New Katie Holmes On Set Candids
October 20th, 2010 by Rian | Filed under Healthy Celebrity, Katie Holmes.Katie Holmes was spotted on the set of her latest film Jack and Jill, which filmed in Los Angeles yesterday afternoon…
Photos via FamePictures
She’s looking good!
What do you all think?
Tags: brunette, healthy size, Katie Holmes, on set, slim, thin
he lower legs/calves looks weird to me, maybe it’s because she isn’t wearing high heels? She does look good though.
I agree. Something odd about her lower legs. Otherwise, she looks good, even if I’m not a fan.
i think she looks great.
Nice body, nice dress, fugly shoes.
she’s def a pear shape.
god what happened she used to be soooooo adorable and thin.
Her calves are huge!
awful legs – she’s lucky she has such a beautiful face.
Lower and upper part seem two different women. Strange. She’s a beauty though
wow – those calves – I’m in shock. I knew she had big calves, but they look really thick here. And I don’t see noticeable muscle definition in them – I think they’re just big. Poor girl. I think she does need the heels. And why is her belly button poking through her dress? Is she supposed to be pregnant in the movie? She sure looks like she’s got a little belly here.
Her calves look HUGE!! I think if we saw the top parts of her legs they’d look just as big. You can kind of tell around the knee area. I think her arms look toned but bigger than usual, too. She used to be so skinny.
She does look really thin, she is just a def pear shape. She’s 5′9″ Id say she’s prob 150? 145?
She’s not a stick, but whatever, the girl is GORGEOUS!
massive calves!!!
BB, I think you react a bit exaggerated!
she´s not the thin sweet and young katy holmes that she used to be anymore but she´s still an attractive lady.
her body.. well, it looks a bit weird because her upper body is so small and in contrast to that are her legs almost huge. =/ but that´s simply how she is built and she can´t change it even if she would lose weight.
The only thing thin on her, is her torso. The arms and thighs/legs are huge. Not a good look. Maybe she is letting herself go?
Bottom-heavy. End of story.
she must do a lot of calf lifts at the gym….wholy crap. but all in all, I think she is beautfil, and I’m glad to see her looking youthful again with long hair and all. Plus, she has killer buff arms. I like.
She always looks good from the knees up. She has the most unfortunate legs – but she is still gorgeous!!
PS – Isn’t it time for another adorable tot!!
I am definitely not seeing what the posters above me are seeing. I don’t see a “bottom heavy woman with huge calves” at ALL. I see a slim, healthy woman. Look at the muscle tone on her upper arms!
I think the second picture gives the illusion that her legs are bigger than they are because her left leg is closest to the camera. The other pictures are more realistic. I think she looks fantastic! I’d much rather see a woman with some defined muscles as a result of working out, than a skinny woman with no tone, who simply starves herself.
does she have an outie? and is it poking through her dress?
she looks much more youthful than in previous pics.
She has AMAZING arms. I want them, please. As for the belly button…preggers? Or did she possibly eat right before this was taken? Either way, she looks cute. Cut her some slack, she’s had a kid and looks great. The calves will never be small. That’s how she built and nothing can make them go down. Props to her.
Agreed! Her arms look amazing! She clearly has been working at it! Maybe it’s all the Suri lifting
She’ll always be Joey to me.
The top half of her looks great, but she needs to firm up on the bottom.
Just like Kelly Osbourne, she would have to be completely emaciated on top to have smaller legs. She is a pear and she can’t do anything to change that.
I didn’t even pay attention to her calves until I read the comments. The only thing I thought was how amazing she looks, especially for having a child and being in her 30’s. A little over critical, ladies? Geez. =/
Weird how Katie looks great to so many people while Mischa gets smashed for having ” fat” or “weirdly shaped” legs… Unfair??
Cankles
Mel i agree, from the top she always looks good. She alawys gains weight and is heavier in her legs
When I saw the first picture, I thought, “Damn, she’s skinny!” but then as I scrolled down and saw her legs, I was a little confused. It’s not like it’s her lower body. Her hips are slim. But those calves…
She has such an attractive face, in my opinion. Looks like she’s keeping slim and working out–nice arms!
She won’t be able to lose the weight on her legs/calves unless she starves herself. It’s the last place to lose fat on her body or on pear shapes. There’s also no such thing has target weight-loss.
Is she pregnant again? Her belly button is sticking out? She seems to have gained some weight fast.
Definitely don’t like her legs. I’m sure they’re naturally like that, why would she try to bulk them up even more. She’s pretty though. And since people always bring up Jolie on Aniston posts, and vice versa, Nicole has nicer body. And she’s like 10 years older. ^_^
I think she’s pretty, too. The dress color looks great on her.
I don’t think her calves are that huge… you’re all overreacting. Her face is so beautiful, I’d kill for that. I’ll go as far and say face-wise she’s more beautiful than some of the VS models. Her arms look great too.
Nicole may have better legs than Katie, but legs are not everything. Comparing the two I think Katie’s way ahead.
Terrible legs.
as everyone else pointed out, her legs look odd. Her upper body looks incredibly fit. There is a disease out there where your legs swell.. Early symptoms?
I agree with AnnieC, in that picture the camera is CLEARLY only a few inches off the ground and her leg is at a bad angle even then. Onnn the other hand, it’s great seeing someone whose legs resemble mine!
Her legs have always been heavier in relation to her torso, but so what? She still appears pretty slender overall and her face is beautiful – at least when she’s not scowling like she does in these pics.
She looks great in the last photo, that cropping definitely works for her
She’s in good shape for her body-type. Not only is she in flats, but particularly unflattering ones. Obviously taking a break from heels between takes. Love that colour on her, helps contribute to her looking more vibrant in general. Her face and hair are looking really good here!
She’s very cute and love the dress. So what if she doesn’t look like a model? She obviously takes care of herself and works hard to be the best physical version of herself taht she can be. I’d rather see muscular calves than stick legs any day.
She’s always been a pear. Now she’s older and has had a child, so it’s more noticable. I think she looks pretty, and somewhat resembles Britney…
Wow my mouth dropped open when I saw her legs. She does seem bottom heavy but she does look great still. I think she does gain weight on her lower half first though.
unfortunate cankles
she has cankles…that’s disgusting!
I don’t think you know what cankles are. Her ankles clearly taper in very noticeably.
Too fat in the legs!!!
It’s not a belly button ladies – she’s wearing panty hose and I believe that’s part of the top of the seam. (I was wearing them today and had the same problem.
If you look at photo 3, her arm looks in proportion to her legs. She used to be so skinny? Maybe all those supposed detoxes she was doing have messed with her system.
Or perhaps it’s just a bad camera angle, her waist looks tiny!
She looks good here, more ‘normal’ imo instead of her usual robot self. I did not know her legs were so thick though, never have looked so big before, strange. I do love her though, a fan from the Dawson’s Creek days. Too bad she married that freakshow, but she still is so pretty. Love the slippers too, UGG, I have the same pair in pink!
Her calves have nothing to do with muscle or fat. Cankles & “fat knees” are due to long muscle bellies and low tendon insertion. There is nothing in the world that can change it. Seems stupid to pick apart someone for their genetics.
Her arms are looking fantastic, I didn’t realize she worked out.
Her hair and face look so beautiful again. I’m so glad she grew out that short hair and started wearing makeup again. Her legs are much bigger compared to the rest of her body, but it’s just the way she was born. She looks great anyway.
Nice bellybutton? What is that?
Anyway, I don’t see what the prob is with her legs either. They looked toned and most legs do not look skinny not in high heels. They aren’t supposed to.
I think she looks great- she may have a bone structure that makes her ankle/calf area larger than others, but honestly she is beautiful!
worst body….just looks at those calves!
What happened to her? Tom Cruise happened to her. She looks old to me. She used to be so cute. Her figure is okay. I’m wouldn’t want the pear-shaped figure.
Love love love the longer hair!! Soo cute!!
what a frump, i’d practically fall over if i saw her looking sexy/hot ever again…also, girl needs to stop with the brow furrowing!!! she is going to age horribly!!! already has!!
Fashion is not my strong suit, but I would suggest knee high boots here to distract from that leg situation. I believe that everyone has a body part that’s needs flattering (I even have several), and her’s are her calves. Trinny and Susannah would never call that ‘disgusting’ like someone here did. It’s a simple thing called ‘female solidarity’, girlfriend.
Beautiful. As for those legs: with dark pantyhose on and/or heels they will look fine. I look the same bodywise and trust me, there is nothing you can do about it. Those legs are a fact and thank god they are at least longgg…
I have legs like her’s. It’s probably genetic, not much can be done about it. Sometimes it seems as if my thighs are thinner than my calves
…..so I empathise
(huge trouble finding boots)
I see a thin beautiful woman. The legs are a tad heavy in comparison to her upper body, so what, hardly any of us are completely proportional. And she doesn’t look as pear shaped as she could since she has those great muscular arms that balance her upper body. I don’t think Katie is the most beautiful thing on earth, nor that great an actress, but i do think she looks pretty fine here.
Acutally i don’t even know if she is a pear, her hips and shoulders are not that far apart in width, maybe she’s more like a skittle.
Think that Katie looks great here. She IS NOT a V.S. model/never will be. And, she is not on the Victoria Beckham diet any more, too (as she was when she 1st married Tom) & after baby Suri (now 4 years old) was born. She hung w/Victoria for awhile & lost lots of lbs at that time. She looks thin (NOT A STICK, tho!) but still healthy here/she seems so happy/confident in these pics (she often does look better when she’s NOT w/Tom)! Except for having Suri…bet Katie regrets marrying Tom Cruise & all his Scientology family/friends! He (Tom) always has someone (“minder”) looking over Katie’s shoulder most of the time! I love that she has allowed her hair to grow out..she is much youthful looking that way/being married to Tom has aged her so much…she needs all the help she can to remain more vibrant/youthful! Yeah, I, too, have to wonder about all those (Scientology)”Purification” detoxes that she does & if they have messed up her weight/metabolism? She has always carried any weight or extra weight in her lower body (hips/thighs/legs). Agree that she’d be emaciated looking if she lost weight in her lower half. Also, I think that the camera angles & the fact that she’s wearing flats (not heels) make her look bigger (in the pics) than she actually is.
According to Katie Holmes, she runs 6 miles a day. She does marathons & those are runner’s legs. She looks great!
if she wasnt making faces i would think she looked lovely. she always reminded me of this girl i went to highschool with that was the queen bee (but she was nice to everyone not a bitch). i like katie. i dont love her acting chops…i dont love her singing chops….but she is a good mom…and seems like a sweet person. she has a nice complexion and a nice body in my opinion.
I think she looks gorgeous and definitely lost some weight! Her legs are beautiful… I think her calves are just genetic. Nothing she can really do to get them slimmer other than to wear some heels to make her legs look longer!
Actually, she looks great! It’s just that her calves are big but then again, not all women can get away with wearing flats. She just needs to work on her calves. I still prefer Katie now than years ago when she was so skinny!
This is exactly what my body is like, I exercise 3-4 times a week and eating sensibily, but my calves/legs won’t slim down at all. It is like my top half is a completely different body to my bottom half. Its nice to see someone the same – Hurray for Katie!!
Just to put things in perspective here. If you look around you, you will see that 85% of women who are in their birthing years (i.e.estrogen) have “larger”/softer lower bodies than upper. It is the typical female form and calling it ugly makes no sense at all.
she has always had chunky lower legs
so she looks better in jeans and no wonder why she wears them all the time
i thought i had it bad with my tiny skinny calves but this is worse by far
she is m skinny as a stick on top, and her thighs r one HUGE contrast to her upper body!! but tis cool!!1noone is perfect n sadly fr others the not perfect part shows in their personalities fr her its her lower body parts
I think she looks great too! She’s not a pear because her shoulders and hips/butt are proportional but she does have heavy legs.
sooo average
@Emily: hahaha “skittle”
Those aren’t runner legs. I’m a runner, her legs are fat.
She looks nice and thin. Her legs are naturally thick, but it´s not a problem.
Legs do not fit the rest of her body… I think if she toned them up a little, do some calve exercises, it would make a big difference. I wish she wouldn’t make such weird faces…
She’s very pretty, and I like the dress. Her face, as she loses the plump young-girl cheeks, is starting to remind me of Maria Shriver.
sexy cheekbones
is her belly button pierced or does she have an outtie?
her calves are huge, but we can’t pick to have perfect bodies. I like katie.
She has the body of a ballet (or any other type)dancer. Thin upper body, muscular thighs and calves. I used to have the same shape and hated it – I felt like I had these enormous bulky legs but small chest and thin arms…unfortunately I developed anorexia and then bulimia, but my leg muscles wasted away.
If she’s happy and feels good, then she is just fine. It is petty to shame her for taking good care of herself.
yes, very bottom heavy…