New Ashley Greene Candids
July 29th, 2009 by Rian | Filed under Healthy Celebrity, Misc Celebs & Diet News.Twilight star Ashley Greene was spotted having lunch with a friend at the Ivy restaurant in Santa Monica yesterday…
Photos via PacificCoastNews
She looks cute and healthy… clearly she hasn’t yet conformed to the “Hollywood Stick Thin” trend. (Good for her!)
What do you all think?
Tags: ashley greene, brunette, candids, healthy size, twilight
cute face.
how old is she?
No comments? am i first? i think she is beautiful but doesn’t look anything like what I imagined Alice Cullen to look like. But never mind.
No.
she has such a pretty face! by no means is she fat but she’d be a total knock out if she toned up a bit
does anyone else think she slightly resembles rachel mcadams or is it just me?
I think she looks like Rachel McAdams too.
Her body is average, nothing special. Since she was at the Ivy, you know she wanted attention.
Not keen on the dress (the colour is hideous with her skin colour) but she’s a pretty girl.
She is very beautiful and her body looks faboulous. Haven’t seen the movie though.
looks like she could have played one of the “charmed” sisters
she will be scrambling under that be skinny pressure soon. i mean, we’ve already started discussing about it so much meaner sites are doing the same…
@Rika – I think she’s about 22 or something. She looks quite young though, I think.
I disagree with what people have said about the colour of the dress being hideous with her skintone, I think it looks stunning. I think it’s more her hair colour that makes it harder to pull off. She looks great though, I’m glad she isn’t overly skinny, and what great legs she has too. If I was going to be picky I’d say her shoulders look a tad broad for the rest of her but I’m not going to be picky and I’m just going to happily say she looks great
&hearts3 the dress
She is average weight but still has that chest bone thing happening. If she was pin thin, it would be very prominent.
Ordinary body, sort of cankles. I don’t like that color against her skin either. Too much contrast between her skin color and dress color, not attractive – I can’t stand when Kelly Osbourn does that either.
<3 didn't work!
thanxxx
I don’t think I like that dress, especially with her pale skin. I am v pale and have a hard time trying to pull off those really bright acid colours.
I normally need a lot of fake tan. But fake tan is such a pain in the arse to apply that I don’t normally bother.
Out of every picture I have ever seen on this site… this girl looks the most like my body. Therefore, I will not reserve judgment.
Her visible clavicles/chest area are nice, but she is a bit “soft” in other areas. Not shapeless, not entirely flabby, just lacking that precise definition. Somewhat short (at least it seems that way), yet well proportioned. Abhorrently white skin, but anemia and lack of melatonin do exist. I love how she trumps it up rather than plays it down with her wardrobe choice. Not beautiful… “cute”… must watch out for gaining weight.
Think that she is a pretty girl. AND, good for her…thus far…for not falling “Prey” to the ‘Hollywood Stick Thin’ Trend !!! Give her time…she may succumb to the other stick thins?!
I think she looks cute too! Needs to tone up just a little bit; and the color of the dress is not the most attractive on her because of her pale skin color.
She is beautiful! Body and face!
shes gorgeous and should stay how she is. it’s refreshing to see someone who doesnt look like they’re on the brink of death
she looks really healthy and natural…good for her.
Interesting! I think I find her beautiful. In a unique kind of way. Not digging the orange though.
She would look 1000x better if she had on actual shoes, preferably something with a small heel or a wedge. Flip flops do not go with that dress AT ALL!!!
Other than that – very pretty girl, nice thin body – could use some toning, but her weight is great…
Cute, fit and healthy, IMO. Not into the orange dress on her, I think another color would be more flattering and I am not a fan of the cut of that dress on anyone but she, herself, looks good.
I actually don’t mind the orange so much…a different shade of orange might have suited it better but I think with the dark hair it does work.
I think she has a very cute body…maybe could tone a bit more but I don’t think she looks bad by any stretch.
Cute girl!
She is stunning. A total knock out.
beautiful sexy healthy girl
Cute, she has a bony chest already so shouldn’t lose weight but could look bad if she put on weight. I think she’s perfect the weight she is.
The dress is awful, I don’t like her figure either.
Pretty girl
What a pretty, pretty girl. Weird choice of dress – I don’t know if I would wear it. I’m hoping she’s got some hot heels in that bag to complete the outfit. . I bet the flip-flops are for walking.
I agree with Mel.
Asalarma, totally agree. Different shoes would change the look completely. I bet she is toned, just the camera angle isn’t capturing it. My arms are really toned, but sometimes they just look big in pictures if I don’t do the hand on the hip pose. She looks perfect for herself (you know, making the most of her body, not over or underweight)! She does remind me of Rose McGowan, from Charmed.
Not for me.
looks to me like a classic pear shape..still very much a pretty girl and this weight look good on her
shes pretty, but i agree i didnt picture alice to look like this.. i pictured her very small and fairylike
Cankles and bad fashion – not a good combo.
with a face like that she will look beautiful no matter what. she’s gorgeous and i think she’d look great with a few lbs. lost or how she is now. jealous of her perfect complexion.
put some polish on those toes or cover them up!
I don’t like her thick and stocky figure. Her face is pretty though, I agree with the Rachel McAdams comment. BTW Rachel would be a great new face to see on here
She’s cute.
I think she loos so beautiful!
@Tina: is there an anti-polishless toes law I am unaware of?
Cute girl, healthy body.
looks*
adorable face, nice healthy figure
its ridiculous what constitutes as cankles these days. some people need to see what the real cankles that spawned the term look like.
anyway, she is average slim, and completely unremarkable, in the nicest possible way.
She has pretty facial features, but the dress doesn’t really fit the occasion. She looks a little frumpy, comfy casual is cool though…
healthy, slim, pretty
Very pretty. Body looks great and very natural. I’ll bet that it’ll look even better when she’s 30 and works out to stay slim (i.e. she’ll have more definition).
I love her – I think she’s the perfect image of healthy and stylish! Anybody know how tall she is/guesses on weight? I’d guess, but I have absolutely no idea how tall she is, except I know she’s a lot taller than “Alice” is supposed to be
Another thought to consider. . . cankles are genetic, not from being overweight.
I hate the style, I think she looked better in Twilight.
I guess she can be called thin, but nothing special.
really great figure…very beautiful girl!
Gorgeous! love that pale skin against the bright orange. She looks fresh, lovely, and has a fantastic figure.
LOVE LOVE LOVE the dress. I think her limbs have a nice length to them. She is lucky in that aspect.
She looks lovely. I wish everyone wuld stop crying cankles! Cankles are on fat people where their ankle is the same size as their calf. Her calf is clearly bigger than her ankle, she just has shorter legs, geez.
Eeeehhhh. That color and the flip flops are not doing her legs any favors. Sorry…
Cute
Funny – she’s all bony at the chest but comparatively thick through the arms and legs – I would say low body fat but she doesn’t look especially toned either.
Yes, good for her, but she really isn’t anything like Alice should be!
I’m sorry but I really don’t find her figure very enviable. And her head looks so small compared to the rest of her. Her face is certainly pretty, though.
I don’t get the cankles comments either. Isn’t the shape of your legs something you are born with? It is not like someone can help it if their legs do not taper to an “acceptable” thinness at the ankles…. and therefore being able to be classified as having a “good body.” How stupid is that.
Jujubee, maybe you’ve noticed that a lot of the physical attributes that make people unattractive in the eyes of a lot of commenters on this site are things that they cannot change – being short or having wide hips, for ex. That still doesn’t stop anyone from criticizing. If that’s unacceptable to you you’re probably on the wrong site.
she looks OK figurewise. She is pretty. I kind of like the look of bright colors against pale skin, but that’s just me. I like the contrast.
badd legs
LOVE alice cullen! she’s adorable!
although I dont understand why nikki reed doesnt get as much attention as she does; I think she’s equally as cute if not cuter..
pale skin and orange dress does not work, otherwise her body looks good, very healthy!
Perfect body! Athletic and slim, but still eats enough.
She seems to have some meat on her bones,which is a really great thing!I loved her in the movie;as for this outfit i don’t like the dress-shoes combo:she should have chosen a great pair of heels to match the dress.
BTW,i like the contrast the dress makes with her skin colour and so the colour of her hair:so unique instead of all those Hollywood blondes!
She is so pretty. Her body looks healthy if you compare it to “normal hollywood”. I so wish that she could stay that way.
A little excercise is godd for everyone though. And real shoes would suite her outfit.
normal
she has cool eyes. lovely.
Whenever a female is wearing flats who isnt tiny-boned Reese Witherspoon/Nicole Richie or just a very tall model, everyone says “cankles.” lol
i like!
very fit and healthy, prefer her with the ‘alice cullen’ hair though IMO.