Cameron Diaz Bares Her Belly On Set
March 30th, 2010 by Rian | Filed under Cameron Diaz, Healthy Celebrity.Cameron Diaz wore a belly-baring top and short cutoffs while filming scenes for her latest movie Bad Teacher, which was shooting in LA on Sunday afternoon.
Photos via FamePictures
While she certainly isn’t as skinny as she was in her “There’s Something About Mary” days, she’s still looking pretty good weight-wise!
What do YOU all think?
Tags: belly, blonde, Cameron Diaz, healthy size, on set, shorts
LOVE Cameron. She is beautiful, thin and strong! Great legs! One of my fav celebrities!!!
her body looks amazing. she actually looked a lot skinnier in these pictures that I saw on another site, in the same outfit. but I have nothing bad to say about her! those legs go on for miles.
She looks FANTASTIC! WOW. Impressive. Rock those gams, Cameron!
She has the perfect body. I’m not seeing anything wrong with it.
god bless her…so much confidence with that unfortunate face….confidence goes a long way.
wow she looks great. best legs in the biz.
She has that genetic athletic body (like my sister) But I dont like it. Too straight, no sensual curves.
she is looking hot…sexy…go Cam!! sometimes when she is too skinny, she has a “boy body”…too straight up and down…i like her “curves”…
beautiful! she’s strong and healthy and looks amazing
legs that go on for days. lovely.
She looks amazing. I’m so jealous.
I would have thought her to be thinner than she appears hear.
*here
She looks good for almost 40.
She has an amazing body for being in her, what is it? 40’s? 50’s?!
Pamela Anderson? IS THAT YOU!
oh no wait..waitt
just joking. Thats one of the few actresses I really admire and think looks great!
pretty good? thinner isnt always better. she looks fabulous!
she’s gorgeous. hot legs!
In the 2nd pick she looks like Kirsten Dunst. Weird. She’s a bit too ‘mature’ (so not to offend those of age) to be wearing that outfit. But whatevs.
bangin body especially for her age.
She looks good, but I think she looks better thinner.
i love her! her legs are the longest!
She looks much better now that she has a few more curves. Her figure was a bit too boyish before.
Wow. Amazing. Those legs are sensational!! She has an unbelievable body
@Berries,I saw pics of her on another site and thought it was Kirsten D as well. Looks a bit chipmunky…
She looks great for her age, I think she’s about 38, but movie role or not she should cover up her blocky torso. Nice legs, but way past her prime which was probably her Mary days. Love that movie : )
She has a great body for ANY age.
i think she DOES look very skinny. she is skinny, toned, and healthy, all at the same time. i didn’t see “something about mary”, but if she was skinnier then than she is here, she probably didn’t look good.
gorgeous!!!!!!!
isn’t she too old for this role [she appears to be playing]? great figure but reminded me of pamela andersson as well.
post pics of salma hayak please? she’s really slimmed down.
amazing!!!
I too have pretty much an athletic body(no waist boooo) and it sucks. She looks good but I somehow preferred her in her sweetest thing days (saying that, that was about 10 years ago)
She’s ageing really well though, go her!!!
Also you gotta love her smile!!
She looks absolutely fabulous!
One of my favorite Hollywood bodies! Always strong, fit and healthy looking. Plus she looks a teeny bit curvier here and looks even more awesome.
Pretty good? Muscular and fit is always hotter than super skinny. Her legs and abs are amazing!
so jealous.
she is rockin!
great legs, but she looks so weird in that outfit, shes too old for that.
she looks amazing!
i think its unrealistic to think people will maintain the same body year after year. as you get older your body changes – its not a bad thing
Wow, she looks awesome! Not only is she thin, athletic, and toned she’s also pretty!
so cute!! Not easy to pull that off, but she manages it! Love her!
Well I guess I’m the only one that is going to be negative. I’m not seeing much of a shape. No waist. And there is something about (not Mary) her belly button that freaks me out. It’s like a new born babies or something. A spray tan would help her tremendously. Anyway, go ahead and bash me.
She has a good body, for sure.
I am the only one who thinks her face doesn’t mach her body?
i thought she was skinny, she looks healty!
no need 4 butt pads, like jessica LOL!
yes lily, bash bash bash your way. nnn, TOTALLY: Cam looks great for ANY age.
Hmmm she almost kinda looks a bit trannylicious… I like her better thinner…
Lily I have always thought the same thing, lol. Not much waist or hips judging from bikini pics I’ve seen. But her body seems a little more shapely in these pics, like she gained a little and it gave her some slight feminine curves. Maybe it’s just the outfit though, not sure.
Her legs go on for ages! Makes up for the fact she has no butt
I’m glad to see a celeb that has not lipo’d themselves to bare bones. Notice her slightly below the belly button pudge. I think all women of average BMI have trouble getting rid of that little pudge.
id love to see some kirsten dunst on here. she’s my all time fave.
cameron looks awesome.
she looks AMAZING. very athletic-skinny.
Well Well Well at first glance i thought to myself HOLY BODY!! H O T! and though i am sticking to that thought a second thought came: cammy is getting OLD..and i have thought that since she was in that movie with ashton kutcher the vegas one…..but who cares they are all old everyones old im old! but yeah she is so inspiring to me she takes good care of herself and has gerrrreatttt legs!!she is def fit to me!!!!
She looks fantastic! If she gained weight, then we should all be that blessed to gain weight. Looks like a healthy, sexy, strong, confident woman to me. Sure beats those stick-skinny little boy bodies so many of you like.
‘pretty good’- she looks fantastic!
to quote zz top “shes got legs and she knows how to use them”!!!
her stomach looks weird. compared to the photos of her in a bikini from a few months ago she had great abs then. and she’s not even 40 yet is she? it’s not like she had kids either so i don’t know why everyone is saying she looks so great “for her age”.
also spanktacular I know lots of women who have maintained their bodies even up to age 50 AND they had children so yeah it’s very realistic because they weren’t even actresses with person trainers and chefs.
Her legs or Chloe Sevigny’s, I can’t decide which ones I like better.
@Hypeothosis She’s in her thirties. Please, please tell me you are kidding.
I think that she is even more beautiful
I bet she winds up looking really slim in the film (flattering camera angle, lighting etc). She hasn’t got the body she had (as Rian said) in ‘There’s Something About Mary’. But, she still looks healthy!
her back legs- thigh area need some work, cellulite.
her thighs are too much.
She is in such good shape! She’s gorgeous.
she’s looking fit!
Her legs go on forever. Great body.
And Berries, she’s filming for a movie she has to wear the outfit. If i had body like that i’d wear it too.
I love cameron, she’s so down to earth and funny and smiley.. she’s already pretty but a her personality makes her stunning!
@”her thighs are too much”
What, too much shape?
Too healthy looking?
Surprised no one has yet said those shorts are tooooooo small! She has a great body, but those shorts look like they are going to bust at the seams!
She looks good. She hasnt gained that much weight.
wowza. hot legs. her face used to be so beautiful. like in “a life less ordinary” so beautiful..
She’s looking good
Not great, but good.
SEXY!!!!!!!! A LOTT!!!
She looks so great. She isn’t really that old. She’s under 40 I think.
On a side note, I’d also like to see some pictures of Kirsten Dunst. She is one of my favorites.
Ill have to put one of these pictures up on my fridge to motivate me…its sad that someone a decade older than me looks 100 times better me. If only i was famous and rich to have a trainer to make me look amazing
Shes bigger than i tought she was (a good thing) but she needs some toning imo. What movie is this?
Think that Cameron looks really GREAT here. She looks thinner in the very 1st pic taken from a side angle at a “distance” away (from her). Yeah, the shorts are short & really tight/fitting BUT if they are part of her wardrobe for the movie then I guess
that is why. She’s 37 or 38 now but still looks thin and a bit more curvy than her body used to be more straight up & down. Overall, she seems athletic thin but NOT SKINNY as she used to be (at times)! Overall, looking HOT!
hot.
No. She is waay too old to pull off this look, she looks a bit daisy duke meets pam anderson. She has always had abdominal issues, to be kind. Her mid section is def not her strong point and she should keep it covered!
Age appropriate please.
I am shocked reading some of the comments saying “she is hot” and has an athletic body, etc. This, with the mushy abdominal area and flabby thighs does not qualify for an athletic or toned body!
I don’t like her body, I never have. Her stomach is looking kind of flabby in these pictures, and her thighs are on the meaty-side. I prefer her when she’s skinny. She doesn’t have good proportions, so when she gains weight, she doesn’t fill out her curves — she just gets plumper.
She looks okay. I wouldn’t want legs that thick, or show them off in short shorts, but at least she is healthy
She looks great. She has gained a touch and it really suits her.
lily
“I know lots of women who have maintained their bodies even up to age 50 AND they had children so yeah it’s very realistic because they weren’t even actresses with person trainers and chefs.”
I agree with you. She looks just OK for someone who is in her late 30s and hasn’t had kids. She is thin but there are plenty of women her age that look like her.
I think the point of the outfit is that she is supposed to be dressed inappropriately for her age in the movie. Looks great regardless.
IDK…I wish she’d take on different roles. She’s not quite girl-next-door anymore…given that she’s not a girl.
Seriously am i the only one who thinks she has a weird stomach?? I’ve thought that since her earliest days…when she was toned and great great body super arms but man that stomach of hers…i hate it.
her face has looked old and haggard for at least 5-6 years now, but her body is still bangin’!
Funny someone mentioned kids….I’m the same age as Cameron, with very similar build, except I have had 2 kids, and I felt that her tummy & belly button looked like she’s had kids too!
she has that sweet round short face
Cant believe I Am Rouge is giving away Vegas Hard Rock Hotel trips http://bit.ly/d3P6XL
she looks fit here. i think she has the body type where she can be super duper tiny and super fit! hottie!!
i have those shorts !! yee!
I second the Kirsten Dunst request.
How someone can say Cameron has ‘flabby thighs’ is beyond me.
Yeah, it’s all very well to say that she ‘looks great for her age’ but she hasn’t had kids and 38 is NOT THAT OLD!
I don’t think she looks that good here. She’s not fat, but the shorts are too small and she has that ’sucking in’ look to her stomach in several pictures. It’s a terrible outfit…
She looks great in these photos, not so skinny anymore!
I didn’t recognize her face at first. I think she’s had something done. Diaz should move on to more mature acting jobs, because this whole Pamela Anderson meets Daisy Duke thing is not working for her anymore.
Am I the only one who doesn’t find her body good looking? Her midsection looks too boyish and her legs are OK but not more. Shame..
It’s not just that she looks silly at her age in this get up but her face is aging face. She was so adorable and fresh faced in her 20’s but there is a time when you put away the belly baring short shorts attire. Her face is not aging well. I’m sorry but it’s true. And her abs-not toned and not good.
Cameron has a BEAUTIFUL FACE!!!!!! Not unfortunate-looking at all!!!
I bet she has a better body than 98% of people on this site.
I wonder who the lucky 2% are?
What movie is this for? Maybe she purposely gained alittle weight to look a certain way for the movie?
o sorry now i see, “BAD TEACHER”
body like britney in these days imo…
Cameron looks fab! All of you people who are screaming “age appropriate”, this woman is only 37-38 and this is a MOVIE ROLE! She is not old by any stretch of the imagination. There must be a lot of 15 year old people on this site. Looks great, for any age, and she totally ROCKS this look!
Not a lot of people her age can pull off the whole ’shorts/tied-up shirt’ look very well, but I think she looks great in it. And to me, it’s not about being age appropriate, but more about how flattering your body type is for what you wear.
She looks better minus about ten pounds and a ten inches of hair.
Her body is in great shape for 38, children or not. Of course she is not the young fresh faced 20 something anymore, but still looks good.
And please do not imply that MOST women can get their pre-pregnancy body back after kids through diet and exercise because if that was the case, the top cosmetic procedure would not be the ‘mommy makeover’ which includes breast lifts and tummy tucks.
Also, cannot imagine ANYONE thinking this girl is big, flabby or needs to loose weight unless they had serious body dysmorphia themselves.