Kim Kardashian Weighs 109 Pounds?
December 5th, 2009 by Rian | Filed under Celebrity Weight Loss, Kim Kardashian.I wasn’t going to post about this, but I’ve had several requests… so here is the photo that everyone is talking about:
Kim is claiming that due to a dedicated diet and exercise plan – as well as taking Quick Trim diet pills – she now weighs 109 pounds (49 kg, 7 stone 11). At 5′2, this would make her BMI 19.9, which is well within the healthy range.
There’s no denying that she is looking pretty good these days – slim, toned and fit.
What do you all think?
Tags: bikini, brunette, fit, Kim Kardashian, slim, toned, weight loss
No way!
She looks really good.. Never been a fan of hers though.
I would have guessed ~120, but since she doesn’t seem to have a brain I guess 109 is correct.
118/119 minimum. What a fool. WHAT a fool!
Y’know what’s scary though? She’s 30! And doing things like that! Taking pictures of herself to post on twitter, claiming to use what are probably dangerous/completely useless diet pills.
Trollop.
what the fuck? they are sick!
NEVER EVER
Lots of photoshopping going on.
sick girls!
There is no way she only weighs 109 lbs….
Sorry, but I call bullshit. She looks good, fit and healthy sure, but not THAT thin. Add in the whole muscle weighs more than fat thing and I really don’t buy it. I’m with the person who would have guessed 120, MAYBE 115 at the very least.
Stop trying to fool us, Kim. We can see you!
she looks bigger than that to me, at least 115 lbs, but then I guess it’s hard to tell from a picture. Khloe looks strange in that picture, her head looks sooooooooo BIG!!! Maybe it’s the angle or the weight change, but it’s not a good look.
Kimbo will have gained all the weight back in a couple of months, as she’s fighting against her natural figure, and she’s using diet pills! Not a good combination!
Yeah she would look a lot thinner if she was 109.
Come on do we really believe her? She has lied about both her size and weight before! I usedto love this girl but lately she has disgusted me with her pushing diet pills to unsuspecting teenagers and young women.
no way is she 109. i’m 5′2″ and when i weighed 110, i looked scrawny and thin. she has a lot of muscle, plus fat because of her larger breasts and butt. i would say 120 because of those factors. she’s not fat by any means and looks wonderful- i just really doubt she’s 109.
she is ugly! why she do this?
i believe it. maybe two or three pounds more than that. she’s probably shorter than she says by an inch or so as well. she can’t weigh too much more. though she has a butt and a chest she also has a tiny waist now and her hips are much narrower now
she looks great
if she were 109 she’s look totally different. Also, poor Khloe, she’s trying so hard to work the angles and sucking it in in that picture! She’s not fat but I understand she must feel really insecure.
aahhhwwww, my eyes!!!!!
pain pain pain
She does not weigh that, the photos are retouched. She is small, but she’s probably 115-125. No way 109.
Err… the photos are distorted.
Neverever, there is not way that she weights less than I do and I’m 116 on a good day. I don’t even get why it’s so important to her to weight 109 pounds. For a woman – not a teenage girl – it is absolutely healthy and normal to weight say around 120 pounds (of course that depends on height, overall figure etc. but you know what I mean …).
I thought the times were everybody desperately wanted to look like a bobble head were over.
oh my gosh.
Excuse me while I laugh my azz off *LMAO*!!!!
If she’s 109, I’m 50lbs. Shoot, we need to go to a hospital, stat. Mental hospital for this one.
At least she’s making money off her delusional lies though!
Pfff, get a life! Other than that, I agree with Chaz.
since she has such a large booty and full bust, 109 seems a little ridiculous. with all the working out and muscle building, i think she’s closer to 115-120. why does she feel the need to lie?
PHOTOSHOP
I absolutely believe her. i am 5′3″ and have a very similar body shape. I’m 116 lb now and look heavier than she does (I also have a larger bone structure). When I was 110 lb I looked very similar. She has big boobs (the padding adds to this) and big hips/butt so it makes you look heavier. But, like i did, the butt and boobs shrink only a little, but your arms, back, stomach, legs and face get skinny. plus, remember the camera adds weight. 5′2 is very petite.
Yes, I’m thinking these pics were photoshopped especially Khloe. I bet it’s hard for Khloe to get a decent angle when it comes to her face.
this pic*
she is really short so maaaaaybe. its disgusting how shes pushing the diet pills though – so unhealthy. she should way herself on live tv
This girl is 5′2”! I’m 5 feet and i weigh 102 and I’m not the fittest, but she looks like me. Some of us just have pudgy thigh parts and some of us have belly flaps and they’ll never go away unless you want to be hospitalization thin. I believe she’s 109. Maybe a few more. But if she was 120 or 125 at her height she would look like fat cow in that bikini and she looks hot. Some many people here are delusional!!!
My BMI’s lower.
no way in hell that she is 109.
why lie? and thats a bad lie too.
Oh come on…her booty alone must clock in at 85 lbs. She’s a beautiful girl though. Just saying the 109 is a lie.
what’s wrong with you people?? she could easily be 109 ! a bmi on 19.9 is NOT THAT LOW, and she looks really fit, toned and skinny so she could be even less. when my bmi was 19.9 i didn’t look even nearly half as good as kim does in this pic.
i may not like her as a celebrity but i have to say i’m glad she hasn’t taken the dieting too far. (though taking diet pills is really bad..) i actually find this picture inspiring, because it gives me hopes that even if my bmi ever got that “high” i might still look good.
so stop with the negative comments! you can’t know kims weight, but whatever it is right now, she looks good!
i wish it wasn’t true because she is supposed to be a role model and all, and the diet pills probably aren’t healthy either, but i think it’s true. i weighed 109lbs once, and yeah i’m not big breasted and it was less than a year ago therefor i was 15, not 30, and all, BUT: i was almost 5′6 and i did not look bobblehead skinny or anything. therefore a smaller, more toned, bigger breasted person could really weigh the same, and look relatively normal.
i believe her. i’m 5′3 and 109 lbs and i look exactly like her
So photoshopped! These girls remind me of the ones who wear a mini-skirt downtown when it’s minus five outside… they crave attention, ANY kind of attention whether it’s good or bad. I wish women would have more respect for themselves and I wish they were more confident in themselves. Nothing like telling your fans to pop some pills to lose weight. If this woman really cared about her fans more than her fortune she’d be a good role model. Ug I hate women like this!!
I agree! How ridiculous of her to claim that. If all that mattered were health and fitness and curves of whatever bs she blabs all the time, she wouldn’t talk that much about her weight. I agree, that cannot be her weight, and that picture IS retouched.
But also, what I find most alarming is what @UK_Elle says. So true!
my bmi is 20 and i look a lot bigger than she does, but i have a much smaller butt and bust.
so i think that sounds about right, i mean she’s really short so 109 isn’t THAT small.
I don’t believe her for a moment, she has to weigh at least 115.
She looks fit and trim but not thin.
I believe her, don’t forget she’s not very tall. In fact, I absolutely believe her, without looking at any photos. I agreee that 109 is really not that low a weight, especially for a 5′2″ petite woman.
SHE IS ONLY 5′2. 109 lbs is a healthy average weight for someone who is only 5′2. If you follow the standard 5 feet 5 lb rule, (this is, if you are 5 feet tall you should weigh 100 lbs., every additional inch over this you add 5 more lbs.)her ideal weight is about 110. I’m 5′9, I weigh 140 lbs. I am thinner than her (at 5′9 your “ideal” weight is 145). because of my height, even though I’m 31 lbs heavier.
who cares? she has no talent and nothing to offer anyone. she’s completely self-obsessed and pathetic.
I wear size 0/xs. At 5 feet tall I weigh 104. There is no way she weighs 109. Her boobs and butt alone would add 10 extra pounds!
I don’t get what’s so unbelievable? 109lbs seems pretty average to me.
Im 112 pounds in 5´2 and I look so much skinny than her.And I dont have breast and butt implants or a fat ass like hers
E
Those who are 5′2 know that Kim
could very well be telling the truth here because we can compare easier. I definetly believe her I’m 5′2 95lbs and we almost look alike! Except she has a huge ass and boobs ! Lucky girl. I don’t like Kim nor
ally but I don’t think shed lie about this.. Although, I do
think the photo may have been altered
As stated already she looks about 115-120, Anyway the camera angle is flattering; shot fom above and they are both sucking in and pushing tits(fake?)out.
I believe that her weight is 109 lbs maybe 110-111. I am 5′2 also and my weight now is 98 lbs and when I was 109 I looked smilar but I had no big boobs.
Next time I need a new scale I’m buying it in Hollywood. I bet I’m 84 pounds
109? probably only after an extreme colon detox that rids her of all her insides.
Okay, the more I look at this pic the more I think it’s Photoshopped. The lighting is inconsistent between the girls and their upper-lower bodies. Plus Kim looks like she was pasted from a picture of her taken 40 feet away…But yeah, if you’re 30 years old and so obsessed with being a pretty little princess who’s constantly dieting WHILE stating she loves her 40 inch ass that mysteriously fits into size 2 jeans she probably does need some psychological help.
Wow! I’m not a fan of hers, but I can’t deny she looks fabulous!
She doesn’t look 109lbs. To me, she looks about 115/120 (considering her height), then again everyone carries weight differently. I’m 5′3.5″, 128lbs and look a bit slimmer than Kim.
She’s got an awesome body either way. I’m just not sure about the “109lbs” business.
No way no how does Kimbo weigh 109 pounds put on the boots cause the bull#@%$#%$ is getting pretty deep.
Sounds believable to me. 109 lbs at 5′2 is pretty average, not skinny. If she was 5′6 or even 5′4 claiming to be 109, that’s when the BS bell starts ringing
Lol Anderbobo, love it!
I think she could be around there. I’m 5′2″ and 135lbs and I’d say she looks similar to me but as Anderbobo said…and she probably has less muscle.
maybe the diet pills dehydratred her so much when she stepped on the scale it was 109? She could weigh something aroudn there though, She has a lovely body, it reminds me of mine though I’m 5′5 and a half (it counts when you are short lol) and 122 pounds. I’m thinking she’s really 115!
Jen, who cares?
@ asha lmfao yur great. Umm kim is not 109. I look like that and I weigh 114. Sooo she lies but what else is new? And the pic has got to be photoshop khloes thigh looks smaller than kims. Seriously come on.
I’m sorry I am so done with the Kardashians being all proud of their curves and being healthy then using a diet pill to lose the weight that they are supposedly proud of. It’s just getting irritating.
I think she’s a dick but I completely believe her. Reading through everyone’s comments shows how differently people can carry weight. I’m 5′4″ and about 115lb. She’s both shorter and thinner than me so it’s totally possible she could be 109.
wow, some of these comments, haha. what’s with all the hate?!
I believe it.. I’m 5′2 and she looks better than me at 109 lbs. it could easily be true. she looks great too!
I completely think she’s telling the truth. I realize she has big boobs but she DEFINITELY looks like she’s lost weight & overall looks thinner. Plus, like others have said, 109 pounds for someone who is only 5′2 is a healthy weight (not really skinny). I think she looks slim but normal here.
That is a very healthy bmi, why wouldn’t it be true, she isn’t thin or fat. Tori Spelling said she was 107 but she is 5′7″ so she looks a lot thinner than someone Kim’s height.
Her butt weighs 109!
When are people going to realize that just because *you* are the same height and look one way at a certain weight, does NOT mean every other person on the planet who is the same height looks the same way at the same weight. People can be be the same height and weight and look radically different. They can be the same height and very different weights and look similar.
Seriously…pick up an issue of Oxygen. Look in the back at the “real people” section with the readers’ heights and weights. You will see that two women with similar stats and look completely different. People reallllllly need to stop using themselves as a measuring stick for the be all and end all of people’s weights. If Kim says she is 109, I believe her. If she lied, who cares? Weight is a useless measurement, as is BMI. The only thing that matters is body fat percentage.
I really don’t like her but I could easily see 109, she looks a lot thinner, and remember her height- she’s on the short side. I think we just don’t want to believe she’s at a low weight, because if you’re like me, you actually kind of like hating on her for her weight lol
But I really really hate the fact that she’s using diet pills and therefore encouraging it. That crap is dangerous and it shows that she has no willpower to do it on her own
My sister is 5′3″ and weighs 114 pounds and she is much thinner. What celebrity doesn’t lie about their weight? I’m guessing she weighs about 120. She wishes she weighed 109.
ohhhhhhhhh who knows what to believe anymore. when people lie about their weight it just creates this endless delusional cycle … yawn yawn yawn.
if she hasn’t been photoshopped then she looks great! shame she’s promoting diet pills though. thats just low.
why? mom weighed 48 kgs and was almost kim’s height whatis the problem?
How old is this photo? weren’t we just seeing posts about how Khloe has gained weight?
I don’t think it matters what she weighs. I wonder why it is so important to her to let everyone know.
I predict there are ups and downs to yet to come. It seems kind of self-defeating to make this much of an issue about the number.
jkat I COMPLETELY agree with you. I get so irritated when people post their stats. I think people do that more to “show off” even though we can’t see their bodies anyways…
o my god DITTO on what Anderbobo said!!!!!!!
hahahha, totally!!
a. muscle does not weight more than fat. a pound is a pound. a pound of brick= a pound of feathers. a pound of muscle however takes up less SPACE than fat. so muscular people can look thinner while weighing the same as a person with greater body fat percentage. b. all of you are forgetting that celebrities tend to look SIGNIFICANTLY heavier in photographs (when they’re not airbrushed of course. C. she is a petite woman… if she was 5′6″ then yes. 109 would be bull shit. and finally D. all of you are just mad that you don’t look like her and are probably FAR FAR away from 109 or the equivalent for your height.
ps. if she isn’t.. who really cares.. her problem if she’s lying about her weight.
hahah oh my god..that is such a lie.
1. that pic is SO photoshopped…she’s not even that thin!
2. even if she was…that pic looks around 115 pounds at 5′2
+ her boobs and butt weigh around 10 pounds
ANDDD if shes been working out so much…she must’ve gained a lot of muscle weight
so 130 MINUMUM.
what a family of pathetic attention seeking nobodies. imagine yourself posting a bikini shot to your twitter. these two are the twit’s.
I could give a rats A%* how much Kim weighs let alone how she got to that weight using unnatural methods. c’mon, diet pills? Meanwhile, stuff some donuts in your face.
Khloe is becoming the most annoying of all of them. They are all obsessed with dieting, their fame and being in the tabloids. Thats because there’s only straw in their brains and they have absolutely nothing worthwhile to contribute to society.
I weigh 109 and I am 5′3..I wish I looked at toned as Kim..I still have love handles and upper inner thigh fat..If I was on this website I would be torn apart. I believe her weight..but I don’t think celebrities should put that out there because it gives the wrong impression. I am an example with a low weight but not a celebrity body by any means.
WHAT A LOAD OF CRAP!!!!!!!!!! 49KG??!! We use kg, not pounds here in Australia as a primary measurement and I am telling you now, she is NOT 49KG!! Jesus, my sister is TINY and doesn’t weigh that much!! When are her disgusting, self absorbed lies GOING TO STOP??!! It’s SO, SO, SO disturbing that one day she’s twice as big as this photo shopped picture and claiming she fits into size 2 jeans, NOW she’s airbrushed to practically a size NOTHING and claims she’s 49KG??!! Hahahahahahaha…. you have made my Sunday, you really have. You deluded, horrible, attention grubbing (expletive)….
ANYONE ELSE WANT TO SEE THIS PHOTO FROM THE BACK??? Now THAT is the real test.
Dascoop…. Couldn’t agree more. Disturbing, isn’t it??!! Sick and twisted.
Hey you all, please remember the rules when replying to this post, especially the parts that say “no excessively cruel or mean comments allowed, and no comments allowed that attack a celebrity’s character or family”. I’ve had to delete several comments on this thread already!
haha wow Jen, good for you? who gives a ****? I think Kim looks great and you’re all jealous and should stop hating!!!
No body will agree with me, but in a way this is bad. For Kim to be promoting weight loss products and flaunting her weight around for young girls to see is asking for trouble. Young girls look up to girls like her, and that triggers ED in them. Kim should just keep her mouth shut about her weight, and what she used to get to her “ideal” weight.
Seriously?
Last time I lied about my weight I was….twelve?
Any of you who are saying you don’t believe it are so stupid. 109 pounds at 5′2 isn’t even skinny. She looks 109. I would die if I ever weighed that much and I am 5′3.
I compeletly believe her. I am 5′2″ and she looks very lean for a curvy short girl like myself. 108lbs is my goal weight and I would love to look like her when I get there.
She looks good but I don’t think she weighs 109, I’d say 120.
this photo looks photoshopped (not by rian but by whoever took the pic and/or published it)…and more impressed with khloe actually.
The rule about 5′ is 100lbs + 5lbs per inch – I always thought it was 3lbs – I am 5′7″ and at 135lbs I was a British size 14 (US size 16-18) and fat.
As a US size 0-2 I weigh about 100lbs.
Weight looks different on different people – dependent on muscle etc – but most of the skinnies on this site are (I would guess) nearer 100lbs – with BMIs which are borderline anorexic.
And what does this woman do? Like so many celebs – she is famous for being famous – no wonder she has to publicize her diet.
I totally believe she weighs 109. What’s killing me is that so many ppl here in the comments are yelling ‘liar liar, she weighs at least 115′! Um….that’s only 6 lbs more. You can believe that she weighs 115 but 109 is completely out of the question? lmao. She is tiny! I think she’s telling the truth.
It is gross that she’s 30 and still doing this ‘attention whore, posing in bikinis’ thing though. Damn, woman….time to grow up a little bit! You’re not a teenager anymore.
idk why i just realized this…if she is 109, i only have 3 more pounds on her and 3 whole inches, but i am still thinner. how is that possible?? that doesn’t even make sense. i don’t even have big boobs or a big butt. i actually none of either. wow.
So i LOVE these girls but i really doubt that Kim weighs 109, i mean really, but either way they are beautiful and have really good body’s…i dont see why ppl hate them so much but oh well…GO KARDASHIAN DOLL”S!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Before saying she can’t possibly be 109 and she “looks 120″ you should stop referring to the standard 5′6” height! She does look about 110 given that she is barely 5′2”.
Both Kim and Khloe are very beautiful and blessed with a wonderful hourglass shape (which is the way a woman “should” look like, not celery stick thin!!!).
jkay- you nailed it. I am so tired of people screaming “no way she weighs that!”, when the truth is we are not all made up the same. Someone of my same height/weight could look either bigger or smaller depending on bone structure and muscle mass.
Anyway…they both look good here. If I were Kim, I’d want to lean out a bit more but hey, that’s just me. At her height and weight she is considered a “normal, healthy weight”. Good for her.
@Lisa haha so true! One of Kim’s “I like to get whizzed on” ass-cheeks might way 109 lbs., and everyone that says Photoshopped pic, well yah it’s darn obvious. Even Khloe looks less like a primate and almost human. Gosh these “ladies” are horrible role models. I mean, diet pills?! WTF any pill to help you lose weight is GARBAGE and DANGEROUS! Sorry for the ALL CAPS but SERIOUSLY!
You know what, I saw her at a restaurant about a year ago (when she was bigger than she is now), and she was TINY in person even then. You see all these pics of her and she looks so curvy, but I didn’t even notice curves, I just saw a pretty petite slim girl…the camera definitely adds poundage.
i’m 5′2 and weigh 107 lbs!!
i look super smaller than her!
plus i’m flat chested. with those boobs, butt and thighs,
there’s no way she is 109
why doesn’t she just step on a scale in front of a camera? That would shut everyone up. Until she does that we’ll all think she’s just saying it, not that that’s even important but clearly it matters to her for people to think she’s tiny….LOL
@UK_Elle AGREE 100%
I’m 5′2, am 116 and look way thinner than she does. I don’t have the boobs or huge ass either, so she is definitely not 109. I would say 120?
i look exactly like her – and i am 5′2 as well . i weigh 119lbs… depending on if she actually has muscle mass or fat …
Hey, I think Khloe looks good here. I say Kim weighs 113 or so. Looks good.
I say she does weight 109. I’m 5′2″, about 115 or 120, and I still have that chubby look. She doesn’t.
My guess is 115 maybe even 120.
Something must be wrong with her scale.
Not even 120. Her body shape is exactly like mine.
If she weighed 109, every tabloid would have an ED story on her.
I think people are forgetting that she is 5′2, so 109lbs isn’t going to look stick thin. Also, big boobs make you look bigger. I believe her.
khloe looks amazing, she has more of a model-type body, great legs, v tall and now pretty lean. that face though…
well, first of all, there´s no way in hell she ways 109, even tho she looks slim and beautiful. she just is not that skinny. besides, these pics are shopped, the are stretched in length, and to not make their arms look weird, the pics have been stretched to the right and left were their arms are. and they are obviously not even ashamed of it, since they haven´t fixed the curtain meets wall-spots. it´s quite obvious that they have fixed these pics.
Thanks Rian, people are vicious! Please keep in mind that frame size is also key in determining one’s weight! Obviously not every 5″2 109 lbs individual will look the same. While I don’t really care for this girl, there is no denying that she is gorgeous and works hard for her body and that’s nothing to be ashamed of! I’m also sick of people who belittle others for not being “naturally thin.” Get over yourselves, the reality is that most people aren’t naturally thin and those who are in the minority. I would wager that many of those who say such cruel things about naturally thicker girls like Kim, Beyonce, etc are not as “naturally thin” as you claim to be! Sorry, I just had to get that off my chest!
FIRST OF ALL – someone wrote she would look like a fat cow if she were 5′2″ and 120 – 125lbs – that is ridiculous. Because I am 5′ 2″ and weight 119lbs and I wear a size 2/4 and am very petite, I’m not the skinniest by any means, but I am fit and I am no where near a fat cow.
And she isn’t lying – she may be lying by 1-3lbs but she is probably around 110. I know if I would take a picture of myself in a bathing suit from that angle, I would probably be a tab bit bigger than her.
i think it’s may be true ,, you know iam 5,2 ft and weigh 104 and look a little thinner than her
hmmm yea im not too sure…she def looks smaller than me atm…yet when i am 115 i look smaller than that (i think)…also, a woman i work with has a figure a lot like kyms…i always thought she was bigger than me (we are same height, similar shape), however she is a size bigger than me but weighs less than me…i.e. she is 5′4 and her weight is always borderline underweight so somewhere around 110lbs…i think she could be telling the truth if she doesnt really have muscle mass anywhere (ie her arms are always pretty thin and her legs not very toned)
lils- i agree with you…celebs always look bigger in pictures… ESPECIALLY the ones who have kym’s curvy shape…it just seems like all the curves are emphasised!
guest1- so true! it depends a lot on your muscle mass! i really think she must be teeny in real life. even in comparison to other celebs she looks really small. especially in the waist (btw im sure you look just lovely! =o) )
no way is she. she looks hot but that is NOT her weight. im 58 and 106. she is sooo not near that.
@ SARA i totally agree with you and could not have said it better myself!!
Who cares if that is what she weighs? She is obviously healhty but its hard to be happy for her with all the diet pills shes endorsing? Thats dangerous to endore those things when you are trying to be a role model for young girls. She used to be all about eating what she wanted and encouraging girls to be their natural weight, what happened to that? Plus Khloe standing next to Kim doesnt helep her look any better. She obviously just trying to hide her body by standing sideways. Cant weight for the third sister, Kourtney, to have her baby and then she can take the diet pills and join her sisters in their skinny race!
Who cares if she 109 or 120?? It’s so pathetic she is 30 but all she speaks is about her weight and body. No doubt she can be 109lbs any human without brain should be lighter
yeah hell no! she looks 120
It’s hard to tell from just this one picture but she easily looks like BMI 19ish to me – don’t get what all the fuss is about.
Maybe a lot of you are forgetting the +4.5 lbs per inch of height rule. 5′2 is pretty small and also celebs often seem to add an ‘official’ inch or so to their real heights.
People look different even at the same height and weight, it just depends on your frame. You also have to remember the camera ADDS weight, and she probably looks a lot tinier in person. A BMI of 19.9 is perfectly normal, even on the heavy side for most female celebrities, whose BMIs tend to range between 17.0-19.0.
109?! I believe, if her breasts are fake!!
i believe her…i’m the same height and am 116 right now and i think i look a little bigger than her
what i DON’T believe, however, is that her stupid quicktrim pills (which she and her sister promote any chance they get) had anything to do with this weightloss. it was all diet and exercise kim, you’re not fooling anyone and it’s disappointing that you would sell yourself out and take advantage of your fans like that
If she’s only 5′2” she probably does weigh around 109 pounds!
I am 5′2 and weigh 104 and she looks around the same size as me, when you carry your weight certain areas, it can make it seem that you’re at a higher weight. Also, 5′2 is so little that even weighing under 100 doesn’t necessarily make you look emaciated. As long as she is trying to stay healthy and maintain a healthy weight, I say good for her.
She doesn’t even look 109 lbs in that picture! 120 maybe.
both she and her sister looks awesome either way
Shame on her for using diet pills to reach that “goal” of hers.
The real issue is whay does she need to tell everyone how much she weights. She must be really insercure. I thinks it really sad.
i just think if she really is that, why brag about it? it screams desperation. i wish she’d stop craving attention and i wish she’d stop receiving it from the media.
@ dayuuuum
that’s crazy talk
I mean dayummm.
Anyway, it seemts to be about half and half people believing her based on their own height and weight and people going either side based on their height and weight. So that just goes to show how different a weight can look on different people even of the same height. So why not believe her. And if we don’t believe her, why do we even care!
Are we denying she looks good? Healthy? I think she looks healthy if a little overtanned, though of course the diet pills aren’t.
And I am very amused by those saying ‘no WAY is she 109, maybe 114′. 5lbs is NOTHING. I might fluctuate 3lbs overnight or 5lbs over a week. And before you say “5lbs really makes a difference on a small frame” I’m 5′2″ aswell!
I don’t think she’s lying — at 5′2, in nearly-perfect shape, one WOULD weigh about 109 pounds, if not a little less (she’s curvy, though, so I don’t think she’d be one of those sub-100 pound women). (Khloe, like me, is VERY tall, so even if she were to be extremely thin she would probably be 110+… More like 120. Why do numbers matter, anyway?). It’s a little sad that she felt like advertising her weight to the world, just because she’s trying to sell some diet pill. It’ll be embarrassing if she ends up gaining (or losing) a good deal of weight again, because now she’s really brought attention to having once been at her “perfect” size.
I don’t really think she’s 109.
Anyway, she still looking good.
Wether its true or not I think she looks stunning in this pic!!
I think Kim and Khloe did some amateur photoshopping before posting this to twitter… Khloe’s legs are not and have never been than thin! Load of CRAP!
They’re both such morons
again you girls use any excuse to post your stats, i mean a girl informed us that she 5′8 and 108. um u are like 5 inches taller than kim what is your point!
She is 106 my bad!
This pic i photoshoped, and really bad too.
No way! I’m 5′2″ and weigh 110lbs. Not only do I not have huge, fake boobs, but I’m very thin all over. She looks great, but needs to stop lying about her size.
Caitlin is correct. I am also 5′2″ and a 102 lbs. and she isn’t a lot bigger than I am. I believe that she’s in the 110-112 lbs range.
Lol Anderbobo! Valid point. I don’t know much about the weights of shorter girls but My bmi isn’t that far of hers and I do NOT have that much fat anywhere nor do I have a but or boobs like hers.
She’s 30???? Vapid.
It looks as she has plenty of muscles and that weighs a lot and she is not the slimmest girl either (nothing wrong with that). So I do not think she weighs so little, but yes she looks healthy, slimmer than before.
@jkat. Exactly!!!
Why would she lie? People on here shouldn’t assume that Kim is like them. IMO unless you are very insecure the numbers on the scales are just that, numbers.
It’s about how amazing your body looks, how fit and toned you are, how smooth and shiny your hair and skin looks, because you’re healthy! Not because the scales say 100, 110, 120. If the numbers on the scales are your biggest priority in life, well, it’s probably a good sign that you need to get one.
Come on people!! she might look 109 from this angle but are we forgetting something?? her HUGE butt!
That thing alone weights 109 lbs!!!! She’s thin from the front but the back is way too big. She’s 120.
she is only 5.2 i think 109 sounds right. she looks great!!! khloe looks like a giant next to her but she looks great too
and i wana add everyone has different bone structures and body fat composition!
wow!!
kimm looks so small here!!
but i think she has a great body!!
what are they doing?!
want that pink bikinni!!:D
I am 5′6, 110 pounds…no WAY she is 109..more like 125
I think she looks great, and I’d say that a good portion of women lie about their weight. I don’t, but that’s because I look small for what I weigh and people usually are like “What? No way!” Kim K. is short, but she has huge boobs and a lot of curves, so I’m gonna guess she isn’t 109, but isn’t far from that, either. Maybe 115, 120 max.
Rian, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE post pics of Jessica Simpson from her trip to NYC – she looks FABULOUS (for once)!
i agree that she weighs 109lbs since i’m the same height and actually 100lbs and i only looks very slightly slimmer.
and about it being photoshopped, i guess the contrast and saturation could have been adjusted a bit, but definitely not the body. i mean, she still has public appearances and all that, she wouldn’t be so stupid to make her arms appear any thinner and all that since everyone would then know that the photos were photoshopped.
however annoying the kardashians may be sometimes, i think good on kim for losing the weight, and good luck to khloe who’s trying to get to her goal weight too
If I where a celeb. or model and I was going to reveal my weight I would report it +5 or 7 lbs. That way no one would think I was lying. I don’t see why people would say they weigh less, it only makes you look worse.
Hahahhaha wow. No way!! She is at least 115!!! She is not fat by any means, but she is def NOT 109!!
haha, their makeup looks terrible. like masks! so much makeup!
Jaime- why don’t you go promote aneorexia a little more??
i didn’t read all the comments but i wanna say i believe her without a doubt. that must be her weight at the beginning of the day, no doubt.
i understand cause i’m 5′2 and at 5′2 you don’t start to look really very skinny until you get to a very low weight like 100 lbs or below. look at nicole richie.
i have 39″ hips at 5′2 and i’m also 109 and when i was 105 as well i had these hips.
109 seems low to those taller, but us at 5′2 know that it’s not such a low weight at our height. weight loss doesn’t show very quickly on shorter people as well. the camera adds pounds too so we must keep all of this in mind.
i think it’s horrid she is pushing diet pills that is obviously not how she lost the weight she has been working out more and drinking healthy smoothies she says it on her twitter too, she says about the diet pills too but who believes that. such contradicting advice.
jade- i agree with the ppl posting their stats. tho i did it to prove a point- that kim may very easily be this weight when you take everythin into account like muscle mass etc. actually i dont think i did post my stats so i am safe! lol actually…mine are nothing to brag about either =S i dont look so great on paper!
Um, with breasts and a butt like that, I don’t think so…
I am 5′2 and I weigh 105lbs and I am thinner than her. So I don’t believe it.
You all, she’s 29, not 30 until next October…
Umm…there heads look completely photo shopped on to their bodies..take a closer look people..actually stare at the pic..its fake!!!..though they do look okay weight wise since working out and eating healthy..I don’t think they should lie to the innocent girls of America who constantly follow what they do.
i want a BIGGEST LOSER SCALE…and i want her to literally to step on it, if it reads 109 then, WOW, congrats to you..but i am willing to bet my chocolate chip cookie that she is 120 pounds NOW. she is no where near the 100s. she should fess up. she claims JLO is her role model, jen.lopez never BRAGS about her size, her weight, throws numbers in our faces, this girl maybe cus she cant act, cant sing, or dance, or work for a living..
maybe all she can do very well is talk about her weight and or how much she lost today— reminds me of ray ramano’s new show clip in which he says something like “I pooped 3 pounds” any day now she is gonna announce that she too pooped a pound, mark my words!
Rian, she is 29 but acts like she is 13 in terms of her vanity.
It is quite sad she is so obsessed with a number on a scale, when you and I (and 99% of people on this site) both know that it is how you look at your weight and how you FEEL at the weight you are at.
You could be 150 pounds, but damn, if you look good and toned, guess what you will always look better than the 109 pound girl! But i will say, when I did weigh in at 201 pounds, none of my friends thought i was at that number, they all said i had so much confidence and didnt “act or look fat” now ive lost the weight, and i swear some days i feel fatter now. kim may always feel FAT, or not good enough. she is leaving a horrible impression on her young sisters. that is a shame
I think she looks amazing! I don’t know if it is photoshopped and I don’t like the diet pills push but she looks great!
She’s completely lying. I am 5′2 and weight 105 pounds and do not have the curves she does. For me to have a similar body I would have to weigh at least 115 pounds.There is absolutely no way that she looks like that considering every press released photo of her at recent events does not match the picture shown here. Stop lying about it Kim and accept the fact that you are gorgeous, but by no means are you that small-nothing wrong with that either.
I’m 5 ft 2 and 113 lbs and looking at her there’s just no way she’s 109. Her boobs are WAY too big for that too be possible because they alone probably weight 5 to 10 lbs. I’m not saying she looks bad but 109 lbs, she is not.
Honestly, who cares? She just does this for attention and she is getting just that. She is useless. I don’t care if she weighs 109, 120, 200, 85… she has nothing to offer except for annoying gossip.
She looks great! No need to tan soo much.
I don’t know about 109. I have a cousin who has the same exact body type and is 5′1. At 123 the girl had about the same body Kim does. I think she is about 113 or so.
samba- I got you, not everyone gives them for the same reason. just a majority of girls do it to be braggy but not everyone O:)
i think she looked sexier before she lost weight…im so over everyone thinking u have to be a twig to be sexy…and Kim K was sexy and curvy,not fat,before!
RIAN…thanks for verifying Kims’s age. She just turned 29 this past October(2009). There were pics of her and her birthday “events”. It’s hard for me to believe she’s @ 109 lbs. She is petite (& has a tiny waist)..but still her boobs & her rear end are….curvaceous!! She is also standing next to Khloe which makes Kim look EVEN shorter/thinner. It’s good about her dedication to exercise/healthy eating…but I honestly don’t think that this is her “natural” weight. She’s been “pushing” the Quick Trim pills and their 4 various “cleanses”. She probably just went thru a major cleanse & is a bit dehydrated & that’s why she can claim to be at 109 lbs. She does seem to have a very good muscle tone…and that makes her look thin, too. Don’t think that she will be able to maintain 109 lbs for very long. It’s just not her “natural” weight range.
And it really annoys me when people celbs or not promote diet pills.First off she wasnt obese before just a bit thick.And she definitely didnt need diet pills to lose any extra weight.She could have just easily lost the extra LB’s with regular exercise and reduced cal & fat intake.Diet pills can litterally KILL people.Ya know Dead!!! It really pisses me off especially that Kim K who so many thicker girls looked up to and thought well shes sexy so maybe my curvy body is sexy too! And she is all oh i love my body i love my curves then suddenyl shes promoting diet pills?? Shame shame…Oh and btw when i say curvy i dont mean fat or obese i mean curvy…ya know slightly thicker.
First off, she looks great-very fit, trim, and toned. I’d say she’s somewhere between 109 and 115. At a petite 5′2, it would be easy for her to be this weight. A person who is 5′2 and 125 lbs (as some of you are claiming) would look much heavier and much less toned than Kim looks here. As to those who said that the lighting appears to be off, I think it looks like Kim oiled herself up before the photoshoot to play up her definition, and her sister didn’t.
Jade…I totally agree with you. It is so weird that people like “brag” about their stats. Why is their weight so important to them that they are posting it on a blog? It blows my mind. We all know it is not a valid point of comparison to the celeb the post is about. It is just to say “I weigh X. I am SO skinny.” Truth is you can weigh 110 lbs and still look fat, or be too thin. It is all about how you carry your weight and what body fat percentage looks good on you.
NO ONE CARES WHAT SOME POSTER WEIGHS!!! Half of them are probably lying anyway, which is why they are so willing to believe that a celeb is lying about her weight. I totally don’t understand that mentality.
She may be 109 lbs, and she prob is given that she is a tiny 5′2 the problem i have is why should we care?
109 is a very small number for my height and frame, so I have never been close to that in my teenage or adult life, and do not know what it looks like. She seems like a very petite woman, so I’d say it’s possible. She looks very thin there, though, and while she looks good, I thought she looked fab before when she was just natural. It’s funny seeing a picture like this to connect that these are hollywoods “curvy” or “bigger” or “normal” girls…..funny isn’t the word I’m looking for, is it?
Everyone carries weight differently. 109lbs at 5′2″ is pretty slim. People are way too tolerant of underweight, unhealthy celebrities these days and think that a BMI anywhere in the 20’s is FAT. I just find it particularly annoying since I’m a good 20 lbs heavier than Kim (supposedly) at 5′3.5″ and look just as slim minus the chest and ass. Come on! It’s POSSIBLE Kim is 109lbs, but I’m just saying that it’s hard to believe when it looks like she has a larger frame (not fat at all, she’s hot), BOOBS and an ass. Also the fact that she looks fit makes it even more difficult to believe she’s THAT weight. Yeah, I’m sure there are people here who are the same height and weight as her, but look slimmer or bigger, everyone is different. And I agree with what LAgurl said, she might as well just get on the scale in front of the camera to SHOW her weight or just stop talking about it. I mean honestly, her body is rockin’, why did she need to tell us all her weight?
this picture doesnt look nearly as distorted as the one with just Kim in it. When I saw that one I literally lmao’d. Plus the heavy spray tan looks ridiculous.
that being said, I totally believe the 109 because of her height……she is pretty short. I also believe that she will never be able to maintain that weight because she is taking those stupid pills.
109lbs? Yeah maybe only her boobies hehehe!
You people who keep saying “109 would be sickly thin” honestly disgust me. 109 is not thin unless you are 5′5 and up. Kim is 5′2. I am 5′3 and at 109 I would look like a fucking COW. I am 99 and look big. She is 109. Soft but thin.
It sounds like most of these attacks stem from the fact that people just don’t like these two or just like bashing reality celebs in general. What’s sad is Kim and sister are advertising themselves so blatantly and weight’s always a hot and extremely sensitive topic. Add the admission that they’re using diet pills and claiming their effectiveness (which I find more alarming than Kim lying or not about her actual weight), is all rather distasteful and thoughtless on their part. Especially for girls who have real issues with body image–these two are totally feeding into that unhealthy mantra and fixation on unattainable and unrealistic Hollywood look.
Take all that aside, and maybe, yeah she could be close to 109, though I’d believe her to be between 110-115. Then again, sometimes those 5 lbs increments don’t matter at all for some and doesn’t change your overall shape five up or five down–they don’t on me, so she really could be telling the truth…
From this picture, I thought what’s the big deal? She looks 109 lbs. But I went to Kim’s website and there are other pictures where you can see them from different angles and I agree with the others she is not 109 lbs. Khloe actually has a tummy but it was cleverly angled away from the camera.
I’m glad she’s gotten in shape but she should NOT be endorsing diet pills, that’s heinous. I don’t know what young girls would look up to her as a role model, that is a strange concept. I can see looking up to Hilary Duff, but a Kardashian? They’re fun to watch, but not role model material. As for the height/weight issue, I think that at 5′2″, or in her case, ALMOST 5′2″, 109lbs is perfectly reasonable, it’s not skinny. She looks fit and healthy. Who knows if she’s a couple pounds over that , really who cares other than Kim..LOL. 109 at 5′2″ is not underweight. It’s normal. I believe her.
First of all I believe her (don’t forget that she’s rather short)and secondly, does it really matter how much you wheigh when you look this good?! While us woman are nitpicking about ounces and inches, our better halves are probably drooling over the mere prospect of dating these two sisters simultaneously.
Wow. A lot of interest.
She could easily be 109. All bodies are different–shapes and masses.
She looks incredible. Her sister looks great, too.
But really, who posts pictures of herself like this and feels the need to publicize how much she weighs?
I agree with Jkat! Not everyone looks exactly the same at the same weight and height. I wish everyone would stop comparing themselves to her! You’re not her! So what if she lies? I’m sure you are all lying about your weights right now, you know why? becuase your weight fluctuates!! So why does it even matter!? 109-114lbs wow big difference! OH MY GOD LETS CALL IN THE TROOPS SHE WAS OFF BY 5 LBS!! And has anyone ever thought to think that maybe her scale is off, lots of people scales are off, do you think she takes the time to get 5 different scales to make sure her weights exactly the same? Does kim even care that much?
not gonna lie, i think her body is amazing. the maxim-type body isn’t what i aspire to look like, but she has a perfect curvy figure. But diet pills are crap, she’s just hawking them.
yeah she looks too curvy to be 109, but as someone mentioned before size is not an indicator of mass. I have a very athletic figure and even though I wear sizes 2-4, it always seems like I weigh 10 lbs more than most others who are my exact same height and size. Go figure.
I believe she weighs 109 pounds. She’s so short.
Those photos look photoshopped. Like Sas said, didn’t Khloe just gain a bunch of weight. How recent are these pictures? I mean Khloe’s thighs seen so tiny. Like everyone else above, diet pills are so bad. I Can’t wait for her to get off them and suffer the consequences.
She was growing on me until this twitter post and weight bragging thing. I thought she wanted to get past the sex tape thing and de-objectify herself.
i find that kind of hard to believe considering how big her boobs are
but on another note i think she has really good proportions
jealous!
I think that she is too short so it can be true…anyway, she is too short and her head looks like the head of the E.T.
im 5′ 2″ and 98 and people tell me i look too thin. but i eat what i want and i havent worked out really since july. if i had more muscle mass i could weigh about 104 (which id love but ive gotten wayyy too lazy) because muscle weighs more than fat. because muscle weighs more than fat, her boobs and butt probably don’t weight more than 6 -8 pounds. so i do tihnk its possible. i think because shes so short, short people usually dont have curves like her, id kill for her hips, soo i think she could be 109 if she doesn’t have a lot of muscle mass, which could be true. im not sure shes fat or skinny, i just think the number is shocking because shes so curvy and short.
jkat you have expressed my thoughts perfectly. ^_^
funny that she would declare it as 109 and not 110 or 111. like a 19.95 special or something.
if wanna get technical too, the only that truly measures health is your waist circumference. If your waist is over a certain number, you are at a higher risk for high blood pressure, diabetes, other issues. Being that this reality/sex star has a tiny waist, she is healthy in terms of her heart health.
Now, these pills she pops, i would STOP that ASAP. Judy Garland was addicted to pills, sooner or later, one or two pills a day turn into 6 then, 8 and before you know you need 12 to “function” and “maintain” she is INSANE to think these “diet pills” are doing her any favors, they are slowly destroying her insides. nobody should take them, nobody!!!!!! That is why I am shocked to see personal trainers advocating them.
Geez, is it so unbelievable that this girl weighs 109? She’s tiny in stature and also in size. When I weighed around that I looked a very similar.
I feel bad for the poor girl – she’s already been labelled curvy/fat, so I don’t think it would matter what she said she weighed, everyone would pounce on her immediately and call her a liar.
She’s SMALL! Look at the pictures!
@ dayummm, seriously? A cow? I must be one giant giant cow.
She looks like could be 109 at 5′2″ to me. 5′2″ is pretty short and she looks to be in fit shape overall, she isn’t going to weight too much at that height.
so much KK hate:(…..ok so putting up this pic with your weight on twitter if that is what she did is a little immature) but i think she truly looks amazing……very playboy-esque body of course…but her abs look great. she claims she works out all the time so i believe this isnt photoshopped…..i really like her body i would just want smaller hips and boobs) but she looks awesome. khloie looks good to just really “HUff” and big…but still good she has a big waist though.
anyways i don’t think kim weighs 109 she might but i think she weighs like 114-119……but she could weigh 109 i really don’t know.
That picture is going to give me nightmares…scary.
Those are my stats – and that’s about how I look. In other words: hot.
C’mon people…
She’s short and tiny she could totally be 109. She looks gorgeous. Don’t be haters:(
theres no way she weighs 49kg. i weigh 49 kg, am the same height as her, have no boobs and no hips.
I really don’t think she has a reason to lie about her weight. She looks super hot and unless she removed her breast implants, I don’t think she could lose any more weight and look attractive.
It’s funny to read these comments and see how worked up people are getting about her weight, its just a number ppl. And Anne, a girl at 5′7 who weighs 135 pounds is typically a size 6 or 8 not a 14-16. Don’t you have to go to the Plus sized dept. to get clothing in sizes over a size 14? Maybe its different in Canada….
not really a fan…
Photoshop is a blessing to many. There is no way Khole looks like that.
Hey Rian-is this the most commented on post ever for TSWS? Just curious…Weird that Kardash’s weight would be this controversial.
Also- who knew TSWS had so many posters who are 5′2″??? You guys are like the 4th Kardashian sister with all the stats-posting. Very funny..
there is no way im 109, 17 years old and 5′ 5″ and everyone says i look hungry so ther is no way she is 109.
What is so so SAD is that there are people on the site saying 120 is a fat cow or at 109 is considered too much weight….WTF?
In the picture Kim looks amazing and fit regardless of the number the scale displays.
I am 5′3″ and 110 lbs. I look skinny and toned (think Cheryl Cole). There is no way on this planet she is 109, blatant lie.
Where is Khloe’s “love weight”? Ah, the magic and power of photo-shop.
I don’t see why it matters how much she weighs. Its just a number! There are so many other factors that go into it (muscle to fat ratio, body frame) that regardless of the number on the scale you can still look less than stellar.
That said – I saw pictures of them when they still had their clothes on and it shows that these pictures have been altered as Kim looks significantly bigger than she does in this shot (not fat but bigger nonetheless).
Last thing I’m gonna say about these two is that they are using their “celebrity” to promote diet pills. Such a bad example esp considering they have younger sisters. I can’t help but wonder if they even really take them.
Look at that tan! HOT!
lauren, you are 5′5″ and the same weight that Kim claims to be–that’s 3 inches on her, so of course you would look a lot thinner (“hungrier”) at that height!
I could believe that she is 109 at 5′2″ since she is pretty short. I’m 5′4″ and 97 lb, but a lot of people guess around 110 because I look healthy and my body is proportionate.
MAN ALOT OF PEOPLE ON HERE ARE REALLY RIDICULOUS….SO WHAT IF SHE WEIGHS 109 LBS…SHE LOOKS FREAKING GOOD…SHE’S EATING RIGHT AND EXCERSICING TAKING CARE OF HERSELF..I WISH I COULD LOOK LIKE HER SHOOT…I GIVE IT TO HER…SHE WORKED FOR IT AND SHE EARNED IT…SO I THINK SHE LOOKS D@MN GOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
…can I just inquire, does every picture they take need to be posed (excessively)? I know that generally when a “leisure” picture is taken it’s actually supposed to be pretty relaxed.
its possible.
im 5′4 and I28..and I look alot smaller than kim..because I am a cheerleader and have muscle > fat
kim has really been looking good lately.
What a lie! Who does she expect to believe this BS? She wishes she were 109, but she looks to be at least 20 pounds more. Nice try, Kim. Man, this lying about her weight/size is getting OLD.
A lot of you girls are really awful. Does passing judgement on people make YOU feel big?
Hahahaha!!!! I’m 5′2 and weighs 48 kilos and i can tell you she is NOT, no no! She must be at least 55 kilos.. that girl is so stupid, she doesn’t have anything else to do than taking pix of her all day long and watching her belly button?? egocentric whore (she has a beautiful face, though. but she sure has the QI of a stincky piece of shit)
she is 109. or around that. now way is she up around the 120’s.
@JADE thank you i totally agree.I officially know what everyone on this site weighs, or claims to weight.Come on now if you ppl are going ot lie about your weight at least pick a believable one!
BTW after looking at this picture again does anyone else think maybe her abs are sprayed on???
she drives me crazy. i mean really how hard does she seriously try? as a matter of fact…her entire life revolves around trying too hard. less is more. they’re all such trash!
If one more person posts their stats I’m going to scream
I think that I am tired of hearing these sisters talk about nothing but their appearance and weights. There’s more to life.
kim in person is very petite! she could be 109 lbs without even being that skinny. she only looks big in photographs. you guys have no idea what you’re talking about
She looks fit and all but who really cares what she weighs? It´s somehow pathetic how she goes around ranting about her weight and jean size. What is she trying to prove?
who cares what she weighs..she has no talent.
I’m petite also, but I still am unsure if she weighs 109 lbs or not…nor do I really care since the girls look fit.
i dont like her at.
@jayley i AGREE LOADS.
i dont even understand why people feel the need to post their stats. i’d love to know who is actually interested in them.
i dont like her at all.
@jayley i AGREE LOADS.
i dont even understand why people feel the need to post their stats. i’d love to know who is actually interested in them.
I don’t really care how much she weighs… is it that important? I haven’t weighed myself in over 15 years, I pretty much know how much I weigh roughly and I certainly know when I lost or put on weight. I don’t understand the obsession with what other people weight… probably because I’m not 15 anymore (but not even then was it of any interest to me)… and there are more important things in life than what some celebrity weighs!
I think they both look good.
jayley: Seriously. Why does everyone feel the need to compete?
dayummm: Your thoughts on “healthy size” are concerning, more so than anyone I’ve seen on this website. Please stop referring to someone 5′3 and 109 as “a cow” – that’s absurd and damaging.
maybe she does weigh 109. but then entails two things:
- how ridiculous of her to post the exact number (why not just say 110?), especially since weight fluctuates with the day! It sounds like she trying to compete with every woman out there, who weighs the least. Other reality stars are thin, and even they arent ridiculous enough to post the exact numbers.
- since shes taking diet pills, its never gonna stay at that number. shell gain a good ten to fifteen once she stops and just eats and exercizes the way the rst of us do.
they both look good. it annoys me when people announce their weight like that – like when its for being a thirty year old at their 14 year old weight. like it can be good, but it can also be bad.
It’s possible that she’s 109. Very possible. Muscle does weigh more than fat and she seems very toned. However, I find it atrocious that she’s bragging about her body weight like it’s some sort of trophy. Excellent role model. Now every young girl who steps on the scale and sees more than 109 is going to think she’s a failure. When will celebrities realize that we already think they have the perfect lives/bodies/hair/everything and stop rubbing it in our faces?
I’m just wondering what is going on with Khloe’s feet! Her toes are all spread out and wide. What’s up with that!
I weigh 108 and am 5′1 and a half… and I can very clearly count the ribs in my back… she is no where near this… she is not fat by any stretch but no where near 109.. 122 would be my estimate
lol justathought, I have seriously memorized the stats of a few people. So annoying.
Hey Z, I remember there was well over 300 comments on the infamous Jessica Simpson post, where she was wearing the mom jeans at the chili cook-off…I really do wonder now which post has the most comments.
She is really short, plus your weight can fluctuate up to ten pounds a day, so if she weighed in the AM without clothes then yeah she could weigh 109 lbs. I like Kim, and I would rather read that she is lying about being 109 when she is 120 vs lying that she is 100 when she is 90. Just sayin.
I believe she’s about 109, but how pathetic. She’s a grown woman posting pics of herself in a bikini bragging about her weight. Her boobs looks bolted on now, totally fake!
way to many prima donnas on here……guess what guys…i care even less what you weigh then i care about KK….
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!
Her ass alone weighs 109!
The more muscle you have, the more you weigh. She may look somewhat toned but if she actually weighs that then she has more body fat on her.
I absolutely believe she weighs 109. I’m 5′2″ as well and we have a similar body shape, and I weigh 111.
When I hit 120 lbs, I look incredibly big and flabby. With such a short height and small frame, a few pounds makes a HUGE difference.
I want to know what’s up with those airbrushed on abs!
i seriously doubt she’s ever been 109, i think she’s closer to 120. on a side note this woman is around 30 yrs old and posting pics of herself in a bikini every three days on twitter! is it just me or is she too dag on old for this. it’s unacceptable for a 15 yr old girl to do it, its inexcusable for a 30 yr old woman. Its time for kim to grow up.
As for khloe I don’t think she was ever fat, i just think she has a huge face/head. Many people have naturally pudgy faces (like amanda bynes!) yet slim bodies. Sadly there’s no exercise she can do to slim that part of her down.
she still looks like shit.
first i think they both look gorgeous. i have a an nearly identical body and completely believe she is about where she says.
also, it occurs to me that everyone is commenting about why this should even matter-you guys all made it matter with all these posts. we all wanted to know/to see/to comment. we all gossip about these issues and thus make it important and justifiable for her to be proud/brag/show it off on twitter etc. especially for continually being persecuted for her weight, and curves. if you think that is so terrible then stop commenting on this type of thing in the first place-you make the market for it!
no way, IM 49kg and I am wwaaaay smaller than her
both of them look good, Kim doesn’t need to be any skinnier
I hate when people claim ridiculous things like “when I’m 120 lbs I’m so flabby”.That is such an irresponsible and blatantly false thing to say. Some of the people on here have a real problem. Actually, when you’re 120 lbs., you’re perfectly healthy and not even fat in the slightest. So go preach about your unhealthy views somewhere else.
For my two cents, she looks like a 109 lbs woman with breast implants to me.
I really don’t care what she weighs, but the picture looks distorted. They both look funny, like their heads are bigger than they should be (no pun intended!). Did someone make this with photoshop or something?
i believe it. she is very short. she is very petite & small boned so she is likely to weigh 49kg
TAN MUCH????
they photoshopped till they dropped
in her dreams!! photoshop 109 but in reality 120. what is it with this girl and her weight. and i dont care what pics she post i will n ever buy that stuff their trying to promote. both of them are photoshop their heads look fake.
OK just because the number on the scale is very low doesn’t necessarily mean that your body is very thin! I’m 5′2 and I used to be 108 pounds. Now I weigh about 124, and I can tell you I look thinner now than when I did at 108 because I work out! I was skinny-fat at 108. So don’t pay too much attention to the scale. Pay attention to your actual measurements and body fat percentage. If Kim is really 109…I don’t think that would be her natural weight. It’s probably a lot of temporary water loss cause of those pills she takes.
look at khloe’s legs! that doesn’t even look right, PHOTO-SHOP!
i bet if kim had more endearing qualities or a more likable personality everyone would say she looks great lol
her proportions are way off:
Torso is WAYY too long
Legs are wayy to short
They’re trying to hide it with that camera angle not shooting straight on, but it’s still very obvious.
long torsoed, short legged bodies are not attractive.
I’m 5′2 and 112 lbs and I’m smaller than her, she might have a different body type.
yeah she’s probably around 109, ive seen girls of 5′2 who are around 90 and look fatter than me and im 5′7 and 105 – yall are sayin she looks around 120, sure, if she were my height.
That photo is a bad product of photoshop.
@charlotte, you said “Torso is WAYY too long
Legs are wayy to short” … And? There isn’t a lot she can do about that, is there?
This picture is dizzying and confusing. I don’t believe it is what it claims to be. Kim’s head looks just wrong compared to that body. And who spends that much time doing makeup and hair like that when all you’ve got on your feet are effin’ flip flops? I’m not buyin’ it.
Regardless, Kim has a very tiny and petite frame. I wouldn’t doubt she could very easily weigh in at 109. No question.
This picture is fake – I’m convinced.
Matilda-haha! Great point!
I hate it when people make comments like-her nose is big! her legs are short; she stocky and her neck is big. I mean-ok thanks, do you want her to just go have surgery so she can look like everyone else and appease dumbasses like you?
and of course-what would one even do about a torso too long and legs too short. how shallow to point it out!
109 without the breast/butt implants maybe.
@Ann- No disrespect but I’m sorry hun there is no way you were 5′7, 135 lbs. and wearing a US 16-18. Congratulations on the weight loss but I don’t see how that could be because I am 5′6 and when I was US 16-18 I was about 220 lbs. Maybe it was a typo?
Anyways however much Kim weighs she looks good. She is fit and in shape, she may not really be taking those diet pills but she definitely stays in the gym!
It does look like shes lost weight, especially in the stomach and legs but I doubt she is 109 pounds- she looks to be about 115 pounds.
I have a friend who is 5ft 2 and weighs only 100-105 pounds and she is way smaller than Kim!
I believe she’s 109… I’m 5′2 and if I were 109 I’d look like that too or smaller.. but probably not as muscular unfortunately. she looks gorgeous.
I don’t see why Kim Kardashian constantly needs to make a big deal out of her weight/size as if she has something to prove. The more she posts these ridiculous photos and videos of herself putting on jeans, the more people are going to criticize and scrutinize her every curve, inch and pound. She’s a terrible waste of time.
Alexa – I think Ann went the wrong way with size conversion. She *might* have been a UK size 14 at 5′7″ and 135lbs (though I think most with those stats would be more like a UK10-12 though of course it depends on where you hold your fat, muscle mass etc.), but a UK 14 equates to about a US size 10 not a 16-18.
oh dear.
im not judging but that pic is plain tacky. they have no class. i was beginning to think kim was ok and beginning to know her limits but no, it just seems to me that she keeps posting these pics of herself to try and convince herself and everyone else that she is comfortable with her body, when clearly she is NOT.
and that is just fueling people to have a go at her because they think it’s pathetic.
if she’d just stop talking about her weight and body for one minute and talk about a few less vain things, maybe people will take her more seriously.
I am 110 pounds at 5′4” and comparing my body to her’s, there’s no way she’s 109 pounds. She has a gorgeous figure, that i’d kill for though
She could be that weight actually. Fat takes up more space than muscle and she’s skinny-fat. I weigh 46 kg myself (I’m 160 cm tall-or should I say short?), but I’m a lot skinnier than she is with very visible ribs and veins etc.
Actually, I am 5′2 and weigh 109. I’m a size 0. There is no way she weighs 109. I would guess she weighs around 120.
oh my god she looks awful now!
&i completely believe that she is 109! She’s extremely tiny in person! You guys are dumb to think she’s lying and that it’s photoshopped. Why the heck would she tweet about these weight updates/goals is they weren’t true? She’s obsessed with going to the gym and losing weight so if she accomplishes something, of course she’ll want everyone to know.
I’m really sad now though. I found another picture of her and she looks like a bobble-head :[ I liked the old kim better when she was about 115-120
‘Shopped. Why? Because the other K sister in the picture is nowhere near that slim, for one.