Even More Skinny Models On The Runway

March 5th, 2010 by Rian | Filed under Models & Supermodels, Skinny Celebrities.

Here is yet another set of catwalk photos for you all to enjoy… this time, from the Anne Valerie Hash ‘Ready to Wear Fall/Winter 2010′ show held in Paris on Wednesday.

Anne Valerie Hash Runway - Skinny Model
Photos via Wenn.com

What do you all think – too thin? Or just right for runway models?

Anne Valerie Hash Runway - Skinny Model

Anne Valerie Hash Runway - Skinny Model

Anne Valerie Hash Runway - Skinny Model

ADVERTISEMENT


Tags: , , , ,

56 Responses to “Even More Skinny Models On The Runway”

  1. Mel | 5/03/10

    The dark skinned model has the best body out of the bunch. The rest look sickly and need a sandwich!!

  2. Marty | 5/03/10

    wow they all look so busted! the last one isnt so bad but the others. Wheew.

  3. happyvegetarian | 5/03/10

    Im so jealous of their figures.

  4. Jade | 5/03/10

    The first one has bad legs. It’s looks like if she lost a little more, her thighs would be THINNER than her lower legs. And if she gained a little she’d have Whitney Port legs (not any better). Oh and DUDE face…

    2nd girl is kinda pretty. She looks hungry but they all are. I looked at the 3rd and 4th models, and realized there’s really no diffence between runway models. Done…

  5. Shayda | 5/03/10

    im bitter over the fact that those girls are so emaciated and yet their boobs are just as big as mine.

  6. fbritney | 5/03/10

    They look really hungry!! theres almost nothing in their eyes..

  7. Lily | 5/03/10

    @ Shayda, “their boobs are just as big as mine”. Big? Really? They have none!

  8. glow | 5/03/10

    They look like a series of x-rays hanging in the doctor’s office.

  9. ella | 5/03/10

    to answer your question: in this distorted world, they are just right for runway models. for human beings they are TOO THIN. although they look like they’re just 16.

  10. UK_Elle | 5/03/10

    LOVE the shoes, find then super skinny supermodel physique a bit disturbing though.

  11. Creepy Doll | 5/03/10

    The first one might be Victor Kruger’s sister! xD
    I love her dress, by the way. Except for the navy blue.

  12. Creepy Doll | 5/03/10

    the second one looks like my 15 years old cousin

  13. MScotton | 5/03/10

    Ew the second one reminds me of my dentist. The 1st isn’t pretty either. But their legs are nice.

  14. affina | 5/03/10

    The model on the first pic scared me

  15. Renee | 5/03/10

    these girls look like they’re 13

  16. Jemima | 5/03/10

    I think they all would look so much lovelier with an extra 15lbs on their bodies… and I love skinny!

  17. maxx05 | 5/03/10

    The 1st one would be an incredible looking man.

  18. maxx05 | 5/03/10

    The rest of the girls need bras under their outfits, it’s not necessary to see all, thanks.

  19. Tara | 5/03/10

    They look great!

  20. Sway | 5/03/10

    THE SHOES!!! As for the models… no. go eat.

  21. Gina | 5/03/10

    Am I the only one who thinks that the shoes are HIDEOUS? They look like men’s bowling shoes- no feminine qualities whatsoever.

    As for the models, of course they are too thin- haven’t we been through this a million times before?

  22. rachel | 5/03/10

    Way too skinny but what else is new with runway models? And the first model is really strange looking.

  23. bobby | 5/03/10

    Noticed a lot of you commented on how they look young – fyi a lot of runway models/models in general are young aka 15… Definitely under 18.

  24. nnn | 5/03/10

    Wow, that first one is MAJOR FUG.

  25. lauren | 5/03/10

    Those shoes are all hideous. They’re all too thin, and none of them look happy. I know they’re told to not show expression, but their faces are distracting because they look so hollow.

  26. Draccae | 5/03/10

    Too thin and I never liked the bony chunk thighs look that people this thin get. Atrocious shoes. Wasn’t that third girl on a reality show?

  27. alicia | 5/03/10

    Definitely thin and they look so depressing. I don’t particularly like any of the outfits either.

  28. Maria | 5/03/10

    I find it disturbing that girls who look underage (& possibly ARE underage) are walking the runways flashing their private parts.
    Their body shape is too much of a topic on its own to be discussed here. Clearly while growing up these girls should fill out too, but the industry kinda expects them to stay prepubescent forever…

  29. ms_benes | 5/03/10

    not attractive

  30. Midori | 5/03/10

    The first model’s legs look strange. Her lower legs are wider than her upper legs. Looks like water retention around her ankles.

  31. Miss Jessie | 5/03/10

    @ Lily
    ouch!

  32. Miss Jessie | 5/03/10

    Hey, hi Midori!

  33. Alison | 5/03/10

    What happened to supermodel’s and runway model’s being some of the most beautiful women in the world, all these girls just look boring, and plain to me, some are downright homely looking. Apparently i could go out a find a skinny homeless girl a put her in a runway show and call it fashion? I miss the days of cindy crawford!

  34. Rebecca | 5/03/10

    The second and third ones look way too young. And their legs are all so tiny even though they’re wearing flats.

  35. MMH | 5/03/10

    @ Maxx05: I agree with your comment. If the first model cut off all her hair she’d be a pretty hot looking guy!

  36. syrah | 5/03/10

    ewww, my eyes. nothing new here. . .

  37. benny | 5/03/10

    yuck. this doesn’t look fun.

  38. moonbel | 5/03/10

    Ugliest shoes EVER!!!!!

  39. Mickey von Dutch | 6/03/10

    Except for the dark toned girl none of these models are attractive. I keep trying to remember when it was exactly that starving yourself became in style.

  40. AlignWithin | 6/03/10

    it is so strange how this almost looks ‘normal’ now.

  41. Mya | 6/03/10

    i think body size they look good. Just the first scared me because I thought it was a MAN

  42. Rue | 6/03/10

    Love the clothes!! and what a great idea for shoes (painting the tip to look like ’steel toe’).

  43. evamattiolo | 6/03/10

    they have great bodies

  44. yin | 6/03/10

    WoWie!”! The black one looks the BEST!
    The first legs look frightening like man legs–> def ugly for a woman—> PLEASE EAT enough!

  45. Heartlessxxx | 6/03/10

    I think they look ok

  46. anaisnun | 6/03/10

    I knew a girl who started out on the runways in Paris, but she didn’t go until she was 17 or just turned 18, there was cocaine all over (it was the late 80’s). She herself was known for being quite thin, but these girls now are smaller. I know a lot of the girls are in their mid teens, but it’s kind of scary for me to actually see the very young ones.

  47. wineanytime | 6/03/10

    1 – no
    2 – no
    3 – alright
    4 – no

  48. Jill | 6/03/10

    I say they look too thin. It looks gross. Their collar bones and knees stick out way too much.

  49. justathought | 7/03/10

    @ BOBBY I dont think we would be allowed to comment on them if they were under 18?

    I think they all look wayy to thin, especially thier legs!

  50. am | 7/03/10

    am i the only one that thinks the last one looks like keira knightley?

  51. Jen | 8/03/10

    @am
    That´s EXACTLY what I just wanted to post.

  52. Renee | 8/03/10

    they are too thin.

  53. LizzieLou | 8/03/10

    Those legs are just gross.

  54. Matilda | 8/03/10

    Disturbing is the right word. But oh, the clothes… fabulous.

  55. Erin | 9/03/10

    Is that alopecia on the 1st one?

  56. missy | 10/03/10

    The third girl is ok looking but they all sorta look like small woodland animals not to mention hungry.