Emma Roberts On The Movie Set
July 31st, 2009 by Rian | Filed under Misc Celebs & Diet News, Skinny Celebrities.Somebody asked for an Emma Roberts post, so here are a couple of photos of her yesterday on the set of her latest movie Valentine’s Day, which is being filmed in Los Angeles…
Photos via FamePictures
Tags: brunette, emma roberts, on set, skinny, thin
Beautifull!!
She has nice legs
She looks lovely. Natural shiny hair, pretty face, cute.
Don’t like the shoes but hey can’t blame the girl for that.
I love her. I know she is skinny, but at least she looks very proportionate for her small frame. Wonder how she does it though, never seen anything about her diet/ ex online or anywhere so far. About time.
She looks like any other American girl. Next.
BORING.
Very pretty and young
I agree with obsessive compulsive, girl next door appeal, she looks very young, lets see her in few years time.
She is adorable! She has great legs!
She looks cute. She reminds me a lot of the twilight girl.
pretty. young.
She’s the next Julia Roberts.
They grow up so fast. She’s ok-looking I guess. I doubt I’d look twice if I passed her on the street.
Emma looks adorable. She is so cute…pulls off the white tee shirt with the jeans and still looks very thin. NOT OVERLY THIN. She manages to be thin and not malnourished or hungry ! Now she is someone I’d ACTUALLY believe when they “claim” to be naturally (genetically) thin!
She looks tiny-maybe 5;3 105 lbs but she looks young so it is probably a good and healthy weight for her!
The side view of her thigh concerns me a bit (too thin?), but she’s looking chic otherwise.
She has a nice butt. Appropriately thin everywhere else.
She looks fab. love the simple summer outfit of white vest and jeans.if only the rain would stop! i think i remember her being blonde but its so much nicer now. if shes 5′3″ id say shes a toned 110lbs
Her body looks a lot better now that she’s grown up. She used to be lanky and unattractive. Too bad I still think she’s a terrible actress who is only popular because of her aunt.la
i think shes beautiful. picture #2 shows that a girl can be thin and have a booty at the same time! lucky girl haha
She has a cute figure, and her face is pretty. I think she’s more attractive than her aunt ever was even like 20 years ago.
Nice legs.
Ridiculous shoes. Too bad she didn’t inherit Julia’s looks.
Her face resembles Sophia Bush’s on pic 2.
it´s simple to look fresh and sweet if you´re a young girl… sigh
what a WEIRD body!
Her body looks too adolescent for such high heels. Something looks strange. I agree with the comment about she being prettier than her aunt.
Holy Shoes, Batman.
Wow, the ugly version of Kristen Stewart!!
Actually, imo she always looks like she tries to copy her.
I like how she is my age! She is just one of those naturally slim and petite girls. I like her she seems humble. Honestly she seems like her body carries more weight up top and in her abdomen. Not saying she’s fat by any means. I wonder how she’ll look in about 5 years.
nice little booty she’s got going on
I don’t think she is 5′3 at all, she is about 5′1, 5′2 max. She is very cute and thin. A good weight.
she’s pretty! she has an apple shape but it’s ok.
I don’t see whats so great about her body, she has small boobs and a bigger ass in comparison, and doesn’t have an extremely awestrucking face either..
she is beautiful
Wow, I’m so jealous! Argh!
Skinny legs! (but her fat arms are a little bit weird)
Cute girl, normal slim. She must be quite coordinated, I salute her. If I wore those shoes, I’d need an ambulance in less than 5 minutes!
The pretty version of Kristen Stewart.
She looks great – but why those shoes?
I think she’s still fresh in the movie industry right now and she kind of lacks definition (which is why I find she’s a bit boring). But she is pretty.
@maxx05, lol!
I agree: She’s very cute; but, those shoes are like retro 70’s! Ugghh…………
She’s pretty.
For some reason I read ‘Emma Watson’ and wondered why she suddenly looked like Kristen Stewart.
Her legs are so long in proportion to the rest of her body. I like them though – long legs are nice. She is pretty and the outfit’s not too much. So a thumb’s up from me!
Such a cutie! I think she’s the Hollywood version of “average” — not a knock-out bombshell, just a pretty, fresh-looking girl. I love the shoes — YSL — but I can’t get over that guy’s feet. They are HUGE!!!
pretty!
her legs look thin compared to the rest of her. her belly looks bloated and she is def carrying some junk in that trunk. overall, she seems ok, really rather apple shaped, with heinous shoes.
I don’t think her belly looks bloated at all. She is super gorgeous and slim. I actully do like her shoes…very unique.
boring? just because there aren’t slutty pictures of her all over the internet.
wtf she’s a classy girl. loves it.
She’s very cute!
she’s cute and seems to have a personality. the shoes on the other hand need to go.
shes sohot wish i had the figure
i like her. she seems lovely and has a great cute figure x
i like her pale skin and dark red hair, and her face is ‘pretty’ tho i dont see anything amazing…i think she is too thin. even if its natural…its def not my cup of tea. very plain, wouldnt look twice. also, she was bigger when she first came out! my guess is she aint meant to be this tiny! heck if hollywoods gotten to her already then next she will blonde, tan and buxom…
Samba, what are you talking about, she was like ELEVEN when she “first came out.” And BLOATED BELLY? Fat arms? Are we looking at the same pics? Clearly a lot of people who post here are insane.
She is cute.
she looked better thinner and blonde but at least she lookz lyk someone we cud pass in the street
“nowayjose | 1/08/09
Samba, what are you talking about, she was like ELEVEN when she “first came out.” And BLOATED BELLY? Fat arms? Are we looking at the same pics? Clearly a lot of people who post here are insane.”
Amen to that!! Finally someone with sense lol
Great little body, I love her legs, hate her shoes.
she looks good
wanting to be thin doesn’t mean the Hollywood has gotten to her.
She probably just started to live a healthier lifestyle and exercises. Unlike when she first came out…when she was a but chubbier, she was quite young then to. People grow into their bodies and beauty.
She really carries her weight in her upper body (comparatively I mean to her very lean-looking legs). She looks young and healthy to me–and very “classically” beautiful.
She looks beautiful. Its nice to see someone who’s not all tanned up and manufactured looking. I hope she sticks to the pale look cause it suits her and her skin will thank her for it in years to come.
she has a great little figure & such a pretty face- she looks really good in jeans which is difficult to do…
LOL, she looks like a mix between Agyness Deyn and Kristen Stewart!
isn’t your upper arm supposed to be thiner than your tight?
booty in the second pic! ow ow! lol!
whats she famous for? nickelodean? hmmpph..
next
She’s beautiful, and imo, really tiny. I doubt she’s 110 at 5.3, when I was 105 at 5.4 I was nowhere near that slim – she’s maybe around 90 – 95?
god damn…those legs! *sigh*
i would give anything for legs like that.