Kim Kardashian In White
December 8th, 2009 by Rian | Filed under Curvy Celebrities, Kim Kardashian.A recently slimmed-down Kim Kardashian was spotted leaving the studio after an appearance on “The Wendy Williams Show” earlier today in Manhattan.
Photos via INFDaily.com
That isn’t the most flattering dress for her figure…
What do you all think?
Tags: brunette, curvy, Kim Kardashian, slim, white dress
She is def NOT 109 lbs!! She looks more like 120 here.
She looks gorgeous, but I don’t see why she always lies about her weight, when it is obvious what she really is!
What a dres! Totally in HATE with it))))))))))))
*sigh* Oh, Kim.
Love her face, but really don’t like the dress… Not flattering at all!! (FIRST?)
she is hot, dress is not
I really couldn’t care less whether or not she’s lying about her weight. But, darn!, that woman has one of the most exotic and stunning faces in HW. She sure knows how to work her make-up
This has def got to be the worst dress she has ever worn!! I agree that this is not a 109 lb woman. Looks more like 125 to me. She does look better with a lot less make up on though.
Was my comment that bad? I guess it could be considered name-calling.
I actually really like the dress and the shoes. its definitely different but i think she looks pretty.
She could have chosen a better dress, but her figure is definitely looking lovely. I don’t think she is lying about her weight, though. I am 5′3″ and weigh 112 pounds and I really don’t think I’d look slim in that dress either. It’s a bad shape and is cut out in all the wrong places.
She looks around the 120’s weight wise not 109… Ugly dress she looks big around mid-section and not thin legs at all
Oh no no no! Take it off! It makes her hips look as large as an airplane runway landing strip! 109 lbs?! If that’s what she is then I’m the Queen of England hands down!
really BEST FACE IN THE WHOLE WORLD! so jealous of her…..
That cutout detail makes the dress look trashy… also why can’t people dress for the weather? She looks gorgeous, but I don’t buy that she weighs 109 lbs (not that she should weigh 109 lbs either).
the dress isn’t so bad, you can see the lines of her body are nice. But yeah, she is really beautiful, and she knows it!
Why does her nose look smaller and her lips look bigger than before? Hmmm….
Yes, very pretty…but different.
Rian! could you PLEASE post the pics of Lady Gaga in London yesterday? She was wearing a clear latex dress and antlers on her head and she looks SOOOO SKINNY! there are pics on the pacificcoastnews website…I’d LOVE to know what everyone thinks:) Thanks!
wow, that is one ugly dress. i would think, if she’s making such a big deal about losing weight, she would do well to stay away from wearing things that make her look preggers.
@ sweetnsour : its always a question of light and angle…the light is really bright on these pics so she automatically gets a smaller looking nose…
i don’t care what she weighs at all – its just a silly number that means nothing at all in space lol! i go by looks alone and she looks hot!
many people forget how truly short she is, shes only 5′2 and at 109 pounds that makes her bmi 19.9. its possible.
she is gorgeous!
no denying that, but definitely the most boring Kardashian.
and the side cut out fatty bits hould of just been covered up!
I agree aoife….who cares what she weighs. She could be really tiny (look how little she is standing in FRONT of her security guard w/ giant platforms) and if she’s not…whatever, HOW MUCH DOES YOUR DRIVERS LISENCE SAY YOU WEIGH LADIES???
However, I do think she is very gorgeous, but I agree the dress is not so flattering…especially for showing off a “Recently slimmed down figure”
I like her face/make-up/hair but he dress is trailer trash and Cheryl cole 2008! She has a ood figure but the dress does absolutely nothing for her opps!
i’m not even a Kim fan but she is GORGEOUS. and very trim.
does it even matter how much she ways, we all carry weight differently and is read differently on scales. Depending on how much fat/muscle yoy have. For kim she looks good, she is naturally curvy and she does it well. Fashion wise it is an awful dress, but she doesnt look “fat” in it!!! jeez
I just saw Sarah Jessica Parker in a tight fitting dress—First time I can remember wondering if she had gained some pounds—maybe it is just the nature of tight dresses…
Such a pretty girl.
Few would care about her weight if she didn’t seemingly lie about it. Some body types are misleading. I’ve always been bigger than I look. However, I do not think that Kim is 109 pounds.
for her height — i think she’s 109 … probably 112 after a day of noshing.
She always look nice. Why talk about your weight. She goes on about how she loves her body and she likes being a little curvy. Just a total contradiction.
She doesn’t even look that ’slimmed down’ at all here. She also looks even bigger than a 19.9 BMI (109lbs).
I don’t think she looks good at all -body wise, her face is pleasant.
You guys have to remember she’s only 5′2, so 109 isn’t that low of a weight. My mom is 5′1 1/2 and 110 and she looks pretty ‘meaty’. Also, it’s hard to judge weight because sometimes even people of the same height look different at the same weight because of fat-muscle distribution and body shape.
yeah, she looks nothing like that bikini picture.
that dress is deffinately not working for her. but it would look really cute on someone who need to add curves to their bottom.
This is probably the hottest woman in Hollywood, even if she is useless. I’d trade bodies with her and I’m even a bit curvy but she has super-curves! Epitome of sexy to me (looks-wise).
109 my assss
There is no way this girl weighs 109 pounds…at least 125
@ Sarlium lol my driver lisence actually says i am 2 lbs heavier than i am now. Cause I lost a bit of weight.
I do believe she is 109 lbs and especially if she doesn’t have too much muscles her weight could be small but the fat makes her look bigger.
This dress makes her look pregnant!
Her face is gorgeous. She looks better when she wears less make-up. Why does ahe always want everyone to know her weight?! She makes a fool of herself everytime. But I guess it’s keeping her in the news, err, umm tabloids.
I think it’s national consensous that Kim Kardashian does not weigh 109 pounds. Sorry sweets, nice try though…
I think she looks great. She has one of the most stunning faces I’ve ever seen!
That dress looks like she has a giant diaper on! Weight wise hard to tell but I am not thinking 109 more like 120…
Wait..american driver’s licenses have your weight on them? Wow..never heard of that before.
Oh, and as for Kim..don’t like her body type at all.
She is gorgeous. I don’t care if she is 109 or not…
smoking hot face~~she looks like princess Jasmine
she is only 5″ 2 which means her bmi is around 20 here – i don’t think 109 is too far off, she is very short…
i like her face without too much make up
Oooo! IMO she’s so pretty! I disagree, I think that dress is perfect for her curvacious figure. Hugs her curves and really encentuates them. Looks much better on her then hanging off some waif.
Jealous, I am.
Ugly face! People are crazy for thinking otherwise. She looks so manly.
im 5′2. i look exactly like her weight wise and im 120.
I believe her about her weight. I’m 5′00 and when I was 108lbs I looked more or less like that, weight-wise (obviously not shaped as wonderfully).
Fatty fatty 2 by 4!
Fat skank!
Hate to say it, but her head or face is just small for the rest of her. Not proportioned at all:(
She ABSOLUTELY weighs about 109 lbs. if she is “5′2″ — I have a very similar body type and height. LISTEN to what all the women with similar bodies here are telling you: At “5′2″, she cannot be this thin and weigh much more than 110 lbs. We know our body types and what they weigh best!
Look at her thin arms, face, flat stomach, lean back, etc. The ONLY places she stores any fat whatsoever are areas where women SHOULD have some fat — tits & ass!
Folks here must be confused because they’re not accustomed to seeing such body types. The typical Hollywood starlet has no boobs/ hips/ass and carries weight in her face or abdomen. Fat distribution and muscle mass are critical components of perceived weight.
I disagree- the dress accentuates the beautiful width of her hips and does her gorgeous waist/hip ratio justice.
i think she looks nice…. and i think the dress looks fine.
poor her.
could you post some GG set,olivia wilde,marinda kerr and alexa chung?
how can i know wich jeans size are they?
i remember a post like with size of celeb…or how much kilo are they
i would love to know!
She must be secerely injured, because that looks like bandage to me. That put aside she looks good, weightwise too.
holy kiss-ass comments. Anyone that posted something positive must be, well, Fat-Ass Kardash herself.
She looked thinner in the other picture than she looks here.
Her face is gorgeous here…but the dress is hideous. I have to laugh w/person who said it looks like she’s wearing a giant diaper (from the front angle)! This dress makes her look heavier than what she “claims” to weigh (@ 109 lbs)…which I still find a bit hard to believe. Only 109 after having done a lot of her Quick Trim Cleanses but she won’t “maintain” her low weight long term. After the cleanses…she will re-gain some lbs. The stars use the cleanses for the Awards Ceremonies to fit into tight gowns, etc. Afterwards, they don’t keep their low weights.
I love her dress! I don’t think it looks that bad on here she has such a pretty face but she talks about herself a bit too much…
@ LEAH i totally agree!!
Why does a pic of Kim make ppl on this site just give out their stats? BTW pick a realistic stat peeps
What is the weather like in NY lately?
What about an elegant winter dress, or an elegant coat? That would be sexier in my mind that this ugly summer dress.
Do Americans seriously have a weight on thier drivers license? WTF!
I’m still getting over the fact that she’s only 5′2″.
I am not a fan of this woman, but I think she looks ethereally beautiful here, hair and makeup wise, and the dress would add to that were it not for those horrible cutouts which ruin an angelic appearance by putting her very human flubber on display.
@JamminJamillah I hear ya!
She looks annoyingly gorgeous, as usual. Love her figure, the dress, hair and her makeup is quite toned down which suits her. Pretty perfect really.
Sarlium – “HOW MUCH DOES YOUR DRIVERS LISENCE SAY YOU WEIGH LADIES??”
Mine says 104. What is your point?
i love her so much!!
but i think she gained weight..?!
the dress looks great,but if it was closed from the back it would look better!!
cool shoes!
defoooo not 109 pounds /49kg nice try !!!
@ Becky yes driver license in the USA has a weight on it even if you are not American citizen but if you have a license.
@ Mel yes mine says 100 lbs and it is not truth cause I am 98 lbs now but I am not going to change it every week because of the weight.lol
I dont envy her body or face, why is she even classed as a celebrity? And her endorsement of slimming pills is just stupid.
Why is it not the most flattering dress for her figure? I think it shows it off quite nicely!
i actually think the dress IS flattering…it is form fitting (loose and layerey ones, which she used to love wearing, don’t really work for her frame and add a lot of weight to it), it shows her slim arms and the thinnest part of her legs, and the cutouts are at the thinnest part of her tiny waist
she’s beautiful, but i think she is incredibly spoiled and think it’s a shame that people like her have managed to become celebrities
109 pounds….no way!
Oksana…At one point my lisence also said I was heavier, but at the time I put the weight on there, I believe it was about a -20lb lie. I’m assuming since you lost a little yours was also initially false?
and Mel, my point is that, at least most of the woman I know, the weights on their drivers lisences are almost ALL tweaked to say that they weigh less than they actually do. And no one says a damned thing. Cuz it’s nothing. But some famous girl apparently “lies” (or gets paid thousands of dollars by this diet pill company) about her weight and it’s like this huge scandal. I think it’s hypocritical. And in my eyes, equivilent to dying your hair, even. Is it ok to scream at women walking down the street w/ dark roots, “SHES NOT A NATURAL BLONDE!”
She is gorgeous. There are few men on this planet that wouldnt want to be with her! GORGEOUS GORGEOUS GORGEOUS!
Not all states have weight listed.
hot dress – just not on her.
she is still gorgeous though (even if she does continuously feel the need to lie about her weight)
She’s never ever 109 lbs! Which is okay. But claiming to be that weight is definitely not.
she looks good
Looks 109 to me.
You guys are crazy! She is NOT 5′2 and 120 or 125 pounds…she may be curvy but she is a SMALL person. totally believe she’s 109…5′2 and 120/125 would look much chubbier than this!
ya right, 109 lbs no way! – her butt cheeks are probably like 50 lbs each cheek.
anemia ibuprofen xse xr effexor 73179 bupropion herb 776079 xanax oral liquid suspension for sale 8P buspirone mech osivr
Sarlium – I have to admit my license weight is 10 pounds off lol. I got my first license at 17. By the time I had to renew it I gained 10 pounds (I wasn’t at my natural weight in h.s. too obsessed with appearance), but anyways I didn’t admit to them that I had gained. ^_^
i’m wonder for how long she will stay it this weight.
She is definetely 109. She’s really short. Camera adds pounds. She would look 109 pounds in person I’m sure.
more like 1(2)9 lbs… liar.
Please, this girl is gorgeous. I don’t care what she weighs, look at that face.
i am 5ft 2 and weigh 113, she definitely looks slimmer than me, i think she could be 109.
wow… 5′2 and 120-125 is NOT ‘chubby’ in the slighest!
im 125lbs 5′2 and wear a size uk 10 (us 6) im curvy like kim but i can imagin in person she probably could be around 113 the camera definatly adds weight! she is gorgeous and has a fantastic figure. she looks miles better than people like alexa chung and victoria beckham, instead of ripping into her for being a ”fattie” at 120lbs people should be prasing her for having a healthy body image. she was never ‘fat’ to begin with she just has curves. no wonder no many young girls have eating disorder if 120lbs is classed as ‘fat’. so sad
She is gorgeous! So stunning! To be honest I think that the dress isn’t actually that bad. She looks cute in it.
tasteless and cheap.
Her face is very pretty, but that dress is GROSS.
the dress isn’t too bad, but not in love.
who care’s what she weighs-she looks effin fabulous!
I dont know, I dont think she is 109. I have a small friend who is 5′2 and 107ish and she doesn’t have big fake boobs or a big butt like Kim. I’d have to agree with everyone here, I dont think she is 109. My friend is asian for crying out loud, she’s like flat and tiny bum! LOL. So it’s hard for me to believe that Kims fake DD’s and Big butt cheecks dont add like 20 more lbs on her…
I agree.
Wow that is one ugly dress! I think she is beautiful though…
Oh I don’t think she is fat at all, not what I meant – I just mean I dont think she weighs the 109 she claims. She looks exceptionally healthy. But if she does weigh the 109 she claims, that would mean I was like – 90lbs by her scale! LOL… but really I’m 110 at 5′5 (and I have a lot of arm muscle but its tight arm muscle and my legs are biking legs). I think lots of people lie about their weight by at least 5-10lbs but maybe she is pushing the 10lbs lower lie? Hmmm… Most of the time I have to lie and say I weigh more than I do or else people think I am sick or something! :S Thats the problem with inheriting the skinny gene. People always think there is something wrong with you until they see everyone in your family got the skinny gene.
I’ve seen this woman without her “war paint” and trust if many of the rest of you have you wouldn’t be fawning over how stunning/gorgeous she is. She is very average and has horrible skin. That being said she looks nice here although there is quite a difference between this and her bikini photos I guess that quick trim wears off really fast.
i like her look…very jlo here….
i stick to my 114-119 theory but possably 109…..but you know what it doesnt even matter she looks hotttt! i like the dress on her a lot! i bet in person she looke feirce!
I’m from Texas and we don’t list weight on our licenses.
I’m tired of people saying that she’s 109 because of how short she is. A lot of people are 5′2″… And I think shes in the 120s because of her height… if she were taller, I would say she weighed more. She probably forced her body down to 109 for a couple days and now is back up 10 pounds.
She is beautiful and has a great body. I hate her whole outfit though. The dress is really tacky, and I hate hate HATE those ugly shoes everyone is wearing that cut off at the ankle. So unflattering!
@ SARLIUM Thanks to your post we all officially know the weight listed on everyone drivers lisscense! haha im not cutting you down i just think its funny its supposed to b a post about kim and now its a post about everyones Drivers liscense weight.
(BTW mine says 125)
Ha- we thankfully do NOT have our weight on driving licences here in the UK. Horrible thought!!!!!!
She is not 109. Look at her tummy and in the last picture there’s some “meat” at her waist spilling out of the dress. If she were 109 that would never happen.
justathought I agree, I can’t stand it when people leave comments in which they conveniently throw their stats in. I mean sometimes they do it completely out of nowhere too, like the poster is talking about the celebs hair or outfit, then it’s “btw I’m 5′7 108 pounds you guys”. Lol. It’ll never end!
I’m 5′2, so I have a very realistic idea of what 109 looks like at that height, and it certainly doesn’t look like that! And I don’t believe it’s just the dress making her look bigger. What’s the excuse for her arms and legs than?
There’s no denying that she’s a beautiful girl though.
I think she looks freakin’ awesome and most people are probably just jealous of her figure. I wish I had a figure like hers mine is more petite and straight down.