Kimberly Stewart Update
August 21st, 2009 by Rian | Filed under Misc Celebs & Diet News, Skinny Celebrities.We haven’t seen pictures of socialite Kimberly Stewart around here in ages! She was a lot more ‘well known’ back in the days when she hung out with Paris Hilton and was photographed by the paparazzi all the time. Anyway, here are some photos of her from last night as she was leaving the Beach Blanket Babylon in London after celebrating her 30th birthday…
Photos via INFdaily.com
She’s looking pretty skinny these days!
What do you all think?
Tags: blonde, candids, inebriated, kimberly stewart, skinny, thin
Very very skinny!
Ghoulish and very thin. Red lipstick doesn’t look good on her
That’s an odd choice of an outfit, I don’t like how high the waist is. I can’t believe this chick called Aniston “homely”… she’s not all that herself.
Very skinny. Bad hair, bad make up, she looks 50 not 30!
Hairstyle doesn’t really compliment her.
Oh my, I suppose she used a lot of drugs (stimulants) because she looks old for 30!
Ummm, she looks like Anna Wintour.
She is boring and falls off of motorcycles haha.
Nice legs though…
she looks just a bit thinner than normal. It didn’t do her face any favors.
harsh, i thought she was looking very nice haha
Still looks slim but there is some sort of undergarment malfunction up top or the dress is too small…not sure. Love love love her hair like this.
Don’t care about her at all. She is not attractive in the slightest. Her makeup is so harsh!
she looks actually a lot older than 30!
people with ugly face always tend to look older than they really are :/
I thought it was awesome when she called Aniston homely. The one and only time anyone ever said so publicly. Aniston is very homely indeed. But Kim is also nothing to write home about.
Aniston IS homely, at least she spoke the truth.
Aniston’s homely, but Stewart’s even uglier. She looks like she’s in her mid-40s. Did she do the Hollywood -5 age shave? Even so, she’s a rough looking 35!
Looks like wax!
This may not be bias because I an have always hated her BUT she looks gross most people look good skinny but you can tell this is not her natural wieght
She does look 35-ish.
she def looks 50 not 30, and no it’s not a hyperbole.
@Lux – you mean exaggeration.
Twig. Ill-fitting dress.
Hyperbole means exaggeration.
Weight looks good.. but the hair and the makeup, she looks a lot older.
Ha..she’s so loaded she has to look down to make sure she’s walking straight.
I like her hair, id like to get something like that, very gorgeous and I actually do like her red lipstick and her dress, she looks awesome
Never heard of her.
I’m much more interested in the guy in the checked shirt (2nd pic)
She looks pretty slim though. but she looks a bit creepy
at least aniston has a body. and nice hair. and a career.
Poor man’s Paris Hilton….she does less than paris.
Wrong dress for her. Styled totally wrong. Yeah, she looks 40, easy.
yikes, clown!! tooooooooooooo much makeup…
Girlfriend needs a tan and her roots done. On another note, she looks okay body wise…
She’s very pretty; but, that dress is so UGLY!!
Woah, I saw the first picture before reading the post, and was so surprised to find out she’s 30. Looks more like late 40’s.
She may look old but you can tell shes healthy (at least weight wise) due to her arm size. she used to be skinnier like back when she hung out with paris hilton
She’s got a comb forward like Nicole Richie. I’m not a fan.
Not looking great for 30. I would have said she looked good for 40 i.e. She looks at least 35.
She’s been this weight for a while now, hasn’t she? Hair is kind of awful, but the outfit is cute.
Cute outfit.She’s not that skinny and looks pretty toned.What I dont’t udnerstant is the neecklace-under-the-dress thing..looks kinda odd.The makeup is wrong too..it accentuates her harsh features even more..and that haircut screams bobblehead.!
kim stewart has always been thin. no surprise in these pics. Like someone mentioned above, she looks like anna wintour with the rigid black dress and cut. It doesn t suit her at all.
There is nothing attractive about her in these photos. She is looking a little rough in the face (her hair/make def aren’t helping) and the dress isn’t her best look
I like that she apparently hasn’t resorted to plastic surgery and the weight seems totally natural on her. The dress, though – even if it wasn’t so ill-fitting it would still be boring, especially for someone like Kim at her own bithday party. Understatement just doesn’t seem to be ‘her’, if you know what I mean.
don’t know her, she looks kind of aged and rough.
OMG, she’s 30? Wow, I thought she was around the 25 mark. She looks nice here. Although, I still don’t like that haircut. Outfit’s cute, though!
I thought she was 40+ o_o
Personally, I think it is pathetic when people attack each other publicly about appearance in particular since no one is perfect..deal with it. Anyways, I like Kim’s outfit, but I don’t think that particular haircut flatters her.
*My comment is towards Kim Stewart attacking Jennifer Aniston’s appearance
holy sh!t shes old
She looks like Sharon Stone, except Sharon stone is much older. Aniston must have “something because she obviously has to have something else. Its not like she is gorgeous or something”. Perhaps Aniston does have something else. And what does that make Kimberly? Useless and ugly.
Bleh. She looks horrible. Trying too hard, looking too dolled-up. Why is she even famous, anyway?
I might be the only chick here that thinks she looks good. Her outfit is chic and the hairstyle is really nice. I think she looks pretty.
shes still alive?
She looks great. Love her hair cut and her dress is really nice.
whoa! i remember her as being so much younger… either a lot of time has passed much faster than i realized, or she is just not aging well
distractingly bad hair.