New Rachel Bilson Candids

December 21st, 2009 by Rian | Filed under Healthy Celebrity, Rachel Bilson.

And for all the Rachel Bilson fans on this site, here are some new photos of her heading to the Toluca Lake Center medical building before going to do some Christmas shopping earlier today…

INFphoto_1145365
Photos via INFDaily.com

INFphoto_1145364

INFphoto_1145376

INFphoto_1145391

ADVERTISEMENT


Tags: , , , ,

56 Responses to “New Rachel Bilson Candids”

  1. PandaBear | 21/12/09

    I read in an interview with her once that she buys all her boots vintage b/c she wears a 5. At any rate I like the boots and she looks pretty and natural sans makeup.

  2. Anda | 21/12/09

    I do not understand why she dresses up like this? She is so cute and has such a nice figure!!

  3. LB | 21/12/09

    she’s so cute!

  4. LB | 21/12/09

    oh wow i’ve never been first ;) excitingg

  5. ms | 21/12/09

    Her roots are very noticable, here. She looks good.

  6. eva mattiolo | 21/12/09

    she is cute,her hair is mess,and wouldnt hurt to loose some weight

  7. CéliAmbre | 21/12/09

    WOULDN’T HURT 2 LOOSE SOME WEIGHT?

  8. Alicia | 21/12/09

    She looks fine.

  9. sweetnsour | 21/12/09

    Clearly no makeup…..love it. She looks as plain as the rest of us do without it.

    Celebs are people too :)

  10. s90 | 21/12/09

    @eva mattiolo: Are you serious??

  11. schbrottte | 21/12/09

    wow, she lost weight

  12. maddison | 21/12/09

    I respect the fact she left the house au naturel. If I was a celeb, my face would never be naked, especially in broad daylight. Yes, it’s called vanity.

  13. Lynn | 21/12/09

    I was thinking she looked great, and then I read “it wouldn’t hurt if she lost some weight”.

    ..
    Seriously.

    I think she looks good without make up. Too bad she’s frowning, but who doesn’t do that.

  14. heatherr | 21/12/09

    guesses as to height and weight guysss? :)

  15. misstigress | 21/12/09

    Thin, as usual. For not wearing makeup, she doesn’t look too bad.

  16. Moll | 21/12/09

    Has she lost? Her face looks different, maybe its just cos she has got no make-up on. She looks cute and casual, but she seriously needs to get her hair done.

  17. kai | 21/12/09

    i think she looks same.
    i love her figure

  18. Maia | 21/12/09

    “It wouldn´t hurt to lose”???? What tha??? She looks great as always

  19. deej | 21/12/09

    i love rachel bilson! it’s so good to see someone famous go out without make up, she still looks great without it.. and i lover her figure. who ever said she needs to loose weight – your mad. get a grip.

  20. PandaBear | 21/12/09

    Ha, I kinda like the roots, reminds me of my hair. Well not right now, but in the summer. Even when I don’t dye my hair turns orange like that in the front…

  21. Paula | 21/12/09

    Love the Marc by Marc Jacobs Petal to the Metal Sasha hobo. First time seeing it in orange. I adore her.

  22. Sam | 21/12/09

    I LOVE her.
    The lack of makeup makes it noticeable (for the first time to me) that her face is not that of a girl anymore. It’s that of a woman.

  23. Cherry | 21/12/09

    Love her <3

  24. SeeWithoutHavingtoGo | 21/12/09

    Moll, I get what you mean. She looks hung-over, I think. Nonetheless, loved ‘The O.C.’. eva mattiolo, lose weight? Are you mad? What you see here is a healthy, twentysomething woman.

  25. Kristy | 21/12/09

    Looks thinner and very cute.

  26. Jade | 21/12/09

    She’s cute and looks young for her age, that’s about it.

  27. jed | 21/12/09

    She was thinner–just a few pounds. She looks better now—closer to her OC weight.

  28. Becks | 21/12/09

    She looks really cute. I’m kinda digging the casual look. She’s very thin but pulls it off well. She always looks good.

  29. crys | 21/12/09

    adorable.
    she looks amazing sans makeup!

  30. kc | 21/12/09

    I want that bag! She’s got a great figure..

  31. Mel | 21/12/09

    She is so cute! She always looks great!

  32. aimdawg | 22/12/09

    she looks like she lost a lot of weight, especially in her face…
    she looks sort of, tired?
    but shes cute…and I actually think the way she is scrubbing it out is CUTE. not everyone likes to dress up with heels and 100% going-out make up all the time. :)

  33. Barbie | 22/12/09

    She looks very plain jane here. Her outfit makes her look bigger than she is or she has gained.

  34. Mickey von Dutch | 22/12/09

    Cute girl at a perfect weight.

  35. qwerty | 22/12/09

    ‘Too bad she’s frowning, but who doesn’t do that.’

    @ Lynn
    I’m too scared of having wrinkles on my forehead,I’ve given up using it long time ago.LOL

    Her thighs look thinner than,say,in November.
    No matter how much she weighs she’ll still have a great shape,
    I remember some photos of her in that white Herve Ledger dress-her waist is incredible

  36. justathought | 22/12/09

    Shes cute and healhty but kind of boring. Love the bag. I wish she would comb her hair. At least shes not starving herself though which makes her aswesome in my book

  37. JB | 22/12/09

    I know she’s fairly short…I’ve done some research…Several websites will say different things about her height, but Kristen Bell has on her Twitter (I know I know, you don’t have to tell me) “5′1″ is the new 6′2″” which makes me think Kristen Bell is 5′1″ right? Well Rahcel is shorter than Kristen, so I’d say she’s 5′ ish…I’m 5′ 1/2″ and I weigh 108…and Rachel looks smaller than me!

  38. Maxx05 | 22/12/09

    She’s lovely, make-up or no make-up. The outfit is cute, tho I HATE all cowboy boots. So the outfit is cute other than the cowboy boots, lol. Rachel is 5′1″. She has been thinner, and I think she looks better a bit slimmer, but she’s always adorable.

  39. JC | 22/12/09

    Height=5′2
    Weight=110 (my guesstimate)

    Looks cute and great!

  40. eva mattiolo | 22/12/09

    yes,I really think she would look more femine and sofisticated if she drop some weight,ofcourse nothing too much

  41. charlotte | 22/12/09

    definitely shouldn’t lose weight. i love her outfit… every piece of it. she’s marvelous.

  42. Starspy | 22/12/09

    I’d say she’s my height–4′11 to 5 feet…her fiance towers over her in flats…and he’s in the neighborhood of 6 feet…
    I wear a size 5 shoe, I’m about five feet tall…
    I’d say she weighs 95-100lbs

  43. Rebecca | 22/12/09

    she’s so adorable

  44. Becks | 22/12/09

    eva: Why would she look more feminine if she lost weight? I’m not following your logic.

  45. eva mattiolo | 23/12/09

    maybe its not logic but It really is that way,you need to see it to get it,for example:runway model would look more femine than rachel wearing the same clothes

  46. qwerty | 23/12/09

    @ eva mattiolo

    Sophisticated-yes.
    Feminine?I don’t think so

    Now,I’m not really into all that ‘feminine/curvy’ cr*p that seems to be promoted these days,I’d choose the ’sophisticated’ look over the ‘curvy’ one any day,but let’s be serious here,models are not considered feminine,rather boyish….androgynous at best

  47. Maxx05 | 23/12/09

    eva m. probably means feminine as in graceful and delicate. Losing a few lbs. would give Rachel a leaner line to her overall silhouette. Did I get it right, Eva? correct me if I didn’t!

  48. eva mattiolo | 23/12/09

    Thats something what I had in mind wile speaking of Rachel,Max05,and Im confused about people who thinks that runway models are anorexic:they are just really skinny and very tall,real anorexic girls loose hair and thei period and they look disgusting,but runway model just look skinny and greceful,and thats BIG difference

  49. little d | 23/12/09

    shes 5 feet tall & a 5 1/2 shoes size.she looks about 5 lbs thinner (when all dressed up and not in frumpy clothes) than i am. i am 95lbs. so my guess is she’s 5 feet tall and about 90-95 lbs. she’s absolutely adorable. i wish there were more petite celebs like her, for fashion purposes

  50. Catherine | 24/12/09

    I wish i looked that good without makeup. As for Eva Mattiolo’s comment that it would’nt hurt her to loose weight, are effing serious? Surely you were just joking to see the reaction you’d get because there is no way in hell she needs to lose any more weight

  51. eva mattiolo | 24/12/09

    She is cute indeed,but Catherine,you obviously dont see what I see,if you have reed my recent post you would know what I mean

  52. sama | 24/12/09

    this shouldn’t really be under “healthy size”… she looks tiny! bit too thin i’d say.

  53. Ribbons | 25/12/09

    She’s already really small. I am surprised it was even suggested that she could lose some weight.

  54. Palomita | 25/12/09

    She’s really cute, not the kind of girl that looks good without makeup though…

  55. retrobanana | 27/12/09

    i want her bagggggggg!!!!!!!!

  56. balanced. | 28/12/09

    too thin, but pretty at any weight.