Kate Walsh Spotted In Beverly Hills

March 15th, 2010 by Rian | Filed under Fit & Toned Celebs, Misc Celebs & Diet News.

Private Practice (and former Grey’s Anatomy) star Kate Walsh was spotted heading to a friend’s house in Beverly Hills for a baby shower yesterday afternoon…

Kate Walsh
Photos via FamePictures

Thin and gorgeous as usual!

Kate Walsh

Kate Walsh

Kate Walsh

ADVERTISEMENT


Tags: , , ,

55 Responses to “Kate Walsh Spotted In Beverly Hills”

  1. sarah | 15/03/10

    Ey not pretty

  2. MScotton | 15/03/10

    She looks pretty good for her age.

  3. Ana Alexa | 15/03/10

    She looks absolutely gorgeous here. So much hotter than when she was first on Grey’s Anatomy and was really overdone with the big hair and heavy make-up. I actually really like the outfit… not sure if the shoes go with it but anyway.

    We’re pretty close to seeing here right nipple in the last pic though… maybe next time she should wear a bra… or button her shirt.

  4. Mellons | 15/03/10

    sooooooo beautiful!
    i love her outfit!
    great legs.

  5. anon | 15/03/10

    meh. her dress is too short. nothing very exciting to say.

  6. marty | 15/03/10

    am i the only one that thinks that no matter how nice her legs are, umm please wear pants

  7. Sian | 15/03/10

    I love her, but when I first looked at the first picture I thought she was in a bathrobe picking up her mail. And the hair doesn’t help either.
    But whatever, great body and great face, imo.

  8. AW | 15/03/10

    very strange outfit. baby shower?

  9. Jade | 15/03/10

    She should maybe button her top up, unless she’s trying to flash someone on purpose. o_O

  10. shaden | 15/03/10

    she looks so amazing..
    nothin more to say..

  11. Em | 15/03/10

    Thin, yes. Gorgeous? Arguably.

    marty – No, you’re not the only one. Since when did it become acceptable to walk around in what looks like a belted men’s shirt? Please, cover up!

  12. The Baltimore Babe | 15/03/10

    Where are her pants?

  13. evamattiolo | 15/03/10

    there is no need for pants,like her body(especially for her age) but her face is not pretty

  14. rachel | 15/03/10

    I don’t think she’s attractive at all. And that’s a horrible dress?, shirt? or whatever it is she’s wearing.

  15. so | 15/03/10

    she looks old here…

    and she’s dressed like she’s going to a swinger party, not a baby shower.

  16. Kaybee | 15/03/10

    I used to wear that same thing when I was little–my dad’s old work shirts as a fingerpainting smock.

  17. isabiatch | 15/03/10

    Looks very silly, like she is in her pajamas – maybe it’s a pool party? I hope. The shoes don’t go at all.

  18. Mel | 15/03/10

    She looks okay. I’ve never been a big fan of hers.

  19. bella | 15/03/10

    Why is she posing to go get her mail. This looks like a cheesy photoshot for a Sears catalogue. A positive is she has great legs.

  20. Rian | 15/03/10

    bella she isn’t getting her mail, she’s arriving at someone’s house for a baby shower. You didn’t read the post. :)

  21. Mickey von Dutch | 15/03/10

    In that first picture it looks like she’s getting the newspaper in her nightgown. What a silly outfit for a grown woman.

  22. Mollie | 15/03/10

    Seems a bit insensitive to wear such a skimpy outfit to a baby shower.She’s not even buttoned up, I can clearly see what she has on underneath. Good grief.

  23. Draccae | 15/03/10

    The woman looks good, the outfit is weird though. Is she wearing a swim coverup or a mens shirt or a dress or what? I

  24. Bella E | 15/03/10

    that outfit is not really fit for a baby shower. Her bra is showing and if she bends over to far…well, I think we all know where Im going with that.

  25. glow | 15/03/10

    Attractive woman with nice legs.

  26. Tiny Dancer | 15/03/10

    She has an amazing figure. I hope I look that good in 10 years.

  27. Anushka | 15/03/10

    Oh I love Kate Walsh! She’s lovely and her body is super for her age! Love her clutch!!

  28. ame | 15/03/10

    when i first saw this pic i thought she was wearing a pajama top too!
    awful dress! but i do think she’s very pretty and in good shape.

  29. melissa | 15/03/10

    GOING TO A BABY SHOWER LOOKING LIKE THAT IS BOSS!!!!!!!!!

  30. working | 15/03/10

    I would hate her showing up to my baby shower…i’d either be fat & pregnant or still fat from the pregnancy lol :s i would not invite her haha

  31. Emmie | 15/03/10

    Beautiful gal, but soooo NOT appropriate. Seriously, something like this would be hard to pull off as a 20-something, but for a gal in her 30’s? NO WAY! Put on some cute jeans/leggings/bermudas and she would look great. Trying too hard comes to mind.

  32. nnn | 15/03/10

    That is a shirt!!!!

  33. Alyssa | 15/03/10

    That outfit makes it looks like she just got out of bed — she has a great, slim body, but the outfit kills it.

  34. bella | 15/03/10

    Sorry, I didn’t read the post . . .and never noticed it was a baby shower . . .now I am even more baffled by that . . .forget about the posing . . .why would you dress like that for a baby shower? I would be offended if someone came to my shower with their bra hanging out

  35. Sarlium | 15/03/10

    Love the outfit, nice body.

  36. elenne | 15/03/10

    so wrong

  37. Jj | 15/03/10

    she looks great. i think you should wear what makes you comfortable no matter the age.

  38. Alyssa | 15/03/10

    Gorgeous for her age… actually gorgeous compared to many younger celebs..

  39. Sian | 15/03/10

    She’s actually in her forties if I’m not mistaken. And she looks a good ten years younger than that and has amazing legs so I don’t think she should stop showing them off, but this shirt-thing she’s wearing definitely needs pants.

  40. onesie | 15/03/10

    i feel like she’s missing pants, or leggings, or something

  41. Carly | 15/03/10

    Why is everyone ripping on her outfit? Shirt dresses are in, albeit this one is a little too short for her age, but still, very stylish. Her legs look absolutely amazing, very toned, especially for her age.

  42. vkat | 15/03/10

    Her legs are awesome.
    As for the outfit, I LOVE shirtdresses, but this one just looks sloppy – it’s wrinkled, too short, awkward (the belt doesn’t lay right), and the sleeves are too baggy.
    Did I say she has great legs!!!

  43. moonbel | 15/03/10

    Her shirt dress is ill-fitting and WAY too short for a woman her age.

  44. justathought | 15/03/10

    Her face looks old, but her body is that of someone 10 years younger than her. I love her super toned thighs and the aviators! I think the dress maybe a bit short for her! Shes got a great bod but i dont think shes gorgeous

    @WORKING: rotfl

  45. misstigress | 16/03/10

    I thought she was walking around in her pajamas at first until I read the headline. She looks ludicrous with her dress (shirt?) having such a short hemline coupled with spiked-heels. Nice legs, though.

  46. misstigress | 16/03/10

    Also, on top of being her gauche attire, she’s in her forties, too, just to set the record straight.

  47. safi | 16/03/10

    that outfit looks slightly bedroom clothing! do like her tho!

  48. observer | 16/03/10

    she forgot to put on pants ?

  49. Alicia | 16/03/10

    I like her and she has great legs, BUT I don’t like the outfit at all.

  50. silver&gold | 16/03/10

    She has a great body. Gorgeous.

  51. Anna | 16/03/10

    I love Kate. She is stunning. I would kill to look that good when I’m 42 !

  52. Olivia Rose | 16/03/10

    Great body, but what on earth is she wearing for a baby shower? she looks barely dressed.

  53. izzy | 17/03/10

    absolutely gorgeous, slim and toned, i love her

  54. Tea | 17/03/10

    uum, strange outfit lol. i thought she was in her bathrobe in the first picture.

  55. retrobanana | 18/03/10

    lovvvve the shoes and the body she has such great gams the dress is a tad short but she looks sexy…



«
»