Another Rachel Bilson Post
October 29th, 2009 by Rian | Filed under Rachel Bilson.Here are some pictures of the much-requested Rachel Bilson after she had lunch at Nate’n Al Deli yesterday in Beverly Hills…
Photos via INFDaily.com
Tags: brunette, candids, Rachel Bilson, slim, thin
nothing special to me
Can’t really tell her weight with all the clothes but she always looks good. So natural looking.
Cutie
The outfit wouuld be really cute either without the scarf, or with the scarf but without the flannel shirt.
Rachel, of course, is beautiful. Though in these pictures with the sunglasses on and messy hair she isnt looking quite her best.
she always looks like a mess. I think a new hair-do is in order
I just have never understood the whole scarf trend. Not flattering at all.
I’m getting tired of leggings being used as pants.
Its one thing if our hot mess Lindsay does it, but it looks weird when Rachel or Shanae try to pull it off.
she sure loves that bag!! and i do too
looks good. messy, but a cute mess. but omg, the wrinkle(s) between her eyes! deep. what is she, 28? it’s a little too soon, especially in Hollywood!
She’s a cutie, love her outift.
I bet it will be 50 comments like this:”Oh she is so cute and petitte”.So boring.Be more creative people!
But she is cute and petite x), at least it is what I think
looks good i approve.
What do you guys think her stats are? Thanks
Cute! I don’t like her bag though, but the rest of her looks great.
Moderation appears to be my middle name today (what gives Rian??I’ve been posting on here for years now).
Someone mentioned her wrinkles- it’s all about habit. At developed the number 11 between my brows in my late 20s as well. It’s from squinting/frowning and in my case it also runs in my family. It takes some effort to stop doing it. anyway..I think she looks good here- nice legs!
i’m sick of that bag!
She always looks healthy and pretty.
Good for her.
Once again, pretty girl, but learn how to dress yourself!
Oh dear, that’s not good.
Another terrible outfit and messy hair on an otherwise pretty girl.
I dig the leggings. Maybe because I waited 10 years to wear them. So, don’t diss them now!
I’m not one of the people who think petite is nice I prefer tall and thin any day!
That outfit is a mess…. the pink of that scarf totally clashes with that weird jacket.
Weight-wise, sure, she’s cute.
her outfit is awful.
Looks the same. I agree w/ other posts– the scarf does not do her any favors.
she doesn’t need to dress herself up to go and have a friggin lunch, people! She’s wearing her comfy clothes, we all do it some times. Get over it.
She looks quite naturally slim to me.
Ditch the flannel, add a fitted blazer and pull the hair back in a pony. No need to appear schlumpy in public Rachel!
You’re right priscilla, cute and petite came to mind. There’s really nothing else to say about Rachel imo, lol.
Leggings as pants are fine on the right figure. Poeple with figures like any of the Kardashian sisters, JLo, Beyonce, Mariah Carey, Jessica Simpson, Hilary Duff you get the idea, that’s when leggings as pants looks awful. If you are thin it’s totally fine. But then that’s the way it is with most trends. You have to be on the thin side for it to really look cute. Like the Herve Leger bandage dresses and skinny jeans. Yeah!
Dr. Truth, I was away from the computer most of the afternoon due to an eye doctor appointment. I’m sorry that I couldn’t get to your comments sooner! (And no, that other one wasn’t deleted).
She is a cute gal, but nothing WOW in these photos…
Barbie: Stick thin in leggings just looks like stick thin – not sexy at all. I don’t know why anybody wants to be really skinny. Don’t you guys want to have boobs and a butt??
Rachel looks cute as always. I think her body is just right, she’s petite and doesnt have super long legs but thats ok. Not every girl should have the same body, that would be sooo boring.
I think she has a great figure-i would say 5′4 115-what do you all think?
While i think its great she has a healthy figure and sets a good example, why does she always always look so weird lately. I mean the scraggly hair parted down the middle?
shes cute!
like her black berry!!:P:P:P
5′6″ 120?
tired of leggings, I think Lindsay Lohan is the only person who can wear them well.
IMDB.COM says that she’s 5′2″, so if that’s the case then I would assume she’s between 110 and 115.
I beg to differ, ms benes. It’s only because that’s the only thing Lindsay wears that one might be led to think she wears them well. I’ve always thought Lindsay is a follower when it comes to fashion, not a trend-setter.
On a separate note, Rachel looks the same. This is her casual style. She looks cute but bland, as always.
She could be so cute. Why does she play it down? What’s with the scarf and the hair? Walmart-much? She could be such an icon if she didn´t look so down in the dumps.