Alicia Keys At The 2009 AMA’s

November 24th, 2009 by Rian | Filed under Healthy Celebrity, Misc Celebs & Diet News.

Here are some pictures of Alicia Keys at the 2009 American Music Awards…

INFphoto_1122803
Photos via INFDaily.com

She looks healthy and gorgeous!

What do you all think?

INFphoto_1123457

INFphoto_1122945

INFphoto_1122795

ADVERTISEMENT


Tags: , , , ,

78 Responses to “Alicia Keys At The 2009 AMA’s”

  1. Mel | 24/11/09

    She looks healthy, but I wouldn’t necessarily call her thin.

    What on earth is going on with her hair!? It looks ridiculous!

  2. Chip | 24/11/09

    Gorgeous! She is definitely a pear shape.

  3. maddison | 24/11/09

    Don’t care for the accessories including the cheap looking shoes. She should ask Kim Kardashian for some diet/workout tips. Her legs could be less thicker.

  4. Elenne | 24/11/09

    shut it you guys, shes gorge and so talented

  5. Red | 24/11/09

    I adore her dress…very pretty girl, nice body not to mention she’s talented too!

  6. Anna | 24/11/09

    i think she looks good

  7. Jillian | 24/11/09

    She looks good. I like her shoulders/collarbone. I don’t care for the dress or shoes.

  8. Alice | 24/11/09

    I think she has a nice upper-body. Nice clavicle and a nice waist, but her legs are a bit thick.

  9. aoife | 24/11/09

    very talented but of course that is not the issue here :)
    i have never liked her legs – but she has one gorgeous face!

  10. CKR | 24/11/09

    I don’t like her. Nothing stands out about her and her body has a weird shape in my opinion.

  11. kt | 24/11/09

    wow i think her body is nearly exactly like mine

  12. Natalie | 24/11/09

    Love the dress, hate the shoes, hate the hair. BUT, she does have a GORGEOUS figure!

  13. Lucy | 24/11/09

    Very thick thighs.

  14. Lily | 24/11/09

    Ugly mouth and horrible legs. But there is no denying she is very talented.

  15. londoncalling | 24/11/09

    Giorgio Armani spring 2010, beautiful, elegant and fun at the same time, i love it.

  16. Girl Butt | 24/11/09

    less thicker, huh?

    I think her body is hot. The dress, however, is another story.

  17. Persephone | 24/11/09

    She is gorgeous and talented. I don’t like her outfit.

  18. meli§a | 24/11/09

    pretty face and her bod has always been fit yet curvy :)

  19. onesie | 24/11/09

    the blue eyeshadow is too matchy-matchy with the outfit… but i love her skin tone, she is so pretty and talented!

  20. lauren | 24/11/09

    all you people criisizing her legs THATS HER BODY TYPE shes a pear-she holds her weight in her bottom half. that being said she could lose 10-15 lbs she’d still be a pear but look a little better. and i have 2 compliment her on the shoe-perfect 2 hide those cankles

  21. Mandy | 24/11/09

    SAME BODY LIKE BEYONCE!

    @ EVERYONE: WHY DOES SHE GOT SUCH COLLARBONES/SHOULDERS BUT THE REST IS NOT THAT SKINNY????

  22. Sanne | 24/11/09

    She looks really good! And really, 10-15 pounds? Look at her collarbones now (they look good though!) and imagine what they would look like with 15 pounds less. You can’t just lose weight in your legs, even if you want to. I don’t think losing 10-15 pounds would be good for her.

  23. Mickey von Dutch | 24/11/09

    The lower part of this dress is not suited for her body type. What’s the use of having all these professionals giving you advice if this is the best they can come up with? My 6-year-old could have told her that this look is a definite “no no!”.

  24. lc | 24/11/09

    I don’t like the way she looks, unattractive and she’s chunky. Her outfit is no good either.

  25. Palomita | 24/11/09

    Shut it kids! That is her BODY TYPE! She’s thick! Very beautiful legs if you ask me :) you can still tell she’s fit but let’s face it, she has a voluptuous figure!

  26. Ivory | 24/11/09

    She has gotten way too thick. Such a shame because she’s stunning from the waist up.

  27. londoncalling | 24/11/09

    @Mickey Von dutch, you can not see the bottom part of the dress, you have a split on the side where you should see swarovski encrusted blue shorts that should have match a belt that she didn’t wear, i think the dress suits the occasion. She is a singer not a model, her body is fine and so are her legs.

  28. spanktacular | 24/11/09

    she is gorgeous (despite the hideous dress and make up) weight wise she looks good. i am not familiar with her weight over the years though

  29. helen | 24/11/09

    Her legs are very bad, too chunky

  30. Jade | 24/11/09

    Her face is absolutely stunning, but those legs are very thick and don’t like good, I’ve never thought so. They are Ashanti legs.

  31. Jade | 24/11/09

    look* not like

  32. nnn | 24/11/09

    Horrible thick body. Her head looks too small for her big body.

  33. What toWear | 24/11/09

    I agree with Londoncalling….She is a singer not a model. Let’s not hold every celebrity’s shape up to the standards of a model. Beauty comes in many different forms.

  34. shaden | 24/11/09

    dont like her figure,she could loose some weight!!
    and i dont like her dress or he hair!!
    the shoes are OK!

  35. Lily | 24/11/09

    @ Mandy, I used to be way too skinny (not on purpose) and my coller bones never stuck out like that. I think it’s genetics.

  36. KT | 24/11/09

    her legs wouldn’t look “chunky” in the slightest if she didn’t wear those god-awful shoes. She is actually very slim and healthy, it’s more healthy to hold your weight in your lower half, i heard a study recently that people with the skinniest thighs were more likely to get heart disease…

  37. summer rain | 24/11/09

    Holy Bedazzler!

    That dress is…something else.

  38. happygolucky | 24/11/09

    She is gorgeous, period. She has the confidence and glow of someone who is good at what they do. her outfit is not anything I would ever wear, but it on her looks fabulous. Honestly, I would rather be her than one of those Victora Secret stick insects.

  39. ruthie | 24/11/09

    Thanks for this post Rian!
    Love seeing more healthy sized celebs on this site:)

  40. Becks | 24/11/09

    Pretty girl. Nice skin tone too. She’s very even and glow-y.

  41. so | 24/11/09

    girls with naturally thick legs like hers should never wear short dresses like this one…

  42. cec | 24/11/09

    I find thick toned legs very attractive. Way better than skinny, shapeless legs with no muscle. She looks gorgeous!

  43. Oksana | 24/11/09

    She reminds me of Riahanna’s body type. They should go to the gym together.

  44. Natascha | 24/11/09

    she is not thick, kelly clarkson is thick! Alicia is stunning, talented and that is wow a beautiful outfit. the dress is so cute and her shoes are so fitting the dress!

  45. Jade | 24/11/09

    Alicia is thick, Kelly is overweight.

  46. Sian | 24/11/09

    If that’s really Armani (and I would never doubt our resident fashion expert), his style has changed a lot. His clothes used to be all about elegance and understatement (they were a bit boring, too) and this dress looks quite different. But I do think it suits her, pear-shape or not, and many people aren’t as fixated on looking skinny as the people on this site and would think she looks great.

  47. K | 24/11/09

    The dress would have looked better in a solid blue with just the rhinestones at top and down the v in front.
    The dress overpowers the girl for me.

  48. asemalla | 24/11/09

    this girl has beyoncés body type! her shoulder section nearly looks like an anorectic’s and her legs…well, i would say i prefer mine to hers! what about a floor-length dress?

  49. Chop_Chop | 24/11/09

    She is a thick girl for sure! But its a lot of muscle so it looks good and not sloppy. I think she is a good example of how to have a few extra healthy pounds that can be called curves and really be curves instead of blobs.

  50. Tee | 24/11/09

    ugghhh do not like her legs at all. She has a beautiful face.

  51. glow | 24/11/09

    Absolutely gorgeous face. So she isn’t tiny. With a face like that she doesn’t have to be.

  52. Cara | 24/11/09

    Not everybody has skinny little chicken thighs and knees…she looks healthy and glowing for her body type. Beautiful woman.

  53. ms_benes | 24/11/09

    Almost perfect, except for her legs.

  54. loveemedo | 24/11/09

    wow heyloooo collarbone!
    i love her shoes

  55. lc | 24/11/09

    I’m sorry, but there is nothing appealing about her.

  56. Bliss | 24/11/09

    I have the same type of legs as she does, although I am taller than AKeys. That being said she is absolutely gorgeous and talented, so if her legs are a bit on the thick side it doesn’t take away from her in the least bit. My husband loves her body, along with Beyonce, JLo, Salma, etc… (you get the picture) :)

  57. MScotton | 24/11/09

    Thighs are heavy! ..at least she has nice collarbones.

  58. DK | 24/11/09

    Not a fan of hers or her body but I loved the dress… can anyone ID it?

  59. moonbel | 24/11/09

    I like the dress :)
    @DK: scroll up to read londoncalling’s first comment. She id’d the dress. ;)

  60. skinny10 | 25/11/09

    lovely outfit and hair style. she looks really gorgeous.

  61. Ginger | 25/11/09

    gorgeous

  62. justathought | 25/11/09

    Shes not thick at all shes just healthy and its her body type. She has beautiful skin and is so toned. This woman would be beautiful at any weight. Just wish she would quit with the weird hairstyles!

  63. observer | 25/11/09

    so gorgeous and talented, but i can’t say i like her fashion choices usually

  64. Luela | 25/11/09

    I don’t understand how she can be so thick (and obviously has a high body fat eprcentage looking at her arms, legs and big waist), but have such prominent clavicles. Strange.

  65. hateonit. | 25/11/09

    Holy hell what is with yu people?? She is a singer. She needs to be healthy. Most importantly she is a human being who for once in this stupid hollywood doesn’t want to be labeled as skinny. Its not her body type. She’s made a wonderful transition from young girl to full grown woman. She’s always been thick in her legs. That’s how her body is and always will be. And kelly clarkson is not thick. She’s overweight. Needless to say why does it matter with a voice like hers? Same with alicia.she’s thick. So what. She aint doin no runway shows. She doesn’t get paid not to eat. She gets paid to sing. Which she does very well I might add. Name a singer that’s skinny. Like a real singer. Mariah carey? Nope. Jazmin sullivan? Nope. Even christina aguliera has got meat on her. They have the better jobs. Not these size 00 models. I can’t blame anyone for their comments. The world has warped your minds into thinking stick is better.

  66. Kokaile | 25/11/09

    Unliky girl: thin arms, but bulky legs.

  67. Draccae | 25/11/09

    Gorgeous healthy looking skin! I don’t know, she looks at an okay weight just a bit out or proportion…she is thinner up top and thicker on bottom.

  68. Janice Marie | 25/11/09

    Why is she considered ‘healthy’ and Jessica Simpson considered ‘fat’? I just don’t get it.

  69. Matilda | 25/11/09

    Lose the shoes I say but the rest is fine. Love the dress!

  70. TallEnglishGirl | 25/11/09

    If she’d just chosen a dress that hit below the knee-cap she would have looked great. Unfortunately, all this dress does is highlight her sausage legs.

  71. Kianna | 25/11/09

    Think that she looks lovely. I think that she is a bit pear-shaped. Her thighs are fine. We are just so accustomed to seeing the stick thin runway models & some Hollywood types (like Rachel Zoe, the pre-baby Nicole Riche, LiLo when she’s at her skinny weight(s)…and so forth). Alicia looks very pretty and has transitioned from teenage look into a beautiful woman with curves. Just b/c she is NOT the typical stick thin Hollywood type…that is a GOOD THING.

  72. alisa | 25/11/09

    ugh you say she looks healthy? if all that weight was on an apple shaped girl you would be calling her fat. she’s probably gained at least 20 pounds

  73. alisa | 25/11/09

    janice marie- i just read your comment….. and i completely agree with you

  74. Rue | 26/11/09

    She looks huge. A huge blue tent with legs. A mobile home!

  75. feefee | 26/11/09

    U people must b blind that girl is gorgeous!!! Sorry size 0 n 2 is malnourished status

  76. nandi | 28/11/09

    She normally looks very hippy & thick. The dress is very flattering and makes her look thinner than usual.

  77. retrobanana | 29/11/09

    okay everyone is gonna yell “sausage legs” and i hate her legs and omg she has horrible legs…well guess what she has thick legs…its called pear shapped you hold your weight in the hips , butt , and thighs….it sucks but it happens.

    alicia rocks it! her and jayz empire state of mind is the jam!!!!!
    good dress

  78. retrobanana | 29/11/09

    ohhhhh to alisa and janice marie… i def have the answer girls!!

    well first offf (i never ever thought jess was fat i love jess i just thought she gained some poundage for a while and got a lil chubbier but she was never fat) and in her last post she looks great i would rather actually look like that than alicia…..however to answer the question if you are implying its a race thing…its not that this is my theory on it. alicia always looked like this. her weight might have fluctuated a tiny bit. but for the most part she always had a big bottom half and a small top half and kept it like that forever.

    however jess was pretty much slim forever even back on newlyweds she seemed pretty thin. and when she sang she wasnt a toothpick but she was def smaller than alica keys am i wrong? then all of a sudden she put on a ton of weight…..i meannnnn i think the diff is that jess has the ability to be thin…not skinny…but thin where as alicias body type is curvy (we have never seen alicia in a bikini with the legs and hips that we have seen jess in have we?)..jess is curvy too but not as bad….and i think i pretty much nailed it. when someone has been thinner in the past and then gains weight it is easier to call them fat than when someone looks kind of average pretty much consistently…..