New Rachel Weisz Photos
March 22nd, 2010 by Rian | Filed under Skinny Celebrities.A stunning-looking Rachel Weisz posed for photographers as she arrived at the Laurence Olivier Awards last night in London…
Photos via PacificCoastNews
I think she looks gorgeous! And very thin.
What do you all think – is she too thin?
Tags: brunette, event, rachel weisz, skinny, thin
what’s that thing sticking out in the second picture?
good weight, but nothing special, really.
I think she’s gorgeous. Love the simple dress.
beautiful! looks to be about 5′6″ 110-115 lovely!
LOVE this woman she is a true beauty!
Always thought Rachel Weisz was a very attractive woman. That dress does nothing for her, however.
she is effortlessly classy, love her
SHe looks liek she has a nice body, but i dont like the all gray color. I prefer to see a bit more color in the spring. Ive heard her name before i think shes an actress, but what is she famous for exactly?
@RIAN: after watching DWTS tonite i would love to see a posts on some of the dancers, espcially Erin Andrews, thanks
I like this dress, but not for spring. She has a nice bod, unfortunate nose.
I love her so much sh could appear in a potato sack and I would thin she looks gorg!!
Ola, what thing?
not to thin, she looks great! I love her in constantine and the brothers bloom. She’s got a cute demeanor.
i dont like the make up very much!
but i dont think that she’s to thin!
there is totally a “thing” sticking out of the dress in the second picture.
In these pictures Rachel looks quite slender, but in other pictures that I’ve seen, she looks as though she’s gained weight. I don’t like the colour of the dress; it really washes her out.
She looks lovely. I don’t think she’s too thin but I remember when she was a bit curvier back in The Mummy. Of course that was 11-12 years ago when she filmed it, so she must’ve succumbed to the pressure of being skinny.
Perfection from head to toe. I love her style and her nose too, for that matter. I hope that she won’t feel pressured to start messing with her face, because it’s refreshing to see “an original” amidst all those generic looking Hollywood Barbies. The same goes for Juliette Binoche, whom I saw on dr. Phil yesterday. Oozing with natural charm.
delusional… all of you… this girl is not that skinny. She’s the same size as Kate Winslet… yet no one says she’s 115lbs… good grief….
She looks very elegant, she is wearing a Narciso Rodriguez dress, the dress is pretty, the colour is awful, weigh wise, good.
She is soooo beautiful! Nice body too but the color of the dress is not so great I think (the design of the dress is all different matter, I want it!)
No, I think she is still a size 3/4. She looks thinner in the neck area cause she a bit older that’s all. Not a big fan of the cut of this dress, but she is looking lovely and very pretty just the same.
I think because everyone in Hollywood (not so much Europe) get their noses done, people seem to forget what a nose looks like.
Stunning really. Elegant and smart, and so talented!
Oh no! Why did she had to lose all that weight that kept her looking beautiful and healthy? Now she just looks sick and older than she really is. She was so stunning previously, when she wasn’t stick thin!
whats wrong with her nose! i think her nose matches perfectly her face! its a individuell look…not that every one hav a barbie face look!!!! so whats the problem…. O_o
She is one of the most beautiful women I have ever seen. She is perfect for me: nice body, amazing face, fantastic hair. And I like because she looks very natural without any cosmetical surgery additions what is quite rare for Holywood.
She looks gorgeous, poised and elegant
A refreshing change from regular trashy Hollywood
she looks a bit thinner than kate winslet to me – she is stunning though i don’t like this dress or make-up!
She definitely looks thinner. Hard to say whether I like her better or worse than before.
She looks great!
wow, she has always been so gorgeous.
and i love her nose. a good schnoz. because, you know, plastic surgery is not mandatory in some places, even though its mandatory in L.A.
I like her nose. She is definitely smaller than Kate Winslet, but I bet she weighs closer to 120+ lbs rather than 110-115.
Great body and pretty woman but these colors (dress color, lip color and hair color) do nothing for her.
She looks older than 40.
She’s so incredibly beautiful and I happen to really love her nose. Her weight is great too. She shouldn’t change a thing.
She is 40??? I think she looks so much younger!
Looks great and the dress is very flattering to her figure.
Agree with you, londoncalling. Everything about her seems good..good weight, good dress/outfit…but HATE this color on her. I cannot remember the last time I saw pics of her so I don’t know if she has lost weight …she looks slim/thin; but not too thin.
She doesn’t look any different to me since last time. Slim and fit and great toned arms.
She looks really pretty. I love her anyway. Great weight.
@nnn – unfortunate nose? Really? She has a perfect nose. I’d much prefer real to fake… but whatever…
She is not too thin at all! I think she looks slim but healthy. I would say her bmi is around 20.
londoncalling I agree. That colour is not good on her but dress is beautiful!
Will you post some of Gillian Anderson at the Olivier awards? She’s a celebrity that has a healthy body by eating healthy food and she’s so gorgeous.
She’s a lovely woman. I hope she doesn’t turn into a bobblehead.
I think she’s gorgeous, but could use some blush.
She is smaller than Kate Winslet but she certainly has the same shaped hips.
beautiful woman but agree with that not being the best color for the dress
She has the beauty to carry off that austerely simple frock – lovely lip colour and warm smile. She is fab!
Wow, lots of posts lately! Maybe it’s just me but for the first time, I haven’t been able to keep up with my comment reading. Lol. I love posts though…Well it looks like Rachel chose the blandest color she possibly could. Kinda boring but her skin looks great. Body looks good.
wow!! she has this grace kelly- esque style about her,truely eleglent.
I think she’s beautiful and thin. Btw, I like her nose – it’s unique (like noses should be) and adds character
I’m sorry guys I just don’t see her appeal.
Classic beauty to me IS Kate Winslet.
Rachel just doesn’t do it for me. The hair, eyebrows, nose, bad make up, bad colored dress.
Just don’t like any of it.
i’m pretty generous in opinion but i think she’s just attractive and that’s it. nothing outstanding. i do, however, agree with those that say her nose is just fine the way it is!
Nothing special, looks ok. Ugly color of dress
She’s..stunning, really. I wish she’d wear a brighter colour though! That dress is sort of, nannyoldwoman to me. But oh well, she could wear a dirty rubbish bag and still look wonderful.
I think she looks simply stunning and the colour of the dress is very on trend. A beautiful English rose.
She’s pretty…She doesn’t appear to be all that thin tho. If she’s 5 6″ I would guess her to be around 125 or 130ish. I’m 5 6″ and 110 lbs and i don’t appear to be this size in photos…then again it could just be that her dress isn’t flattering. I don’t understand why every1 is always saying the camera adds ten pounds, provided your photographer knows what they are doing and you know how to stand that’s simply not true.
I reckon she is drop dead gorgeous. However, I don’t like her in these pic