for all

  57. Kiki | 11/06/09

    BuffMama: “There’s simple no excuse?” You act as if she’s committed a mortal sin by not weighing 110 pounds, as if she’s taken food out of the mouths of starving children simply by not looking like Taylor Swift or whoever! People like her and her fans don’t mind that she isn’t stick-thin. I mean, she’s bringing home the bacon, so to speak, she she’s doing something right. I guess, if she has any excuse, it’s that the world still wants Britney, and she’s happy to provide the goods, even if they are a little different than they were when she was 16 (and who’s aren’t?).

  58. person | 11/06/09

    I prefer the blurry photos.

  59. mallory | 11/06/09

    Muscles, mixed with a bit of fat.

  60. Anjana | 11/06/09

    I am guessing she is a size 4. The camera adds 20 lbs because the light deflects off of muscle and fat differently,magnifying the body fat. Especially when you’re that short. You have to absically be a size 0 to look good on camera-like julliane hough Getting to a size 0 is a major pain in the ass for us mere mortals, but it isn’t impossible for a celebrity. i agree that if she doesn’t want to put in the work to look good in the candids, she should just wear more flattering costumes, i love the army dress on her!

  61. Dr. Truth | 11/06/09

    These outfits are a cross between Michael Jackson and Madonna. All she needs now are some nipple tassels and a monkey, and she’s all set.
    Ridiculous.

  62. spanktacular | 11/06/09

    i think she looks great :-)
    muscular, toned, healthy.

    i really wanna see her live.

  63. step girl | 11/06/09

    She looks great and her show was amazing. Britney is such a performer and exudes something really special. Sure her body isn’t perfect, but she really knows how to move and work it. Just because she has a little extra fat doesn’t mean she should be ashamed of it and cover everything up. She is beautiful and I agree, with one of the commenters that the medication (she likely takes, I have no idea really) could have something to do with her bloating. I also remember hearing that she was bulimic, so, her younger skinny days were from a completely unhealthy lifestyle.

  64. amanda | 11/06/09

    I’m not a huge Britney fan but I was given a ticket to her concert from a friend who had a sister bail on her last minute.

    I was actually REALLY surprised by how tine looking she is in person. At 5′4 or 5′5 I would guess her to only weigh around 115 pounds….she’s very small.

  65. Ali | 11/06/09

    Once again, why does this no-talent has-been even bother? I mean honestly, her days of pretending to be talented were over LONG ago. GIVE UP FATASS! The whole Spears family should just give up.

  66. loveemedo | 11/06/09

    fit and healthy, but i would like her to have less body fat

  67. Jordan | 11/06/09

    wow she looks terrible. trash. what the heck as she been doing the past few months… working out but eating 3 times as much ?

  68. Zuwee | 11/06/09

    She looks pretty toned, but on the thicker side…

  69. M* | 11/06/09

    oh right… a “has been” sells out millions at her concerts… a has been has JUST signed for 20 more concerts in america after already toured there.. a has been has been asked to tour in australia.. a has been has changed her life around and has sold about a MILLION CDS.. um… may i suggest you get a dictionary and go back to school. you dont know what you are talking about.. give this girl the truth she needs.. she is hot, healthy, and toned!

  70. tinypaintings | 11/06/09

    I wish she would stop wearing clothes like that. Her thighs scare me.

  71. Jay | 11/06/09

    SHE LOOKS GREAT! If you think back, Britney the Woman (as opposed to Britney the Teen) was never stick thin, she always had ‘thunder thighs’ and muscle. I think she looks sexy as hell now.

  72. Amy | 11/06/09

    There’s no way in hell she weighs 115 lb.

  73. chaz | 11/06/09

    115lbs pah!! More like 135lbs minimum!

  74. Natasha | 11/06/09

    she looks thick and beefy.

    115? lol.. you people are crazy.

  75. grrrant | 11/06/09

    I saw her at the o2 in London on 7th June and believe me these pics don’t do her justice, she looked much better close up in real life. I do think with a little less body fat she’d look better though but she is fit and fabulous :D Xx

  76. mary-lyn | 11/06/09

    What’s the problem with her anyway!! Is that because she has a secret dream to be a topless or something ??I can belive she can wear that stuff like in front all those person !!
    Goshh!! and even if the outfit was nice SHE DON’T have the body for that kind of stuff!!
    Sorry Britney you’Re NOT 18 anymore!!

  77. desaudia | 11/06/09

    ugh…its the skanky low dollar look

  78. Ruby | 11/06/09

    AMAZING!! I can’t believe how fantastic Britney is looking these days. She looks gorgeous. And I’m going to her concert when she comes to Australia – can’t wait!!

  79. Bella | 11/06/09

    She looks hot and healthy. I bet she is happy at this way – not starving herself or on her junk food/drinking binges. I’m proud of her.

  80. jill | 12/06/09

    She looks great. People who say otherwise don’t know what a muscular toned woman looks like. She’s never going to look like she’s 16 again. She’s 27 and has had two kids back to back. She could use some work on her stomach area, she has a bit of a muffin top, but she’s fine as she is. Her legs are big, but there is no helping that. She has dancer legs.

  81. Nique | 12/06/09

    She should cut down on both working out and eating.
    Else she will look like Venus WIlliams.
    Toned but fat. Which is alright for a tennis star, but not for a supposedly sexy singer.

  82. Tai | 12/06/09

    She always looks good in magazine shoots, videos, or onstage (kinda, needs to cover up more) but IRL she always looks like she needs a shower and deodorant and a breath mint. Eww.

  83. Lindsay | 12/06/09

    I agree with Draccae…those stage outfits aren’t doing her any favors. Actually I don’t think those outfits would do anyone any favors unless they were 17 years old and super teenage skinny. I think she looks pretty good…she’s not built like a stick so I’m not sure why she gets so much schtick now for not being model skinny. She looks great for her build.

  84. Dianna | 12/06/09

    She can NOT pull off those costumes

  85. hc | 12/06/09

    I have to agree with BuffMama. She needs to cover it up a bit. Not just because the costumes are unflattering, but also because… it’s just time. Once you’re hitting your 30’s and/or you have a couple of kids, you need to cover it up a bit. I’m not saying a Mumu, just something a little more tasteful and flattering. I just think women who try to look like teenagers when they are adult and grown become ridiculous and pathetic no matter how thin and great their bodies are. Anyway, even though I don’t hate Britney, I have to come to the conclusion that the girl just doesn’t have the greatest taste.

  86. trollydolly | 13/06/09

    She looks great but the outfits! Dear God! The last photo looks like someone who dressed in the dark. But she’s never been known for her sartorial elegance now has she?

  87. Erica | 13/06/09

    Venus Williams is FAT? wtf?

  88. Ruthy | 14/06/09

    thickish and biggish, blah…she should never have gained from years ago she looked great then

  89. Crystal'Rose | 14/06/09

    Id ask for my money back.

  90. Britney Dean | 14/06/09

    She looks like a fat sausage stuffed into those stupid outfits.
    I bet Velveeta cheese oozes out of the seams of that super-slimming spandex body suit when she changes after a show.

    “Toned and healthy womanly body” looks more like “thick and chunky Louisiana possum stew in a bag” when you’re an international pop star, shaking it on stage It may cut it for the average ladies of the blogging world, but you would think someone who used to be on the top of it all would want to look on the top of her game for her “comeback”.

    She used to be so cute and energetic. Now she looks like she smells like a used KFC box. :(

  91. Fiona | 14/06/09

    Toned but fat…. and I mean it, she is fat, period.

  92. M* | 14/06/09

    britney dean sausage– you are the cow.. not Britney Spears!

  93. levi1eye | 14/06/09

    She is a little stubby over-all for my taste. But I’ve no doubt she’s in phenomenal shape.