New Kim Kardashian Photos

January 20th, 2010 by Rian | Filed under Curvy Celebrities, Kim Kardashian.

Kim Kardashian also made an appearance at Mel B’s Couture Lollipop launch last night…

SPL151838_003
Photos via SplashNews

She looks the same as usual weight-wise!

SPL151838_004

SPL151838_005

SPL151838_009

ADVERTISEMENT


Tags: , , , , ,

107 Responses to “New Kim Kardashian Photos”

  1. Amy | 20/01/10

    She looks gorgeous – a very beautiful woman.

  2. MScotton | 20/01/10

    The last picture looks best. I do not care for her body but she did lose weight.

  3. Cossey | 20/01/10

    “Does this dress make my butt look big?”

  4. MScotton | 20/01/10

    Wait she looks like a tank compared to the one in the black skirt behind her.

  5. Lisa | 20/01/10

    She is absolutely gorgeous!
    I love her body, but her but is a bit ott (real or fake)

  6. Mags | 20/01/10

    She looks great here. I think that dress is a perfect match for her shape and her skin tone. I’d say she looks like a healthy 120lbs here.

  7. rhiannon | 20/01/10

    beautiful!!!!!

  8. Amber | 20/01/10

    Nah she looks heavier than 120lbs….maybe 130lbs. And hard to belive no one has mentioned her face looks strange. Has she had some work done?

  9. Lauren | 20/01/10

    One of her sisters has just got married, and the other has just got married. She hasn’t done either so she must feel insecure.

  10. Lauren | 20/01/10

    I mean the other has just had a baby not got married.

  11. teebee | 20/01/10

    GORGEOUS. slim & curvy :)

  12. teebee | 20/01/10

    and she is absolutely not 130 pounds. she’s super short! I believe her when she says she’s around 110. I know that people who have seen her in person say she’s really tiny, just with curves.

  13. Lily | 20/01/10

    Kim, you need to lay off the drag queen make-up…you’d look younger with a fresher, more natural look. She has a bit of trout pout going on too…?

    She looks great body-wise though :)

  14. Lily | 20/01/10

    @ teebee, yeah I’ve seen her in person, and she is tiny to the point where I didn’t think it was her

  15. asemalla | 20/01/10

    She has like the most gorgeous face ever, and I wouldn’t mind having her body, either. But she’s one of those cases about which I would say: Your personality makes you ugly. Really, what’s she famous for? Standing around looking sexy? Give me a personal trainer and a makeup-artist and I can do that too.

  16. Mickey von Dutch | 20/01/10

    Did she do something to her face? It looks very different somehow, and not in a good way.

  17. spanktacular | 20/01/10

    she looks fantastic here :-)

  18. TinaSparkle | 20/01/10

    @ Teebee I agree. JLo is another example of someone who is perceived as quite curvy, but is actually petite in person.

    and @ Lauren, some women aren’t desperate to get married and have babies so that is a weird thing to post.

    I think her lips have been freshly injected and are overdone, and I’d love to see her with a little less makeup. I’m sure the real Kim is under there somewhere.

  19. elenne | 20/01/10

    i wonder if you guys saw me on the street would be thinking ‘omg shes to thick and untoned’ or ‘omg, her face’

  20. Lynn | 20/01/10

    Her legs look good. I’ll never be a fan of her face or butt.

  21. Mindi | 20/01/10

    She looks good. I’ve seen her in person before and people… SHE IS SKINNY! It’s amazing how much the camera adds.. but you’d be shocked to see how thin she really is. Plus, keep in mind she is about 5 feet tall.. very very petite.

  22. Berenice | 20/01/10

    the dress is gorgeous and she has an amazing shape, but oh my goodness kim what have you done to your face? the first pic makes the plastic surgery reaaally obvious, wow she used to be so beautiful and now her cheeks and smile look weird.. not good!

  23. Mags | 20/01/10

    @elenne, I highly doubt many of us are this critical or judgemental of the people we see in day to day life. The general public holds celebrities to a whole other standard than ‘normal’ people. They have stylists, personal trainers, makeup artists, etc., so they have a definate advantage on us norms. Not to mention that this is a gossip website focused on the appearance of celebrities…

  24. dum-dum | 20/01/10

    her ass looks smaller. I mean it’s still humongous but it appears as though she had some fat removed and injected it into her lips.

  25. nnn | 20/01/10

    She is stunning–even with the overdone makeup and dress. Her body looks cute now that she slimmed down. I think she is about 116 if she is 5′2 or so. Her butt is big, but at least its perky.

    Also, Jlo was NEVER this small or even close. She is much bigger and broader and has large arms. Kim seems to be petite everywhere except her backside.

  26. nnn | 20/01/10

    Rian—can you PLEASE do a post on Jessica Simpson in the turtleneck tucked into the leggings??!! Its amazing how much she has gained and how unflattering her outfit is…

  27. passerbee | 20/01/10

    elenne,
    no, not me, b/c i only judge “celebs”. most of them are being paid a horrendous amount of money not b/c their acting skills are that much better than the next actor in l.a. but because of their looks. a lot of that amount of money come from us viewers/listeners/fans. i want something for my money!!
    ;D

  28. Marty | 20/01/10

    I’ve said it in previous posts; This woman exploits her beauty so much.
    I mean, what talent does she have?

    Then again, I flaunt my good looks whenever I can as well…*is embarrased*

  29. happyvegetarian | 20/01/10

    She’s still stick, but she looks good and I like the dress. I want to taste those couture lollipops so bad.

  30. Michelle | 20/01/10

    She looks great! Her butt looks amazing now!
    It aint big in a big o fat butt way now its big in a toned muscular wayy better way.
    Her body is amazing and strong looking now!
    INSPO!!

  31. Cossey | 20/01/10

    You could set a bottle of beer on that ass!!

  32. Michelle | 20/01/10

    But her lips do look kinda wierd? Maybe she overdid the plumping lipgloss?

  33. Fili | 20/01/10

    I would KILL for that dress! And Kim looks gorgeous, as usual.

  34. Dee | 20/01/10

    I agree, since she’s only 5′2 she probably is around 110lbs. She has curves but she also looks like she has a small waist.

  35. Miss Jessie | 20/01/10

    She is one I would rather see than hear

    (and she looks damn good)

  36. s90 | 20/01/10

    It must be a nightmare taking all that makeup off at the end of the day. And Kim: Less is more!

    I’d say 5′2 and around 115. That is still petite by the way (IMO).

    I like the YSL ankle boots but I wish she chose a different pair of shoes that would complement her outifit.

  37. glow | 20/01/10

    Nice looking woman.

  38. Rose | 20/01/10

    She wears too much concealer.

  39. malia | 20/01/10

    she’s tiny. no way is she 120+
    it feels good to criticize celebs.
    and it’s cheaper than therapy

  40. Miss Jessie | 20/01/10

    @ s90 maybe she does take a size 2 after all – after she takes off the makeup

  41. Creepy Doll | 20/01/10

    Another couture lollipop! This one looks so cute *_____* grean and magenta… aww!

  42. Cristina | 20/01/10

    i like kourtney and kim- they are both gorgeous. sometimes kim’s style is weird, but i usually like what both sisters wear. too much makeup, i agree- but i think she looks great.

  43. vkat | 20/01/10

    reminds me of Cher.
    What’s with the fancy lolipops?

  44. Raven* | 20/01/10

    She does nothing for me.

  45. lmd | 20/01/10

    Her legs seem slimmer. I just don’t understand why she’s famous…

  46. Stacy | 20/01/10

    beautiful but i am over her!

  47. Mem | 20/01/10

    Beautiful, but too bad it’s all fake…including her personality and everything she’s scripted to say.

  48. kt | 20/01/10

    booooooo

  49. s90 | 20/01/10

    @miss jessie: Ha. In her dreams, maybe :P Then again, I’m from UK, and we have consistent sizes, seems like the states have alot of the vanity sizing thing going on.

  50. Jj | 20/01/10

    Ugh another Kim k post? Boring

  51. teebee | 20/01/10

    saw some other pics from this event of her and MelB standing next to each other and kim is thinner!!

  52. Meko | 20/01/10

    wow wats up with her face! shes definately had some work done. must had used the family plastic surgeon. she looks good body wise but her butt looks weird to me like unproportioned. definately not a Jlo a##. lol

  53. Alana | 20/01/10

    nice body, but honestly i don’t really see where she lost weight

  54. shaun | 20/01/10

    I’m I the only person who can’t stand this girls. I mean really, they are pretty, but the are petty, annoying, dumb, and materialistic. I had to turn their show off the other day, bc the mother was complaining about her 4 thousand dollar Chanel dress (she mentioned the price over and over again) and actually I think the mom is the worse. I have worked with Khloe in the past, dressing her for some tv appearances, and boy, I got to give it to her she is funny, but she talked in a baby voice the whole time. Like really, how old are you? These girls (including the mother, bc she desperatly wants to be young) really don’t contribute much to anything. I would be happy to just do away with them all together.
    (Sorry for my rant)

    But going back to what this website is about. I think kim looks good here. That brian litchenberg dress fits are nicely, but those YSL booties, and tights ruin the look. I also have met kim in person and was shocked to see how small she actually was, and this was before she lost some weight.

  55. moonbel | 20/01/10

    She looks so beautiful. I LOVE THOSE SHOES!!!

  56. Tee | 20/01/10

    I love how we’re always speculating over this chick’s weight…we’re paying her bills lol

  57. Londoncalling | 20/01/10

    Brian Lichtenberg fall 2009, she is always wearing this designer, maybe she has shares, and ysl “easy” ankle boots, nice, her face looks kind of strange, or maybe is my pc?

  58. Teri | 20/01/10

    IDK. A butt like that weighs something when you step on the scale. 120 + is a legitimate guess for her weight, in my opinion, even if she is 5′2. Maybe she could squeeze into a very stretchy dress in size two, but no way would she ever get her hips/butt into a tight pair of size 2 jeans.

  59. happygolucky | 20/01/10

    EEK! forget commenting on her body –I can’t see past the hatchet job she did to her face! Seriously, she no longer looks like herself and instead appears to be some middle aged woman who’s been pumped up with botox and fillers. As someone else said, she’s turning into Cher. I’m sorry, but what an idiotic thing to do!

    Oh, and couture lollypops are equally idiotic.

  60. HANAN | 21/01/10

    malia
    hhhhhhhh,,lol
    and why she put so much make up

  61. M | 21/01/10

    Is everyone blind, She absolutly had a nose job! thats whats making her look weird and less attractive in my opinion, yeah she probably plumps up her lips but …Nose Job!

  62. MentallySkinny | 21/01/10

    What is up with the freakin’ lollipop? Trying TOO HARD to be sexy! She does seem a tiny bit thinner, but that ass doesn’t help. Her body is far from being among the best.

  63. Pan | 21/01/10

    I do not really care for this woman at all (being that she is completely media-horny), but I think she has a gorgeous body. I read a comment about Kim looking like a tank compared to the girl in the black skirt behind her; that is because the girl behind her has no womanly shapes whatsoever.
    Her face would also look great if she would lose 3/4 of the make-up and would draw different facial expressions…

  64. blaine_edwards | 21/01/10

    Hey where’s my comment?

  65. blaine_edwards | 21/01/10

    Oh NO Kim, what happened to ur face, are u trying to look more like Kris??? Not good, Looks like u were blowing a balloon and ur cheeks got stuck or u put chicken cutlets in there. I hope whatever uve done is reversible and ur not stuck w/ the joker face. Ur a beautiful girl and do not need all that make-up, I think, well maybe u do idk. Bod looks great though!

  66. deej | 21/01/10

    i think her bodies great! better than having no butt!

    i think however said about her having stuff done on her face is right, it’s got that weird puffy look to it.. such a shame as she is literally so beautiful! she had perfect face proportions. wish people would stop commenting on how she’s not super skinny and looks like a little kid, she’s has womanly curves!

    stay the way you are kim, you look amazing!

  67. deej | 21/01/10

    * i meant as in she doesn’t have that young girls body that lots of these incredibly skinny celebrity women do and we’re meant to find attractive!

  68. so | 21/01/10

    vain and pointless.
    why is she even famous?

  69. Nina | 21/01/10

    @Pan couldnt agree more, that woman behind on the picture looks like a 13 year old boy in a black skirt with no ass (and i guess no boobies too unless its silicone) so if Kim would try another facial expression and not wearing that tranny clown make-up she´d look even better. But her body is def. hot i mean c´mon!! But still the BEST BODY to me belongs to VS Model Kroutzen Douz or however u spell her name (and Kim stop sucking that lollipop like it´s a trailer for your next “home video”)

  70. Boo Boo | 21/01/10

    She looks pretty as usual. 5′2 120 ish is about right. Her face is gorgeous. She actually seems like a sweet low key person unlike her over-the-top sisters. She is very soft spoken. Yeah she is famous for her looks but hey, isn’t most of Hollywood? Don’t understand the hate; jealous much.

  71. BeFabulous | 21/01/10

    I wish I had her great legs

  72. Elena | 21/01/10

    i would say she is about 110lbs maybe even less! i think shes stunning – beautiful face and body!

  73. evamattiolo | 21/01/10

    FAT!

  74. NameRequired | 21/01/10

    She is a very beautiful woman. It is a shame about her big butt. If her butt wasn’t so big she would have an awesome figure.

  75. Mel | 21/01/10

    Ugly dress!! I still can’t believe she thinks she is a size 2. She is at least a 6!!

  76. toni | 21/01/10

    @malia … “it feels good to criticize celebs.
    and it’s cheaper than therapy” HAHAHA, best comment yet.

    Also everyone asking… it was a launch for Couture Lolipops (read the post). That’s why she’s holding one.

  77. milan | 21/01/10

    LOL A hot guy just walked behind me and saw her photo and said…

    SHE’S STARTING TO LOOK LIKE CHER IN THE FACE!!!

    I have to admit take away the hair and focus just on her cheeks, lips and eyes and she does look like cher a little. wow.

    The girl seems too fake for me.

    My man said when he hears her speak he thinks she talks dumb. He thinks she’s very inmature.

  78. aud | 21/01/10

    she looks really good here..like the dress, she actually does look tinier than usual here

  79. Antonia | 21/01/10

    She’s really pretty

  80. Kianna | 21/01/10

    Kim does look pretty great in this dress. @teebee…agree w/you about Kim being tiny/petite
    with definite ample curves. She does not photograph well…At 5′2″ and her curves….it makes her look sort short.tiny and “boxy” looking at times. I’d agree w/those who say she looks about 115 lbs. I saw her on a TV commercial advertising / “PUSHING”
    the QuickTrim Products & she was in a bikini. She looked pretty decent. Of course the photograph was “full frontal” and she always photos much better that way rather than when she turns to the side and the other (sometimes dumb poses se does)!

  81. Sally | 21/01/10

    I am freaking 112 lbs in 5´2 and I would look like an anorexic standing next to this giant butt.And I dont any implants.I said she is more like 132 lbs.
    PS:face is like a walking photoshop picture

  82. Peanizzle | 21/01/10

    I guess, I’m the only one who thinks this girl is ugly, wears to much makeup, & needs to lose some weight…

  83. aoife | 21/01/10

    i saw the pictures of her standing next to mel b. who has a fantastic small and seriously toned body and kim looked smaller than her so i think she must be tiny in real life!
    like the dress and she looks great! all the girls just need to wear a less eye makeup!

  84. anon | 21/01/10

    her booty doesn’t look as ridiculous in these pictures as it usually does.

  85. tina lerche | 21/01/10

    I don’t care much about any of the Kardashian sisters but Kim is quite beautiful bodywise :) And I like her facial features a lot =D

  86. daisydeyn | 21/01/10

    MScoton”wait looks like a tank next to the other girl?” Jesus!
    Sorry she is not A SKELETON!This is how women should look.I love her body type.She is beautyful and the world need women like this i m sosick of watching skeleton girls look unhealthy and live with just drgus n caffeine!

  87. MScotton | 21/01/10

    daisyden – women can look many different ways, so for you to say this is how women should look, that is only your opinion.
    I prefer a more athletic, thinner look myself. Paula Radcliffe’s body is perfect in my opinion but atlas we can’t all be elite marathon runners.

  88. kelsey | 21/01/10

    her butt is too big it’s gross

  89. maddison | 21/01/10

    I’m with MScotton on this one. I love marathon runner’s bodies. Very lean and strong. Kim’s figure is ok. Her bum has shrunken to an acceptable size.

  90. cec | 21/01/10

    her sis Kourtney is prettier. but Kim’s body is off the chain, for real. she has that body that looks good in anything, definitely makes heads turn!

  91. Jillian | 21/01/10

    I think she’s worked really hard on her body and looks great now. My only complaint with Kim is, why so much makeup? She is never photographed with a more natural look. She is beautiful too and hardly needs all of it. Tone it down a notch or two, Kim!!

  92. whatsreallygoingon | 21/01/10

    i hope i don’t have an unacceptable butt.

  93. Becky Bloomwood | 21/01/10

    i dislike EVERYTHING about her so much.

  94. nico_ | 21/01/10

    i think kim would benefit from less makeup. the heavy eye makeup she wears disguises her eyes and the heavy foundation/blush/bronzer really hides her skin rather than helping it.

  95. Z | 21/01/10

    Funny how someone always has to post the “this is how women SHOULD look” comment. As if that is any more empowering to women as saying “anorexic-thin” is ideal/sexy. It’s just as judgmental, un-supportive and unkind towards females. Not everyone is 100 lbs and not everyone has child-bearing hips so chill with the criticism. Anyway, Kim looks very pretty imo. Still no way she is 109. Sorry. Jillian Michaels from BL is 5′2″ and 120 lb. Granted she has a lot of muscle but none of the T&A Kim has..

  96. Aims | 21/01/10

    daisydeyn – THERE IS NO SPECIFIC WAY A WOMAN SHOULD LOOK, you may a bigger person in general so I understand your need to stab slender girls and support bigger ones. Its much easier than jumpping on the tredmill.
    On Kim Kardashian – I think Kim and Khole and the other one have really gross faces and that GIANT butt is just disturbing. I can’t even look at it without feeling sick to my stomach. Kim wears 10 years worth of makeup on her messed up face and I constantly wonder how much she spends on makeup. I think its gross to see foundation on peoples skin like that and her mascara is just over the top, plus eyelines… omg, calm the fuck down.

  97. December Ann | 21/01/10

    Her face was much prettier before the surgeries. She wears entirely too much make-up. Oh, and, fat.

  98. shaden | 22/01/10

    the style of her dresses are always the same!!
    but she is very pretty,i like her shoes!

  99. justathought | 22/01/10

    She does have a cute and curvy body but im so sick of hearing her talk about it and her quicktrim pills. I hate that shes endorsing diet pills now. She used to talk about how everyone should just be natural and eat what they want. Shes so beautiful and needs to quit with all the makeup. I always love what shes wearing though

  100. Parker Posey | 22/01/10

    I can’t believe someone actually stated that Kim’s sister Kourtney is prettier than her. Kim has a beautiful face and Kourtney is average at best. Kourntey is the least attractive sister by far. kourtney is thinner and shorter but she is not a pretty girl.

  101. Ekaterina | 22/01/10

    Such a shame that she had a nose job, she looked so stunning before but now doesn’t anymore.

  102. PoliteTia | 22/01/10

    She looks very tranny. Her fake butt is just annoying. I saw her commercial fo weigh loss supplements. It is obviously a photoshopped effort. She just needs to work out and I’m sure the weight will come off.
    The black ‘tights’ thing is NOT fooling anyone.

  103. CRYSTAL | 23/01/10

    People who think she had a nose job are retarded. It’s called contouring. I think she should lose a couple more pounds though.

  104. justathought | 23/01/10

    @ Milan: i actually saw a magazine where they said kim looked like cher, haha.

    @ Z: I totally agree with you. There is no way a woman should look yet someone always post that on this site.

  105. M | 24/01/10

    No no no Crystal she has had a nose job, train your eyes to see in better detail. She use to have a bigger, bird beak like nose and now she has a tiny tiny nose that doesnt fit with the rest of her bigger face proportions. Either way she is less attractive and her personality makes her even more less attractive.

  106. Jade | 24/01/10

    Parker Posey, you know everyone has different opinions right. You think Kourtney is the least attractive but Khloe looks like a caveman.

  107. Doog | 25/01/10

    She looks like her mommy in the first pic. I feel like I’m looking at Kris.