New Kirsten Dunst Bikini Photos

May 24th, 2010 by Rian | Filed under Celebs in Bikinis, Misc Celebs & Diet News.

Actress Kirsten Dunst was photographed in a bikini at the Eden Roc Hotel in Cap d’Antibes, France yesterday…

Kirsten Dunst
Photos via BauerGriffin

What do you all think – hot or not?

Kirsten Dunst

Kirsten Dunst

ADVERTISEMENT


Tags: , , ,

91 Responses to “New Kirsten Dunst Bikini Photos”

  1. MScotton | 24/05/10

    For some reason this girl always looks dumpy to me and not because she is fat, she isn’t.

  2. Londoncalling | 24/05/10

    Looking good, very pale!!

  3. Jemima | 24/05/10

    I’m sure she’ll get slated by lots on here for being pale and not super toned, but I think she looks like a really cute and attractive. Very feminine.

  4. Emily | 24/05/10

    From the front she looks a lot flatter and firm than i thought she would, i had this very skinny but kinda flabby Kirsten pictured in my head, but she actually looks kinda toned. (Not like she works out enormously but not skinny-fat either imo). Also, i’m pale too, and with that harsh sunlight, wow, she looks good, it’s not an easy thing to do :)

  5. Shayda | 24/05/10

    um…hot! were her boobs always that big?

  6. Rosie | 24/05/10

    She looks like she’s gained a bit of weight to me. She looks healthier than she has done in the past. Which is only a good thing in my book.

  7. Ariel | 24/05/10

    Super hot!! I like her and her skin is very beautifull!

  8. Cecilia | 24/05/10

    She looks normal and cute.

  9. sarz | 24/05/10

    healthy but not hot!

  10. Valeria | 24/05/10

    I really love her pale flawless skin (at least from the pics it always looks flawless!)
    of course she has gained a bit since her Marie Antoinette days but it was about 4 years ago and I guess it’s perfectly normal
    I’m not crazy for her untoned figure but she seems to be all right with it since she looks healthy and happy and that’s all that matters
    she’s very pretty

  11. Mel | 24/05/10

    She looks average. She could def be more toned, but she doesn’t look that bad.

  12. Jade | 24/05/10

    I love pale skin <3. I'm sure she slathered on the sun screen. She looks thin and not very toned, but looks fine to me. It looks attainable for someone who doesn't work out much.

  13. stella | 24/05/10

    pale skin rocks. she looks good. but ‘toned’ is my no. 1 “hate”-word since visiting this website. duh.

  14. Rachel | 24/05/10

    I like the way she looks in these photos. Her body looks more youthful because she’s not one of those scary-skinny, stringy muscle chicks!

  15. snoops | 24/05/10

    I remember her waist being smaller than this? She used to have a little waist – asides from that being gone, she looks fine. I like pale skin.

  16. Michellekins | 24/05/10

    She looks great and much healthier these days.

  17. Bird | 24/05/10

    Is she kristen dunst?
    Her face has changed a lot I guess
    But where is the gap between her teeth?

  18. Jj | 24/05/10

    she looks good. i don’t think all women have to be toned. it’s natural for women to be softer and more feminine the toned thing is a new concept if you look over time.

  19. nina | 24/05/10

    I would not want her body. She’s slim but she’s not toned at all. Her body is kind of blah. And that hair makes her look way older…

  20. retrobanana | 24/05/10

    i think she looks a lot better actually…..but what has she done lately i meannn without the spiderman movies i don’t think she would have any money…bring it on used to be my favorite movie from ages 14-18…..but i mean come on….do people hire her for anything…especiallly now that we have malin ackerman…..she does look better though i like the meat on her…

  21. isabiatch | 24/05/10

    Looks fine. Yeah, she’d probably get more positive feedback with better posture and a tan, but she looks healthy and slim here.

  22. lmd | 24/05/10

    Definitely a lot healthier than she used to be.

  23. Jen | 24/05/10

    I think her body looks great. She’s pale, yes, but it’s better than being orange!

  24. Jillian | 24/05/10

    I think she looks great.

  25. clo | 24/05/10

    yay for rocking the pale skin!
    she’s gained a bit but so what? she looks happy and has totally been rocking fierce outfits in cannes

  26. happyvegetarian | 24/05/10

    I don’t like her body at all….

  27. Amy | 24/05/10

    I would be pretty happy if I had her body, I think she looks good.

  28. RedBullGuzzler | 24/05/10

    So many celebrities are being spotted in France, ATM.
    Just saying!

  29. Shannon | 24/05/10

    I really have always like her. So glad she doesn’t go the spray-tan ‘orange’ route. Her skin color is quite beautiful, very creamy looking. Not everyone chooses to work out. I think she looks quite healthy, here.

  30. groove is in the heart | 24/05/10

    She looks good! Her skin is gorgeous.

  31. morwen | 24/05/10

    i actually think she looks lovely!

  32. Lisa S. | 24/05/10

    She doesn’t look that toned because she’s not tanned. Well known that getting a tan makes you look defined.

  33. Polly | 24/05/10

    Hot! Who knew she had such a great figure underneath her hobo outfits?!

  34. sami | 24/05/10

    saggy boobs

  35. hlw | 24/05/10

    Wow, tanned or not, her skin is always gorgeous. She is lucky to have a lot of natural assets; she doesn’t seem to have to try very hard to be slender or beautiful. I think that she is talented, liked her in Marie Antoinette and most everything else she’s done. Hopefully she is now free of whatever addiction she was dealing with and it would be great to see her in a film in the near future.

  36. Kianna | 24/05/10

    Kirsten looks cute (but I have seen her in better, more flattering outfits)…BOTH in bikinis and in clothes or “spiffed up” for a Red Carpet or Gala Event. She’s thin…but she doesn’t look as thin as she probably actually is…due to her sloppy’/’slouchy’ posture & the fact that she needs to work on toning herself. (In her tummy, waist area, butt & upper legs). Haven’t seen her for awhile…but she does a-p-p-e-a-r to LOOK happier, so that is a good thing. Wonder what she has been doing…as someone mentioned, her last substantial movie (Spiderman Series) was w-a-y back in 2008. Maybe she’ll get some more movie opportunities. Wasn’t she in a movie where she played a queen or something & wore all those very old type dresses which required corsets, etc???

  37. Julia | 24/05/10

    She looks good, but good posture would make her look so much better! Such a relatively easy change to make, too!

  38. rachel | 24/05/10

    I think she looks really good. She has a cute shape. And I applaud her for not streaking on that fake tan stuff and turn herself into an orange.

  39. Megan | 24/05/10

    I’ve been wondering about her. I think she looks good weight-wise and I’ve always thought she was pretty.

  40. venus | 24/05/10

    @ Redbullguzzler……it’s the Cannes film festival…a major film festival where all the celebs love to go and do some schmoozing!

    She looks nice and normal. Bet she looks much thinner in the flesh.

  41. Rebecca | 24/05/10

    Hot, hot,hot! Such beautiful skin.

  42. nnn | 24/05/10

    Looks good (for her). I love pale skin, but she might want to do a slight bronzer. She is beyond white!!!

  43. Tee | 24/05/10

    She looks pretty good, not much has changed. Which is a good thing! She is healthy.

  44. MNG | 24/05/10

    nice skin!
    I like bodies which are a little more toned, but everyone is different so I still think she looks good

  45. érica | 24/05/10

    she looks good here, great skin and the pale suits her!

  46. UK_Elle | 24/05/10

    Love her style, she looks great.

  47. Cinnamon | 24/05/10

    Neither hot or not…kinda just okay.

  48. nico___ | 24/05/10

    guessing by the “hot or not” question, i’m going to guess you think hideous?

  49. Angela | 24/05/10

    i’m as pale as her naturally, but i don’t think i’d be caught in a swimsuit without a tan. just doesn’t mix

  50. MentallySkinny | 24/05/10

    I had never seen pictures of her in a bikini and I’m surprised. She’s average and could be more toned, but I always tought she would look sickly thin. She actually has boobs and is cute!

  51. Berries | 24/05/10

    yay, she looks like how I’d look it a bikini. I think she’s looking good, and I love her pale skin. More girls need to rock it. She’s pretty.

  52. Sian | 24/05/10

    I think she has a very cute figure without (seemingly) needing to work for it. And since I’m super pale myself I appreciate celebs getting in a bikini without hitting the tanning booth first.

  53. Elenne | 24/05/10

    sort of like her anyway

  54. Lola | 24/05/10

    any guesses on her height/weight here?

  55. sarah | 24/05/10

    i love pale! lots of comments about her not being very toned but bear in mind pale skin does not showcase muscle tone – that’s why body builders tan as they do – dark skin shows contour. i’ll bet if she was tan you would see that she is more toned than she appears by these photos.

  56. KT | 24/05/10

    she’s always had a good figure, i vote hot!!

  57. Truth teller | 24/05/10

    What’s with all of the lying with you people. She looks pale and flabby. Stop the PC talk and get real. She needs a tan and lots of yoga.

  58. Leonie | 24/05/10

    I like Kirsten, she’s very unique looking. Not loving her body shape, but she looks good

  59. patty | 24/05/10

    she has put on weight over the years. She use to be really thin. She looks normal here

  60. Stephanie | 24/05/10

    Maybe 5′6″ 117-119 lbs?

  61. Mer | 24/05/10

    What lying Truth teller? She’s obviously pale nobody’s denying it. And she’s not flabby. I don’t understand why a person would “need” a tan. The color you were born with isn’t attractive or good enough?

  62. dascoop | 24/05/10

    she has a pretty body and real boobs…what a concept!
    Bikini shots are unforgiving, so I think we have to take into consideration angles and close ups.
    Overall, she looks great!

  63. Lana-bee | 24/05/10

    the girl is of german and swedish ancestry she is not supposed to be tan!!!!!!!!

  64. snoops | 24/05/10

    @ Truthteller, why does kirsten “need” a tan or to do yoga? To suit you?

    I doubt she cares what you think….

    And lots of people do NOT find a tan attractive anymore, this isnt the 80’s.

  65. Kiki | 24/05/10

    I think she rocks.

  66. Alicia | 24/05/10

    She looks fine and I think it is good she is sticking with her skin-tone.

  67. Sian | 24/05/10

    Being ‘flabby’ requires excess body fat or skin, Kirsten obviously doesn’t have that; she might not have a lot of visible muscle tone but that’s NOT the same as ‘flabby’.
    Sometimes I feel like I’ve entered the twilight zone when I read some the comments on here.

  68. Mickey von Dutch | 25/05/10

    I never was nor will I ever be a fan of this bland looking girl. Her rapid rise to fame back in the days suprised me, her swift way back to obscurity didn’t.

  69. justathought | 25/05/10

    She looks average, she could be more toned, but she doesn’t look that bad. I always tought she would look sickly thin. I liked her better in the spiderman movies and bring it on.
    @LOLA: shes 5″7 so im guessing 130 lbs. She was apparently 113 lbs back when she filmed bring it on

  70. Jonny | 25/05/10

    Kirsten got cleavage!!!!! Me likey!!!

  71. Melyanna | 25/05/10

    It’s refershing to see a celeb with a natural body.
    I don’t mind the imperfections, she looks much better than those with a plastic doll look.

  72. Maria | 25/05/10

    She looks natural. I love it.
    She has also gained some weight from a while back when she was super-skinny; she looks womanly and really nice now.
    I don’t even care if she’s toned and fit, she may not be firm, but come on, the female body is meant to have some softness.

    Oh. And..I don’t want to sound perv, but I like the cleavage. I’m turning green with envy (kind of ;) )

  73. hanan | 25/05/10

    great

  74. felicity79 | 25/05/10

    I love the pale skin, I wish I could embrace my paleness, but I submit to the tanning bed every year, I suck. Regarding her body, I think she looks fine, nothing wrong, but I just think she would look so much better if she lifted weights and added a little bit of muscle. She looks fine here, but if she had more muscle, she’d look great, but it’s all a matter of opinion I guess.

  75. Lily | 25/05/10

    I’m thinking a different color bathing suit would be more flattering on light skin.

  76. HB | 25/05/10

    Pretty skin, I hope she’s wearing sunscreen.
    I think she actually looks really slim and cute here.

  77. kdog | 25/05/10

    i saw her in soho last year & was pretty surprised to find her average weight wise/ body size – surprised in a good way.

  78. Livy | 25/05/10

    Does she work out? Because parts of her look fit and toned and parts of her look bloated. She looks good though, like “regular girl” body instead of “movie star” body.

  79. james | 25/05/10

    cute girl but you can tell she eats bad and have never seen a gym. still though, she looks good for not taking care of herself

  80. JamminJamillah | 25/05/10

    Her skin is awful. Yes, it’s the color she was born with; no, she shouldn’t have to change it. Nevertheless, we should be free to admit that some natural characteristics are generally less desirable than others — radioactive/incandescent white skin among them. Hey, we all have flaws, and just because they’re “natural” doesn’t mean they’re any less attractive.

  81. clo | 25/05/10

    I guess ultra pale skin is generally less desirable to you, don’t know about everyone else though.

  82. Maria | 25/05/10

    JamminJamillah:
    So, you’re saying it’s common sense that pale skin is not attractive? (or in your words: “awful”)
    I strongly disagree. I know many people who like tanned skin, even orange skin, mostly women putting themselves under pressure to fit questionable ideals. But I have a bunch of friends who prefer fair skin. And, as you may have heard, in some Asian countries women actually aim to look as pale as possible.
    I am “blessed” with very pale skin, and I absolutely DON’T think it’s unattractive. I don’t put any effort in making it appear darker. I actually like my complexion a lot.
    To each their own.. I don’t believe, “pale skin is awful” is objective reasoning.

  83. Lisa | 25/05/10

    I think she looks great and agree with those that say her pale skin looks lovely.
    When did orange become a skin color anyway?

  84. gina | 25/05/10

    not the hottest, but still though i love her, she’s cute. :)

    btw rian, great posts – diane kruger, salma hayek, kirsten dunst. thanks for those!

  85. BOBBY | 25/05/10

    always had a big rack, tiny waist – gained a bit of weight since her young days, but in a healthy normal way… still a rockin’ bod.

  86. jeanine | 25/05/10

    Kirsten dunst is soooooo HOT!!! loving the pale creamy skin! yeah Rian, thanks for an update on kirsten! :)

  87. Danni7 | 26/05/10

    She is looking great! I think she is very toned, no flab at all in areas where most of us have it.

  88. Matilda | 26/05/10

    She looks absolutely fine. She’s an actress, not a model.

  89. erin | 26/05/10

    totally not hot… i can’t put y finger on what it is, but it ISN’T the pale skin, she is definitely not fat… she’s just a frump…. like she sort of hasn’t got much self pride in her appearance or something…. i dunno exactly

  90. Ru | 26/05/10

    The girl BEHIND her looks hot. Does that count?

  91. mmajim | 5/06/10

    Very hot , love the milky white skin. I would hit that so hard!!!