Katie Holmes Spotted In Manhattan

May 26th, 2010 by Rian | Filed under Katie Holmes, Polls.

Katie Holmes was spotted visiting an office building in Manhattan yesterday afternoon in order to check up on her designer clothing line that is allegedly in the works…

Katie Holmes
Photos via FamePictures

Would you be willing to purchase and/or wear clothing from Katie's designer line when it becomes available?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Katie Holmes

Katie Holmes

Katie Holmes

ADVERTISEMENT


Tags: , , , , , ,

57 Responses to “Katie Holmes Spotted In Manhattan”

  1. Emilee | 26/05/10

    She dresses weird because she has to now that she practices Scientology.

  2. kc | 26/05/10

    good body, bad outfit.

  3. shaden | 26/05/10

    haha,when i saw the sentence :check up on her designer clothing line that is allegedly in the works, i remembered all her outfit and i was like YUK!

  4. legs | 26/05/10

    shes turned into such a mom. she should hang out with posh spice again because it seemed she got really thin and chic at that time

  5. snoops | 26/05/10

    Hell no I would not by clothes “designed” by this tool.

    Cant stand her, she seems so self-obsessed, snobby and cold and her life is nothing short of a joke now since she married tom cruise. I dont even think shes that pretty, just average looking but tall, she always dresses boring and she has the vibe of a middle aged woman when really she is only in her 20’s or something? Freak. I hate.

  6. Sarah | 26/05/10

    Good body, the outfit is ok x

  7. vkat | 26/05/10

    I only voted “no way” because I’m sure it will be pricey. She looks cute here. I like that tunic top with the belt. Not digging the shape of her legs.

  8. morticia | 26/05/10

    she always looks a bit miserable…she should never wear leggings, her shape doesn’t allow it, and the fug brown boots with black….yucky…her face looks decent…

  9. MScotton | 26/05/10

    Oh God, poor thing!

  10. Pry | 26/05/10

    I like her face, her body is good and her outfit is nice.
    I don’t know what kind of clothes would she design, some designers wear simple clothes and design some great pieces….

  11. Teri | 26/05/10

    poor girl.

  12. syrah | 26/05/10

    i better not be seeing people referring to her legs as “unfortunate” here. looking good! she could use a smile, or maybe a hug? this woman is NO fashion plate however, just sayin’. . .

  13. RedBullGuzzler | 26/05/10

    Appalling legs!

  14. Alicia | 26/05/10

    I think most celeb clothing lines are comical, but VB and L.A.M.B both are amazing. I do not love Katie Holmes style, but maybe someone does…

  15. maxx05 | 26/05/10

    I hadn’t looked that closely until someone mentioned it, but what unfortunate legs.

  16. blicx | 26/05/10

    she used to be so stylish, what happened? She’s very pretty and extremely photogenic. she has the most perfect skin too, lucky.

  17. Mel | 26/05/10

    Terrible outfit!! She always looks sad, and never smiles :(

    I liked her back in her dawsons creek days. Her body looks really thick now.

  18. nnn | 26/05/10

    Huge tree trunk legs that are also very short for her height!!

    I wouldn’t wear any of her “designs” as she is never dressed stylishly…

  19. Jade | 26/05/10

    There’s no way I would wear her clothes, and yeah I’m sure the prices will be outrageous. She wears a lot of trendy outfits, but half of them make her look like a bum imo…Her legs look awful in the first pic, bad shot. Not so bad in the rest. They do look short considering how tall she is. At least the top defines her waist.

  20. Emily | 26/05/10

    I wouldn’t want to buy her clothes, or i don’t know but at least right now i’m not interested, if they costed the same as “regular” clothes do i wouldn’t say no if there was something cute, but i can’t picture myself being willing to pay designer prices for her line. I think her outfit is adorable, but the ankle boots would be better on someone with thinner legs. Not that her legs aren’t thin, but the shape of them is kinda heavy and they’re not really the best part of her body imo, and ankle boots, with leggings, call for killer legs imo.

  21. Sian | 26/05/10

    She has all the money in the world to buy designer clothes but she can’t put together an outfit to save her life. The proportions in this one combined with the cowboy boots are all wrong, imo.

  22. sama | 26/05/10

    she has a clothes line?…shes the last person that should be designing clothes

  23. Michelle | 26/05/10

    Dear Katie,
    I don’t think your out of your twenties yet so hire a hot stylist and dress like it!

  24. christina | 26/05/10

    her legs looks muscular, and relatively small. i think they look great, actually.

    but oh yeah her style is horrible, she always looks like she’s tryin too hard at what she’s wearing even though what she’s wearing always looks off. i feel bad for her for being married to tom cruise, with all that scientology bullshit, and the fact that he’s most likely gay or bisexual (with favor to men).

  25. BAK | 26/05/10

    Sorry, but this girl just doesn’t have good taste in fashion. If she is putting out a line, I would think she is having A LOT of help from some professionals, because she would be so clueless. Its been years and years since I have seen her wear anything halfway flattering or “fashionable”

  26. b | 26/05/10

    And if by “designer,” you meant dirty clothes hamper.

  27. toaddy | 26/05/10

    The only clothes line she should have should be in her backyard to hang wet ones!!!! And she has on the apron to go with the chore!!!

  28. Londoncalling | 26/05/10

    The dress by juicy couture rolled sleeved plaid dress, the boots are co-op barneys new york flat studded buckle ankle boots, and Chloe bag, no i wouldn’t buy anything from her fashion line, but why , now days, everybody is going into fashion?

  29. jess | 26/05/10

    I would not buy anything from her line, especially given her dull, plain taste. Most of the time she looks like she threw on the first thing she found on her closet floor.

  30. greenbird | 26/05/10

    leggings were def. a bad choice for her.

  31. yo | 26/05/10

    being a designer should require you to dress nicely. but otherwise it looks like she’s gained. she’s so boring now! i liked her back when she was with chris klein!!!

  32. balanced. | 26/05/10

    Wow, this woman garners a lot of strong opinions.

  33. Rebecca | 26/05/10

    i don’t know why she looks so terrible and thick-legged in all your posts…when i saw her in dawson’s creek, i always thought she was so skinny. did i never notice her body type, or did she just gain weight after getting involved with tom?

  34. Leonie | 26/05/10

    I feel sorry for Katie, her life would be heartbreaking at the moment.

  35. lolastarsandstripes | 26/05/10

    I think she dresses ok, but I only voted ‘no way’ because I too am sure it will be too expensive.
    She’s very cute looking and pretty though…no matter what her size.
    Shame about the Scientology bit though!

  36. kt | 26/05/10

    for someone with unlimited funds she has absolutely no fashion sense.

    she is luck that she is tall so that naturally slims her out a bit, but she chubby legs unfortunately & a flat chest.

  37. bohokitty | 26/05/10

    Why would I buy clothes designed by someone who hasn’t even figured her own style? She only has two looks “blah, my mom would wear that” and “hey, didn’t I see something similar on Jessica Alba last week?”( I’m not knocking Jessica’s style she knows what works for her) I liked her body better before Tom although she could just be getting older.

  38. blah.blah | 26/05/10

    Wow I just saw some picture of her at the National Movie Awards and she looked pretty skinny. Either way she’s very pretty and she should have worn something else though, she’s lost her style…

  39. ruby | 27/05/10

    nah :\
    so boring. she has no fashion sense she is just using her name. and she us not even cute.
    her daughter on the other hand is so pretty ^^

  40. justathought | 27/05/10

    her legs looks muscular, i think they look great, actually.THEY ARE NOT FAT!! She doesnt have the same body as she did in Dawsons creek becuase that was like 10 years ago, shes older now, she cant have the same body!

    yea the outfit is horrible but at least she has alittle color to her face for once and looks happier imo. Maybe shes not designing the clothes, shes just putting her name on the

  41. JeanGenie | 27/05/10

    Dito Greenbird, leggings were indeed a bad choice, bless her.

    Rebecca Dawsons Creek was on like over a decade ago, I think her body may well have changed and it is not just the pictures Rian posts.

  42. Simplyred | 27/05/10

    Lindsey Lohan has a designer line and most of the time she doesn’t look like she showers and the Olson twins have ones too and they dress like they’re 90 years old. Why not give Katie Holmes a line and see what she can do?

  43. connieculkins | 27/05/10

    She’s one of those actresses like Mischa B or Jennifer Love or Christina A who made it big as teens so they were skinny in part because they were teens. Now that that they are adults they have gotten a larger, more mature body, probably all normal, but maybe this isn’t acceptable in Hollywood and leads them all to look sort of miserable because they want so badly to be skinny again. I think Katie has opted for more mature clothes to go with the more mature body, but she still doesn’t feel beautiful. These women aren’t happy unless they look like Victoria’s secret models.

  44. mostlyfit | 27/05/10

    No to her fashion line. She doesn’t quite have a style or own anything she’s wearing regardless of how good she looks.

    She’s a beautiful woman with a great body. She never had great legs though, which even she’s admitted to over the years.

  45. Cindy18 | 27/05/10

    This woman has no mind of her own. She was fairly thin before Tom became too controlling and told her to gain weight so they could have another kid. No wonder she’s miserable all the time – she’s married to THAT!

  46. retrobanana | 27/05/10

    i think her outfit is actually cute but it is something every girl i see on the street wearingit looks straight out of delias…she has a nice glow though

  47. BOBBY | 27/05/10

    she is the worst dresser everrrrrrr how it’s possible to make designer things look this bad is beyond me.

  48. Jj | 27/05/10

    don’t wear leggings katie. she looked so cute in the outfits she was in 2 years ago. she needs to get back to that.

  49. Jouhna | 28/05/10

    For her body shape and height it is hard to fine clothing that fits right and looks good. She is over 5′9 and wears like a size 9/10 shoe and has thick legs, maybe designing her own line will give her something to wear that fits her body. I mean really she is physically fit and will never have the model body.

  50. justathought | 28/05/10

    The olsens twin dress horrible but yet they have really successful clothing lines! Plus Jessica Simpson doesnt always wear the best outfits and shes making a fortune designing shoes and bags! Maybe Katies line will be good too even though she cant dress herself

    connieculkins: How do you possibly know that? that sounds ridiculous to me!!!

  51. lucy | 28/05/10

    She need to lose some weight

  52. blahblahblah | 28/05/10

    OMGOSH, I just googled some pictures of Katie from back in her Dawson’s Creek days – I can’t believe it’s the same person! She looks so different now, very mumsy.

  53. Capricorn17 | 29/05/10

    About the clothing line, I think she should be given the benefit of the doubt, after all her and Victoria were best buds so they must have the same taste in something. About her, I think she’s just not a teenager anymore!!! That being said, I always thought she had a pear shaped body: smaller on top and larger legs. Maybe due to her daughter, job and husband’s scientology addiction she just hasnt had time to get to the gym?

  54. asemalla | 30/05/10

    Bet all the money they make with that clothing line will go to Scientology…so I deff won’t buy them!

  55. k girl | 30/05/10

    suri dresses like a grown up & katie like a teen…jeez

  56. mc | 31/05/10

    Remember when she used to smile?? (pre-evil Tom)

  57. mc | 31/05/10

    Michelle, she’s 30…