Katie Holmes In Short Shorts
November 11th, 2009 by Rian | Filed under Katie Holmes.Katie Holmes was photographed filming scenes on the set of her latest film in Long Island, NY…
Photos via SplashNews
Is it my imagination, or has she gained some weight recently, especially in the leg area? It wasn’t really noticeable in Monday’s post.
Tags: Katie Holmes, legs, shorts, weight gain speculation
FIRST
she has not gained, if anything she’s lost. she’s a pear, plain and simple, always will be always was, no matter what weight.
She has always had heavy legs.
She may have gained a little, but she looks adorable in this outfit. I want that sweater, I love suede elbow patches!
She has no ass and her legs are really tree-like.
i thought she had LOST weight in the last post, but her legs definitely look quite chunky in these photos. maybe she has gained, although i have always thought her legs were bigger than her upper body. she also hasn’t chosen the most flattering shoes to wear with short shorts, but i still think she looks cute overall.
i agree with lilly….she’s a pear shape. i don’t know why people are so critical of someone’s shape..they cannot change it. if she wanted to get her thighs really skinny she would look emaciated up top. she runs all the time (NY marathon)…she’s obviously in shape
I’m sure she doesn’t own mirrors.
Sloppy looking, she really doesn’t have any sense of style..
Its not that she’s not thin enough, its just that the shorts are hideous by themselves.
If you have have financial means and access to help from all sorts of professionals (hair and fashion stylists, make-up artists, designers, and so on) there is really no excuse to go out looking like this. She’s still very young but she looks like she has given up.
Actually, her legs AREN’T chunky like Addie wrote. If you look well, there really isn’t any fat on her legs. They are thick, but toned. She has no butt whatsoever.
FYI- THIS is cankles ladies, unlike Audrina;)
She just carries her weight in her legs. She a healthy size for her.
she is not aging well
I think…that I’ve seen this pics one too many times, they seem to be posted everywhere!
londoncalling: LOL!
I’ve always noticed kind of a bigger leg on her, particularly her calves. I remember her wearing skinny jeans when they were just gaining popularity & being surprised at her leg shape. Other than that, I think she’s looking trim.
her legs are not her best asset, nor is her husband.
Fantastic point, dascoop. He is all gums and hair and lunacy.
This girl is so bland to me. Think it’s HER choice to look like this? I often wonder.
i think the angle is just bad on the first two pictures. in the the last two, her legs actually look pretty great.
I wouldn’t want her legs but she can’t d anything about it. She’s still pretty (though she’s lost her spark ever since meeting Tom Cruise).
She should NOT wear shorts. She does not have the legs for them.
She will always have a cute face though
horrible fashion sense… she always looks like such a dirty mess
Poor Katie!
Please take a long hard look at yourself….. I’ve said it before…. you were so cute…. what happened?
I actually think her legs are great! toned, and no cellulite.
Gawd, I hate those cheap shoes –so ugly and unflattering. Even if they’re part of a costume for the movie, couldn’t they have found her some other flats?
Her legs look toned but unfortunately for her she has heavy lower legs that no amount of exercise can alter.
some people really have a weird shape. she has not butt but her legs are big. i am opposite to her no matter how much weight i lose my butt always stays.
On Katie’s behalf (and on behalf of her lower half…), I have to agree with earlier posts: She is a PEAR shape. No changing that. She was um, “blessed” with a rather thick set of legs, and she’s a runner to boot (which, contrary to popular belief, doesn’t help thin out already thicker legs, just makes them leaner) – two traits I share with her. Nothing to do but do.
Tree trunk legs!!
I don’t think her legs look that bad here and they’re certainly toned and possibly cellulite-free, I don’t see why she shouldn’t wear shorts. And I’ll always like her face, she can look really beautiful.
On another note, Rian, could you show us the other side of the first pic, the one with Anna Paquin in it?
She has always had a pear shape to her. Her legs have always been slightly larger than the rest of her. She is still looks great.
u call those short shorts lol
$5 Chinese shoes? I haven’t seen those in years.
now I wait for londoncalling to tell me they’re $750 loubitons lol
Just like Britney Spears… why don’t these girls have stylist???
it’s not her whole legs..she wasn’t blessed with the best calves, but if you look at pictures of her just from the knees up it looks like she has nice legs
No one with cankles like this should be wearing those shoes!!!
I totally agree with southerngumdrops- she can’t change her bone structure and body type! She looks healthy and fit, what’s wrong with that? No one is perfect.
those shoes are so cute!! and so is the sweater.
Honestly, I think she looks like a cute mom on the go.
There’s no reason why anyone SHOULDN’T BE ABLE to wear shorts, and definitely not her. She has no cellulite and even though she has heavier legs at least she’s working them. They’re just her legs, geez give her a break. Even though people with my body type appear thinner (comparing us), she is in WAY better shape than I am. WAY BETTER. No way I could run a marathon.
Plus, she’s a really tall girl (unlike her husband; he’s a somewhat tall girl)…usually taller people arent stick figures naturally (contrary to the common belief of models)
If she was wearing a low wide at the back wedge sandal it would have balanced out the chunkiness of her legs.
As she has alot of money in the bank I wonder why she hasn`t gone for vella smooth as this would reduce the circumference of her leg. Although it is not a permanent treatment and she would have to keep having it done. With a Hollywood budget this could be easily obtained.
To me her legs look very smooth and toned and muscular from all her running.
She looks really lovely in that last photo — and also looks just like her daughter!
OK guys….she’s on the SET OF A MOVIE. Those clothes are not her choice. It’s a COSTUME.
I think her legs have always had that shape….
Her legs are just very muscular from all the running she does. She probably didn’t choose the outfit if she’s filming scenes for a movie. She does seem to have a very strange fashion sense on a regular basis, though.
She hasn’t gained weight at all, she has gained muscle. Is that such a crime?!
bo-ring.
This is a good weight for her. Toned and normal, not the scary-skinny she was getting when she was hanging out with Posh. I think she’s comfortable in her own skin which is rare in Hollywood.
@Miss Jessie, LOL!
She hasn’t gained weight. It just looks that way because of her heavier legs. Her top part is very tiny. She is pear shaped I guess.
it doesn’t look like she gained weight, but more that the one picture is really zoomed in and makes her legs look larger. either way, this girl needs a makeover. i can’t believe how different she looks these days and not in a good way.
Plain jane.
i think she has gained, her face looks fuller.
she always looks like that
+1 to Add’s comments! Thanks for saying that! It really is difficult to explain to people how hard it is to stay on the thinner side when you’re so freakin’ tall. Maybe for some tall people (models and other genetically blessed gals) it’s not that bad, but for me (5′9″) and my best friends (5′10″ and 5′11″) it is REALLY tough to keep it all together. Granted, we can gain weight and not have it show quickly, and my friend that’s 5′10″ didn’t show her pregnancy until she was 6 or 7 months along b/c she is so tall and has a long torso. But it IS hard b/c the body just takes a very different shape when it’s so “stretched out” and lanky. And the calves? UGH! I feel the pain! Even when I ran 35-40 miles a week training for races, my calves were still thick and ROCK SOLID. LOL! Nothing us tall girls can do about some of this stuff. Wish I could be 5′4″ sometimes…
Think that Katie was photographed at bad angles in the 1st two pics. (She/her legs look better in the last pics) She looks normal/healthy. Her legs ARE NOT TOOTH PICKS…but her legs seem toned to me (from running). She, is, I agree, pear shaped. If she were to try to get her legs thinner…her top half would look very emaciated. She looked too thin when she & Posh Spice were hanging out a lot ‘back in the day’. Agree, with someone…her two liabilities…her legs (which she can only do so much with…like running) and that creepy husband.
She has lost all her sparkle, glow…like her “life was been sucked/drained out of her” since she met up with Tom Cruise! She turns 30 next month…around the 18th and she looks so much older…like premature aging! I liked her so much better w/her longer hair. She is just going to turn 30 & she could still get “away with” longer hair for another few years yet.
So & Ella – I agree. I love her legs! they look toned and fit.
Girls like her have to put more effort in their workouts for sleeker, toned legs. Oh, and avoid wearing shorts in public!
i think her clothes are not so cute…omg!!!
She just has big legs.
She’s always had these legs and one talked about how this was her insecurity in H-wood since everyone else is so skinny. I go back and forth on her though, today she’s ok.
i agree with above somewhere, she has always had thick set legs!
Brainwashed!
Why don’t you post on Anna Paquin instead of Katie Holmes? She has one of the best bodies out there.
She hasn’t gained. Those shorts just aren’t all that flattering on her. The shoes aren’t helping either. The sweater is adorable.
it was a much needed weight gain…..
she actually looks like a healthy mother now
This is just the perfect example of big boned!
her outfit is OK!!but her jacket is so NOT OK!!!!
and her weight is just in her legs!!
Do you really think so, riot? Cause I bet if Rian put Paquin’s and, say, Jade Ewen’s body up to a vote, the skinny stream-lined looking one would win hands down…
the clothes look like something she would have worn on Dawson’s Creek!
The first two pics her legs look pretty thick. Must just be the angle because the next two they don’t. They do seemed toned at least, and running will give you bigger calves. I think she looks awful here though, hate the tired outfit and saggy butt.
at her absolute skinniest, she always has very heavy thighs. she doesn’t have a good shape but she masks it well in certain outfits.
Don’t think, that she gained. It’s those shoes, which make her look bigger.
she’s getting uglier since she married tom cruise. why the hell did she marry him anyway? dont know she looks lame to me..
cankles, the worst ever.
Nice legs. Maybe Tom’s letting her eat now
How could she actually where those shoes? Like, how does she do that? For real…I’m just picturing myself walking around in those…like yeah, I’m cool, I’m wearing these shoes…lol. I dont get it!