Cheryl Cole Attends ‘Outside The Law’ Premiere

May 22nd, 2010 by Rian | Filed under Cheryl Cole, Fit & Toned Celebs, Skinny Celebrities.

Cheryl Cole attended the ‘Outside the Law’ premiere at the Palais des Festivals during the 63rd Annual International Cannes Film Festival yesterday.

Cheryl Cole
Photos via FamePictures

She’s looking fit, toned and slim as usual!

What do you all think?

Cheryl Cole

Cheryl Cole

Cheryl Cole

ADVERTISEMENT


Tags: , , , , , ,

112 Responses to “Cheryl Cole Attends ‘Outside The Law’ Premiere”

  1. happyvegetarian | 22/05/10

    She looks like she’s gained some weight in the arms, but she looks good.

  2. sairaw | 22/05/10

    First?!?!

  3. Mal | 22/05/10

    way to skinny..hate the dress pretty hair & shoes

  4. sairaw | 22/05/10

    if eva longoria and jennifer garner had a baby that’d be her

  5. sarah | 22/05/10

    Terrible dress. Is she trying to bring back the 5th element?

  6. abby | 22/05/10

    first? a little too revealing?
    very pretty tho

  7. R | 22/05/10

    first?

  8. Michelle | 22/05/10

    Ugly, ugly dress. Looks like a linen table cloth.

  9. R | 22/05/10

    Wow, that was exciting. I didn’t realize the excitement of first commenter until now!

  10. sassy | 22/05/10

    She looks like she walked off a set of that 80’s TV show Dynasty. Those tats are so hideous –esp. the one on the upper thigh. Dress looks very cheap. She has a great figure and it’s obvious that she wants everyone to see every inch of it!

  11. MScotton | 22/05/10

    Her legs are looking thicker than they where.
    She is pretty though.

  12. Sian | 22/05/10

    I think I’d like the dress if it wasn’t for the high slit. Her hair’s way too big and yes, those tats ruin the look further.

  13. snoops | 22/05/10

    I do not. care for. the dress.

    I like this shoulder length hair on her though, suits her more than super long and its more individual (as compared to most celebrities)

  14. qwerty | 22/05/10

    Nice arms
    Dress looks cheap

  15. MMH | 22/05/10

    She has a fantastic figure! The dress is very
    ‘interesting’ to say the least. I would think that sitting down and not showing everything you got would be difficult.

  16. Hypeothosis | 22/05/10

    She looks amazing!!!!

  17. Hypeothosis | 22/05/10

    and whats wrong with wanting to show every inch of your body if your worked so hard for it?!

  18. Zebrariffic | 22/05/10

    ha ha look at that man checking her out and pondering in the first pic!!!!

  19. suz | 22/05/10

    That dress is very strange. But she still looks gorgeous.

  20. bianca | 22/05/10

    i hate her hair in these pics…she trying to look like fran drescher as “the nanny”? great body though.

  21. CRYSTAL | 22/05/10

    she looks HOT. This is a perfect weight for her.

  22. Jo | 22/05/10

    Sarah – good call on the 5th element dress! I was thinking the same thing. A pretty daring choice. Otherwise, she looks super cute.

  23. Anonymous | 22/05/10

    Are those stretch marks in the triangular slit in the 2nd pic? (I don’t care if they really are stretch marks, it just looks like it. Plus, I think she’s gorgeous.)

  24. Ru | 22/05/10

    Duuuuuude, the guy behind her was checking out her breast through the slits. Tacky-tacky!!

  25. lauren | 22/05/10

    OMG @sairaw, SO TRUE!!

    anywho, she looks absolutely gorgeous! love her body and love her hair!

  26. jo | 22/05/10

    she’s pretty and has a great figure but she needs to stop dressing like a hooker, it’s really tiring to watch.
    I guess she did gain a bit of weight and I’m happy for her; she probably loses weight when she is emotionally distressed.

  27. BOBBY | 22/05/10

    thick cankle legs. only looks okay because she starves herself. genetically is a fattie.

  28. Nina | 22/05/10

    Sche ca’t dress. Always looks tacky…or caught in ca. 1992.

  29. Michelle | 23/05/10

    shes so pretty. that dress is so ugly and it looks really stiff.

  30. geeksupremo | 23/05/10

    Omg super gorgeous face.! I couldn’t care less about the dress, her beautiful face makes up for everything!

  31. Kimberly | 23/05/10

    She is really beautiful. So true about being an Eva/Jen G. spin off…There is something that is very appealing about her to me. She still seems fresh and optimistic.

  32. KT | 23/05/10

    she’s a little bobbleheaded! very skinny, and yucky dress

  33. coco | 23/05/10

    is she around 5′3 ?
    thats what i read…
    what do you guys think ?
    shes cute anyway.

  34. justathought | 23/05/10

    haha @ the guy staring a hole in the back of her head in the first picture :)

    She looks like shes gained but i like it, now she actually has curves and looks healthy!!!!What is that showing under her dress? At the bottom its like grey but at the top i think she has some sort of skin colored garment on???

  35. justathought | 23/05/10

    o and i love the hair and makeup but i just noticed the long grey nails…eww

  36. BeFabulous | 23/05/10

    I looove her dress, but I don’t like the tattoo on her thigh.

  37. Lenore | 23/05/10

    If the dress was a darker color it would look much better, and yeah, her thigh tatoo ruins the look a bit. Plus I’m curious what that line on the side of her breast in the 2nd picture is?

  38. laura | 23/05/10

    she always loks pretty but i dont like that dress and she loks like she could do with putting on a bit of weight.

  39. BonyMaria | 23/05/10

    In close-ups the dress looks like an amateur sewing club work.. I’m glad nothing’s falling out at least

  40. Shana | 23/05/10

    @ Sairaw – your comment…hysterical !

  41. Emily | 23/05/10

    I actually kinda like the dress, granted i’d like it more if the cut wasn’t quite so high and if the front part covered slightly more of her boob / side area. She must really love her legs, i think almost every time i see a pic of her she’s either wearing something really short or something with a cut just like that one.

  42. Lorie | 23/05/10

    wow…

  43. Leonie | 23/05/10

    She looks gorgeous, but I see scars on boobs! Boob job? And stretchmarks on hips! Not the most flattering dress, but she is still a stunner!

  44. zhnjg | 23/05/10

    That looks like a lace insert, not scars on her boobs.

  45. zhnjg | 23/05/10

    or mesh, I should say. To keep her boobs in the dress.

  46. JessicaR | 23/05/10

    sigh, she isnt stretch marked, she is wearing invisible underwear…thats what the creases are. Quite possibly an all in one body suit.

  47. Amy | 23/05/10

    The dress is awful.

  48. Sarah | 23/05/10

    It is quite amusing how contradictory these comments are, for one person her arms are ‘big’ and to someone else there are great. Additionally the dress is lovely yet to others it is unflattering. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I think she looks great xx

  49. ira | 23/05/10

    ashley cole… what an idiot! look what you had! maybe she can’t choose dresses, or hide underwear successfully, but i would still love to have that face! her face ALWAYS looks gorgeous.

  50. shaden | 23/05/10

    SO AMAZIGN!

  51. Prettiestfeet | 23/05/10

    I think she looks awesome.. would give my right arm to look like her.. hair, body, face. I like the dress!

  52. HB | 23/05/10

    You can kind of see her ribs in the back, but the dress looks good on her, she’s quite slim. Her legs seem strange, though. Very cute face!

  53. Lina | 23/05/10

    she has rly bad body

  54. Holls | 23/05/10

    She’s a pear but you can’t tell that much because of her boob job.
    She claims to hate her legs but i agree, she sure does like to show them off!

    Gourgeous, but no prettier than other band members.

    5′3, 105?

  55. nomnomnom | 23/05/10

    The guy’s expression in the first pic is hilarious and that thigh tattoo of hers is hideous.

    On a more positive note, she has a healthy glow in these photos.

  56. Mel | 23/05/10

    Terrible dress, but she is still gorgeous!

  57. t_t_b_p | 23/05/10

    Looking good! Any weight guesses?

  58. nowayjose | 23/05/10

    Really loathe the dress. I am not a fan of cut-outs, but this would have been much cuter as a mini…trying to make something so slutty into a “gown” never works. Her leg looks so soft…slender, but needs toning. And yes, that is definitely a cankle but maybe just bloat and retaining water.

  59. ruby | 23/05/10

    @sairaw: YES YES omg i couldnt have described her any better. hilarious xD

    i think she has a more than gorgeous face she is very beautiful and looks really elegant. but waaaaaaaayyy too skinny! she is too too skinny and if she gained some weight it would be much sexier. seriously, her ribs are showing. it’s good for her that her face doesnt get thinner it means she is healthy but if it was like another celebrity with the same body but a thinner face everyone would call it too skinny!

  60. Elenne | 23/05/10

    gained but still lager than her natural size, although i think ‘genetic fattie’ is rather extreme.

    she looks nice.

  61. Elenne | 23/05/10

    still smaller/thinner*

  62. kgirl | 23/05/10

    1st, 2nd shes pretty.
    3rd one looks like a hooker showin up!! she b better whitout that stain.

  63. Londoncalling | 23/05/10

    Versace fall2010, louboutin heels, gold corto moltedo clutch, do not like the women, but, she, does, look beautiful here, lovely dress!!!

  64. nia | 23/05/10

    I’d say @ 5′3 she’s about 110lbs. She looks a lot healthier than she did a few years back…

  65. Gemma | 23/05/10

    I quite like the dress. Revealing. But she is looking HOT
    I would kill to look like her.
    Have to say, I think her legs have looked skinnier, but that could just be because she is quite short.
    Can’t deny it. She is stunning

  66. Jade | 23/05/10

    I don’t like the dress, but she has the body for it. Her dimples are cute. <3

  67. rachel | 23/05/10

    She’s really pretty. She’s also very thin but toned as well. The dress is ugly though and the color doesn’t do anything for her. She still looks pretty though.

  68. syrah | 23/05/10

    reeeeer!

  69. laura | 23/05/10

    Dress would be better either minus the slit or the cut outs, both is too tacky. I don’t like her legs but probably down to body shape not weight, 5′3 and 104 pounds i would guess.

  70. Karen | 23/05/10

    Chavtastic!!

  71. fffffff | 23/05/10

    she need dress that riviling to the premier cuz she gets only 15 minetus to shine.

  72. Tara | 23/05/10

    Ugly shoes.
    She looks cheap.

  73. moonbel | 23/05/10

    She looks great! Cute face.

  74. Tara | 23/05/10

    Btw, look at the guy who’s at the background of the first picture haha.
    And I’m really curious about her diet and work out.
    I personally think her BMI would be around 18. She doen’t look stick thin, but toned and healthy. But she’s really slim.

  75. Tara | 23/05/10

    Why do all my comments have to wait for approvement?

  76. cecile | 23/05/10

    lol, look at the guy staring at her in the first pic, guess he didnt like the dress either.

  77. Londoncalling | 23/05/10

    Sometimes pictures dont do justice to these dresses, you need to see them up close to realize they are, definitely, not cheap!

  78. chaz | 23/05/10

    Cheryl is 5ft 3” and 8stone 3lbs. 115lbs. By her own admission in a UK magazine very recently. She has alot of muscle in her legs.

  79. Michelle | 23/05/10

    HOLY CRAP! I JUST NOTICED THE PHOTOG. ON THE LEFT IN THE 1ST PIC LOOKS EXACTLY LIKE DR.CHRISTIAN TROY

  80. Jill E. | 23/05/10

    This should be under ‘weight gain’. She looks thin but her legs and arms are bigger.

  81. siennagold | 23/05/10

    she’s pretty

  82. Caley | 23/05/10

    God, shes got about as much class and sophistication as a bag of spanners! She has all this money (apparently) and she couldnt find a dress that fitted the occasion? Just goes to show though…you can take the girl out of the council-estate…..

  83. disturbia | 23/05/10

    this is a good weight for her….she looks strong, healthy, and gorgeous

  84. bubbbbles | 23/05/10

    I don’t like her hair /: AND her legs are too trained, for my taste
    i prefer SKINNY not fit(::

  85. regan | 23/05/10

    She looks great!

    Can we call her Cheryl Tweedy? Loser Cole is out of the picture now.

  86. Sheridan | 23/05/10

    She looks great, although not too sure about the dress. And Bubbbbles she is skinny… if she’s not skinny then I don’t know what is. Skinny and fit looks waaaay better than emaciated skinny.

  87. Angela | 23/05/10

    i’d rather keep my waist-hip ratio than be a complete stick like her.

  88. érica | 23/05/10

    she has a pretty facem, but her head looks huge compared to her body, the dress and the leg tattoo look cheap!

  89. robmista | 23/05/10

    She needs to tone up, not skinny or toned enough.

  90. justathought | 24/05/10

    @NOMNOMNOM: what thigh tattoo, i only see on her hand?

  91. Leonie | 24/05/10

    @justathought – If you look to the top of leg in the 3rd pic you can see it poking out the slit of her dress. It’s a band tatoo that wraps around her whole thigh I think

  92. kennedy | 24/05/10

    omg she looks like a clown with so much make up on. her hairdo looks weird and unnatural to the max. dress is tacky too. worst part might be an awful tattoo on her hand- very prison -like

  93. Teethy | 24/05/10

    I think she looks fantastic! When I first saw the pics all I thought is WOW. She inspires me to go to the gym. I think that if I had her body Id want to wear a dress like that too. I like the dress

  94. Milena | 24/05/10

    He is sooooo beautiful, nothing can spoil her: nither dress no tattoes

  95. Maria | 24/05/10

    Her proportions remind me of myself when I was too skinny. However she seems to have gained a little, she has gone from stickthin to just very petite. I guess for many men her weight must still be a major turn-off, not that it matters.
    What DOES matter though is that dress – absolutely HIDEOUS, I’d be so ashamed walking around like this. She always dresses so tacky.

  96. Kel | 24/05/10

    Hi Maria, I agree with you about the dress. Maybe it’s a British thing – no offence – but she never seems to dress quite right to me. As for her figure, I agree she looks petite not real skinny. I guess her fitness is good, but I think at her best she combined both real fit and ultra-lean – hard to do but she has the genes to do this even better. :)

  97. elisita | 24/05/10

    shes beautiful. dress is hideous!

  98. Shelley | 24/05/10

    I hate the cutout dresses. So tacky. Her abdomen is concave, looks like she hasn’t eaten!

  99. Lily | 24/05/10

    It amazes me how some women are so skinny but yet have big calves. She’s definetely got some cankles.

  100. jesssssssssssssssssssss | 24/05/10

    I love her! She’s so pretty I don’t even care about the clothes.. I’m loving the guy in the back.. I bet he wishes he was wearing that dress… lol

  101. seriously? | 24/05/10

    Cankles? For crying out loud, that’s the postion of her leg & foot. Can some of you really be that stupid?

  102. venus | 24/05/10

    She doesnt have stretch marks on her hips….or she may do but you can’t see. Some gaps in her dress are covered in a flesh toned fabric and it has creased. If you look carefully on some of the other pictures on the net of the same dress you can tell more. She is very pretty but there is nothing sexy about her body. I like slim curvy- she is straight up and down.

  103. Stephanie | 24/05/10

    She really does look to be 5′3″ 105 here– whatever she said to a magazine

  104. Mem | 24/05/10

    Love this girl. Although I don’t always agree with what she wears.

  105. Rebecca | 24/05/10

    she has gained a lot…she’s definitely still attractive, but those few pounds on her makes a huge difference and takes her from drop-dead gorgeous to just pretty

  106. justathought | 25/05/10

    OMG i didnt knwo that was a tattoo on her leg i thought that was part of her underclothes sticking out…eww

  107. Estelle | 25/05/10

    This girl needs a stylist and a new hairstylist; the dress needs to be burned, and her hair looks like a crow’s nest.

  108. Alicia | 25/05/10

    She is a very attractive woman, but that dress is trashy. Personally, I don’t believe in letting everything show-leave something to the imagination.

  109. Manda | 25/05/10

    I would not believe her to be 5′3 and 115…she looks 105-108 to me!

  110. chaz | 25/05/10

    it’s impossible to give a guarentee on weight from a picture. if she’s muscular (legs/arms) then she will weigh more! I believe 115 lbs at her height!

  111. Matilda | 26/05/10

    Not liking her hair here… it’s too big! And not keen on the dress either.

  112. liz | 1/06/10

    I wish I had her face! the cutest dimples!!!